What about ‘due process’ for Americans on the front end? Are Democrats mad that alien enemies aren’t following the people’s process for entry?

[ThisIsMe]

In many threads here libs have clearly expressed their disdain for the alleged lack of due process being extended by the Trump admin to alien enemies…Are there any threads or any lib news agencies expressing anger toward alien enemies for blatantly ignoring the people’s process?
If one ignores the process on the front should they really expect process on the back end?
WTF? Why is our system so broken and toothless?

Well hell, you know the answer..

They only care about due process on the back end. They want to make it easy for them to come, and hard as hell for them to go.

 

[ThisIsMe]

The first word in the U.S. Constitution is "We". The opening phrase is "We the People". This phrase emphasizes that the government's authority comes from the people.


"We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America"

It's amazing how you all seem to follow the cotus when it suits you. Most leftys say "the cotus is living and breathing" and it's an "outdated document about slavery", but darn it, when you need it, it's suddenly valid.

 

[Moonglow]

It's amazing how you all seem to follow the cotus when it suits you. Most leftys say "the cotus is living and breathing" and it's an "outdated document about slavery", but darn it, when you need it, it's suddenly valid.

Agree or disagree, the system tries to work.

 

[ThisIsMe]

Agree or disagree, the system tries to work.

It only works when you follow it, even when it doesn't suit you.

 

[j-mac]

True, but the Reagan era policy was to let them in.

Typical of a liberal to say that....Um, no, Reagan policy was not to let them in. Reagan was a pragmatic leader, that wanted to achieve bi partisan agreements. He made the mistake of believing that Democrats at the time would honor their word, and strengthen our borders if Reagan were to go along with amnesty for those already here. He quickly found out that Democrats can not be trusted, as they broke their promise. And now, you're lying about what it was.....Like I said, typical.

 

[j-mac]

Agree or disagree, the system tries to work.

It only works when BOTH sides quit trying to bend it around their own corrupt notions....

 

[BrokeLoser]

It only works when BOTH sides quit trying to bend it around their own corrupt notions....

‘Processes” only work when they ALWAYS work to the benefit of good real core Americans… Have you noticed Moonglow and the rest of the purple hair nose ringers ALWAYS hope that our processes work against good real core Americans and for Mexico’s people, for degenerates and for criminals….etc etc?

Mark Levin: This isn't about due process, this is about anarchy | Fox News Video

Fox News host Mark Levin explores how the Supreme Court has interpreted due process throughout the years and how it's applied to illegal migrants on 'Life, Liberty & Levin.'

www.foxnews.com

“When America Wins The Left Loses Every Single Time”

 

[j-mac]

‘Processes” only work when they ALWAYS work to the benefit of good real core Americans… Have you noticed Moonglow and the rest of the purple hair nose ringers ALWAYS hope that our processes work against good real core Americans and for Mexico’s people, for degenerates and for criminals….etc etc?

Mark Levin: This isn't about due process, this is about anarchy | Fox News Video

Fox News host Mark Levin explores how the Supreme Court has interpreted due process throughout the years and how it's applied to illegal migrants on 'Life, Liberty & Levin.'

www.foxnews.com

“When America Wins The Left Loses Every Single Time”

Absolutely right...These people, the segment you're talking about, are embracing that lifestyle because they never were taught what real responsibility was all about....

The future in their hands is bleak....

 

[Moonglow]

‘Processes” only work when they ALWAYS work to the benefit of good real core Americans… Have you noticed Moonglow and the rest of the purple hair nose ringers ALWAYS hope that our processes work against good real core Americans and for Mexico’s people, for degenerates and for criminals….etc etc?

Mark Levin: This isn't about due process, this is about anarchy | Fox News Video

Fox News host Mark Levin explores how the Supreme Court has interpreted due process throughout the years and how it's applied to illegal migrants on 'Life, Liberty & Levin.'

www.foxnews.com

“When America Wins The Left Loses Every Single Time”

My hair is not purple, nor has it ever been. There are no tats, no rings, not even on my fingers. Why don't you tell more lies? That is all you have. If you dumbshitz ain't figured it out by now yer lawless president in getting his nose rubbed in his own illegal shit because he likes to be a criminal and break laws.

 

[Moonglow]

It only works when BOTH sides quit trying to bend it around their own corrupt notions....

Indeed, yet that is not what the leaders like Biden and Trump do, they break laws and have immunity, and their lawlessness only encourages more to do it.

