Twitter Attacks Lawyer Representing American Patriot, Kyle Rittenhouse

[freyasman]

One can't claim self defense when they cause the problem

Caused what problem

murder

Nobody was murdered in any of those videos.

 

[daveman]

You neglect to include that the person who shot those 2 criminals was also breaking WI gun laws so he was also a criminal.

nope, still wrong blue

Lawyer: Kyle Rittenhouse Had Firearm in Wisconsin Legally

The 17-year-old charged for his role in a shooting in Kenosha, Wisconsin was carrying a legal firearm at the time, his attorney said in an interview.

www.mediaite.com

Wisconsin statute prohibits children younger than 14 from “possession of control” of “any firearm” unless they are accompanied by an adult aged 18 or older who has been designated by a parent or guardian. The state’s regulations governing those aged 15 and older vary widely depending on the type of gun being used and on whether the user is engaged in activity defined as hunting or training.

It was ILLEGAL for him to carry that rifle in public.

You neglect to include that the person who shot those 2 criminals was also breaking WI gun laws so he was also a criminal.

nope, still wrong blue

Lawyer: Kyle Rittenhouse Had Firearm in Wisconsin Legally

The 17-year-old charged for his role in a shooting in Kenosha, Wisconsin was carrying a legal firearm at the time, his attorney said in an interview.

www.mediaite.com

Wisconsin statute prohibits children younger than 14 from “possession of control” of “any firearm” unless they are accompanied by an adult aged 18 or older who has been designated by a parent or guardian. The state’s regulations governing those aged 15 and older vary widely depending on the type of gun being used and on whether the user is engaged in activity defined as hunting or training.

Wisconsin Open Carry

Wisconsin Open Carry

www.usacarry.com

The minimum age to open carry in Wisconsin is 18.

There is a difference between possessing (owning) a rifle and carrying it in public.

WI gun laws on open carry state one must be 18 to open carry a rifle and 21 to carry a handgun

OK so he gets a little misdemeanor,,,at least hes still alive to tell the story,,,

He shouldn't have been there at all.

He was committing a criminal act and during that commission of a crime he killed 2 people.

Tell me if a person breaks into your house and shoots you and your wife can he claim it was self defense?

say that 3 times really fast and it still wont be true,,,

he basically ran a stop sign and killed 2 people that were trying to kill him,,, doesnt mean he murdered anyone,,,

I never said he murdered anyone.

I said he killed 2 people while he himself was committing a crime

but you left out the part where those two were trying to kill him,,,

Were they?

Or were they just going to rough him up?

It was Rittenhouse's action of breaking the law that put him in the middle of the riots.

Everything that proceeded from the instant he decided to break the law is ultimately Rittenhouse's own fault.

"It was that woman's fault she got raped. Did you see the way she was dressed?"

That's exactly what you're saying.

 

[Coyote]

You neglect to include that the person who shot those 2 criminals was also breaking WI gun laws so he was also a criminal.

nope, still wrong blue

Lawyer: Kyle Rittenhouse Had Firearm in Wisconsin Legally

The 17-year-old charged for his role in a shooting in Kenosha, Wisconsin was carrying a legal firearm at the time, his attorney said in an interview.

www.mediaite.com

Wisconsin statute prohibits children younger than 14 from “possession of control” of “any firearm” unless they are accompanied by an adult aged 18 or older who has been designated by a parent or guardian. The state’s regulations governing those aged 15 and older vary widely depending on the type of gun being used and on whether the user is engaged in activity defined as hunting or training.

It was ILLEGAL for him to carry that rifle in public.

You neglect to include that the person who shot those 2 criminals was also breaking WI gun laws so he was also a criminal.

nope, still wrong blue

Lawyer: Kyle Rittenhouse Had Firearm in Wisconsin Legally

The 17-year-old charged for his role in a shooting in Kenosha, Wisconsin was carrying a legal firearm at the time, his attorney said in an interview.

www.mediaite.com

Wisconsin statute prohibits children younger than 14 from “possession of control” of “any firearm” unless they are accompanied by an adult aged 18 or older who has been designated by a parent or guardian. The state’s regulations governing those aged 15 and older vary widely depending on the type of gun being used and on whether the user is engaged in activity defined as hunting or training.

Wisconsin Open Carry

Wisconsin Open Carry

www.usacarry.com

The minimum age to open carry in Wisconsin is 18.

There is a difference between possessing (owning) a rifle and carrying it in public.

