I just have to ask, what does the fact that he's a Somali-American (may or may not be Muslim) have to do with it?
Because if he was white and the victim was black that would have been the biggest part of the "information of the shooter"
They drop racial narratives when it doesnt fit agenda.
Personally, i dont give a ****. I know the media is bullshit. His race doesnt matter. What matters is he is supposed to be keeping in line the general well being of his community and instead he shoots a woman for nothing.
Not to mention, he endangered his own partner. There was a police officer from TN on Tucker Carlson yesterday and he questioned not only the lack of details about the officer, but also his decision making. He said officers are trained to not fire from inside their car, and certainly not across the bow of their partner.
Also; and this is important, this officer had three complaints against him in just two years of service. Again, this officer stated that this is more than usual, the last one being at the end of May, so just recently.
Good cops don't want bad cops in their ranks either. In fact, good cops
despise bad cops, as they realize that as effective, intelligent, rational, logical, ethical cops, they have by far the most to lose due to the actions of unfit officers. I am sure his partner isn't feeling all warm and fuzzy about this encounter in the least. How gun shy would anyone be in getting back in a cruiser with any partner after going through this?
His race, religion, National origin are not the crux of the case, but presenting these facts ARE part of the narrative. They are the facts of the case. Just as if the cop was white and named O'Reilly and had three complaints against him in two years without consequences it would be vital information. If a media article types up 12,000 words but omits the most basic details, well, I question their discourse and ability to be objective.