Billy_Bob
Diamond Member
Epic fail...South Dakota has A LOT fewer people. Like Wyoming, they are socially distant by default. And they are not a shining example.California is the empirical evidence that the lockdown has worked.Yes. https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2020/04/01/lockdown-coronavirus-california-data/Did those doctors graduate from Trump U.?
Do you have a scientific refutation of their hypothesis or are you one those "listen to the science" guys who only accept the science you agree with?
There Is No Empirical Evidence for These Lockdowns | RealClearPolitics
There Is No Empirical Evidence for These Lockdowns | RealClearPoliticswww.realclearpolitics.com
South Dakota has no lock down. They have less deaths per million than California.
You're missing the entire point here and demonstrating what I said to Berg.
South Dakota: Latest updates on coronavirus
Here's an update on the coronavirus case counts in South Dakota and the latest news on the COVID-19 outbreak.www.livescience.com
Several major meat processing plants across South Dakota have shut down as workers fall ill with COVID-19, raising concerns about a possible shortage of beef, poultry and pork in supermarkets, the Associated Press reported April 13. The Smithfield Foods plant in Sioux Falls, which is now the fourth-largest coronavirus hotspot in the United States, produces about 5% of the nation's pork supply.SD ranks 47th for population but had one the fourth largest outbreaks. That seems like a fail.
We dealt with people from Denver who were infected and infected many here in Wyoming. We used the medications that Trump was talking about and lowered our hospital stays by over half and we used them early in people who remained home confined. By doing what we did we have a very good control of what is happening. Its how we dealt with the problems that made the difference.