Kruska
Diamond Member
- Thread starter
- #81
Rubbish - neutrality is not defined by personal beliefs - but by international law. Something you seem to know very little to nothing about.Actually, yes I would agree they were neutral. You see, unlike you I do not determine neutrality based on my personal beliefs.
That is an actual difference between you and I. To you, everything seems to be based purely on your own beliefs and nothing else.
Neutrality — defined by the UN as the legal status arising from the abstention of a state from all participation in a war between other states, the maintenance of an attitude of impartiality toward the belligerents, and the recognition by the belligerents of this abstention and impartiality — is critically important for the United Nations to gain and maintain the confidence and cooperation of all in order to operate independently and effectively, especially in situations that are politically charged.
Did Poland vote in the UN Ukraine assembly with - condemning the Russian offensive? or did they abstain (NEUTRAL) like China? or did they vote not to condemn Russia such as Belarus?
Bringing in personal beliefs like you - and then trying to revert those on someone else is plain stupid.
Not being able to differentiate between sending weapons (which is rightful according to international law) and being Neutral (not sending weapons or assistance) - just shows how ignorant you are.