WI gun laws on open carry state one must be 18 to open carry a rifle and 21 to carry a handgun

OK so he gets a little misdemeanor,,,at least hes still alive to tell the story,,,

He shouldn't have been there at all.

He was committing a criminal act and during that commission of a crime he killed 2 people.

Tell me if a person breaks into your house and shoots you and your wife can he claim it was self defense?

say that 3 times really fast and it still wont be true,,,

he basically ran a stop sign and killed 2 people that were trying to kill him,,, doesnt mean he murdered anyone,,,

I never said he murdered anyone.

I said he killed 2 people while he himself was committing a crime

but you left out the part where those two were trying to kill him,,,

Were they?

Or were they just going to rough him up?

It was Rittenhouse's action of breaking the law that put him in the middle of the riots.

Everything that proceeded from the instant he decided to break the law is ultimately Rittenhouse's own fault.

"It was that woman's fault she got raped. Did you see the way she was dressed?"

That's exactly what you're saying.

Women who dress provocatively are not breaking the law.

Big difference.

 

[freyasman]

You neglect to include that the person who shot those 2 criminals was also breaking WI gun laws so he was also a criminal.

nope, still wrong blue

Lawyer: Kyle Rittenhouse Had Firearm in Wisconsin Legally

The 17-year-old charged for his role in a shooting in Kenosha, Wisconsin was carrying a legal firearm at the time, his attorney said in an interview.

www.mediaite.com

Wisconsin statute prohibits children younger than 14 from “possession of control” of “any firearm” unless they are accompanied by an adult aged 18 or older who has been designated by a parent or guardian. The state’s regulations governing those aged 15 and older vary widely depending on the type of gun being used and on whether the user is engaged in activity defined as hunting or training.

It was ILLEGAL for him to carry that rifle in public.

You neglect to include that the person who shot those 2 criminals was also breaking WI gun laws so he was also a criminal.

nope, still wrong blue

Lawyer: Kyle Rittenhouse Had Firearm in Wisconsin Legally

The 17-year-old charged for his role in a shooting in Kenosha, Wisconsin was carrying a legal firearm at the time, his attorney said in an interview.

www.mediaite.com

Wisconsin statute prohibits children younger than 14 from “possession of control” of “any firearm” unless they are accompanied by an adult aged 18 or older who has been designated by a parent or guardian. The state’s regulations governing those aged 15 and older vary widely depending on the type of gun being used and on whether the user is engaged in activity defined as hunting or training.

Wisconsin Open Carry

Wisconsin Open Carry

www.usacarry.com

The minimum age to open carry in Wisconsin is 18.

There is a difference between possessing (owning) a rifle and carrying it in public.

WI gun laws on open carry state one must be 18 to open carry a rifle and 21 to carry a handgun

OK so he gets a little misdemeanor,,,at least hes still alive to tell the story,,,

He shouldn't have been there at all.

He was committing a criminal act and during that commission of a crime he killed 2 people.

Tell me if a person breaks into your house and shoots you and your wife can he claim it was self defense?

say that 3 times really fast and it still wont be true,,,

he basically ran a stop sign and killed 2 people that were trying to kill him,,, doesnt mean he murdered anyone,,,

I never said he murdered anyone.

I said he killed 2 people while he himself was committing a crime

but you left out the part where those two were trying to kill him,,,

Were they?

Or were they just going to rough him up?

It was Rittenhouse's action of breaking the law that put him in the middle of the riots.

Everything that proceeded from the instant he decided to break the law is ultimately Rittenhouse's own fault.

"It was that woman's fault she got raped. Did you see the way she was dressed?"

That's exactly what you're saying.

Bingo.


"If he hadn't been there with a rifle, they wouldn't have attacked him" is the moral equivalent of "If she hadn't gone to the frat party, she wouldn't have gotten roofied and raped".

 

[progressive hunter]

You neglect to include that the person who shot those 2 criminals was also breaking WI gun laws so he was also a criminal.

nope, still wrong blue

Lawyer: Kyle Rittenhouse Had Firearm in Wisconsin Legally

The 17-year-old charged for his role in a shooting in Kenosha, Wisconsin was carrying a legal firearm at the time, his attorney said in an interview.

www.mediaite.com

Wisconsin statute prohibits children younger than 14 from “possession of control” of “any firearm” unless they are accompanied by an adult aged 18 or older who has been designated by a parent or guardian. The state’s regulations governing those aged 15 and older vary widely depending on the type of gun being used and on whether the user is engaged in activity defined as hunting or training.

