Very efficient solar cells

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Solyndra failed mostly because we didnt gove them enough money.

That can be said of anything, or anyone who has ever existed...

Oh yeah? Go ahead and dump your life savings into horse drawn carriages.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Liar, cheap heat is in fossil fuels subsidize

Enflish, please.

I dont speak Indy , pumpkin boi

You apparently don't speak English, either. Just here to have your little fit, are ya?

 

[Wyatt earp]

Tax breaks maybe, but another Solyndra **** no.

Funny thing about that...Solyndra failed mostly because we didnt give them enough money. The chinese heavily subsidize solar and are dominating the market.

So you are for Trumps tariffs, huh?

That's why he started it, a Chinese solar company in Georgia was complaining about your own Chinese country men.

 

[Wyatt earp]

Liar, cheap heat is in fossil fuels subsidize

Enflish, please.

I dont speak Indy , pumpkin boi

You apparently don't speak English, either. Just here to have your little fit, are ya?

What fit, pumpkin pucker?

.

 

[TNHarley]

Pass an amendment, statist boy.

So what? As if you have any idea how subsidies work, or how we benefit from them. Your opinion isn't worth much.

It's about the constitution.
Sorry if I dont support abuse of power for a belief, unlike you.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

So you are for Trumps tariffs, huh?

No. Clearly I am for heavily subsidizing solar. And tech training too. I have more.

 

[Wyatt earp]

Pass an amendment, statist boy.

So what? As if you have any idea how subsidies work, or how we benefit from them. Your opinion isn't worth much.

It's about the constitution.
Sorry if I dont support abuse of power for a belief, unlike you.

Ha ha pumpkin fiddler admited he was for trumps tariffs.

.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

It's about the constitution.

Haha, sure . What a crock of shit. It's about your Randian purity. Nothing more.

 

[Wyatt earp]

So you are for Trumps tariffs, huh?

No. Clearly I am for heavily subsidizing solar. And tech training too. I have more.

Yup your for Trumps tariffs, hey isn't it to early Linus to wait for the great pumpkin?

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

So you are for Trumps tariffs, huh?

No. Clearly I am for heavily subsidizing solar. And tech training too. I have more.

Yup your for Trumps tariffs, hey isn't it to early Linus to wait for the great pumpkin?

Enjoy playing with your little dollies.

 

[fncceo]

Subsidies, tax breaks, incentives, are a way to favor one kind of business (or a particular business in a sector) over others for political reasons.

Sometimes, those reasons, are a desire to keep alive a way of life that has outlived its productivity (like farm subsidies and the family farm) or placing taxes on chain stores and online retailer to protect 'mom and pop' stores.

Other times, it's a way to socially engineer society, by promoting goods and services that are considered to be "in the public good" and subsequently punishing businesses that some consider to be not so.

In every case, a subsidy can only exist where those who benefit from it have sufficient political influence to wiggle the subsidy through Congress.

In every case, a subsidy only lowers the cost for some, by spreading that cost 'savings' (plus a massive administrative cost) to others.

In every case, a subsidy is a political tool for subverting market forces.

"When buying and selling are legislated, the first thing to be bought and sold are legislators" -- P.J. O'Rourke

 

[TNHarley]

It's about the constitution.

Haha, sure . What a crock of shit. It's about your Randian purity. Nothing more.

Show me where the constitution gives the fed gov power to subsidize people or companies.
I'll wait, dumbfuck.
So, post a link or shut the **** up

 

[fncceo]

Solyndra failed mostly because we didnt gove them enough money.

That can be said of anything, or anyone who has ever existed...

Oh yeah? Go ahead and dump your life savings into horse drawn carriages.

I made my money marketing cigarettes and alcohol to children ... did pretty well for myself.

 

[TNHarley]

As fncceo just posted, its fed gov discrimination.
Eat it, fortfag.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Subsidies, tax breaks, incentives, are a way to favor one kind of business (or a particular business in a sector) over others for political reasons.

Yes and no, mostly no. That is a stupid and simplistic view of subsidies. For instance, not having food or fuel shortages is not political. Subsidies as infrastructure and energy investment are not political. Sure, politics can affect anything, but subsidies are a useful tool and a triumph of modern, stable economics.

You people are living in la la land. Get off the zero-hedge website once in a while, get some fresh air.

 

[ThunderKiss1965]

Tax breaks maybe, but another Solyndra **** no.

Funny thing about that...Solyndra failed mostly because we didnt give them enough money. The chinese heavily subsidize solar and are dominating the market.

Its easy to dominate a market when your labor force average income is around 10,000 US dollars a year

 

[Dick Foster]

So you are for Trumps tariffs, huh?

No. Clearly I am for heavily subsidizing solar. And tech training too. I have more.

You have more what? Shitforbrains?

 

[ding]

It's about the constitution.

Haha, sure . What a crock of shit. It's about your Randian purity. Nothing more.

Show me where the constitution gives the fed gov power to subsidize people or companies.
I'll wait, dumbfuck.
So, post a link or shut the **** up

Where does the constitution restrict subsidies?

 

[Old Rocks]

Lazard’s latest annual Levelized Cost of Energy Analysis (LCOE 12.0) shows a continued decline in the cost of generating electricity from alternative energy technologies, especially utility-scale solar and wind. In some scenarios, alternative energy costs have decreased to the point that they are now at or below the marginal cost of conventional generation.

At utility scale, both solar and wind are the cheapest form of generation, without subsidies. If they are correct about the ability of the nanotubes, they would simply add a step to the existing manufacturing process. And more than double the productivity of the panel. This would put solar as clearly the cheapest way to produce electricity. Add grid scale battery storage, and you have no need of generation other than solar and wind.

 

[Wyatt earp]

Lazard’s latest annual Levelized Cost of Energy Analysis (LCOE 12.0) shows a continued decline in the cost of generating electricity from alternative energy technologies, especially utility-scale solar and wind. In some scenarios, alternative energy costs have decreased to the point that they are now at or below the marginal cost of conventional generation.

At utility scale, both solar and wind are the cheapest form of generation, without subsidies. If they are correct about the ability of the nanotubes, they would simply add a step to the existing manufacturing process. And more than double the productivity of the panel. This would put solar as clearly the cheapest way to produce electricity. Add grid scale battery storage, and you have no need of generation other than solar and wind.

Just get your sock and put him on mount saint Helen's and tell him to blow.