We should be clear about the reason for the necessity of Israel's attack on Iran's nuclear facilities.

[Rigby5]

They aren't deterrents when they are calling for the destruction of Israel and the US. No matter, Israel and the US can remove these "deterrents" as they should. Many other countries in the ME don't trust Iran with nuclear weapons either.

Wrong.
First of all, it is a lie to claim anyone called for the "destruction" of Israel or the US.
The actual meanings of the words used translate more to "resist".
Second is that the US illegally invaded or took over Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, Egypt, Syria, the Ukraine, Palestine, etc., so all countries now have a legitimate need for a nuclear deterrent.
Third is it is impossible for Iran to use nukes on Israel since Jerusalem is predominantly Palestinian Arab.
Forth is Iran has no long-range offensive delivery means and could only use nukes in defense.

 

[Rigby5]

They didn't give it up, silly.

Of course they did, or else they would have had nukes over 20 years ago.

 

[Rigby5]

Not only did Reagan cause a recession,

Caused the shit out of it!!!

And still had 3.5% average growth. And beat the Evil Empire.

Gorbachev was a vastly better and more peaceful leader than Reagan any day.
Reagan almost doubled military spending, and is what caused our economic failures that risk total bankruptcy now.

 

[Rigby5]

If they got them to get rid of their nuclear program then what did Israel bomb?

The negotiations by people like Obama was to stop refining enriched uranium, not to get rid of the centrifuges.
They need the centrifuges since later presidents, like Trump, could renege on the deal, and he did.

 

[Kondor3]

Four days of fighting and the mullahs are already asking for "talks" - squealing like stuck pigs...

Allah may very well be akbar but you mullah-a$$hole$ and your dip$hit Revolutionary Guard pu$$ie$ certainly aren't...

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Third is it is impossible for Iran to use nukes on Israel since Jerusalem is predominantly Palestinian Arab.

Muslim terrorists aren't historically shy about killing fellow Muslims.
And Shia terrorists in Iran aren't shy about killing Sunnis, even in Jerusalem.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Gorbachev was a vastly better and more peaceful leader than Reagan any day.
Reagan almost doubled military spending, and is what caused our economic failures that risk total bankruptcy now.

Gorbachev was a vastly better and more peaceful leader than Reagan any day.

Damn, a little early to be drunk off your ass, isn't it?

Reagan almost doubled military spending,

And crushed the Evil Empire.

 

[struth]

The negotiations by people like Obama was to stop refining enriched uranium, not to get rid of the centrifuges.
They need the centrifuges since later presidents, like Trump, could renege on the deal, and he did.

So they didn't stop their nuclear program, that was just a lie.

 

[Rigby5]

When you have certain knowledge that your neighbor will destroy your home and everyone in it just as soon as he can assemble the means to do so, you take all necessary steps to prevent him from acquiring those means. Note that Israel never states the desire to push any other nation into the sea or to wipe its people off the earth.

Wrong.
It was an obvious lie to claim Iran has aggressive nuclear intent.
First of all, Israel can't be attacked because it has 13 million Palestinian natives mixed in with the 6 million Israeli Jews.
Second of all, Iran can't attack the US since it has no long range delivery system.

And it is a lie to claim Zionist are not honest about their desire to steal all of Palestine.
They even are tying to claim they have a right to steal Lebanon and Jordan.

And it is also a like to claim any Palestinian ever threatened any Jew.

 

[Rigby5]

So they didn't stop their nuclear program, that was just a lie.

Wrong.
Obviously they did stop their nuclear program, otherwise they would have had nukes 15 years ago.

 

[struth]

Wrong.
Obviously they did stop their nuclear program, otherwise they would have had nukes 15 years ago.

obviously they didn't, or Israel wouldn't of had anything to bomb

Iran has made clear they have no plans to stop it either.

Global watchdog finds Iran failing to meet nuclear obligations​

Watchdog finds Iran failing to meet nuclear obligations

Iran condemns the resolution passed by the IAEA's board of governors as "political" and says it will open a new uranium enrichment facility.

www.bbc.com

 

[Rigby5]

Muslim terrorists aren't historically shy about killing fellow Muslims.
And Shia terrorists in Iran aren't shy about killing Sunnis, even in Jerusalem.

Wrong.
Defensive use of weapons is not "terrorism".
Moslems have never been guilty of "terrorism" because it is against their religion to be aggressive.
While Palestine is 85% Sunni, they are indistinguishable from the Shiite and there is no conflict between them.
The Iranian could never attack Jerusalem due to holy places like the Dome of the Roc.

 

[Rigby5]

obviously they didn't, or Israel wouldn't of had anything to bomb

Iran has made clear they have no plans to stop it either.

Global watchdog finds Iran failing to meet nuclear obligations​

Watchdog finds Iran failing to meet nuclear obligations

Iran condemns the resolution passed by the IAEA's board of governors as "political" and says it will open a new uranium enrichment facility.

www.bbc.com

Wrong.
Maintaining nuclear facilities does not mean they were still actively using them to enrich uranium.

The claim "Iran failed to meet nuclear obligations" is just a lie.
The sites not only were inspected regularly, but cameras were installed.

 

[Donald H]

What next to come of this?

The Zionist regime has seen that multiple f-35's have been taken down.

The Iron Dome is easily penetrated by modern weapons.

The damage being done to the Zionists is not acceptable.

The Zionists are calling for America's help.

Iran is likely to attempt considerable damage on America's assets in the region.

China and Russia may choose to keep the hypersonic weapons coming to Iran.

Is this a harbinger of World war that can't be concluded without nuclear weapons.

IMHO: No on nukes because there would be nothing left to gain for America and the Zionist regime.

It appears to be shaping up as to most predictions of it being a lengthy war.

 

[Kondor3]

It was an obvious lie to claim Iran has aggressive nuclear intent...

Damn, but these Islamo-Nazi sympathizers are funny...

 

[rightwinger]

If they got them to get rid of their nuclear program then what did Israel bomb?

Power plants

 

[krichton]

The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) has never certified that Iran is in “compliance” with the deal. Moreover, each quarter since January 2016, the IAEA has reported that it still has not been able to determine that Iran has no undeclared nuclear facilities and materials and thus cannot conclude that Iran’s nuclear program is peaceful.

Known or Possible Iranian Violations of the JCPOA Fact Sheet - EMET | Endowment for Middle East Truth

The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) has never certified that Iran is in “compliance” with the deal. Moreover, each quarter since January 2016, the IAEA has reported that it still […]

emetonline.org

Lies and fairytales. Everything they reported can easily be verified on their own site.

IAEA and Iran - IAEA Board Reports | IAEA

www.iaea.org

Iran was in compliance all the way up till mid to late 2019. Without an agreement binding them there was no reason for them to NOT develop nuclear technology.

 

[struth]

Power plants

Nuclear plants

 

[struth]

Wrong.
Maintaining nuclear facilities does not mean they were still actively using them to enrich uranium.

The claim "Iran failed to meet nuclear obligations" is just a lie.
The sites not only were inspected regularly, but cameras were installed.

But they were enriching uranium

 

[Kondor3]

Power plants

Fun, ain't it? Anything and everything that would be useful to the mullahs in prosecuting this war.