It was ILLEGAL for him to carry that rifle in public.

You neglect to include that the person who shot those 2 criminals was also breaking WI gun laws so he was also a criminal.

nope, still wrong blue

Lawyer: Kyle Rittenhouse Had Firearm in Wisconsin Legally

The 17-year-old charged for his role in a shooting in Kenosha, Wisconsin was carrying a legal firearm at the time, his attorney said in an interview.

www.mediaite.com

Wisconsin statute prohibits children younger than 14 from “possession of control” of “any firearm” unless they are accompanied by an adult aged 18 or older who has been designated by a parent or guardian. The state’s regulations governing those aged 15 and older vary widely depending on the type of gun being used and on whether the user is engaged in activity defined as hunting or training.

Wisconsin Open Carry

Wisconsin Open Carry

www.usacarry.com

The minimum age to open carry in Wisconsin is 18.

There is a difference between possessing (owning) a rifle and carrying it in public.

WI gun laws on open carry state one must be 18 to open carry a rifle and 21 to carry a handgun

OK so he gets a little misdemeanor,,,at least hes still alive to tell the story,,,

He shouldn't have been there at all.

He was committing a criminal act and during that commission of a crime he killed 2 people.

Tell me if a person breaks into your house and shoots you and your wife can he claim it was self defense?

say that 3 times really fast and it still wont be true,,,

he basically ran a stop sign and killed 2 people that were trying to kill him,,, doesnt mean he murdered anyone,,,

I never said he murdered anyone.

I said he killed 2 people while he himself was committing a crime

but you left out the part where those two were trying to kill him,,,

Were they?

Or were they just going to rough him up?

It was Rittenhouse's action of breaking the law that put him in the middle of the riots.

Everything that proceeded from the instant he decided to break the law is ultimately Rittenhouse's own fault.

"It was that woman's fault she got raped. Did you see the way she was dressed?"

That's exactly what you're saying.

Women who dress provocatively are not breaking the law.

Big difference.

and neither did kyle,,,

 

[otto105]

I don't support law breaking of any kind and I have said that repeatedly.
You do.

If that person was carrying illegally he is just as much a criminal as Rittenhouse is.

The Second Amendment is the law.

Apparently, you're perfectly fine with lawbreaking in the form of the enactment and enforcement of unconstitutional “law” that violates the Constitution which is the highest law in this nation.

You cannot credibly support any act of government which violates the people's right to keep and bear arms, and still honestly claim to oppose lawbreaking or to uphold the rule of law.

So you want felons, rapists and murderers to be able to buy guns and carry them in public?

The Supreme Court has ruled that states have the right to pass laws regarding firearms and those state laws that have not been ruled unconstitutional are just as valis as any other law.

And don't forget the Second Amendment does not give you the right to discharge any firearms but only to keep and bear.

They're going to anyway.

So why do you think there should be laws restricting those us who are not "felons, rapists and murderers" from being able to do so?

Democrats don't want people safe.

The want people unable to resist leftist tyranny.

Armed people don't get on the cattle cars.

Stupid libertarian canard.

Does wanting people to be safe mean downplaying a deadly virus for political purpose?

Democrat's want all people to resist tyranny unlike ever-trumpers who love their dictators.

The Holocaust didn't happen because the Jewish people didn't have guns. It happened because a fascist racist government demonized them with falsehoods and sycophants like you bought the lies.

 

[daveman]

You neglect to include that the person who shot those 2 criminals was also breaking WI gun laws so he was also a criminal.

nope, still wrong blue

Lawyer: Kyle Rittenhouse Had Firearm in Wisconsin Legally

The 17-year-old charged for his role in a shooting in Kenosha, Wisconsin was carrying a legal firearm at the time, his attorney said in an interview.

www.mediaite.com

Wisconsin statute prohibits children younger than 14 from “possession of control” of “any firearm” unless they are accompanied by an adult aged 18 or older who has been designated by a parent or guardian. The state’s regulations governing those aged 15 and older vary widely depending on the type of gun being used and on whether the user is engaged in activity defined as hunting or training.

It was ILLEGAL for him to carry that rifle in public.

