Zone1 Unequal Protection Under the Law

[IM2]

“Using publicly released reports, we examine the preferences Harvard gives for recruited athletes, legacies, those on the dean’s interest list, and children of faculty and staff (ALDCs). Among white admits, over 43% are ALDC. Among admits who are African American, Asian American, and Hispanic, the share is less than 16% each. Our model of admissions shows that roughly three quarters of white ALDC admits would have been rejected if they had been treated as white non-ALDCs. Removing preferences for athletes and legacies would significantly alter the racial distribution of admitted students, with the share of white admits falling and all other groups rising or remaining unchanged.”

Study finds 43 percent of Harvard's white students are legacy, athletes, related to donors or staff

The number drops dramatically for black, Latino and Asian American students with less than 16 percent each coming from those categories, the study said.

www.nbcnews.com

https://www.nber.org/system/files/working_papers/w26316/w26316.pdf

Here we see white ALDC students who would not qualify under any other circumstance are accepted at more than double the percentage of Asians, Blacks, Hispanics, and Native Americans who meet the same criteria. Equal protection means that government entities must treat all individuals the same when the circumstances or situations are the same. Students for Fair Admissions claimed that Harvard violated Title VI of the Civil Rights Act. Title VI “prohibits discrimination based on race, color, and national origin in federal financial assistance programs and activities.” The numbers show that when the circumstances and situations are the same, meaning ALDC preferences, 2.68 times more whites get admitted due to this preference than Asians, Blacks, Hispanics, and Native Americans. Judging by the Equal Protection clause, those same groups are not receiving equal protection as determined by the fourteenth amendment relative to ALDC preferences.

 

[1srelluc]

I'd be tickled to death if every leftist Ivy League school had to pull the copper plumbing out the walls to pay for the lawsuits.

Go head, eat your own......Godspeed.

 

[johngaltshrugged]

So the leftist wokesters running Harvard are actually closet racists?
Have you ever seen my shocked face?

 

[1srelluc]

So the leftist wokesters running Harvard are actually closet racists?
Have you ever seen my shocked face?

Yeah, I don't think that he thought that one through very well.....Parroting has it's consequences.

 

[MarathonMike]

Meanwhile poor Black people are gunning each other down like the Wild West. But who cares, the real problem is Ivy Leagues cater to rich White alumni. It's all about priorities.

 

[Anomalism]

Meh.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

“Using publicly released reports, we examine the preferences Harvard gives for recruited athletes, legacies, those on the dean’s interest list, and children of faculty and staff (ALDCs). Among white admits, over 43% are ALDC. Among admits who are African American, Asian American, and Hispanic, the share is less than 16% each. Our model of admissions shows that roughly three quarters of white ALDC admits would have been rejected if they had been treated as white non-ALDCs. Removing preferences for athletes and legacies would significantly alter the racial distribution of admitted students, with the share of white admits falling and all other groups rising or remaining unchanged.”

Study finds 43 percent of Harvard's white students are legacy, athletes, related to donors or staff

The number drops dramatically for black, Latino and Asian American students with less than 16 percent each coming from those categories, the study said.

www.nbcnews.com

https://www.nber.org/system/files/working_papers/w26316/w26316.pdf

Here we see white ALDC students who would not qualify under any other circumstance are accepted at more than double the percentage of Asians, Blacks, Hispanics, and Native Americans who meet the same criteria. Equal protection means that government entities must treat all individuals the same when the circumstances or situations are the same. Students for Fair Admissions claimed that Harvard violated Title VI of the Civil Rights Act. Title VI “prohibits discrimination based on race, color, and national origin in federal financial assistance programs and activities.” The numbers show that when the circumstances and situations are the same, meaning ALDC preferences, 2.68 times more whites get admitted due to this preference than Asians, Blacks, Hispanics, and Native Americans. Judging by the Equal Protection clause, those same groups are not receiving equal protection as determined by the fourteenth amendment relative to ALDC preferences.

Our model of admissions shows that roughly three quarters of white ALDC admits would have been rejected if they had been treated as white non-ALDCs.

How many black admits would have been rejected if they were treated as whites?
90%? 95%? 98%?

 

[1srelluc]

OP done up and RUNN-OFT.....He must have realized he was biting the hand that feeds the leftist cause.....or is lookin' for answers.

