Two More Arguments To Dispense With.

[PoliticalChic]

Deeply sorry to have ended that sentence with a preposition.


1. "Ilhan Omar advocates for a foreign policy centered on diplomacy and human rights rather than military force, emphasizing the need to end endless wars and reduce military spending. She believes that prioritizing diplomatic solutions can lead to a more peaceful and just global engagement." AI

After accepting the Nobel Peace Prize, Obama bombed more countries than any President since WWII
“U.S. Bombed Iraq, Syria, Pakistan, Afghanistan, Libya, Yemen, Somalia in 2016”
The U.S. dropped an average of 3 bombs per hour last year
The U.S. dropped an average of 3 bombs per hour last year


Flashback: Pelosi Said Obama Did Not Need Authorization to Attack Libya
Flashback: Pelosi Said Obama Did Not Need Authorization to Attack Libya




2. A prominent theme in the post of many of the usual suspects, anti-American, anti-Trump, is that the Iranians never intended nor had any nuclear weapon intentions. Bad man Trump bombed them for no reason!

Well, then it's a win-win. If you are right about the peaceful intentions of the 7th century fanatics, then they didn't lose anything.

If Trump was right, the world is saved from another North Korea.

 

[ThisIsMe]

Deeply sorry to have ended that sentence with a preposition.

Thats ok, at least it wasn't a dangling participle...those are embarrassing.....

 

[Donald H]

After accepting the Nobel Peace Prize, Obama bombed more countries than any President since WWII
“U.S. Bombed Iraq, Syria, Pakistan, Afghanistan, Libya, Yemen, Somalia in 2016”
The U.S. dropped an average of 3 bombs per hour last year

We might conclude from that that America fixed it for Obama?

 

[elektra]

A shame you cant creat a thread where the title tells us what you are talking about

Your title states two arguments to dispense with. If you present those arguments they are not articulated very well. They are obscured not clearly stated at all.

Two arguments as a title, what are those arguments?

Carry on, I think you are too obtuse to articulate the two arguments into to concise points.

Next time, give your thread a title that reflects what you talk about. Those of us not in your fan base like to see a title that reflects your opinion.

Shitty title, poor opening. Can you state the two arguments in two sentences then articulate your opinion on those two arguments.

 

[PoliticalChic]

We might conclude from that that America fixed it for Obama?

Let's check

1. Obama guaranteed nuclear weapons to Iran
2.Obama sent a pallet of $400 million cash to Iran
3. Obama freed up $900 million more for Iran


Gee, looks like you finally got one right.

 

[PoliticalChic]

A shame you cant creat a thread where the title tells us what you are talking about

Your title states two arguments to dispense with. If you present those arguments they are not articulated very well. They are obscured not clearly stated at all.

Two arguments as a title, what are those arguments?

Carry on, I think you are too obtuse to articulate the two arguments into to concise points.

Next time, give your thread a title that reflects what you talk about. Those of us not in your fan base like to see a title that reflects your opinion.

Shitty title, poor opening. Can you state the two arguments in two sentences then articulate your opinion on those two arguments.

A pity you are so limited in ability that you can't ascertain what others had no trouble with. There's that preposition again.

Are you a government school grad?


Can I politely suggest that you avoid my threads as they clearly embarrass you.

Or, aim for more education, and you will fit right in.

Best of luck on your recovery.

 

[elektra]

A pity you are so limited in ability that you can's ascertain what others had no trouble with.

Are you a government school grad?

A pity that instead of taking constructive criticism you get your butt hurt and then flame and troll one of the first posts in your thread

You certainly graduated nowhere near the top of your class.

I challenged you to articulate your two arguments in two concise sentences. You cant do it.

I could speculate why you do not have the intelligence too but I can already see you got your ego hurt over your lack of a proper title and concise points to discuss

 

[BackAgain]

Thats ok, at least it wasn't a dangling participle...those are embarrassing.....

She is a bit like Winston Churchill who once noted that the rule of grammar was one of those “rules up with which I shall not put.”

That aside, a good OP.

 

[IM2]

Let's check

1. Obama guaranteed nuclear weapons to Iran
2.Obama sent a pallet of $400 million cash to Iran
3. Obama freed up $900 million more for Iran


Gee, looks like you finally got one right.

3 more lies.

