What can republicans do for blacks?

[beagle9]

All I heard is "Stop listening to the Democrats" and a strange argument as to why Republicans don't tell Blacks what they can do(Because Blacks say they can't do anything? That is called a challenge by a group, not a command!)

Well, Democrats have a funny way of telling blacks to never listen to Republicans, or that they're traitorous if they step out of line.

Yeah, you go with that.

All I heard is "Stop listening to the Democrats" and a strange argument as to why Republicans don't tell Blacks what they can do(Because Blacks say they can't do anything? That is called a challenge by a group, not a command!)

Well, Democrats have a funny way of telling blacks to never listen to Republicans, or that they're traitors if they step out of line. People like Cain, Borelli, Carson, West... just to name a few are looked down upon and chastised for not holding the liberal Democrat view of things.

Yeah, you go with that.

Like I posted earlier, Blacks rarely vote conservative.

Problem here is why most Blacks are anti-conservative in their politics. Because of Brainwashing? Because of Handouts?
Or is there something in that philosophy that goes against the collective experience of Blacks?

Naw--it can't be the last one. It has to be liberal Brainwashing.

Did you watch the Democrat presidential debate? The candidates were arguing who could expand the welfare state even more. Free goodies appeal to Democrat voters which blacks happen to be a majority of.

Helping people who need help rather than helping the wealthy who do not need it

Taking less money from people is helping them? I assume you consider all money governments first and what they allow you to keep is because of their good graces.

You don't help people by pandering to them every time they make a mistake in life. All you do is give them reason to make more mistakes. That's the reason out of wedlock births are at record highs in the black community.

The problem with man trying to fix something outside of him utilizing the wisdom and words given him from above, is that he opens up the door for the devil to exploit his idiocy in which he takes it upon himself to engage in.

To actually do anything or to give away anything this day and age as to based upon a person's skin color, well is pure foolishness. Think about how bad that can be exploited by the evil one who looks for stuff like that to empower one or many of his own (all depending), for whom might live in and amongst the group in which is being looked at in this foolish way.

The evil one is placed back into a box if people are therefore judged upon their character as Martin Luther King said it so well, and not upon their physical attributes.

This goes for clicks that cling together protecting their own with other peoples money in which they steal to give to their weak in which they are found as highly dependent also in that way. How many rich peoples off spring do you know, that are being taken care of by the rich because they wouldn't take care of themselves if their strings were cut? The situation with the government and it's dependents are no different.

The government steals the hardworking peoples money through over taxation, then it gives it to it's dependents who have been made dependent by this action, and so we end up seeing the same situation go on that exist within the so called wealthy class who does the same thing, thus creating people who are highly dependent in either one group or the other. So it becomes a contest of who is best at using it's power more wrongfully than the other, but meanwhile the true working class who holds it all up for both to exploit in these ways are being crushed under the weight of it all.

The evil one exploits both these concepts, because he can penetrate the weak among these groups, and once he does that, then he either reeks havoc with them by making the wealthy look a fool or the government by making it's leaders look a fool.

When will we learn that Martin Luther King spoke the truth about it, and quit being total fools about all of this stuff ?

 

[midcan5]

Noted in my original post linked below, racism in America has changed into an apology or excuse for racism. Transference is a fascinating psychological trick, add to that the arguments that cite some statistic that provides a counterbalancing argument, and you soon realize racism may always be with us for deep down humankind is a tribal animal. Like our simple cousins we don't like the idea someone steps into our territory or get desert we feel belongs to us. Of course the fox laughs all the way to the bank. For the interested check out the book quoted below, oh and pass it on to others.

