Want ONE simple law to help curb mass-shootings?

[M14 Shooter]

That doesn't mean you can create laws to prevent it. You can only punish the assailants after the fact. What you're doing is trying to take everyone's guns in some pie-in-the-sky fantasy...

NO, nitwit, I am trying to CURB the sale of assault weapons whose ONLY purpose is to kill as many as possible in a very short period.........
Try doing the same killing spree by a maniac using a car, hammer or knife.

Your appeal to emotion does not change the fact your statement: "...an assault weapon) whose ONLY purpose is NOT hunting, but to kill as many human beings as possible...". is a lie.
Why do you need to lie to make your point?

 

[M14 Shooter]

Using right wing "logic", the MAKER of a bomb vest is NOT culpable for the suicide bomber who blows himself up in a crowded movie theater, right or wrong?

Your appeal to emotion does not change the fact your statement: "...an assault weapon) whose ONLY purpose is NOT hunting, but to kill as many human beings as possible...". is a lie.
Why do you need to lie to make your point?

 

[mudwhistle]

Your ignorance is massive! Zip it before it gets you sued for exposure.

Here's an IDIOT who places the second amendment way above the first.

Sorry, but issues like this are never the end of it once we buckle to pressure.

You see.....we're dealing with compulsive liars on the left. First they get their same-sex marriage.......next thing they're locking people up for not wanting to be happy about it.

The same thing will happen over guns. Commie bastards will be popping out of the woodwork making gun ownership illegal.

 

[nat4900]

You're a fucking liar too!!!

Once the assault - weapons are gone you'll just call any gun that isn't a flintlock an assault - weapon.

No, dingbat....I am the proud owner of TWO Beretta's.

At one time, Tommy Guns were outlawed, but the gun manufacturers insisted that Bambis and wild turkeys needed to not only be killed, but into instant chopped meat.

 

[M14 Shooter]

You're a fucking liar too!!!
Once the assault - weapons are gone you'll just call any gun that isn't a flintlock an assault - weapon.

No, dingbat....I am the proud owner of TWO Beretta's.
At one time, Tommy Guns were outlawed, but the gun manufacturers insisted that Bambis and wild turkeys needed to not only be killed, but into instant chopped meat.

Your appeal to emotion does not change the fact your statement: "...an assault weapon) whose ONLY purpose is NOT hunting, but to kill as many human beings as possible...". is a lie.
Why do you need to lie to make your point?

 

[mudwhistle]

You're a fucking liar too!!!

Once the assault - weapons are gone you'll just call any gun that isn't a flintlock an assault - weapon.

No, dingbat....I am the proud owner of TWO Beretta's.

At one time, Tommy Guns were outlawed, but the gun manufacturers insisted that Bambis and wild turkeys needed to not only be killed, but into instant chopped meat.

Then it's worse than i thought. ...
You're a hypocrite as well.

 

[nat4900]

The same thing will happen over guns. Commie bastards will be popping out of the woodwork making gun ownership illegal.

Nonsense.......Did you know that in 1934 a law BANNING the sale of Thompson guns (machine guns) was passed and was in effect until 1968 when the gun manufacturers fought to reverse that law and, of course won.

The world did NOT come to an end during those 35 years for American hunters....although the law was actually passed to keep "Negroes" from buying them, capitalism eventually overruled even that fear of minorities.

 

[Soggy in NOLA]

Which means it makes even less sense to sue a gun manufacturer for designing a product that does what it was intended to do.

Try that circular logic shit on someone else. That shit wont fly here.

Nothing circular about it. Manufacturers are liable when their products dont work the way they are supposed to while using them correctly. Like if you are driving a car and it randomly explodes or it doesn't brake because of a design flaw, the manufacturers are liable.

When a product works as it's designed to do and people, through their intentional or negligent acts use the products to cause harm a manufacturer cannot be held liable because the products are working as designed.

Guns that shoot are doing what they were designed to do. They are a tool for self defense and hunting. If someone kills another person using a tool that works correctly they aren't liable. If someone runs another over with a car, it's not the cars design that is the problem, it's the killers negligent/intentional behavior.

Likewise with firearms if the gun shoots properly they are not liable. The killer is.if the gun is designed badly and it explodes or something instead of shooting bullets then yeah there is a design flaw. But you can't sue a manufacturer for product that works as it is intended

And thats why comparing cars killing to guns killing is stupid, thanks

I don't think anyone made that comparison.... you missed the point. The comparison is one of liability. If I beat you silly with a hammer, you gonna sue Craftsman? Good luck with that.

