william the wie
Gold Member
- Nov 18, 2009
- 16,667
- 2,409
- 280
- Thread starter
- #21
Pogo what is sinking in is you are wrong and to ignorant to know it.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Pogo what is sinking in is you are wrong and to ignorant to know it.
Well now you're just repeating yourself. You were wrong the first time and you continue to be wrong. There is no requirement for any level of success in an attempted assassination for it to BE an attempted assassination.
Correct, and yes I have been repeating myself, as it doesn't seem to be sinking in. I noted that all along.
He intended to assassinate... he stated as much... he attempted to get the cop's gun and failed. Had he only THOUGHT about attempting to get the cop's gun, it wouldn't have been an assassination attempt... it would have merely been a plot to assassinate. But since he went for the gun, it's an attempted assassination. He failed miserably... but he still attempted it.
Wrong. His plan, insofar as he says he had one, consisted of two steps -- ONE, acquire the cop's gun; TWO, shoot the target. Those are two separate things, not one. What he attempted was Step One. That failed. WITHOUT accomplishing Step One --- THERE IS NO STEP TWO. It is not possible to shoot someone with your finger.
Let's stop here and assess just that much to see where we are.
Attempt to grab cop's gun (Step one) -- yes.
Attempt to shoot Rump (Step two) -- no.
Let's put it yet another way: While you can't accomplish step two without step one, you CAN accomplish step one without ever committing step two. That's why we call them "two separate things". If they were one separate thing, they would be what we call "inseparable".