You neglect to include that the person who shot those 2 criminals was also breaking WI gun laws so he was also a criminal.

nope, still wrong blue

Lawyer: Kyle Rittenhouse Had Firearm in Wisconsin Legally

The 17-year-old charged for his role in a shooting in Kenosha, Wisconsin was carrying a legal firearm at the time, his attorney said in an interview.

www.mediaite.com

Wisconsin statute prohibits children younger than 14 from “possession of control” of “any firearm” unless they are accompanied by an adult aged 18 or older who has been designated by a parent or guardian. The state’s regulations governing those aged 15 and older vary widely depending on the type of gun being used and on whether the user is engaged in activity defined as hunting or training.

Wisconsin Open Carry

Wisconsin Open Carry

www.usacarry.com

The minimum age to open carry in Wisconsin is 18.

There is a difference between possessing (owning) a rifle and carrying it in public.

WI gun laws on open carry state one must be 18 to open carry a rifle and 21 to carry a handgun

OK so he gets a little misdemeanor,,,at least hes still alive to tell the story,,,

He shouldn't have been there at all.

He was committing a criminal act and during that commission of a crime he killed 2 people.

Tell me if a person breaks into your house and shoots you and your wife can he claim it was self defense?

say that 3 times really fast and it still wont be true,,,

he basically ran a stop sign and killed 2 people that were trying to kill him,,, doesnt mean he murdered anyone,,,

I never said he murdered anyone.

I said he killed 2 people while he himself was committing a crime

but you left out the part where those two were trying to kill him,,,

Were they?

Or were they just going to rough him up?

It was Rittenhouse's action of breaking the law that put him in the middle of the riots.

Everything that proceeded from the instant he decided to break the law is ultimately Rittenhouse's own fault.

"It was that woman's fault she got raped. Did you see the way she was dressed?"

That's exactly what you're saying.

Women who dress provocatively are not breaking the law.

Big difference.

What started the whole chain of events is the domestic terrorists set a dumpster on fire and were pushing it towards the gas station where the boy was.

He put out the fire with an extinguisher. Because dumpster fires next to gas pumps is a bad idea. Surely even you can agree with that.

The domestic terrorists attacked him for it.

You idiot leftists can stop pretending the domestic terrorists are perfectly innocent.

The boy put out a fire. You wish he'd been murdered for it.

What the fuck is wrong with you?

 

[KissMy]

Kyle Rittenhouse lead defense lawyer John Pierce locked out of Twitter over tweet advocating for his client

Twitter's censorship of Rittenhouse's defense team continues.

reclaimthenet.org

"Twitter locked the account of John Pierce, the lead defense lawyer for Kyle Rittenhouse, over a tweet comparing Rittenhouse to the “unknown patriot” who fired the opening shot of the Battle of Concord on April 19th, 1775 that started the American Revolutionary War. This is the second time in two days that a lawyer on Rittenhouse’s defense team has been censored by Twitter. On September 1, defense lawyer Lin Wood was locked out of his account after advocating for his client. Twitter later reinstated the account, admitting the suspension was a mistake."

View attachment 384419

All the guy said is that Kyle will go down in history along side of the patriot who fired the shot heard around the world -- what Kyle did was just that important....and he will be remembered along side of other Revolutionary patriots like Crispus Attucks and Peter Salem....

Twitter is actively trying to censor the defense efforts of Kyle and violating the free speech of him and his legal defense team -- it is past time now that Trump nationalizes Twitter and Facebook so everyone's speech can be heard, no government censorship -- except for socialist liberal lies and propaganda...no more shutting down people's political speech, no more deleting QAnon posts just because JFK Jr. is still alive and will announce his support for Trump in 2020 -- Now there is some political speech that does need to be cracked down on, like speech that disagrees with real Americans -- and I trust the Trump admin will decide what is best when it comes to that....

Kyle Rittenhouse should get another lawyer that don't lie so much claiming he intended to start a civil war instead of firing in self defense. Kyle Rittenhouse not anywhere near that important.

 

[otto105]

One can't claim self defense when they cause the problem

Caused what problem

murder

Nobody was murdered in any of those videos.

What is kyle from Antioch charged with?

 

[daveman]

I don't support law breaking of any kind and I have said that repeatedly.
You do.

If that person was carrying illegally he is just as much a criminal as Rittenhouse is.

The Second Amendment is the law.

Apparently, you're perfectly fine with lawbreaking in the form of the enactment and enforcement of unconstitutional “law” that violates the Constitution which is the highest law in this nation.