 

[elektra]

Thats ok, at least it wasn't a dangling participle...those are embarrassing.....

Is the improper use of the ellipses embarrassing?

 

[Donald H]

Let's check

1. Obama guaranteed nuclear weapons to Iran
2.Obama sent a pallet of $400 million cash to Iran
3. Obama freed up $900 million more for Iran


Gee, looks like you finally got one right.

I got #2 and #3 right!

I would need more information on #1. It appears that's a guarantee that Obama didn't fulfill.

(be civil and to the point of the question on #1, or we won't be able to discuss it together.)

 

[PoliticalChic]

A pity that instead of taking constructive criticism you get your butt hurt and then flame and troll one of the first posts in your thread

You certainly graduated nowhere near the top of your class.

I challenged you to articulate your two arguments in two concise sentences. You cant do it.

I could speculate why you do not have the intelligence too but I can already see you got your ego hurt over your lack of a proper title and concise points to discuss

You've already been put in your place.....there is no reason to be back.

I've offered you two constructive options......stop subscribing to my threads, or drop the jealousy and aim for more education.......that I provide.

 

[PoliticalChic]

3 more lies.

What I posted is easily documented.

Why would you resort to a post that makes you look so bad????


Is it the skin color thing and you feel the need to lick Obama's boots?

Grow the heck up: you are more than melanin.

 

[PoliticalChic]

I got #2 and #3 right!

I would need more information on #1. It appears that's a guarantee that Obama didn't fulfill.

(be civil and to the point of the question on #1, or we won't be able to discuss it together.)

I didn't say he fulfilled it, merely that he did his best to guarantee it.




1. As the adage goes, "realitly is defined by actions, not words."
If you check, Obama himself said that Iran would never be allowed nuclear weapons. Then he guaranteed them nuclear weapons.


2. To make sure they could enrich uranium and build inter-continental missiles, Obama gave them a deal with no inspections.
AI Overview
According to the
Bipartisan Policy Center: "Iran Deal Limits Inspectors' Access to Suspicious Sites". The Bipartisan Policy Center notes that the timeline for IAEA access to suspicious sites in Iran is 54 days, not the commonly reported 24 days.


3. A bit late, but ask yourself now, since Trump removed any pressure, why the world's worst state sponsor of terrorism should be given.....guaranteeded.....nuclear weaponss?


4.And as far as the otherr great enemy of America, the second biggest loser is China, who bought a million barrels of Iran's oil. And China need oil.


5. And the third loser? The war put on display the difference between Russian military equipment, and air defenses, and America's military equipment.




Did you vote for Iran and the Democrats??? That make you the really biggest loser.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Which of these represents the presidency of the United States...


a. One who takes actions against a nation that has revealed the intentions to destroy America....

or


b. this:

 

[BackAgain]

3 more lies.

Yours.

 

[Donald H]

I didn't say he fulfilled it,

So we can agree on that.

merely that he did his best to guarantee it.

And failed to guarantee anything, so we agree on that too.

We've never really disagreed on anything concerning the evil of any US president!

We may disagree on Iran establishing military superiority over the Zionist regime, but that's best left to pending future developments. For now all I can say is that America intended to stop the war to limit damage to the Z regime. It's being suggested that's 1/2 a trillion $$.

 

[Donald H]

In the final analysis, the job is left undone on eliminating Iran from the list of tasks assigned by the PNAC agenda.

It's feared by some that this war is the last best chance to complete the task.

 

[Doc7505]

Let's check

1. Obama guaranteed nuclear weapons to Iran
2.Obama sent a pallet of $400 million cash to Iran
3. Obama freed up $900 million more for Iran


Gee, looks like you finally got one right.

~~~~~~
Indeed! Barry Soetoro gave the Ayatollah more than $1.7 billion in cash and Joey B surpassed Barry donation to nuclear war...

Read more:

US payment of $1.7 billion to Iran made entirely in cash

The Obama administration is acknowledging its transfer of $1.7 billion to Iran earlier this year was made entirely in cash, using non-U.S. currency.

apnews.com

xxxxxxxxxx​

Biden’s $90 Billion Bailout to Tehran

Rejoining the Iran deal could undo years of progress in the Middle East.

foreignpolicy.com

 

[ThisIsMe]

Is the improper use of the ellipses embarrassing?

No, that is completely acceptable....