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/10/25/us/racial-disparity-traffic-stops-driving-black.html

"Beyond white and black. Another classic misunderstanding posits that the Southern strategy involves only white-black dynamics, or more generally, only race. On the contrary, Phillips was clear that whites would flee the Democratic Party in revulsion at "blacks and browns;' citing in particular the ascendant Mexican American community in the Southwest." To be sure, especially in the 1970S and 1980s, the portrayal of African Americans as criminals and welfare cheats provided the central themes in dog whistle assaults. Even during these decades, though, racial bogeymen varied by region, with Latinos in the Southwest, Asians in certain metropolitan areas, and Native Americans in the upper Midwest and in other pockets of the country also serving as racial scapegoats. The prominence of these other groups in racial demagoguery would increase over this period, and after the 2001 World Trade Center attacks, Muslims as potential terrorists and Latinos as illegal aliens would become core archetypes in dog whistle narratives. Dog whistling comes out of the South and its preoccupation with blacks, but it always involved equal opportunity racism, and never more so than today." p 29 'Dog Whistle Politics: How Coded Racial Appeals Have Reinvented Racism and Wrecked the Middle Class' by Ian Haney López, Oxford

original post: What can republicans do for blacks? | Page 2 | US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum

 

[beagle9]

The problem with man trying to fix something outside of him utilizing the wisdom and words given him from above, is that he opens up the door for the devil to exploit his idiocy in which he takes it upon himself to engage in.

To actually do anything or to give away anything this day and age as to be based upon a person's skin color, well is pure foolishness. Think about how bad that can be exploited by the evil one who looks for stuff like that to empower one or many of his own (all depending), forwhom might live in and amongst the group in which is being looked at in thisfoolish way.

The evil one is placed back into a box if people are therefore judged upon their individual character as Martin Luther King said it so well, and not upon their physicalattributes.

This goes for clicks that cling together protecting their own with other peoples money in which they steal to give to their weak in which they are found as highly dependent also in that way. How many rich peoples off spring do you know, that are being taken care of by the rich because they wouldn't take care of themselves if their strings were cut? The situation with the government and it's dependents are no different.

The government steals the hardworking peoples money through over taxation,then it gives it to it's dependents who have been made dependent by this action, and so we end up seeing the same situation go on that exist within the so called wealthy class who does the same thing, thus creating people who are highly dependent in either onegroup or the other. So it becomes a contest of who is best at using it's power more wrongfully than the other, but meanwhile the true working class who holds it all up for both to exploit inthese ways are being crushed under the weight of it all.

The evil one exploits both these concepts, because he can penetrate the weak among these groups, and once he does that, then he either reeks havoc with them by making the wealthy look a fool or the government by making it's leaders look a fool.

When will we learn that Martin Luther King spoke the truth about it, and quit being total fools about all of this stuff ?

 

[rightwinger]

Ten percent of the wealthy control 75% of the wealth

They follow the golden rule....he who has the gold, makes the rules

Why would it make a difference how much wealth they have? That doesn't mean their wealth is societies wealth.

You brought it up

Not societies wealth, but why do we continue policies that benefit only the wealthy when they obviously don't need it?

"Not benefiting" means "confiscation". Admit it.

So, if we no longer bend over backward to allow them to accumulate more wealth, we are confiscating it

Time to stop helping those who do not need it

who gets to decide which people "need" it and how much they "need" ? answer that and you will understand why socialism always fails.

We the people get to decide

Just like we decided on supply side economics in the first place. Helping the American people is not socialism

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

Well, Democrats have a funny way of telling blacks to never listen to Republicans, or that they're traitorous if they step out of line.

Yeah, you go with that.

Well, Democrats have a funny way of telling blacks to never listen to Republicans, or that they're traitors if they step out of line. People like Cain, Borelli, Carson, West... just to name a few are looked down upon and chastised for not holding the liberal Democrat view of things.

Yeah, you go with that.

Like I posted earlier, Blacks rarely vote conservative.

Problem here is why most Blacks are anti-conservative in their politics. Because of Brainwashing? Because of Handouts?
Or is there something in that philosophy that goes against the collective experience of Blacks?

Naw--it can't be the last one. It has to be liberal Brainwashing.

