Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
The reason that Democrats control the House, Candy is that the number of Representatives each State gets is based on population totals that include illegals. Why should flooding your State with illegals gain you a political advantage? It does under our present set up.Why should illegals have political representation?
No clue how the court will respond, but it's an easy enough question.
U.S. Supreme Court to hear Trump bid to exclude illegal immigrants from representation
The Census does more than apportion political representation.
..he's the best POTUS in a long time..doing a great job....you're a geniusThe current constitution says count persons....Feel free to amend the Constitution....Why should illegals have political representation?
No clue how the court will respond, but it's an easy enough question.
U.S. Supreme Court to hear Trump bid to exclude illegal immigrants from representation
The Census does more than apportion political representation.
Illegals shouldn't be counted in the census.
Not necessary. Enforce existing law.
If you're talking about deporting people...you blob has had 4 years...he's not done shit on that front either.
Remember how you guys were beating your chests about federal agents driving around scooping up illegals by the bus load?
It never happened.....
..the DUMBASS states like Cali are stopping it...not only do they assist the illegals, they even PAY illegals for -----------------------being illegal!!!!!!!!!! very very stupid
San Francisco to pay $190,000 for sanctuary law violation, lawyer says
A man from El Salvador in the U.S. illegally who sued San Francisco after police turned him over to immigration authorities in violation of the city's sanctuary law is set to be awarded $190,000, his attorney said Thursday.www.latimes.com
Your blob just can't get the job done. Time for a change.
The reason that Democrats control the House, Candy is that the number of Representatives each State gets is based on population totals that include illegals. Why should flooding your State with illegals gain you a political advantage? It does under our present set up.Why should illegals have political representation?
No clue how the court will respond, but it's an easy enough question.
U.S. Supreme Court to hear Trump bid to exclude illegal immigrants from representation
The Census does more than apportion political representation.
That is the real reason that Democrats have never wanted a secure border.
Why should illegals have political representation?
No clue how the court will respond, but it's an easy enough question.
U.S. Supreme Court to hear Trump bid to exclude illegal immigrants from representation
Why? Because that's what the Constitution call for.
The U.S. Constitution empowers the Congress to carry out the census in "such manner as they shall by Law direct" (Article I, Section 2). The Founders of our fledgling nation had a bold and ambitious plan to empower the people over their new government. The plan was to count every person living in the newly created United States of America, and to use that count to determine representation in the Congress.
Census in the Constitution.
A census counter is completely unable to determine who is here legally or not at that. This is just another case where the government tries to blame others for it's failures.
Technically, it calls for the enumeration of "the whole Number of free Persons". At that time of writing there was no immigration law as there was no reason to have any.
Illegal aliens are not "free" but only "free-roaming", no different than a burglar who enters your house.
There is no logic in giving Congressional representation to foreign entities.
People will argue that there were no semi-automatic weapons back then either so banning them is OK.
None of it is OK. Besides, they are not foreign entities. They are people here processing our food. Caring for our children. Taking care of our lawns,
They are criminals. They broke the law and entered this country illegally.
That's why we call them "illegals."
So? Those employing them are breaking the law also. Should we exclude them also? And if so, how do we go about doing this?
No, those hiring them are American citizens who can vote, and therefore should be counted in the census.
But illegals are criminals, and are not entitled to the full benefits the US Constitution bequeaths on real American citizens.
If illegals weren't criminals and truly were dindu nuffins, they wouldn't be arrested for being criminals, as ICE did yesterday. ICE arrested more than 170 of the criminals in several "sanctuary cities" yesterday.
ICE sweeps through D.C., other sanctuary cities; more than 170 arrests
That's 170 criminals who won't be illegally voting for Joe Biden.
They never were going to, to start with.
Why should illegals have political representation?
No clue how the court will respond, but it's an easy enough question.
U.S. Supreme Court to hear Trump bid to exclude illegal immigrants from representation
Why? Because that's what the Constitution call for.
The U.S. Constitution empowers the Congress to carry out the census in "such manner as they shall by Law direct" (Article I, Section 2). The Founders of our fledgling nation had a bold and ambitious plan to empower the people over their new government. The plan was to count every person living in the newly created United States of America, and to use that count to determine representation in the Congress.
Census in the Constitution.
A census counter is completely unable to determine who is here legally or not at that. This is just another case where the government tries to blame others for it's failures.
Technically, it calls for the enumeration of "the whole Number of free Persons". At that time of writing there was no immigration law as there was no reason to have any.
Illegal aliens are not "free" but only "free-roaming", no different than a burglar who enters your house.
There is no logic in giving Congressional representation to foreign entities.
