WorldWatcher
Platinum Member
...whereas government employees have free healthcare,...
What government employees get free health care? (Outside military service members.)
WW
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
...whereas government employees have free healthcare,...
The son of a ***** past two post master generals, were put in there to DESTROY it, so the billionaires can get their wish of privatizing it.
The Postal Service has informed the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) of its intention to temporarily suspend its employer’s contributions for the defined benefit portion of the Federal Employees Retirement System (FERS) to conserve cash and preserve liquidity due to its ongoing, severe financial crisis.
“There will not be any immediate detrimental impact to our current or future retirees if normal FERS cost payments are temporarily withheld,” said Postal Service Chief Financial Officer Luke Grossmann. “The risk to the Postal Service and the American public from insufficient liquidity for postal operations dramatically outweighs any longer-term risk to the pension funds from not making the currently due payments. We will continue to transmit to OPM employees’ contributions to FERS and will also continue to transmit employer automatic and matching contributions and employee contributions to the Thrift Savings Plan. It must be noted that our pension systems remain much better funded than other agencies.”
The Postal Service pays about $200 million every other week to OPM for the FERS annuity. Suspension of payments, effective April 10, will free about $2.5 billion in the current fiscal year.
And make their financial problems $2.5B worse next year.
ETA: As a reminder, the USPS is buying 66,000 electric vehicles at a program cost of $145,454 per unit.
The USPS is nothing but a bloated jobs program.
Trump's America!!
The Postal Service has informed the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) of its intention to temporarily suspend its employer’s contributions for the defined benefit portion of the Federal Employees Retirement System (FERS) to conserve cash and preserve liquidity due to its ongoing, severe financial crisis.
“There will not be any immediate detrimental impact to our current or future retirees if normal FERS cost payments are temporarily withheld,” said Postal Service Chief Financial Officer Luke Grossmann. “The risk to the Postal Service and the American public from insufficient liquidity for postal operations dramatically outweighs any longer-term risk to the pension funds from not making the currently due payments. We will continue to transmit to OPM employees’ contributions to FERS and will also continue to transmit employer automatic and matching contributions and employee contributions to the Thrift Savings Plan. It must be noted that our pension systems remain much better funded than other agencies.”
The Postal Service pays about $200 million every other week to OPM for the FERS annuity. Suspension of payments, effective April 10, will free about $2.5 billion in the current fiscal year.
And make their financial problems $2.5B worse next year.
ETA: As a reminder, the USPS is buying 66,000 electric vehicles at a program cost of $145,454 per unit.
The USPS is nothing but a bloated jobs program.
I live comfortably in retirement on my 401Ks provided by my private sector employers and my investments. Your response is typical knee jerk rubbish. Come back when you actually THINK about what I said. Or not, that works too.
What government employees get free health care? (Outside military service members.)
WW
Sigh I guess I have to educate another one. Private Sector companies transitioned away from pension plans to 401K (or similar) retirement plans because of the MASSIVE LIABILITIES that pension plans become.Sure, there are exceptions to the rules, but the disappearing pensions in the private sector is related to trickle down (voodoo) of the past 50+ years. Anyone being honest knows this. But we need more "wealthy" people for the right to kneel too
View attachment 1242002
Sigh I guess I have to educate another one. Private Sector companies transitioned away from pension plans to 401K (or similar) retirement plans because of the MASSIVE LIABILITIES that pension plans become.
There are nearly 3 million Federal employees currently and over 1.2 million former Federal employees drawing FERS benefits. Do you see the problem now? You do know that taxpayers pay for the FERS benefits and Federal employee salaries, right? Class dismissed.
I was an HR professional for decades.
The reason there were MASSIVE LIABILITIES is because the defined benefits plans:
There is no real difference between a PROPERLY funded and managed defined benefits program and a defined contributions program. As a matter of fact many retirees convert define contributions retirement savings to defined benefit retirements by converting to annuities.
- Were managed by the employer, meaning they could make promises today their ass couldn't meet in the future.
- Were managed by the employer, instead of being paid properly and managed properly by 3rd party entities. The employer had a motivation to keep the money in the business instead of investing for the retirement promisses.
You are trying to use scary scale numbers. It doesn't matter of it's 10 employees or 3,000,000 employees. Properly funded pensions are perfectly fine.
There are a couple of real reasons pensions wained...
The video below explains who Wall Street saw the advantages.
- We became a much more mobile society so people weren't in the jobs long enough for pensions, and
- Wall street figured out they could make a shit ton of money by skimming revenue off of an obscure tax law - that being the 401K provision.
WW
you dont pay mine....im CSR...Sigh I guess I have to educate another one. Private Sector companies transitioned away from pension plans to 401K (or similar) retirement plans because of the MASSIVE LIABILITIES that pension plans become.
There are nearly 3 million Federal employees currently and over 1.2 million former Federal employees drawing FERS benefits. Do you see the problem now? You do know that taxpayers pay for the FERS benefits and Federal employee salaries, right? Class dismissed.
I was an HR professional for decades.
The reason there were MASSIVE LIABILITIES is because the defined benefits plans:
There is no real difference between a PROPERLY funded and managed defined benefits program and a defined contributions program. As a matter of fact many retirees convert define contributions retirement savings to defined benefit retirements by converting to annuities.
- Were managed by the employer, meaning they could make promises today their ass couldn't meet in the future.
- Were managed by the employer, instead of being paid properly and managed properly by 3rd party entities. The employer had a motivation to keep the money in the business instead of investing for the retirement promisses.
You are trying to use scary scale numbers. It doesn't matter of it's 10 employees or 3,000,000 employees. Properly funded pensions are perfectly fine.
There are a couple of real reasons pensions wained...
The video below explains who Wall Street saw the advantages.
- We became a much more mobile society so people weren't in the jobs long enough for pensions, and
- Wall street figured out they could make a shit ton of money by skimming revenue off of an obscure tax law - that being the 401K provision.
WW
Who pays for their healthcare?What government employees get free health care? (Outside military service members.)
WW
i pay into mine.....Who pays for their healthcare?
So do I. Voters should demand all government employees must allocate portion of their earnings, based on earnings, to subsidize healthcare for the people. This country is backward. Other developed countries, government works for the people.i pay into mine.....
Who pays for their healthcare?
Who pays for their healthcare?
That’s the difference. You and I pay out of our pocket and we also pay healthcare coverage for government workers.Everybody I know does. I've been paying into Medicare since 1966 . I go see a doctor twice a year, and only one prescription, for Valsartan, which costs a lot less than my premiums.
Sigh I guess I have to educate another one. Private Sector companies transitioned away from pension plans to 401K (or similar) retirement plans because of the MASSIVE LIABILITIES that pension plans become.
There are nearly 3 million Federal employees currently and over 1.2 million former Federal employees drawing FERS benefits. Do you see the problem now? You do know that taxpayers pay for the FERS benefits and Federal employee salaries, right? Class dismissed.
Federal government workers and the government share the cost of health insurance, with the government typically paying about 70-75% of the total premium. The employee's share is paid through pre-tax deductions. Coverage is largely managed through the Federal Employees Health Benefits (FEHB) Program.Who pays for their healthcare?