Did you watch the Democrat presidential debate? The candidates were arguing who could expand the welfare state even more. Free goodies appeal to Democrat voters which blacks happen to be a majority of.

Helping people who need help rather than helping the wealthy who do not need it

Taking less money from people is helping them? I assume you consider all money governments first and what they allow you to keep is because of their good graces.

You don't help people by pandering to them every time they make a mistake in life. All you do is give them reason to make more mistakes. That's the reason out of wedlock births are at record highs in the black community.

Paying the lowest tax rates in 70 years is helping them, relaxing labor and environmental laws is helping them, protecting from foreign competition is helping them....all in the name of trickle down prosperity

Sounds like in the name of BS to me.

When were environmental regulations ever relaxed? We have more every single year no matter what party is in charge. Labor laws? When were they relaxed as well? Which laws? Foreign competition? Have you been inside of a Walmart lately?

See.....now you're just making ship up to try and make a point that isn't there.

FactChecking Obama’s Budget Speech
The president went too far in his critique of the House Republicans' deficit-reduction plan.

• By Lori Robertson
• Posted on April 15, 2011

A Taxing Burden

Obama also argued that the "wealthy" could afford to pay more in taxes since their "tax burden" is the lowest it has been in 50 years. But it depends what measure one uses. The CBO’s most recent analysis showed that the average federal tax rate for high-income taxpayers was its lowest in 1986 during the Reagan administration.

The White House based that claim on its own analysis of 2005 tax data for the 2010 Economic Report of the President. It calculated the effective tax rate of individuals making more than $250,000 a year and those making more than $2 million, by dividing the amount of income by the amount paid in federal income and payroll taxes. The figures were also adjusted for wage growth, the report said.

"This analysis suggests that the effective tax rates that applied to high-income taxpayers reached their lowest levels in at least half a century in 2008," the report said.

But the White House’s own analysis showed a similar tax burden in the late 1980s.

FactChecking Obama’s Budget Speech

 

[danielpalos]

All I heard is "Stop listening to the Democrats" and a strange argument as to why Republicans don't tell Blacks what they can do(Because Blacks say they can't do anything? That is called a challenge by a group, not a command!)

Well, Democrats have a funny way of telling blacks to never listen to Republicans, or that they're traitorous if they step out of line.

Yeah, you go with that.

All I heard is "Stop listening to the Democrats" and a strange argument as to why Republicans don't tell Blacks what they can do(Because Blacks say they can't do anything? That is called a challenge by a group, not a command!)

Well, Democrats have a funny way of telling blacks to never listen to Republicans, or that they're traitors if they step out of line. People like Cain, Borelli, Carson, West... just to name a few are looked down upon and chastised for not holding the liberal Democrat view of things.

Yeah, you go with that.

Like I posted earlier, Blacks rarely vote conservative.

Problem here is why most Blacks are anti-conservative in their politics. Because of Brainwashing? Because of Handouts?
Or is there something in that philosophy that goes against the collective experience of Blacks?

Naw--it can't be the last one. It has to be liberal Brainwashing.

Did you watch the Democrat presidential debate? The candidates were arguing who could expand the welfare state even more. Free goodies appeal to Democrat voters which blacks happen to be a majority of.

Helping people who need help rather than helping the wealthy who do not need it

so you support mandatory government redistribution of wealth? are you a decendent of Marx?

promoting the general welfare requires it.

 

[rightwinger]

Like I posted earlier, Blacks rarely vote conservative.

Problem here is why most Blacks are anti-conservative in their politics. Because of Brainwashing? Because of Handouts?
Or is there something in that philosophy that goes against the collective experience of Blacks?

Naw--it can't be the last one. It has to be liberal Brainwashing.

Did you watch the Democrat presidential debate? The candidates were arguing who could expand the welfare state even more. Free goodies appeal to Democrat voters which blacks happen to be a majority of.

