U.S. Supreme Court to hear Trump bid to exclude illegal immigrants from representation

[Oldestyle]

Why should illegals have political representation?

No clue how the court will respond, but it's an easy enough question.

U.S. Supreme Court to hear Trump bid to exclude illegal immigrants from representation

The Census does more than apportion political representation.

The reason that Democrats control the House, Candy is that the number of Representatives each State gets is based on population totals that include illegals. Why should flooding your State with illegals gain you a political advantage? It does under our present set up.

That is the real reason that Democrats have never wanted a secure border.

 

[harmonica]

Why should illegals have political representation?

No clue how the court will respond, but it's an easy enough question.

U.S. Supreme Court to hear Trump bid to exclude illegal immigrants from representation

The Census does more than apportion political representation.

Illegals shouldn't be counted in the census.

Feel free to amend the Constitution....

Not necessary. Enforce existing law.

The current constitution says count persons....
If you're talking about deporting people...you blob has had 4 years...he's not done shit on that front either.

Remember how you guys were beating your chests about federal agents driving around scooping up illegals by the bus load?

It never happened.....

you're a genius
..the DUMBASS states like Cali are stopping it...not only do they assist the illegals, they even PAY illegals for -----------------------being illegal!!!!!!!!!! very very stupid

San Francisco to pay $190,000 for sanctuary law violation, lawyer says

A man from El Salvador in the U.S. illegally who sued San Francisco after police turned him over to immigration authorities in violation of the city's sanctuary law is set to be awarded $190,000, his attorney said Thursday.

www.latimes.com

Your blob just can't get the job done. Time for a change.

..he's the best POTUS in a long time..doing a great job....

 

[pknopp]

Why should illegals have political representation?

No clue how the court will respond, but it's an easy enough question.

U.S. Supreme Court to hear Trump bid to exclude illegal immigrants from representation

The Census does more than apportion political representation.

The reason that Democrats control the House, Candy is that the number of Representatives each State gets is based on population totals that include illegals. Why should flooding your State with illegals gain you a political advantage? It does under our present set up.

That is the real reason that Democrats have never wanted a secure border.

Obama deported more people than Trump.

 

[JGalt]

Why should illegals have political representation?

No clue how the court will respond, but it's an easy enough question.

U.S. Supreme Court to hear Trump bid to exclude illegal immigrants from representation

Why? Because that's what the Constitution call for.

The U.S. Constitution empowers the Congress to carry out the census in "such manner as they shall by Law direct" (Article I, Section 2). The Founders of our fledgling nation had a bold and ambitious plan to empower the people over their new government. The plan was to count every person living in the newly created United States of America, and to use that count to determine representation in the Congress.

Census in the Constitution.

A census counter is completely unable to determine who is here legally or not at that. This is just another case where the government tries to blame others for it's failures.

Technically, it calls for the enumeration of "the whole Number of free Persons". At that time of writing there was no immigration law as there was no reason to have any.

Illegal aliens are not "free" but only "free-roaming", no different than a burglar who enters your house.

There is no logic in giving Congressional representation to foreign entities.

People will argue that there were no semi-automatic weapons back then either so banning them is OK.

None of it is OK. Besides, they are not foreign entities. They are people here processing our food. Caring for our children. Taking care of our lawns,

They are criminals. They broke the law and entered this country illegally.

That's why we call them "illegals."

So? Those employing them are breaking the law also. Should we exclude them also? And if so, how do we go about doing this?

No, those hiring them are American citizens who can vote, and therefore should be counted in the census.

But illegals are criminals, and are not entitled to the full benefits the US Constitution bequeaths on real American citizens.

If illegals weren't criminals and truly were dindu nuffins, they wouldn't be arrested for being criminals, as ICE did yesterday. ICE arrested more than 170 of the criminals in several "sanctuary cities" yesterday.

ICE sweeps through D.C., other sanctuary cities; more than 170 arrests

That's 170 criminals who won't be illegally voting for Joe Biden.

They never were going to, to start with.

Whether or not they were going to try to vote is irrelevant. They're still criminals, and they're still not eligible for political representation or being counted in the census.