You cannot credibly support any act of government which violates the people's right to keep and bear arms, and still honestly claim to oppose lawbreaking or to uphold the rule of law.

So you want felons, rapists and murderers to be able to buy guns and carry them in public?

The Supreme Court has ruled that states have the right to pass laws regarding firearms and those state laws that have not been ruled unconstitutional are just as valis as any other law.

And don't forget the Second Amendment does not give you the right to discharge any firearms but only to keep and bear.

They're going to anyway.

So why do you think there should be laws restricting those us who are not "felons, rapists and murderers" from being able to do so?

Democrats don't want people safe.

The want people unable to resist leftist tyranny.

Armed people don't get on the cattle cars.

Stupid libertarian canard.

Does wanting people to be safe mean downplaying a deadly virus for political purpose?

Democrat's want all people to resist tyranny unlike ever-trumpers who love their dictators.

The Holocaust didn't happen because the Jewish people didn't have guns. It happened because a fascist racist government demonized them with falsehoods and sycophants like you bought the lies.

Oh, eat shit, you dumbass.

It's leftists who want an all-powerful government...not conservatives.

Democrats want all people to resist tyranny?

Then why do they want to ban guns?

And don't even bother denying it. It's a fact.

It'd be cool if you could stop lying for two minutes in a row.

 

[progressive hunter]

One can't claim self defense when they cause the problem

Caused what problem

murder

Nobody was murdered in any of those videos.

What is kyle from Antioch charged with?

nothing from antioch,,,

 

[Coyote]

You neglect to include that the person who shot those 2 criminals was also breaking WI gun laws so he was also a criminal.

nope, still wrong blue

Lawyer: Kyle Rittenhouse Had Firearm in Wisconsin Legally

The 17-year-old charged for his role in a shooting in Kenosha, Wisconsin was carrying a legal firearm at the time, his attorney said in an interview.

www.mediaite.com

Wisconsin statute prohibits children younger than 14 from “possession of control” of “any firearm” unless they are accompanied by an adult aged 18 or older who has been designated by a parent or guardian. The state’s regulations governing those aged 15 and older vary widely depending on the type of gun being used and on whether the user is engaged in activity defined as hunting or training.

It was ILLEGAL for him to carry that rifle in public.

You neglect to include that the person who shot those 2 criminals was also breaking WI gun laws so he was also a criminal.

nope, still wrong blue

Lawyer: Kyle Rittenhouse Had Firearm in Wisconsin Legally

The 17-year-old charged for his role in a shooting in Kenosha, Wisconsin was carrying a legal firearm at the time, his attorney said in an interview.

www.mediaite.com

Wisconsin statute prohibits children younger than 14 from “possession of control” of “any firearm” unless they are accompanied by an adult aged 18 or older who has been designated by a parent or guardian. The state’s regulations governing those aged 15 and older vary widely depending on the type of gun being used and on whether the user is engaged in activity defined as hunting or training.

Wisconsin Open Carry

Wisconsin Open Carry

www.usacarry.com

The minimum age to open carry in Wisconsin is 18.

There is a difference between possessing (owning) a rifle and carrying it in public.

WI gun laws on open carry state one must be 18 to open carry a rifle and 21 to carry a handgun

OK so he gets a little misdemeanor,,,at least hes still alive to tell the story,,,

He shouldn't have been there at all.

He was committing a criminal act and during that commission of a crime he killed 2 people.

Tell me if a person breaks into your house and shoots you and your wife can he claim it was self defense?

say that 3 times really fast and it still wont be true,,,

he basically ran a stop sign and killed 2 people that were trying to kill him,,, doesnt mean he murdered anyone,,,

I never said he murdered anyone.

I said he killed 2 people while he himself was committing a crime

but you left out the part where those two were trying to kill him,,,

Were they?

Or were they just going to rough him up?

It was Rittenhouse's action of breaking the law that put him in the middle of the riots.

Everything that proceeded from the instant he decided to break the law is ultimately Rittenhouse's own fault.

"It was that woman's fault she got raped. Did you see the way she was dressed?"

That's exactly what you're saying.

Women who dress provocatively are not breaking the law.

Big difference.

What started the whole chain of events is the domestic terrorists set a dumpster on fire and were pushing it towards the gas station where the boy was.

He put out the fire with an extinguisher. Because dumpster fires next to gas pumps is a bad idea. Surely even you can agree with that.

The domestic terrorists attacked him for it.

You idiot leftists can stop pretending the domestic terrorists are perfectly innocent.

