Two More Arguments To Dispense With.

[RhodyPatriot]

A shame you cant creat a thread where the title tells us what you are talking about

Your title states two arguments to dispense with. If you present those arguments they are not articulated very well. They are obscured not clearly stated at all.

Two arguments as a title, what are those arguments?

Carry on, I think you are too obtuse to articulate the two arguments into to concise points.

Next time, give your thread a title that reflects what you talk about. Those of us not in your fan base like to see a title that reflects your opinion.

Shitty title, poor opening. Can you state the two arguments in two sentences then articulate your opinion on those two arguments.

Is this a reunion with PolitcalChic's grade school teacher?

You were always so disappointed...

 

[RhodyPatriot]

Yours.

PPPSSSSTTTT.

IM2 isn't really black.

 

[BackAgain]

PPPSSSSTTTT.

IM2 isn't really black.

I saw his book-jacket photo. I am pretty sure he is a person of color.

Unless he used a stand-in.

 

[RhodyPatriot]

I saw his book-jacket photo. I am pretty sure he is a person of color.

Unless he used a stand-in.

Book-jacket photo?

 

[PoliticalChic]

Book-jacket photo?

strait jacket photo.

 

[BackAgain]

Book-jacket photo?

He was semi doxxed here some time back.

I am far too lazy to go look it back up.

 

[RhodyPatriot]

He was semi doxxed here some time back.

I am far too lazy to go look it back up.

Weird.

 

[elektra]

No, that is completely acceptable....

No, it is improper use. Look it up

 

[ThisIsMe]

No, it is improper use. Look it up

I like em, so I'll keep using em!.....

 

[badbob85037]

Deeply sorry to have ended that sentence with a preposition.


1. "Ilhan Omar advocates for a foreign policy centered on diplomacy and human rights rather than military force, emphasizing the need to end endless wars and reduce military spending. She believes that prioritizing diplomatic solutions can lead to a more peaceful and just global engagement." AI

After accepting the Nobel Peace Prize, Obama bombed more countries than any President since WWII
“U.S. Bombed Iraq, Syria, Pakistan, Afghanistan, Libya, Yemen, Somalia in 2016”
The U.S. dropped an average of 3 bombs per hour last year
The U.S. dropped an average of 3 bombs per hour last year


Flashback: Pelosi Said Obama Did Not Need Authorization to Attack Libya
Flashback: Pelosi Said Obama Did Not Need Authorization to Attack Libya




2. A prominent theme in the post of many of the usual suspects, anti-American, anti-Trump, is that the Iranians never intended nor had any nuclear weapon intentions. Bad man Trump bombed them for no reason!

Well, then it's a win-win. If you are right about the peaceful intentions of the 7th century fanatics, then they didn't lose anything.

If Trump was right, the world is saved from another North Korea.

30,000 were killed as obama bombed Libya "to protect the people". A country whose prisons were full of terrorist were emptied after the bombings. The people paid next to nothing at the gas pumps and were freer than all other Muslim nations. Hillary cackler like a hen with a 12 inch rooster as Libya leader was beat, stabbed, and shot to death in the street. In victory the flags of Al Quada flew in the cities. It's called genocide just like the over 600 Mexican and American people obama's shipment of arms murdered. It makes me wonder how he sleeps at night.

 

[luiza]

2. A prominent theme in the post of many of the usual suspects, anti-American, anti-Trump, is that the Iranians never intended nor had any nuclear weapon intentions. Bad man Trump bombed them for no reason!

Well, then it's a win-win. If you are right about the peaceful intentions of the 7th century fanatics, then they didn't lose anything.

If Trump was right, the world is saved from another North Korea.

The assertion is that
If something might or could be true, it is reasonable to act as though it is true .

You got that one wrong .
It's a perfect Non QED

Ironically it is the apparent basis for all US offensive military thinking .

Look where that has got them .
The most ridiculed and despised nation on earth , along with Israel HQ .

 

[PoliticalChic]

30,000 were killed as obama bombed Libya "to protect the people". A country whose prisons were full of terrorist were emptied after the bombings. The people paid next to nothing at the gas pumps and were freer than all other Muslim nations. Hillary cackler like a hen with a 12 inch rooster as Libya leader was beat, stabbed, and shot to death in the street. In victory the flags of Al Quada flew in the cities. It's called genocide just like the over 600 Mexican and American people obama's shipment of arms murdered. It makes me wonder how he sleeps at night.

After accepting the Nobel Peace Prize, Obama bombed more countries than any President since WWII
“U.S. Bombed Iraq, Syria, Pakistan, Afghanistan, Libya, Yemen, Somalia in 2016”
The U.S. dropped an average of 3 bombs per hour last year

 

[PoliticalChic]

The assertion is that
If something might or could be true, it is reasonable to act as though it is true .

You got that one wrong .
It's a perfect Non QED

Ironically it is the apparent basis for all US offensive military thinking .

Look where that has got them .
The most ridiculed and despised nation on earth , along with Israel HQ .

1. "Ilhan Omar advocates for a foreign policy centered on diplomacy and human rights rather than military force, emphasizing the need to end endless wars and reduce military spending. She believes that prioritizing diplomatic solutions can lead to a more peaceful and just global engagement." AI

After accepting the Nobel Peace Prize, Obama bombed more countries than any President since WWII
“U.S. Bombed Iraq, Syria, Pakistan, Afghanistan, Libya, Yemen, Somalia in 2016”
The U.S. dropped an average of 3 bombs per hour last year
The U.S. dropped an average of 3 bombs per hour last year


Flashback: Pelosi Said Obama Did Not Need Authorization to Attack Libya
Flashback: Pelosi Said Obama Did Not Need Authorization to Attack Libya




2. A prominent theme in the post of many of the usual suspects, anti-American, anti-Trump, is that the Iranians never intended nor had any nuclear weapon intentions. Bad man Trump bombed them for no reason!

Well, then it's a win-win. If you are right about the peaceful intentions of the 7th century fanatics, then they didn't lose anything.

If Trump was right, the world is saved from another North Korea.

 

[toobfreak]

Deeply sorry to have ended that sentence with a preposition.

Why? Ending with a preposition has been acceptable english for 100 years.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Why? Ending with a preposition has been acceptable english for 100 years.

The reference was to Churchill.


AI Overview

The phrase "up with which I shall not put" is a witty retort attributed to Winston Churchill. It is a response to criticism about ending a sentence with a preposition, specifically "put." The full quote, often cited as, "This is the type of arrant pedantry up with which I will not put," is a clever way of mocking those who insist on strict grammatical rules that can lead to awkward phrasing.