 

[Moonglow]

Typical of a liberal to say that....Um, no, Reagan policy was not to let them in. Reagan was a pragmatic leader, that wanted to achieve bi partisan agreements. He made the mistake of believing that Democrats at the time would honor their word, and strengthen our borders if Reagan were to go along with amnesty for those already here. He quickly found out that Democrats can not be trusted, as they broke their promise. And now, you're lying about what it was.....Like I said, typical.

1986: Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986Congress enacted the Immigration Reform and Control Act (also known as the Simpson-Mazzoli Act or the Reagan Amnesty) and President Ronald Reagan signed it into law in November 1986.

Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986 - A Latinx ...​

From 1987 to 1990, Presidents Ronald Reagan and George Bush, Sr. used their executive authority to protect from deportation a group that Congress left out of its 1986 immigration reform legislation—the spouses and children of individuals who were in the process of legalizing. These “Family Fairness” actions were taken to avoid separating families in which one spouse or parent was eligible for legalization, but the other spouse or children living in the United States were not—and thus could be deported, even though they would one day be eligible for legal status when the spouse or parent legalized. Publicly available estimates at the time were that “Family Fairness” could cover as many as 1.5 million family members, which was approximately 40 percent of the then-unauthorized population. After Reagan and Bush acted, Congress later protected the family members. This fact sheet provides a chronological history of the executive actions and legislative debate surrounding Family Fairness.

https://www.americanimmigrationcouncil.org/research/reagan-bush-family-fairness-chronological-history

 

[Moonglow]

1986: Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986Congress enacted the Immigration Reform and Control Act (also known as the Simpson-Mazzoli Act or the Reagan Amnesty) and President Ronald Reagan signed it into law in November 1986.

Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986 - A Latinx ...​

From 1987 to 1990, Presidents Ronald Reagan and George Bush, Sr. used their executive authority to protect from deportation a group that Congress left out of its 1986 immigration reform legislation—the spouses and children of individuals who were in the process of legalizing. These “Family Fairness” actions were taken to avoid separating families in which one spouse or parent was eligible for legalization, but the other spouse or children living in the United States were not—and thus could be deported, even though they would one day be eligible for legal status when the spouse or parent legalized. Publicly available estimates at the time were that “Family Fairness” could cover as many as 1.5 million family members, which was approximately 40 percent of the then-unauthorized population. After Reagan and Bush acted, Congress later protected the family members. This fact sheet provides a chronological history of the executive actions and legislative debate surrounding Family Fairness.
https://www.americanimmigrationcouncil.org/research/reagan-bush-family-fairness-chronological-history

This was recomended by the RCC and American based RCC.

 

[sparky]

insisting on due process on the way out with no concern of it on the way in is hypocrisy ~S~

 

[j-mac]

Indeed, yet that is not what the leaders like Biden and Trump do, they break laws and have immunity, and their lawlessness only encourages more to do it.

So, what’s your solution?

 

[Moonglow]

So, what’s your solution?

Find real leaders.

 

[j-mac]

Find real leaders.

That’s it? Boy, that’s some deep thinking right there….

 

[Moonglow]

That’s it? Boy, that’s some deep thinking right there….

Not really , but since you don't follow the laws or rules you'd never know what one is.

 

[j-mac]

Not really , but since you don't follow the laws or rules you'd never know what one is.

Ok, back to insignificant status with you

 

[Dragonlady]

Garcia had 17 court appearances
that was due process


View attachment 1104642

Yes, and Garcia's "due process" resulted in an Order saying he could not be deported to El Salvador. The government ignored the results of that due process, and needs to bring him back.

 

[Dragonlady]

That’s it? Boy, that’s some deep thinking right there….

No, that pretty much hits the nail on the head. From a legal standpoint, the Republican Party should never have allowed a lifelong criminal like Donald Trump, to run for office. But they thought that if they surrounded him with good people, they could "manage" his worst impulses.

The mistake that Republicans made was not impeaching him in 2020, but waiting for the voters to weigh in wasn't altogether unreasonable, but after January 6th, the Republican failure to impeach Trump and bar him from public office for life, has been the nation's undoing.

Even worse, right wing media continued to promote the idea the 2020 election was "stolen" and Republicans introduced more than 400 laws to ensure "election security", even though Trump's own staffers at Homeland Security, the FBI, and the DOJ all declared it the most fair and honest election in US history.

Nothing was done to ensure that the American people were told the truth, and Trump was allowed to continue lying about the election, as Republicans who refused to impeach Trump and told Democrats to take it to the Courts, then participated in blocking criminal prosecution of Trump and his staffers.

So now you have a twice impeached, convicted felon, and adjudicated rapist running your country. That doesn't seem to be working out well for you.