People will argue that there were no semi-automatic weapons back then either so banning them is OK.
None of it is OK. Besides, they are not foreign entities. They are people here processing our food. Caring for our children. Taking care of our lawns,
They are criminals. They broke the law and entered this country illegally.
That's why we call them "illegals."
So? Those employing them are breaking the law also. Should we exclude them also? And if so, how do we go about doing this?
No, those hiring them are American citizens who can vote, and therefore should be counted in the census.
But illegals are criminals, and are not entitled to the full benefits the US Constitution bequeaths on real American citizens.
If illegals weren't criminals and truly were dindu nuffins, they wouldn't be arrested for being criminals, as ICE did yesterday. ICE arrested more than 170 of the criminals in several "sanctuary cities" yesterday.
ICE sweeps through D.C., other sanctuary cities; more than 170 arrests
That's 170 criminals who won't be illegally voting for Joe Biden.
They never were going to, to start with.
Whether or not they were going to try to vote is irrelevant. They're still criminals.
Immigration and Customs Enforcement generally doesn't arrest criminals for no reason at all.
Why should illegals have political representation?
No clue how the court will respond, but it's an easy enough question.
U.S. Supreme Court to hear Trump bid to exclude illegal immigrants from representation
Why? Because that's what the Constitution call for.
The U.S. Constitution empowers the Congress to carry out the census in "such manner as they shall by Law direct" (Article I, Section 2). The Founders of our fledgling nation had a bold and ambitious plan to empower the people over their new government. The plan was to count every person living in the newly created United States of America, and to use that count to determine representation in the Congress.
Census in the Constitution.
A census counter is completely unable to determine who is here legally or not at that. This is just another case where the government tries to blame others for it's failures.
Technically, it calls for the enumeration of "the whole Number of free Persons". At that time of writing there was no immigration law as there was no reason to have any.
Illegal aliens are not "free" but only "free-roaming", no different than a burglar who enters your house.
There is no logic in giving Congressional representation to foreign entities.
People will argue that there were no semi-automatic weapons back then either so banning them is OK.
None of it is OK. Besides, they are not foreign entities. They are people here processing our food. Caring for our children. Taking care of our lawns,
They are criminals. They broke the law and entered this country illegally.
That's why we call them "illegals."
So? Those employing them are breaking the law also. Should we exclude them also? And if so, how do we go about doing this?
No, those hiring them are American citizens who can vote, and therefore should be counted in the census.
But illegals are criminals, and are not entitled to the full benefits the US Constitution bequeaths on real American citizens.
If illegals weren't criminals and truly were dindu nuffins, they wouldn't be arrested for being criminals, as ICE did yesterday. ICE arrested more than 170 of the criminals in several "sanctuary cities" yesterday.
ICE sweeps through D.C., other sanctuary cities; more than 170 arrests
That's 170 criminals who won't be illegally voting for Joe Biden.
They never were going to, to start with.
Whether or not they were going to try to vote is irrelevant. They're still criminals.
Immigration and Customs Enforcement generally doesn't arrest criminals for no reason at all.
So why lie about them voting? Only a very, very small number get arrested.
Why should illegals have political representation?
No clue how the court will respond, but it's an easy enough question.
U.S. Supreme Court to hear Trump bid to exclude illegal immigrants from representation
Why? Because that's what the Constitution call for.
The U.S. Constitution empowers the Congress to carry out the census in "such manner as they shall by Law direct" (Article I, Section 2). The Founders of our fledgling nation had a bold and ambitious plan to empower the people over their new government. The plan was to count every person living in the newly created United States of America, and to use that count to determine representation in the Congress.
Census in the Constitution.
A census counter is completely unable to determine who is here legally or not at that. This is just another case where the government tries to blame others for it's failures.
Technically, it calls for the enumeration of "the whole Number of free Persons". At that time of writing there was no immigration law as there was no reason to have any.
Illegal aliens are not "free" but only "free-roaming", no different than a burglar who enters your house.
There is no logic in giving Congressional representation to foreign entities.
People will argue that there were no semi-automatic weapons back then either so banning them is OK.
None of it is OK. Besides, they are not foreign entities. They are people here processing our food. Caring for our children. Taking care of our lawns,
They are criminals. They broke the law and entered this country illegally.
That's why we call them "illegals."
So? Those employing them are breaking the law also. Should we exclude them also? And if so, how do we go about doing this?
No, those hiring them are American citizens who can vote, and therefore should be counted in the census.
But illegals are criminals, and are not entitled to the full benefits the US Constitution bequeaths on real American citizens.