Helping people who need help rather than helping the wealthy who do not need it

Taking less money from people is helping them? I assume you consider all money governments first and what they allow you to keep is because of their good graces.

You don't help people by pandering to them every time they make a mistake in life. All you do is give them reason to make more mistakes. That's the reason out of wedlock births are at record highs in the black community.

Paying the lowest tax rates in 70 years is helping them, relaxing labor and environmental laws is helping them, protecting from foreign competition is helping them....all in the name of trickle down prosperity

Sounds like in the name of BS to me.

When were environmental regulations ever relaxed? We have more every single year no matter what party is in charge. Labor laws? When were they relaxed as well? Which laws? Foreign competition? Have you been inside of a Walmart lately?

See.....now you're just making ship up to try and make a point that isn't there.

FactChecking Obama’s Budget Speech
The president went too far in his critique of the House Republicans' deficit-reduction plan.

• By Lori Robertson
• Posted on April 15, 2011

A Taxing Burden

Obama also argued that the "wealthy" could afford to pay more in taxes since their "tax burden" is the lowest it has been in 50 years. But it depends what measure one uses. The CBO’s most recent analysis showed that the average federal tax rate for high-income taxpayers was its lowest in 1986 during the Reagan administration.

The White House based that claim on its own analysis of 2005 tax data for the 2010 Economic Report of the President. It calculated the effective tax rate of individuals making more than $250,000 a year and those making more than $2 million, by dividing the amount of income by the amount paid in federal income and payroll taxes. The figures were also adjusted for wage growth, the report said.

"This analysis suggests that the effective tax rates that applied to high-income taxpayers reached their lowest levels in at least half a century in 2008," the report said.

But the White House’s own analysis showed a similar tax burden in the late 1980s.

FactChecking Obama’s Budget Speech

Yea....our wealthy have had it so rough over the last thirty years...

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

Did you watch the Democrat presidential debate? The candidates were arguing who could expand the welfare state even more. Free goodies appeal to Democrat voters which blacks happen to be a majority of.

Helping people who need help rather than helping the wealthy who do not need it

Taking less money from people is helping them? I assume you consider all money governments first and what they allow you to keep is because of their good graces.

You don't help people by pandering to them every time they make a mistake in life. All you do is give them reason to make more mistakes. That's the reason out of wedlock births are at record highs in the black community.

Paying the lowest tax rates in 70 years is helping them, relaxing labor and environmental laws is helping them, protecting from foreign competition is helping them....all in the name of trickle down prosperity

Sounds like in the name of BS to me.

When were environmental regulations ever relaxed? We have more every single year no matter what party is in charge. Labor laws? When were they relaxed as well? Which laws? Foreign competition? Have you been inside of a Walmart lately?

See.....now you're just making ship up to try and make a point that isn't there.

FactChecking Obama’s Budget Speech
The president went too far in his critique of the House Republicans' deficit-reduction plan.

• By Lori Robertson
• Posted on April 15, 2011

A Taxing Burden

Obama also argued that the "wealthy" could afford to pay more in taxes since their "tax burden" is the lowest it has been in 50 years. But it depends what measure one uses. The CBO’s most recent analysis showed that the average federal tax rate for high-income taxpayers was its lowest in 1986 during the Reagan administration.

The White House based that claim on its own analysis of 2005 tax data for the 2010 Economic Report of the President. It calculated the effective tax rate of individuals making more than $250,000 a year and those making more than $2 million, by dividing the amount of income by the amount paid in federal income and payroll taxes. The figures were also adjusted for wage growth, the report said.

"This analysis suggests that the effective tax rates that applied to high-income taxpayers reached their lowest levels in at least half a century in 2008," the report said.

But the White House’s own analysis showed a similar tax burden in the late 1980s.

FactChecking Obama’s Budget Speech

Yea....our wealthy have had it so rough over the last thirty years...

Why, are they supposed to?

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

Why can't blacks "do" for themselves like the rest of us?

