Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Another progtard who think he's slick. ^^^Uh huh. “Preconceived opinions” about the sworn testimony of witnesses which will be presented publicly.
Evidence either exists or it doesn’t.
youre assuming that the jan 6th committe is operating subjectively and/or emotionally. But they are not, its only you trumpists that are.Preconceived opinions will be drawn as conclusions by the entirely partisan committee. They will also present the evidence they believe supports their preconceived conclusion. They will absolutely prove their own bias — but not their conclusion.
Another slicktard. ^^^youre assuming that the jan 6th committe is operating subjectively and/or emotionally. But they are not, its only you trumpists that are.
Only evidence stands up to scritiny.
You misspelled, “duh” which is ironic considering it’s your most word.Uh huh. “Preconceived opinions” about the sworn testimony of witnesses which will be presented publicly.
Evidence either exists or it doesn’t.
No. You’re wrong. I am 100% correct. The fully and exclusively partisan committee members is certainly Unobjective. They’re biased as hell. And no. Not “emotionally.” This isn’t emotional for these libtards, it is entirely devoid of emotion, and devoid of reason, and devoid of any concern for the truth, or the factual inaccuracy of what we know they will already say.youre assuming that the jan 6th committe is operating subjectively and/or emotionally. But they are not, its only you trumpists that are.
Only evidence stands up to scritiny.
townhall.com
www.pbs.org
www.newsmax.com
WaPo and NYT? You do realize that is fake news?Today's Washington Post has an interesting article about what is intended to be demonstrated when the televised hearings begin this week.
I cannot copy & past the entire long article (I would refer you to your digital subscription of the Post for that). But, I can offer you a taster of the coverage.
I found it particularly relevant following Maggie Halberman's (in Friday's New York Times) reportage....that Pence's staff had grown so alarmed over the safety of Pence following the stoking of animosity and anger towards him by the POTUS-at-the-time that they alerted the Secret Service that protection should be increased. They saw the storm that was coming by Trump's irresponsible rhetoric in front of crowds. (I'd recommend you open your digital subscription to the Times to read Halberman's reportage from Friday.)
Anyway, here is a taster from today's Washington Post:
"Almost a year after the formation of the House select committee investigating the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the U.S. Capitol, lawmakers are set to take their case public.
On Thursday night, Chairman Bennie G. Thompson (D-Miss.) and Vice Chairwoman Liz Cheney (R-Wyo.) will launch a series of televised hearings featuring a combination of live witnesses, pretaped interviews with figures that include Trump family members and previously unseen video footage.
The hearings mark the culmination of an inquiry that has involved more than 1,000 interviews and reviews of more than 125,000 records. Taken together, the work represents the most comprehensive record yet of the deadly assault, and which panel members have come to believe stands out as only the most visible evidence of a broader plot to undermine American democracy — one that emanated from the White House.
To tell that story, the committee will draw on testimony from administration insiders, including a previously obscure aide who has given the committee a detailed reconstruction of meetings and movements in the West Wing. The committee also has video recordings of interviews with Trump’s daughter Ivanka and her husband, Jared Kushner, that some inside the process believe will make for gripping television.
But the end result of the committee’s efforts remains an open question. Public opinions about Jan. 6 and about former president Donald Trump have long since hardened into competing blocs, making it difficult to break through, even with prime-time programming."
(the above underlining is by my avatar.)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Should be interesting television. Historical television, in my opinion.
Of course, it will be compared to the Watergate Hearings.
We'll see how this committee presents its' findings.
Betcha the first thing they do is wipe out the chalk lines in the back of the box....well, the Select Committee is about to step into the batter's box...
WaPo and NYT? You do realize that is fake news?
Huh?Another progtard who think he's slick. ^^^
Everyone's on to your game, progtard.
Truth, the WHOLE truth, and nothing BUT the truth.
You progtards assholes fail miserably on all three counts.
Your fear is palpable. Justifiably so.You misspelled, “duh” which is ironic considering it’s your most word.
Anyway, as you almost always are, you’re wrong. Again. The Congress will have witnesses present for part of the time. (Must have some excuse to get the partisan vermin’s their screen time.) Oh, they will also play-back prior recorded depositions.
And evidence also consists of those deposition tapes, and photo’s maybe. But here is the kicker. Evidence can be true or false. “Witnesses” might say (or have already given testimony saying) that “Trump did it,” but them saying something isn’t necessarily reliable evidence. Or credible. Or maybe just laughable.
Huh?
Can you clarify?
Funny, usually you want to censor the voices in my head, now you want to hear them.Others don’t hear the voices in your head.
Lol. Your attempt to tell me about some alleged fear is as laughable as all the other shit you spew. Ask Bubba Clinton about “sworn” testimony. Try to follow along you imbecile libtard: If you testify under oath and lie your ass off, it’s still sworn testimony.Your fear is palpable. Justifiably so.
It’s all sworn testimony. Questions regarding The Who, what, when, where and how will be answered by former Trump admin officials as well as family. There is nothing partisan on the part of the committee in how those witnesses chose to respond.
CrumblyNuts ^ has bloviated yet again.John Belushi holds his eyes still while rolling in his grave again every time BackAgain posts using his image as an avatar.
Lol. Your attempt to tell me about some alleged fear is as laughable as all the other shit you spew. Ask Bubba Clinton about “sworn” testimony. Try to follow along you imbecile libtard: If you testify under oath and lie your ass off, it’s still sworn testimony.
And if you spew you hostile guesswork in lieu of actual factual answers, the testimony is still sworn. Worthless bullshit, but sworn worthless bullshit.
There is nothing less than entirely partisan in this faux committee. I have already shared what we can expect that shitpile to “find.” And that is what they will “find” regardless of the lack of actual credible evidence to support it.
Uh huh. The witnesses will all be lying.