Immigration and Customs Enforcement generally doesn't arrest criminals for no reason at all.

 

[pknopp]

Why should illegals have political representation?

No clue how the court will respond, but it's an easy enough question.

U.S. Supreme Court to hear Trump bid to exclude illegal immigrants from representation

Why? Because that's what the Constitution call for.

The U.S. Constitution empowers the Congress to carry out the census in "such manner as they shall by Law direct" (Article I, Section 2). The Founders of our fledgling nation had a bold and ambitious plan to empower the people over their new government. The plan was to count every person living in the newly created United States of America, and to use that count to determine representation in the Congress.

Census in the Constitution.

A census counter is completely unable to determine who is here legally or not at that. This is just another case where the government tries to blame others for it's failures.

Technically, it calls for the enumeration of "the whole Number of free Persons". At that time of writing there was no immigration law as there was no reason to have any.

Illegal aliens are not "free" but only "free-roaming", no different than a burglar who enters your house.

There is no logic in giving Congressional representation to foreign entities.

People will argue that there were no semi-automatic weapons back then either so banning them is OK.

None of it is OK. Besides, they are not foreign entities. They are people here processing our food. Caring for our children. Taking care of our lawns,

They are criminals. They broke the law and entered this country illegally.

That's why we call them "illegals."

So? Those employing them are breaking the law also. Should we exclude them also? And if so, how do we go about doing this?

No, those hiring them are American citizens who can vote, and therefore should be counted in the census.

But illegals are criminals, and are not entitled to the full benefits the US Constitution bequeaths on real American citizens.

If illegals weren't criminals and truly were dindu nuffins, they wouldn't be arrested for being criminals, as ICE did yesterday. ICE arrested more than 170 of the criminals in several "sanctuary cities" yesterday.

ICE sweeps through D.C., other sanctuary cities; more than 170 arrests

That's 170 criminals who won't be illegally voting for Joe Biden.

They never were going to, to start with.

Whether or not they were going to try to vote is irrelevant. They're still criminals.

Immigration and Customs Enforcement generally doesn't arrest criminals for no reason at all.

So why lie about them voting? Only a very, very small number get arrested.

 

[JGalt]

Why should illegals have political representation?

No clue how the court will respond, but it's an easy enough question.

U.S. Supreme Court to hear Trump bid to exclude illegal immigrants from representation

Why? Because that's what the Constitution call for.

The U.S. Constitution empowers the Congress to carry out the census in "such manner as they shall by Law direct" (Article I, Section 2). The Founders of our fledgling nation had a bold and ambitious plan to empower the people over their new government. The plan was to count every person living in the newly created United States of America, and to use that count to determine representation in the Congress.

Census in the Constitution.

A census counter is completely unable to determine who is here legally or not at that. This is just another case where the government tries to blame others for it's failures.

Technically, it calls for the enumeration of "the whole Number of free Persons". At that time of writing there was no immigration law as there was no reason to have any.

Illegal aliens are not "free" but only "free-roaming", no different than a burglar who enters your house.

There is no logic in giving Congressional representation to foreign entities.

People will argue that there were no semi-automatic weapons back then either so banning them is OK.

None of it is OK. Besides, they are not foreign entities. They are people here processing our food. Caring for our children. Taking care of our lawns,

They are criminals. They broke the law and entered this country illegally.

That's why we call them "illegals."

So? Those employing them are breaking the law also. Should we exclude them also? And if so, how do we go about doing this?

No, those hiring them are American citizens who can vote, and therefore should be counted in the census.

But illegals are criminals, and are not entitled to the full benefits the US Constitution bequeaths on real American citizens.

If illegals weren't criminals and truly were dindu nuffins, they wouldn't be arrested for being criminals, as ICE did yesterday. ICE arrested more than 170 of the criminals in several "sanctuary cities" yesterday.

ICE sweeps through D.C., other sanctuary cities; more than 170 arrests

That's 170 criminals who won't be illegally voting for Joe Biden.

They never were going to, to start with.

Whether or not they were going to try to vote is irrelevant. They're still criminals.

Immigration and Customs Enforcement generally doesn't arrest criminals for no reason at all.