 

[Correll]

Noted in my original post linked below, racism in America has changed into an apology or excuse for racism. Transference is a fascinating psychological trick, add to that the arguments that cite some statistic that provides a counterbalancing argument, and you soon realize racism may always be with us for deep down humankind is a tribal animal. Like our simple cousins we don't like the idea someone steps into our territory or get desert we feel belongs to us. Of course the fox laughs all the way to the bank. For the interested check out the book quoted below, oh and pass it on to others.

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/10/25/us/racial-disparity-traffic-stops-driving-black.html

"Beyond white and black. Another classic misunderstanding posits that the Southern strategy involves only white-black dynamics, or more generally, only race. On the contrary, Phillips was clear that whites would flee the Democratic Party in revulsion at "blacks and browns;' citing in particular the ascendant Mexican American community in the Southwest." To be sure, especially in the 1970S and 1980s, the portrayal of African Americans as criminals and welfare cheats provided the central themes in dog whistle assaults. Even during these decades, though, racial bogeymen varied by region, with Latinos in the Southwest, Asians in certain metropolitan areas, and Native Americans in the upper Midwest and in other pockets of the country also serving as racial scapegoats. The prominence of these other groups in racial demagoguery would increase over this period, and after the 2001 World Trade Center attacks, Muslims as potential terrorists and Latinos as illegal aliens would become core archetypes in dog whistle narratives. Dog whistling comes out of the South and its preoccupation with blacks, but it always involved equal opportunity racism, and never more so than today." p 29 'Dog Whistle Politics: How Coded Racial Appeals Have Reinvented Racism and Wrecked the Middle Class' by Ian Haney López, Oxford

original post: What can republicans do for blacks? | Page 2 | US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum

Nothing but unsupported opinion.

THe 70s and 80s saw some serious crime problems, and Law and Order was a valid political issue.

Calling it a Dog Whistle does not change that.

 

[beagle9]

Did you watch the Democrat presidential debate? The candidates were arguing who could expand the welfare state even more. Free goodies appeal to Democrat voters which blacks happen to be a majority of.

Helping people who need help rather than helping the wealthy who do not need it

Taking less money from people is helping them? I assume you consider all money governments first and what they allow you to keep is because of their good graces.

You don't help people by pandering to them every time they make a mistake in life. All you do is give them reason to make more mistakes. That's the reason out of wedlock births are at record highs in the black community.

Paying the lowest tax rates in 70 years is helping them, relaxing labor and environmental laws is helping them, protecting from foreign competition is helping them....all in the name of trickle down prosperity

Sounds like in the name of BS to me.

When were environmental regulations ever relaxed? We have more every single year no matter what party is in charge. Labor laws? When were they relaxed as well? Which laws? Foreign competition? Have you been inside of a Walmart lately?

See.....now you're just making ship up to try and make a point that isn't there.

FactChecking Obama’s Budget Speech
The president went too far in his critique of the House Republicans' deficit-reduction plan.

• By Lori Robertson
• Posted on April 15, 2011

A Taxing Burden

Obama also argued that the "wealthy" could afford to pay more in taxes since their "tax burden" is the lowest it has been in 50 years. But it depends what measure one uses. The CBO’s most recent analysis showed that the average federal tax rate for high-income taxpayers was its lowest in 1986 during the Reagan administration.

The White House based that claim on its own analysis of 2005 tax data for the 2010 Economic Report of the President. It calculated the effective tax rate of individuals making more than $250,000 a year and those making more than $2 million, by dividing the amount of income by the amount paid in federal income and payroll taxes. The figures were also adjusted for wage growth, the report said.

"This analysis suggests that the effective tax rates that applied to high-income taxpayers reached their lowest levels in at least half a century in 2008," the report said.

But the White House’s own analysis showed a similar tax burden in the late 1980s.

FactChecking Obama’s Budget Speech

Yea....our wealthy have had it so rough over the last thirty years...