 

[Mikeoxenormous]

“Using publicly released reports, we examine the preferences Harvard gives for recruited athletes, legacies, those on the dean’s interest list, and children of faculty and staff (ALDCs). Among white admits, over 43% are ALDC. Among admits who are African American, Asian American, and Hispanic, the share is less than 16% each. Our model of admissions shows that roughly three quarters of white ALDC admits would have been rejected if they had been treated as white non-ALDCs. Removing preferences for athletes and legacies would significantly alter the racial distribution of admitted students, with the share of white admits falling and all other groups rising or remaining unchanged.”

Study finds 43 percent of Harvard's white students are legacy, athletes, related to donors or staff

The number drops dramatically for black, Latino and Asian American students with less than 16 percent each coming from those categories, the study said.

www.nbcnews.com

https://www.nber.org/system/files/working_papers/w26316/w26316.pdf

Here we see white ALDC students who would not qualify under any other circumstance are accepted at more than double the percentage of Asians, Blacks, Hispanics, and Native Americans who meet the same criteria. Equal protection means that government entities must treat all individuals the same when the circumstances or situations are the same. Students for Fair Admissions claimed that Harvard violated Title VI of the Civil Rights Act. Title VI “prohibits discrimination based on race, color, and national origin in federal financial assistance programs and activities.” The numbers show that when the circumstances and situations are the same, meaning ALDC preferences, 2.68 times more whites get admitted due to this preference than Asians, Blacks, Hispanics, and Native Americans. Judging by the Equal Protection clause, those same groups are not receiving equal protection as determined by the fourteenth amendment relative to ALDC preferences.

Harvard huh? You do know that Harvard is a very progressive school of education. They usually work with the Marxists. But hey keep on voting for the racists/Marxists and you will continue to be a 2nd class citizen.

The old stereotype of the left-leaning college student seems to be true, at least at Harvard. When asked to place their political leanings along a spectrum ranging from “very left” to “very right”, exactly three fourths of students said they were left-leaning and just under 11% claimed to be right-leaning, yielding an overall index of 0.12.

Harvard Divided: How do opinions on hot topics differ by class ... - …​

www.hodp.org/project/harvard-divided-how-do-opinions-on-hot-topics-differ-by-cla

 

[Dekster]

“Using publicly released reports, we examine the preferences Harvard gives for recruited athletes, legacies, those on the dean’s interest list, and children of faculty and staff (ALDCs). Among white admits, over 43% are ALDC. Among admits who are African American, Asian American, and Hispanic, the share is less than 16% each. Our model of admissions shows that roughly three quarters of white ALDC admits would have been rejected if they had been treated as white non-ALDCs. Removing preferences for athletes and legacies would significantly alter the racial distribution of admitted students, with the share of white admits falling and all other groups rising or remaining unchanged.”

Study finds 43 percent of Harvard's white students are legacy, athletes, related to donors or staff

The number drops dramatically for black, Latino and Asian American students with less than 16 percent each coming from those categories, the study said.

www.nbcnews.com

https://www.nber.org/system/files/working_papers/w26316/w26316.pdf

Here we see white ALDC students who would not qualify under any other circumstance are accepted at more than double the percentage of Asians, Blacks, Hispanics, and Native Americans who meet the same criteria. Equal protection means that government entities must treat all individuals the same when the circumstances or situations are the same. Students for Fair Admissions claimed that Harvard violated Title VI of the Civil Rights Act. Title VI “prohibits discrimination based on race, color, and national origin in federal financial assistance programs and activities.” The numbers show that when the circumstances and situations are the same, meaning ALDC preferences, 2.68 times more whites get admitted due to this preference than Asians, Blacks, Hispanics, and Native Americans. Judging by the Equal Protection clause, those same groups are not receiving equal protection as determined by the fourteenth amendment relative to ALDC preferences.

Being the son of a professor or granddaughter of an alum does not automatically land anywhere in "race, color, and national origin" so, nope.

 

[IM2]

Being the son of a professor or granddaughter of an alum does not automatically land anywhere in "race, color, and national origin" so, nope.

Actually it does when your college excluded people by race, color and national origin for about 200 years.

 

[IM2]

Our model of admissions shows that roughly three quarters of white ALDC admits would have been rejected if they had been treated as white non-ALDCs.

How many black admits would have been rejected if they were treated as whites?
90%? 95%? 98%?

None.. Because they could have been an unqualified legacy admit..

 

[White 6]

Thread Locked after cleanup.