What you think doesnt matter...what actually happened does. 10/10 made the comparison

Well, obviously a hammer isn't as deadly as a gun.... but car sure the heck is. Fact... more people die in auto accidents than are shot dead. But my point is simply that you can't hold a manufacturer liable for misuse of a legal product. That's all.

 

[Soggy in NOLA]

Using right wing "logic", the MAKER of a bomb vest is NOT culpable for the suicide bomber who blows himself up in a crowded movie theater, right or wrong?

Name one manufacturer of bomb vests...

 

[M14 Shooter]

The same thing will happen over guns. Commie bastards will be popping out of the woodwork making gun ownership illegal.

Nonsense.......Did you know that in 1934 a law BANNING the sale of Thompson guns (machine guns) was passed and was in effect until 1968 when the gun manufacturers fought to reverse that law and, of course won.

All of this is a lie.
Why do you need to lie to make your point?

 

[nat4900]

Name one manufacturer of bomb vests...

Funny, Soggybrain......Ergo, if you want to avoid liability and you make bomb vests, all you need to do is to incorporate and file for 501c status.

 

[Soggy in NOLA]

Name one manufacturer of bomb vests...

Funny, Soggybrain......Ergo, if you want to avoid liability and you make bomb vests, all you need to do is to incorporate and file for 501c status.

Well, that's a stretch... but I'll answer your question... since in most of the case of suicide bombers, the manufacturer and the perpetrator are one in the same, I'd hold them both accountable, well, assuming I could scrape up enough pieces.

 

[nat4900]

All of this is a lie.
Why do you need to lie to make your point?

Hey, nitwit....What EXACTLY is a lie?

The fact that a law was passed in 1934?

Look up the National Firearms Act of 1934.

 

[nat4900]

the manufacturer and the perpetrator are one in the same

Actually NO.....If that were the case terrorists would run out of bomb makers.

 

[M14 Shooter]

Name one manufacturer of bomb vests...

Funny, Soggybrain......Ergo, if you want to avoid liability and you make bomb vests, all you need to do is to incorporate and file for 501c status.

Your appeal to emotion does not change the fact your statement: "...an assault weapon) whose ONLY purpose is NOT hunting, but to kill as many human beings as possible...". is a lie.
Why do you need to lie to make your point?

 

[M14 Shooter]

All of this is a lie.
Why do you need to lie to make your point?

Hey, nitwit....What EXACTLY is a lie?
The fact that a law was passed in 1934?
Look up the National Firearms Act of 1934

You said:

Did you know that in 1934 a law BANNING the sale of Thompson guns (machine guns) was passed and was in effect until 1968 when the gun manufacturers fought to reverse that law and, of course won.

NFA 1934 did not ban ANY machine gun, including the Thompson.
Thus, a lie.
The GCA 1968 did not amend the NFA34 in any way.
Thus, a lie.

Why do you need to lie to make your point?

 

[mudwhistle]

The same thing will happen over guns. Commie bastards will be popping out of the woodwork making gun ownership illegal.

Nonsense.......Did you know that in 1934 a law BANNING the sale of Thompson guns (machine guns) was passed and was in effect until 1968 when the gun manufacturers fought to reverse that law and, of course won.

The world did NOT come to an end during those 35 years for American hunters....although the law was actually passed to keep "Negroes" from buying them, capitalism eventually overruled even that fear of minorities.

That was one type.

Libroids want to ban them all so they can start instituting forced Hope & Change

 

[nat4900]

NFA 1934 did not ban ANY machine gun, including the Thompson.
Thus, a lie.
The GCA 1968 did not amend the NFA34 in any way.
Thus, a lie.

Why do you need to lie to make your point?

So, facts are just bothersome things....and then you accuse me of lying?

Well, so be it......

 

[nat4900]

Libroids want to ban them all so they can start instituting forced Hope & Change

......and don't forget that we also want to put you in one of those concentration camps.....LOL

 

[M14 Shooter]

NFA 1934 did not ban ANY machine gun, including the Thompson.
Thus, a lie.
The GCA 1968 did not amend the NFA34 in any way.
Thus, a lie.
Why do you need to lie to make your point?

So, facts are just bothersome things....and then you accuse me of lying?

I stated a fact - that you lied.
I then asked:
Why do you need to lie to make your point?
Well?