If illegals weren't criminals and truly were dindu nuffins, they wouldn't be arrested for being criminals, as ICE did yesterday. ICE arrested more than 170 of the criminals in several "sanctuary cities" yesterday.
ICE sweeps through D.C., other sanctuary cities; more than 170 arrests
That's 170 criminals who won't be illegally voting for Joe Biden.
They never were going to, to start with.
Whether or not they were going to try to vote is irrelevant. They're still criminals.
Immigration and Customs Enforcement generally doesn't arrest criminals for no reason at all.
So why lie about them voting? Only a very, very small number get arrested.
Doesn't matter. They're still criminals and should not be counted in the census.
ICE should also arrest and deport more of them.
Why should illegals have political representation?
No clue how the court will respond, but it's an easy enough question.
U.S. Supreme Court to hear Trump bid to exclude illegal immigrants from representation
The Census does more than apportion political representation.
That's not what this string is about, PK. Stay on topic.The reason that Democrats control the House, Candy is that the number of Representatives each State gets is based on population totals that include illegals. Why should flooding your State with illegals gain you a political advantage? It does under our present set up.Why should illegals have political representation?
No clue how the court will respond, but it's an easy enough question.
U.S. Supreme Court to hear Trump bid to exclude illegal immigrants from representation
The Census does more than apportion political representation.
That is the real reason that Democrats have never wanted a secure border.
Obama deported more people than Trump.
That's not what this string is about, PK. Stay on topic.The reason that Democrats control the House, Candy is that the number of Representatives each State gets is based on population totals that include illegals. Why should flooding your State with illegals gain you a political advantage? It does under our present set up.Why should illegals have political representation?
No clue how the court will respond, but it's an easy enough question.
U.S. Supreme Court to hear Trump bid to exclude illegal immigrants from representation
The Census does more than apportion political representation.
That is the real reason that Democrats have never wanted a secure border.
Obama deported more people than Trump.
The subject is whether illegals should be counted towards the number of Congressional Representatives each State receives. Stay on topic.That's not what this string is about, PK. Stay on topic.The reason that Democrats control the House, Candy is that the number of Representatives each State gets is based on population totals that include illegals. Why should flooding your State with illegals gain you a political advantage? It does under our present set up.Why should illegals have political representation?
No clue how the court will respond, but it's an easy enough question.
U.S. Supreme Court to hear Trump bid to exclude illegal immigrants from representation
The Census does more than apportion political representation.
That is the real reason that Democrats have never wanted a secure border.
Obama deported more people than Trump.
I'm not the one who brought the subject up. I simply addressed a falsehood.
The subject is whether illegals should be counted towards the number of Congressional Representatives each State receives. Stay on topic.That's not what this string is about, PK. Stay on topic.The reason that Democrats control the House, Candy is that the number of Representatives each State gets is based on population totals that include illegals. Why should flooding your State with illegals gain you a political advantage? It does under our present set up.Why should illegals have political representation?
No clue how the court will respond, but it's an easy enough question.
U.S. Supreme Court to hear Trump bid to exclude illegal immigrants from representation
The Census does more than apportion political representation.
That is the real reason that Democrats have never wanted a secure border.
Obama deported more people than Trump.
I'm not the one who brought the subject up. I simply addressed a falsehood.
It's quite clear you'd like this string to be closed, PK because it's also clear that you don't appear to have an argument why illegals SHOULD be counted when it comes to determining how many Reps each State gets in the House!The subject is whether illegals should be counted towards the number of Congressional Representatives each State receives. Stay on topic.That's not what this string is about, PK. Stay on topic.The reason that Democrats control the House, Candy is that the number of Representatives each State gets is based on population totals that include illegals. Why should flooding your State with illegals gain you a political advantage? It does under our present set up.Why should illegals have political representation?
No clue how the court will respond, but it's an easy enough question.
U.S. Supreme Court to hear Trump bid to exclude illegal immigrants from representation
The Census does more than apportion political representation.
That is the real reason that Democrats have never wanted a secure border.
Obama deported more people than Trump.
I'm not the one who brought the subject up. I simply addressed a falsehood.
That has been clearly covered so mods might as well shut this one down.
It's quite clear you'd like this string to be closed, PK because it's also clear that you don't appear to have an argument why illegals SHOULD be counted when it comes to determining how many Reps each State gets in the House!The subject is whether illegals should be counted towards the number of Congressional Representatives each State receives. Stay on topic.That's not what this string is about, PK. Stay on topic.The reason that Democrats control the House, Candy is that the number of Representatives each State gets is based on population totals that include illegals. Why should flooding your State with illegals gain you a political advantage? It does under our present set up.Why should illegals have political representation?