So why lie about them voting? Only a very, very small number get arrested.

Doesn't matter. They're still criminals and should not be counted in the census.

ICE should also arrest and deport more of them.

 

[pknopp]

Why should illegals have political representation?

No clue how the court will respond, but it's an easy enough question.

U.S. Supreme Court to hear Trump bid to exclude illegal immigrants from representation

Why? Because that's what the Constitution call for.

The U.S. Constitution empowers the Congress to carry out the census in "such manner as they shall by Law direct" (Article I, Section 2). The Founders of our fledgling nation had a bold and ambitious plan to empower the people over their new government. The plan was to count every person living in the newly created United States of America, and to use that count to determine representation in the Congress.

Census in the Constitution.

A census counter is completely unable to determine who is here legally or not at that. This is just another case where the government tries to blame others for it's failures.

Technically, it calls for the enumeration of "the whole Number of free Persons". At that time of writing there was no immigration law as there was no reason to have any.

Illegal aliens are not "free" but only "free-roaming", no different than a burglar who enters your house.

There is no logic in giving Congressional representation to foreign entities.

People will argue that there were no semi-automatic weapons back then either so banning them is OK.

None of it is OK. Besides, they are not foreign entities. They are people here processing our food. Caring for our children. Taking care of our lawns,

They are criminals. They broke the law and entered this country illegally.

That's why we call them "illegals."

So? Those employing them are breaking the law also. Should we exclude them also? And if so, how do we go about doing this?

No, those hiring them are American citizens who can vote, and therefore should be counted in the census.

But illegals are criminals, and are not entitled to the full benefits the US Constitution bequeaths on real American citizens.

If illegals weren't criminals and truly were dindu nuffins, they wouldn't be arrested for being criminals, as ICE did yesterday. ICE arrested more than 170 of the criminals in several "sanctuary cities" yesterday.

ICE sweeps through D.C., other sanctuary cities; more than 170 arrests

That's 170 criminals who won't be illegally voting for Joe Biden.

They never were going to, to start with.

Whether or not they were going to try to vote is irrelevant. They're still criminals.

Immigration and Customs Enforcement generally doesn't arrest criminals for no reason at all.

So why lie about them voting? Only a very, very small number get arrested.

Doesn't matter. They're still criminals and should not be counted in the census.

ICE should also arrest and deport more of them.

Wash, rinse and repeat. This same argument will be made for years. Doesn't it get old?

 

[Correll]

Why should illegals have political representation?

No clue how the court will respond, but it's an easy enough question.

U.S. Supreme Court to hear Trump bid to exclude illegal immigrants from representation

The Census does more than apportion political representation.

They are citizens of a foreign nation, and political representation is the primary purpose.

 

[Oldestyle]

Why should illegals have political representation?

No clue how the court will respond, but it's an easy enough question.

U.S. Supreme Court to hear Trump bid to exclude illegal immigrants from representation

The Census does more than apportion political representation.

The reason that Democrats control the House, Candy is that the number of Representatives each State gets is based on population totals that include illegals. Why should flooding your State with illegals gain you a political advantage? It does under our present set up.

That is the real reason that Democrats have never wanted a secure border.

Obama deported more people than Trump.

That's not what this string is about, PK. Stay on topic.

 

[pknopp]

Why should illegals have political representation?

No clue how the court will respond, but it's an easy enough question.

U.S. Supreme Court to hear Trump bid to exclude illegal immigrants from representation

The Census does more than apportion political representation.

The reason that Democrats control the House, Candy is that the number of Representatives each State gets is based on population totals that include illegals. Why should flooding your State with illegals gain you a political advantage? It does under our present set up.

That is the real reason that Democrats have never wanted a secure border.

Obama deported more people than Trump.

That's not what this string is about, PK. Stay on topic.

I'm not the one who brought the subject up. I simply addressed a falsehood.

 

[Oldestyle]

Why should illegals have political representation?

No clue how the court will respond, but it's an easy enough question.

U.S. Supreme Court to hear Trump bid to exclude illegal immigrants from representation

The Census does more than apportion political representation.

