Little-Acorn
Gold Member
Yes, we've had wonderful, sparkling news that the U.S. and Iran are near to a settlement in their talks about Iran's attempts to build an atomic Bomb.
And why wouldn't Iran be satisfied with the deal? It lets them build the Bomb they've wanted all along after ten years.
Basically, the Obama administration has surrendered. Iran will now get The Bomb.
The only difference between this outcome, and handing matches to a child in a powder magazine, is that (a) the child can only blow up a block or two, and (b) the child has never declared his intention of destroying his neighbors.
--------------------------------------------------
U.S. Caves to Key Iranian Demands as Nuke Deal Comes Together Washington Free Beacon
U.S. Caves to Key Iranian Demands as Nuke Deal Comes Together
Limited options for Congress as Obama seeks to bypass lawmakers
BY: Adam Kredo
March 26, 2015 2:00 pm
LAUSSANE, SwitzerlandāThe Obama administration is giving in to Iranian demands about the scope of its nuclear program as negotiators work to finalize a framework agreement in the coming days, according to sources familiar with the administrationās position in the negotiations.
U.S. negotiators are said to have given up ground on demands that Iran be forced to disclose the full range of its nuclear activities at the outset of a nuclear deal, a concession experts say would gut the verification the Obama administration has vowed would stand as the crux of a deal with Iran.
Until recently, the Obama administration had maintained that it would guarantee oversight on Tehranās program well into the future, and that it would take the necessary steps to ensure that oversight would be effective. The issue has now emerged as a key sticking point in the talks.
Concern from sources familiar with U.S. concessions in the talks comes amid reports that Iran could be permitted to continue running nuclear centrifuges at an underground site once suspected of housing illicit activities.
This type of concession would allow Iran to continue work related to its nuclear weapons program, even under the eye of international inspectors. If Iran removes inspectorsāas it has in the pastāit would be left with a nuclear infrastructure immune from a strike by Western forces.
āOnce again, in the face of Iranās intransigence, the U.S. is leading an effort to cave even more toward Iranāthis time by whitewashing Tehranās decades of lying about nuclear weapons work and current lack of cooperation with the [International Atomic Energy Agency],ā said one Western source briefed on the talks but who was not permitted to speak on record.
With the White House pressing to finalize a deal, U.S. diplomats have moved further away from their demands that Iran be subjected to oversight over its nuclear infrastructure.
āInstead of ensuring that Iran answers all the outstanding questions about the past and current military dimensions of their nuclear work in order to obtain sanctions relief, the U.S. is now revising down what they need to do,ā said the source. āThat is a terrible mistakeāif we donāt have a baseline to judge their past work, we canāt tell if they are cheating in the future, and if they wonāt answer now, before getting rewarded, why would they come clean in the future?ā
The United States is now willing to let Iran keep many of its most controversial military sites closed to inspectors until international sanctions pressure has been lifted, according to sources.
This scenario has been criticized by nuclear experts, including David Albright, founder and president of the Institute for Science and International Security.
And why wouldn't Iran be satisfied with the deal? It lets them build the Bomb they've wanted all along after ten years.
Basically, the Obama administration has surrendered. Iran will now get The Bomb.
The only difference between this outcome, and handing matches to a child in a powder magazine, is that (a) the child can only blow up a block or two, and (b) the child has never declared his intention of destroying his neighbors.
--------------------------------------------------
U.S. Caves to Key Iranian Demands as Nuke Deal Comes Together Washington Free Beacon
U.S. Caves to Key Iranian Demands as Nuke Deal Comes Together
Limited options for Congress as Obama seeks to bypass lawmakers
BY: Adam Kredo
March 26, 2015 2:00 pm
LAUSSANE, SwitzerlandāThe Obama administration is giving in to Iranian demands about the scope of its nuclear program as negotiators work to finalize a framework agreement in the coming days, according to sources familiar with the administrationās position in the negotiations.
U.S. negotiators are said to have given up ground on demands that Iran be forced to disclose the full range of its nuclear activities at the outset of a nuclear deal, a concession experts say would gut the verification the Obama administration has vowed would stand as the crux of a deal with Iran.
Until recently, the Obama administration had maintained that it would guarantee oversight on Tehranās program well into the future, and that it would take the necessary steps to ensure that oversight would be effective. The issue has now emerged as a key sticking point in the talks.
Concern from sources familiar with U.S. concessions in the talks comes amid reports that Iran could be permitted to continue running nuclear centrifuges at an underground site once suspected of housing illicit activities.
This type of concession would allow Iran to continue work related to its nuclear weapons program, even under the eye of international inspectors. If Iran removes inspectorsāas it has in the pastāit would be left with a nuclear infrastructure immune from a strike by Western forces.
āOnce again, in the face of Iranās intransigence, the U.S. is leading an effort to cave even more toward Iranāthis time by whitewashing Tehranās decades of lying about nuclear weapons work and current lack of cooperation with the [International Atomic Energy Agency],ā said one Western source briefed on the talks but who was not permitted to speak on record.
With the White House pressing to finalize a deal, U.S. diplomats have moved further away from their demands that Iran be subjected to oversight over its nuclear infrastructure.
āInstead of ensuring that Iran answers all the outstanding questions about the past and current military dimensions of their nuclear work in order to obtain sanctions relief, the U.S. is now revising down what they need to do,ā said the source. āThat is a terrible mistakeāif we donāt have a baseline to judge their past work, we canāt tell if they are cheating in the future, and if they wonāt answer now, before getting rewarded, why would they come clean in the future?ā
The United States is now willing to let Iran keep many of its most controversial military sites closed to inspectors until international sanctions pressure has been lifted, according to sources.
This scenario has been criticized by nuclear experts, including David Albright, founder and president of the Institute for Science and International Security.