Why is the government who is operating in the same ways as it is accusing the wealthy of doing in this nation (i.e. operating separately instead of in unity with all Americans), not being looked at as a villan also by Americans ? I mean just like the current government is doing to the wealthy who it see's now as somehow being separate and the villan, and also them being someone that it has targeted in this nation for it's wealth in which I'd say they are doing to them wrongfully also, well how come the government became the all and powerful OZ we should all somehow be fooled by ?

Either one can be wrong, but the working class in this nation is paying dearly for it now.

 

[S.J.]

And yet the top 10% of the wealthy support most of the country. Imagine that.

Government can't do anything for our wealthy. They don't need government--government needs them.

Ten percent of the wealthy control 75% of the wealth

They follow the golden rule....he who has the gold, makes the rules

Why would it make a difference how much wealth they have? That doesn't mean their wealth is societies wealth.

You brought it up

Not societies wealth, but why do we continue policies that benefit only the wealthy when they obviously don't need it?

"Not benefiting" means "confiscation". Admit it.

So, if we no longer bend over backward to allow them to accumulate more wealth, we are confiscating it

Time to stop helping those who do not need it

Your idea of "helping" someone is to "not rob" them. No one has "helped" the rich since the tiered tax system was implemented. If someone makes more money than you, and you tax them at a higher rate to prevent them from accumulating wealth, you are confiscating their wealth. You sure have a convoluted way of thinking.

 

[Maryland Patriot]

This guy nails it!

Love me some ZoNation!

Just another CON$ervative telling Blacks they are too stupid to know what's good for them.
Gee, I can't imagine why that doesn't win over the Black community to the GOP!

I look at it differently
The democrats are the ones telling the blacks they are just genetically too stupid to get ahead in life without forced government programs like affirmative action and quotas.
The republicans are the ones trying to tell the blacks that all they have to do is work for their goals to achieve their goals, no special programs needed because the blacks are equal from the start.

 

[Boss]

There is something wrong with the person the Democrat are supporting--is that better?

I'm not telling anyone how to vote, or who to support. I just find it ironic that you're bashing Republicans for doing essentially the same thing as Democrats do.

I am bashing Republicans?

I ask "hat you will do in exchange fr the Black vote?" and I got as an answer:

Self help speeches(See Boss comment)

You can't win someones vote that way. You have to offer a little more--not what you think is the same.

I didn't give a self help speech, I just explained the difference between liberal democrats and conservatives. Your political viewpoint is, the black person is incapable of helping himself because of his pigmentation. Due to this unfortunate condition of nature, you have to save his day by providing him with benefits and advantages over others. Conservatives view the same black person as an individual who is equally capable of success and doesn't need to be given an advantage over others.

So we have about 70-80 years of democrats dangling the carrot on a stick... vote for us and we'll take care of you. We'll give you free stuff. We'll do this for you, we'll make that happen for you... just vote Democrat. Whenever it doesn't pan out, you can always blame those mean old Republicans... vote more Democrats in! When the programs fail or don't produce the results promised, blame it on Republicans. Racists... white privilege... they don't want you to have free stuff. Vote Democrat!

Just as LBJ predicted, "We'll have them (blacks) voting Democrat for 100 years!"

However, when we objectively look at the economic growth in prosperity within the black community from 1965 until now, it's the worst performance in the history of blacks in America, post slavery.

 

[rightwinger]

Why can't blacks "do" for themselves like the rest of us?

Because they live in impoverished communities with few job prospects.

 

[rightwinger]

This guy nails it!

Love me some ZoNation!

Just another CON$ervative telling Blacks they are too stupid to know what's good for them.
Gee, I can't imagine why that doesn't win over the Black community to the GOP!

I look at it differently
The democrats are the ones telling the blacks they are just genetically too stupid to get ahead in life without forced government programs like affirmative action and quotas.
The republicans are the ones trying to tell the blacks that all they have to do is work for their goals to achieve their goals, no special programs needed because the blacks are equal from the start.