The reason that Democrats control the House, Candy is that the number of Representatives each State gets is based on population totals that include illegals. Why should flooding your State with illegals gain you a political advantage? It does under our present set up.

That is the real reason that Democrats have never wanted a secure border.

Obama deported more people than Trump.

That's not what this string is about, PK. Stay on topic.

I'm not the one who brought the subject up. I simply addressed a falsehood.

The subject is whether illegals should be counted towards the number of Congressional Representatives each State receives. Stay on topic.

 

[pknopp]

Why should illegals have political representation?

No clue how the court will respond, but it's an easy enough question.

U.S. Supreme Court to hear Trump bid to exclude illegal immigrants from representation

The Census does more than apportion political representation.

The reason that Democrats control the House, Candy is that the number of Representatives each State gets is based on population totals that include illegals. Why should flooding your State with illegals gain you a political advantage? It does under our present set up.

That is the real reason that Democrats have never wanted a secure border.

Obama deported more people than Trump.

That's not what this string is about, PK. Stay on topic.

I'm not the one who brought the subject up. I simply addressed a falsehood.

The subject is whether illegals should be counted towards the number of Congressional Representatives each State receives. Stay on topic.

That has been clearly covered so mods might as well shut this one down.

 

[Oldestyle]

Why should illegals have political representation?

No clue how the court will respond, but it's an easy enough question.

U.S. Supreme Court to hear Trump bid to exclude illegal immigrants from representation

The Census does more than apportion political representation.

The reason that Democrats control the House, Candy is that the number of Representatives each State gets is based on population totals that include illegals. Why should flooding your State with illegals gain you a political advantage? It does under our present set up.

That is the real reason that Democrats have never wanted a secure border.

Obama deported more people than Trump.

That's not what this string is about, PK. Stay on topic.

I'm not the one who brought the subject up. I simply addressed a falsehood.

The subject is whether illegals should be counted towards the number of Congressional Representatives each State receives. Stay on topic.

That has been clearly covered so mods might as well shut this one down.

It's quite clear you'd like this string to be closed, PK because it's also clear that you don't appear to have an argument why illegals SHOULD be counted when it comes to determining how many Reps each State gets in the House!

 

[pknopp]

Why should illegals have political representation?

No clue how the court will respond, but it's an easy enough question.

U.S. Supreme Court to hear Trump bid to exclude illegal immigrants from representation

The Census does more than apportion political representation.

The reason that Democrats control the House, Candy is that the number of Representatives each State gets is based on population totals that include illegals. Why should flooding your State with illegals gain you a political advantage? It does under our present set up.

That is the real reason that Democrats have never wanted a secure border.

Obama deported more people than Trump.

That's not what this string is about, PK. Stay on topic.

I'm not the one who brought the subject up. I simply addressed a falsehood.

The subject is whether illegals should be counted towards the number of Congressional Representatives each State receives. Stay on topic.

That has been clearly covered so mods might as well shut this one down.

It's quite clear you'd like this string to be closed, PK because it's also clear that you don't appear to have an argument why illegals SHOULD be counted when it comes to determining how many Reps each State gets in the House!

They should be counted as that is what the Constitution call for. End of story. If you disagree the founders provided and avenue for that also.

 

[DGS49]

Well here's the thing: The Constitution is clear and the census will count every person living in the U.S. The ruling will be either 8-0 or 9-0, depending on whether the Lefties can sabotage Judge Barrett's confirmation.

But notice how the "Right Wing EXTEMISTS" on the Court will vote AGAINST the wishes of the President.

Because the Narrative that Right Wing Justices are simply political tools of Conservative Republicans is a lie.

But you will not see a single article or Op-Ed piece in the NYT, CNN, etc., pointing this out, because the Fact goes against the Narrative, and they will CONTINUE to print stories about how the Conservatives on the court are simply toadies for Republican politicians.

Democrats are evil.

 

[pknopp]

Well here's the thing: The Constitution is clear and the census will count every person living in the U.S. The ruling will be either 8-0 or 9-0, depending on whether the Lefties can sabotage Judge Barrett's confirmation.

