Want ONE simple law to help curb mass-shootings?

[nat4900]

Since all you gun-loving right wingers have thoroughly masturbated on this thread by putting anything as a suggestion to CURB the mass shootings that are unique to Americans as wanna-be cowboys.....Here's TWO things you should consider:

1. Re-read the O/P as far as what was the modest suggestion, and

2. Would you agree that before purchasing an assault weapon one should undergo the same scrutiny and background checks as an airline pilot does?
(it may not be full-proof but it sure as hell would make it tougher for nut jobs to get a hold of a deadly weapon.)

Now you can masturbate some more.

 

[OKTexas]

Since all you gun-loving right wingers have thoroughly masturbated on this thread by putting anything as a suggestion to CURB the mass shootings that are unique to Americans as wanna-be cowboys.....Here's TWO things you should consider:

1. Re-read the O/P as far as what was the modest suggestion, and

2. Would you agree that before purchasing an assault weapon one should undergo the same scrutiny and background checks as an airline pilot does?
(it may not be full-proof but it sure as hell would make it tougher for nut jobs to get a hold of a deadly weapon.)

Now you can masturbate some more.

You're already required to have a special license to buy an assault weapon.

 

[nat4900]

Your already required to have a special license to buy an assault weapon.

Follow my suggestion and check what an airline pilot has to endure for scrutiny before taking the lives of hundreds of people into his/her hands.

 

[OKTexas]

Your already required to have a special license to buy an assault weapon.

Follow my suggestion and check what an airline pilot has to endure for scrutiny before taking the lives of hundreds of people into his/her hands.

Why, there is no comparison between a commercial airline pilot and the average gun owner, what do you idiots call that, a false comparison fallacy? BTW how did all that scrutiny work out on the Malaysia flight that the pilot flew into the ocean, or the one that flew his plane into the Alps? No individual American has killed so many with a gun. Hell there's not even a serial killer that has a body count like your scrutinized airline pilots.

 

[nat4900]

Your already required to have a special license to buy an assault weapon.

Follow my suggestion and check what an airline pilot has to endure for scrutiny before taking the lives of hundreds of people into his/her hands.

Why, there is no comparison between a commercial airline pilot and the average gun owner, what do you idiots call that, a false comparison fallacy? BTW how did all that scrutiny work out on the Malaysia flight that the pilot flew into the ocean, or the one that flew his plane into the Alps? No individual American has killed so many with a gun. Hell there's not even a serial killer that has a body count like your scrutinized airline pilots.

Were those 2 pilots American pilots?

Look, forget it.....I don't have time for all the right wing bullshit tonight..

Just get your gun and walk around your neighborhood shouting "I'm a REAL American....just look at my gun..."

 

[OKTexas]

Your already required to have a special license to buy an assault weapon.

Follow my suggestion and check what an airline pilot has to endure for scrutiny before taking the lives of hundreds of people into his/her hands.

Why, there is no comparison between a commercial airline pilot and the average gun owner, what do you idiots call that, a false comparison fallacy? BTW how did all that scrutiny work out on the Malaysia flight that the pilot flew into the ocean, or the one that flew his plane into the Alps? No individual American has killed so many with a gun. Hell there's not even a serial killer that has a body count like your scrutinized airline pilots.

Were those 2 pilots American pilots?

Look, forget it.....I don't have time for all the right wing bullshit tonight..

Just get your gun and walk around your neighborhood shouting "I'm a REAL American....just look at my gun..."

Aw, did I fluster the little baby, the FAA requires all pilots from foreign countries to go through the same checks as our pilots. Otherwise they won't allow that airline into US airspace.

 

[jon_berzerk]

And if you sell your car to some clown who later drives drunk and kills someone, the victim's family should be able to sue YOU for millions in damages, right???

Pretty dumb response (as always)......Name another manufacturer...beside gun ones......who CANNOT be sued by consumers?

can they be sued for using a car to kill someone

 

[Avatar4321]

Provide an idea that is not unconstituional and contrary to jurisprudence and maybe someone would consider it. Till then no one is obligated to entertain your attempts to deprive them of the ability to defend themselves

If a person has no right to defend themselves they have no liberty to govern themselves.

 

[Avatar4321]

Your already required to have a special license to buy an assault weapon.

Follow my suggestion and check what an airline pilot has to endure for scrutiny before taking the lives of hundreds of people into his/her hands.

Why, there is no comparison between a commercial airline pilot and the average gun owner, what do you idiots call that, a false comparison fallacy? BTW how did all that scrutiny work out on the Malaysia flight that the pilot flew into the ocean, or the one that flew his plane into the Alps? No individual American has killed so many with a gun. Hell there's not even a serial killer that has a body count like your scrutinized airline pilots.

Were those 2 pilots American pilots?

Look, forget it.....I don't have time for all the right wing bullshit tonight..

Just get your gun and walk around your neighborhood shouting "I'm a REAL American....just look at my gun..."

This is your persuasive reasoning?