Affirmative action helped every American family....not just blacks

 

[Maryland Patriot]

This guy nails it!

Love me some ZoNation!

Just another CON$ervative telling Blacks they are too stupid to know what's good for them.
Gee, I can't imagine why that doesn't win over the Black community to the GOP!

I look at it differently
The democrats are the ones telling the blacks they are just genetically too stupid to get ahead in life without forced government programs like affirmative action and quotas.
The republicans are the ones trying to tell the blacks that all they have to do is work for their goals to achieve their goals, no special programs needed because the blacks are equal from the start.

Affirmative action helped every American family....not just blacks

No, it did not and it is not.

 

[rightwinger]

This guy nails it!

Love me some ZoNation!

Just another CON$ervative telling Blacks they are too stupid to know what's good for them.
Gee, I can't imagine why that doesn't win over the Black community to the GOP!

I look at it differently
The democrats are the ones telling the blacks they are just genetically too stupid to get ahead in life without forced government programs like affirmative action and quotas.
The republicans are the ones trying to tell the blacks that all they have to do is work for their goals to achieve their goals, no special programs needed because the blacks are equal from the start.

Affirmative action helped every American family....not just blacks

No, it did not and it is not.

Affirmative action was a major success for our country

Women benefitted more than blacks. If you have a wife or daughter.....you have benefitted from affirmative action

 

[Maryland Patriot]

This guy nails it!

Love me some ZoNation!

Just another CON$ervative telling Blacks they are too stupid to know what's good for them.
Gee, I can't imagine why that doesn't win over the Black community to the GOP!

I look at it differently
The democrats are the ones telling the blacks they are just genetically too stupid to get ahead in life without forced government programs like affirmative action and quotas.
The republicans are the ones trying to tell the blacks that all they have to do is work for their goals to achieve their goals, no special programs needed because the blacks are equal from the start.

Affirmative action helped every American family....not just blacks

No, it did not and it is not.

Affirmative action was a major success for our country

Women benefitted more than blacks. If you have a wife or daughter.....you have benefitted from affirmative action

wrong.
nobody benefited more than blacks. Society suffered as a whole.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

This guy nails it!

Love me some ZoNation!

Just another CON$ervative telling Blacks they are too stupid to know what's good for them.
Gee, I can't imagine why that doesn't win over the Black community to the GOP!

I look at it differently
The democrats are the ones telling the blacks they are just genetically too stupid to get ahead in life without forced government programs like affirmative action and quotas.
The republicans are the ones trying to tell the blacks that all they have to do is work for their goals to achieve their goals, no special programs needed because the blacks are equal from the start.

What should we expect from a party that thinks their constituents are too stupid to figure out how to get a Voter-ID?

DOJ Expert Witness: Blacks Are Less Sophisticated Voters
Katie Pavlich | Oct 21, 2014

"Opponents of Voter I.D. laws have a slew of emotional reasons why they oppose identification requirements at the polls on the Election Day, but their main argument is that Voter I.D. legislation is racist. But while anti-voter I.D. liberals accuse their opponents of racism, they often engage in bigotry themselves.

Take for example DOJ expert witness Charles Stewart's recent comments that blacks in North Carolina are less sophisticated and therefore Voter I.D. laws must be abolished. Former DOJ Attorney J. Christian Adams has the story:

An expert witness paid with tax dollars by the United States Department of Justice testified that North Carolina election laws impact black voters disproportionately and that blacks are less sophisticated.

Charles Stewart, a political scientist was retained by the Justice Department to testify against voter identification laws and other election integrity measures. His testimony argued that ending same day voter registration and requiring voters to vote in the precinct where they live constitutes racial discrimination."

- DOJ Expert Witness: Blacks Are Less Sophisticated Voters


Can you imagine any other race of people being talked about like this by Democrats and still desire to vote for them? Asians, Hispanics, Arabs????? There would be utter outrage.