But notice how the "Right Wing EXTEMISTS" on the Court will vote AGAINST the wishes of the President.

Because the Narrative that Right Wing Justices are simply political tools of Conservative Republicans is a lie.

But you will not see a single article or Op-Ed piece in the NYT, CNN, etc., pointing this out, because the Fact goes against the Narrative, and they will CONTINUE to print stories about how the Conservatives on the court are simply toadies for Republican politicians.

Democrats are evil.

You note that the Constitution is clear (and it is) but it is those who are arguing for upholding the Constitution that are evil and not those who simply want to toss it aside?

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Why should illegals have political representation?

No clue how the court will respond, but it's an easy enough question.

U.S. Supreme Court to hear Trump bid to exclude illegal immigrants from representation

Why? Because that's what the Constitution call for.

The U.S. Constitution empowers the Congress to carry out the census in "such manner as they shall by Law direct" (Article I, Section 2). The Founders of our fledgling nation had a bold and ambitious plan to empower the people over their new government. The plan was to count every person living in the newly created United States of America, and to use that count to determine representation in the Congress.

Census in the Constitution.

A census counter is completely unable to determine who is here legally or not at that. This is just another case where the government tries to blame others for it's failures.

Technically, it calls for the enumeration of "the whole Number of free Persons". At that time of writing there was no immigration law as there was no reason to have any.

Illegal aliens are not "free" but only "free-roaming", no different than a burglar who enters your house.

There is no logic in giving Congressional representation to foreign entities.

People will argue that there were no semi-automatic weapons back then either so banning them is OK.

None of it is OK. Besides, they are not foreign entities. They are people here processing our food. Caring for our children. Taking care of our lawns,

all jobs unemployed America citizens should be doing

Irrelevant. They have to be paid a legal wage and have taxes paid. Many employers and Wall Street isn't interested in that so it's not going to happen.

it's relevant if criminals are taking from rightful citizens

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Well here's the thing: The Constitution is clear and the census will count every person living in the U.S. The ruling will be either 8-0 or 9-0, depending on whether the Lefties can sabotage Judge Barrett's confirmation.

But notice how the "Right Wing EXTEMISTS" on the Court will vote AGAINST the wishes of the President.

Because the Narrative that Right Wing Justices are simply political tools of Conservative Republicans is a lie.

But you will not see a single article or Op-Ed piece in the NYT, CNN, etc., pointing this out, because the Fact goes against the Narrative, and they will CONTINUE to print stories about how the Conservatives on the court are simply toadies for Republican politicians.

Democrats are evil.

ok all non-citizens should be counted 3/5th

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Why should illegals have political representation?

No clue how the court will respond, but it's an easy enough question.

U.S. Supreme Court to hear Trump bid to exclude illegal immigrants from representation

The Census does more than apportion political representation.

Illegals shouldn't be counted in the census.

Feel free to amend the Constitution....

Not necessary. Enforce existing law.

The current constitution says count persons....
If you're talking about deporting people...you blob has had 4 years...he's not done shit on that front either.

Remember how you guys were beating your chests about federal agents driving around scooping up illegals by the bus load?

It never happened.....

you're a genius
..the DUMBASS states like Cali are stopping it...not only do they assist the illegals, they even PAY illegals for -----------------------being illegal!!!!!!!!!! very very stupid

San Francisco to pay $190,000 for sanctuary law violation, lawyer says

A man from El Salvador in the U.S. illegally who sued San Francisco after police turned him over to immigration authorities in violation of the city's sanctuary law is set to be awarded $190,000, his attorney said Thursday.

www.latimes.com

Your blob just can't get the job done. Time for a change.

Blart he's done many jobs bringing America out of the Obama chaotic and divisive years and keep you snowflakes up at night sleepless and cultish

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Why should illegals have political representation?

No clue how the court will respond, but it's an easy enough question.

U.S. Supreme Court to hear Trump bid to exclude illegal immigrants from representation

The Census does more than apportion political representation.

you are correct it gives tax money to states for the upkeep of those illegal immigrants

Actually it doesn't do that either. Keep swinging Blart..you're bound to hit a foul ball some day.

Blart you're never right oh well