 

[LOki]

Well, when you get done with the first draft of your Constitutional Amendment to repeal the Second Amendment, do post it for us to peruse.

The above was written by a militia member???....and exactly where in the Constitution is it written that you could own an assault weapon that ripped apart some of those babies at Sandy Hook into FOURTEEN separate parts?

2nd Amendment.

That was easy.

 

[mudwhistle]

Actually, we should always follow what lobbyists push (aka, BRIBE) congress to do (and in some instance, NOT to do) when searching for legislation to curb an abuse of the common welfare and good.

Regarding mass murders, we know that gun manufacturers (and their bought puppet, the NRA) fought and won the right to NOT be sued for the misuse of their deadly products.

If we wanted to make a substantial dent with mass shootings (almost impossible to eliminate without reversing the Constitution's 2nd amendment) pass a law that gun manufacturers AND gun vendors can be sued when their product is sold WITHOUT a thorough background and psychological clean bill of health.

Utter stupidity.

It assumes that gun manufacturers have total control over their products and their uses. This is like assuming that auto manufacturers can stop people from drunk-driving.

 

[2aguy]

Since all you gun-loving right wingers have thoroughly masturbated on this thread by putting anything as a suggestion to CURB the mass shootings that are unique to Americans as wanna-be cowboys.....Here's TWO things you should consider:

1. Re-read the O/P as far as what was the modest suggestion, and

2. Would you agree that before purchasing an assault weapon one should undergo the same scrutiny and background checks as an airline pilot does?
(it may not be full-proof but it sure as hell would make it tougher for nut jobs to get a hold of a deadly weapon.)

Now you can masturbate some more.

No. It isn't even slightly full proof. Criminals will get them if they want them…..and a mass shooter, will go through the background check, even one for a pilot, and then shoot people. Or he will just use another gun…..and considering semi auto rifles like the AR-15 are used to kill people less than knives, clubs and bare hands…..what is your problem with them……?

 

[nat4900]

Utter stupidity.

It assumes that gun manufacturers have total control over their products and their uses. This is like assuming that auto manufacturers can stop people from drunk-driving.

Yes, indeed "utter stupidity"....Since autos' PRIMARY function is driving and guns' PRIMARY function is killing.

 

[mudwhistle]

Utter stupidity.

It assumes that gun manufacturers have total control over their products and their uses. This is like assuming that auto manufacturers can stop people from drunk-driving.

Yes, indeed "utter stupidity"....Since autos' PRIMARY function is driving and guns' PRIMARY function is killing.

So, you're saying gun deaths matter more than deaths caused by drunk drivers?

Talking about utter stupidity.

All deaths matter numbnuts.

 

[mudwhistle]

Obama has sold more guns than any president before him.

He has given more weapons to our enemies than any other president.

Thanks to Obama, ISIS is driving around in up-armored HummVees that Democrats demanded Bush pay for.....costing us billions. Obama also spent $500,000,000.00 on Syrian rebels and has nothing to show for it.

Zip

Nada

 

[nat4900]

So, you're saying gun deaths matter more than deaths caused by drunk drivers?

Talking about utter stupidity.

All deaths matter numbnuts.

Avoiding the question as to whether cars are manufactured as killing machines, versus the manufacturing of guns as killing implements...

Sure all deaths matter.........including the FACT that you and I will be dead some day.

 

[Avatar4321]

Utter stupidity.

It assumes that gun manufacturers have total control over their products and their uses. This is like assuming that auto manufacturers can stop people from drunk-driving.

Yes, indeed "utter stupidity"....Since autos' PRIMARY function is driving and guns' PRIMARY function is killing.

You keep pretending that's the standard of manufacturing liability. But in order for a manufacturer to be liable there has to be a flaw in the products design. If a product does what it is designed to do, then there is no liability. No matter how much you don't like it.

 

[M14 Shooter]

Name the manufacturer who can be sued, not for products that are defective, but for products that are subsequently used by people to break laws. We'll wait.

Your premise is as dumb as you surely must be.......Gun manufacturers are simply putting together for sale items that are used to KILL others....period.

Your failure to understand why you have no sound argument here is willful.

 

[M14 Shooter]

Yes, indeed "utter stupidity"....Since autos' PRIMARY function is driving and guns' PRIMARY function is killing.

This is, of course, a lie.
Why do yo have to lie to make your point?

 

[KissMy]

Actually, we should always follow what lobbyists push (aka, BRIBE) congress to do (and in some instance, NOT to do) when searching for legislation to curb an abuse of the common welfare and good.

Regarding mass murders, we know that gun manufacturers (and their bought puppet, the NRA) fought and won the right to NOT be sued for the misuse of their deadly products.

If we wanted to make a substantial dent with mass shootings (almost impossible to eliminate without reversing the Constitution's 2nd amendment) pass a law that gun manufacturers AND gun vendors can be sued when their product is sold WITHOUT a thorough background and psychological clean bill of health.

You are a total retard! How would you like it if a criminal used healthy food or water as a murder weapon & the producers were sued out of business? Why don't you just go starve to death & put yourself out of misery?