Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
No, it isn't. It's paying back into the society that allowed them to get so very rich, and we did.Taxing the rich more is aiding and abetting the thief who is robbing you.
Simple as that.
No, right in this country taxing the rich has worked, very well. We just stopped doing it. After 500K, 50% should be ours, make as much as you like.PaintMyHouse, you can post all the wealth inequality posts you like, but that is just so much whining and nothing in the way of solutions except the bogus "tax the rich more" ineffective bullshit.
You tax-the-rich-more-ons act as if rich people are the only ones who used roads and bridges.No, it isn't. It's paying back into the society that allowed them to get so very rich, and we did.Taxing the rich more is aiding and abetting the thief who is robbing you.
Simple as that.
No, it isn't. It's paying back into the society that allowed them to get so very rich, and we did.Taxing the rich more is aiding and abetting the thief who is robbing you.
Simple as that.
The more you tax something, the less of it you get. This is basic economics. What happened under those high tax rates was that less was produced. People stop working when most of their money is taken away from them for doing so.No, right in this country taxing the rich has worked, very well. We just stopped doing it. After 500K, 50% should be ours, make as much as you like.PaintMyHouse, you can post all the wealth inequality posts you like, but that is just so much whining and nothing in the way of solutions except the bogus "tax the rich more" ineffective bullshit.
You don't understand the economics but tell me this, why are such a defender of the rich when you will never be one? Or is it because you have a fantasy that you will be rich someday? That's the usual lie people swallow.The more you tax something, the less of it you get. This is basic economics. What happened under those high tax rates was that less was produced. People stop working when most of their money is taken away from them for doing so.No, right in this country taxing the rich has worked, very well. We just stopped doing it. After 500K, 50% should be ours, make as much as you like.PaintMyHouse, you can post all the wealth inequality posts you like, but that is just so much whining and nothing in the way of solutions except the bogus "tax the rich more" ineffective bullshit.
So you want to take production more, idiot?
Better to tax consumption more.
We already do that, through gas taxes, licenses, and vehicle taxes, but we need more, obviously.Here's an idea. Let's tax everyone who uses roads and bridges more.
Fair is fair. You should cough up some cash to pay society back for those roads and bridges.
You don't understand the economics but tell me this, why are such a defender of the rich when you will never be one? Or is it because you have a fantasy that you will be rich someday? That's the usual lie people swallow.
And, we want less wealth at the top and way more at the bottom where it actually helps the nation and the economy.
During the decade 1951 to 1960, when the top tax rate was at 90 percent, there were three recessions.
I understand economics very well. And what makes you think I am not wealthy?You don't understand the economics but tell me this, why are such a defender of the rich when you will never be one? Or is it because you have a fantasy that you will be rich someday? That's the usual lie people swallow.The more you tax something, the less of it you get. This is basic economics. What happened under those high tax rates was that less was produced. People stop working when most of their money is taken away from them for doing so.No, right in this country taxing the rich has worked, very well. We just stopped doing it. After 500K, 50% should be ours, make as much as you like.PaintMyHouse, you can post all the wealth inequality posts you like, but that is just so much whining and nothing in the way of solutions except the bogus "tax the rich more" ineffective bullshit.
So you want to take production more, idiot?
Better to tax consumption more.
And, we want less wealth at the top and way more at the bottom where it actually helps the nation and the economy.
Well let's see, in the US if you are pulling down 500K a year, you are very well off. At one mil, you're rich. That's why I want 50% of anything over 500K.You don't understand the economics but tell me this, why are such a defender of the rich when you will never be one? Or is it because you have a fantasy that you will be rich someday? That's the usual lie people swallow.
And, we want less wealth at the top and way more at the bottom where it actually helps the nation and the economy.
What do you see as "rich," ShitMyPants? $100K a year? $250K
I know that Obama isn't rich, nor is Nancy Pelosi or Joe Biden. Brad Pit and Matt Damon aren't really rich, not like the guy down the street from your mom who got a brand new Lexis, right?
Define "rich" for us.
I block sigs, Post it or forget it. And I look at any and all solutions, that aren't dogma.I understand economics very well. And what makes you think I am not wealthy?You don't understand the economics but tell me this, why are such a defender of the rich when you will never be one? Or is it because you have a fantasy that you will be rich someday? That's the usual lie people swallow.The more you tax something, the less of it you get. This is basic economics. What happened under those high tax rates was that less was produced. People stop working when most of their money is taken away from them for doing so.No, right in this country taxing the rich has worked, very well. We just stopped doing it. After 500K, 50% should be ours, make as much as you like.PaintMyHouse, you can post all the wealth inequality posts you like, but that is just so much whining and nothing in the way of solutions except the bogus "tax the rich more" ineffective bullshit.
So you want to take production more, idiot?
Better to tax consumption more.
And, we want less wealth at the top and way more at the bottom where it actually helps the nation and the economy.
Is this your only defense you have left? I think you have just made it pretty clear who is intellectually bankrupt in this conversation.
I have outlined some very specific solutions which are direct causes of wealth inequality. All you have is "tax the rich more".
I don't think you really are interested in solving the problem. I think you just have an innate hatred of the wealthy that has been nurtured by the class warfare of the Left, and so any "solution" which involves putting some pain on the wealthy resonates with you.
See my sig.
Well let's see, in the US if you are pulling down 500K a year, you are very well off. At one mil, you're rich. That's why I want 50% of anything over 500K.
I block sigs, Post it or forget it. And I look at any and all solutions, that aren't dogma..
See my sig.
From the link:
Vice President Joe Biden used a Black History Month event at his official residence Monday night to decry the rich, both white and black, for stunting economic growth and suggested that “emancipation” is in order.
“A lot of wealthy white and black people aren't bad but they control 1 percent of the economy and this cannot stand,” Biden told about 100 guests, including past civil rights activists and NBC weatherman Al Roker.
I wonder if Uncle Joe realizes who has been in charge for the last 8 years. This is just more liberal divide the nation BS.
Besides his quote about the 1 percent being idiotic. But the worse is yet to come if Hillary wins.
UNCHAINED: Biden calls for 'emancipation' of people's wealth...
'This cannot stand'...