No clue how the court will respond, but it's an easy enough question.
U.S. Supreme Court to hear Trump bid to exclude illegal immigrants from representation
The Census does more than apportion political representation.
That is the real reason that Democrats have never wanted a secure border.
Obama deported more people than Trump.
I'm not the one who brought the subject up. I simply addressed a falsehood.
That has been clearly covered so mods might as well shut this one down.
Well here's the thing: The Constitution is clear and the census will count every person living in the U.S. The ruling will be either 8-0 or 9-0, depending on whether the Lefties can sabotage Judge Barrett's confirmation.
But notice how the "Right Wing EXTEMISTS" on the Court will vote AGAINST the wishes of the President.
Because the Narrative that Right Wing Justices are simply political tools of Conservative Republicans is a lie.
But you will not see a single article or Op-Ed piece in the NYT, CNN, etc., pointing this out, because the Fact goes against the Narrative, and they will CONTINUE to print stories about how the Conservatives on the court are simply toadies for Republican politicians.
Democrats are evil.
it's relevant if criminals are taking from rightful citizensall jobs unemployed America citizens should be doingWhy should illegals have political representation?
No clue how the court will respond, but it's an easy enough question.
U.S. Supreme Court to hear Trump bid to exclude illegal immigrants from representation
Why? Because that's what the Constitution call for.
The U.S. Constitution empowers the Congress to carry out the census in "such manner as they shall by Law direct" (Article I, Section 2). The Founders of our fledgling nation had a bold and ambitious plan to empower the people over their new government. The plan was to count every person living in the newly created United States of America, and to use that count to determine representation in the Congress.
Census in the Constitution.
A census counter is completely unable to determine who is here legally or not at that. This is just another case where the government tries to blame others for it's failures.
Technically, it calls for the enumeration of "the whole Number of free Persons". At that time of writing there was no immigration law as there was no reason to have any.
Illegal aliens are not "free" but only "free-roaming", no different than a burglar who enters your house.
There is no logic in giving Congressional representation to foreign entities.
People will argue that there were no semi-automatic weapons back then either so banning them is OK.
None of it is OK. Besides, they are not foreign entities. They are people here processing our food. Caring for our children. Taking care of our lawns,
Irrelevant. They have to be paid a legal wage and have taxes paid. Many employers and Wall Street isn't interested in that so it's not going to happen.
ok all non-citizens should be counted 3/5thWell here's the thing: The Constitution is clear and the census will count every person living in the U.S. The ruling will be either 8-0 or 9-0, depending on whether the Lefties can sabotage Judge Barrett's confirmation.
But notice how the "Right Wing EXTEMISTS" on the Court will vote AGAINST the wishes of the President.
Because the Narrative that Right Wing Justices are simply political tools of Conservative Republicans is a lie.
But you will not see a single article or Op-Ed piece in the NYT, CNN, etc., pointing this out, because the Fact goes against the Narrative, and they will CONTINUE to print stories about how the Conservatives on the court are simply toadies for Republican politicians.
Democrats are evil.
Blart he's done many jobs bringing America out of the Obama chaotic and divisive years and keep you snowflakes up at night sleepless and cultishyou're a geniusThe current constitution says count persons....Feel free to amend the Constitution....Why should illegals have political representation?
No clue how the court will respond, but it's an easy enough question.
U.S. Supreme Court to hear Trump bid to exclude illegal immigrants from representation
The Census does more than apportion political representation.
Illegals shouldn't be counted in the census.
Not necessary. Enforce existing law.
If you're talking about deporting people...you blob has had 4 years...he's not done shit on that front either.
Remember how you guys were beating your chests about federal agents driving around scooping up illegals by the bus load?
It never happened.....
..the DUMBASS states like Cali are stopping it...not only do they assist the illegals, they even PAY illegals for -----------------------being illegal!!!!!!!!!! very very stupid
San Francisco to pay $190,000 for sanctuary law violation, lawyer says
A man from El Salvador in the U.S. illegally who sued San Francisco after police turned him over to immigration authorities in violation of the city's sanctuary law is set to be awarded $190,000, his attorney said Thursday.
Your blob just can't get the job done. Time for a change.
Blart you're never right oh wellActually it doesn't do that either. Keep swinging Blart..you're bound to hit a foul ball some day.you are correct it gives tax money to states for the upkeep of those illegal immigrantsWhy should illegals have political representation?
No clue how the court will respond, but it's an easy enough question.
U.S. Supreme Court to hear Trump bid to exclude illegal immigrants from representation
The Census does more than apportion political representation.