The boy put out a fire. You wish he'd been murdered for it.

What the fuck is wrong with you?

What started The Whole chain of events was an illegally armed minor.

 

[progressive hunter]

You neglect to include that the person who shot those 2 criminals was also breaking WI gun laws so he was also a criminal.

nope, still wrong blue

Lawyer: Kyle Rittenhouse Had Firearm in Wisconsin Legally

The 17-year-old charged for his role in a shooting in Kenosha, Wisconsin was carrying a legal firearm at the time, his attorney said in an interview.

www.mediaite.com

Wisconsin statute prohibits children younger than 14 from “possession of control” of “any firearm” unless they are accompanied by an adult aged 18 or older who has been designated by a parent or guardian. The state’s regulations governing those aged 15 and older vary widely depending on the type of gun being used and on whether the user is engaged in activity defined as hunting or training.

It was ILLEGAL for him to carry that rifle in public.

You neglect to include that the person who shot those 2 criminals was also breaking WI gun laws so he was also a criminal.

nope, still wrong blue

Lawyer: Kyle Rittenhouse Had Firearm in Wisconsin Legally

The 17-year-old charged for his role in a shooting in Kenosha, Wisconsin was carrying a legal firearm at the time, his attorney said in an interview.

www.mediaite.com

Wisconsin statute prohibits children younger than 14 from “possession of control” of “any firearm” unless they are accompanied by an adult aged 18 or older who has been designated by a parent or guardian. The state’s regulations governing those aged 15 and older vary widely depending on the type of gun being used and on whether the user is engaged in activity defined as hunting or training.

Wisconsin Open Carry

Wisconsin Open Carry

www.usacarry.com

The minimum age to open carry in Wisconsin is 18.

There is a difference between possessing (owning) a rifle and carrying it in public.

WI gun laws on open carry state one must be 18 to open carry a rifle and 21 to carry a handgun

OK so he gets a little misdemeanor,,,at least hes still alive to tell the story,,,

He shouldn't have been there at all.

He was committing a criminal act and during that commission of a crime he killed 2 people.

Tell me if a person breaks into your house and shoots you and your wife can he claim it was self defense?

say that 3 times really fast and it still wont be true,,,

he basically ran a stop sign and killed 2 people that were trying to kill him,,, doesnt mean he murdered anyone,,,

I never said he murdered anyone.

I said he killed 2 people while he himself was committing a crime

but you left out the part where those two were trying to kill him,,,

Were they?

Or were they just going to rough him up?

It was Rittenhouse's action of breaking the law that put him in the middle of the riots.

Everything that proceeded from the instant he decided to break the law is ultimately Rittenhouse's own fault.

"It was that woman's fault she got raped. Did you see the way she was dressed?"

That's exactly what you're saying.

Women who dress provocatively are not breaking the law.

Big difference.

What started the whole chain of events is the domestic terrorists set a dumpster on fire and were pushing it towards the gas station where the boy was.

He put out the fire with an extinguisher. Because dumpster fires next to gas pumps is a bad idea. Surely even you can agree with that.

The domestic terrorists attacked him for it.

You idiot leftists can stop pretending the domestic terrorists are perfectly innocent.

The boy put out a fire. You wish he'd been murdered for it.

What the fuck is wrong with you?

What started The Whole chain of events was an illegally armed minor.

your ignorance becomes more clear each time you talk,,,,

the whole chain of events started when a few decided to burn down a city,,,

 

[otto105]

I don't support law breaking of any kind and I have said that repeatedly.
You do.

If that person was carrying illegally he is just as much a criminal as Rittenhouse is.

The Second Amendment is the law.

Apparently, you're perfectly fine with lawbreaking in the form of the enactment and enforcement of unconstitutional “law” that violates the Constitution which is the highest law in this nation.

You cannot credibly support any act of government which violates the people's right to keep and bear arms, and still honestly claim to oppose lawbreaking or to uphold the rule of law.

So you want felons, rapists and murderers to be able to buy guns and carry them in public?

The Supreme Court has ruled that states have the right to pass laws regarding firearms and those state laws that have not been ruled unconstitutional are just as valis as any other law.

And don't forget the Second Amendment does not give you the right to discharge any firearms but only to keep and bear.

They're going to anyway.

So why do you think there should be laws restricting those us who are not "felons, rapists and murderers" from being able to do so?

Democrats don't want people safe.

The want people unable to resist leftist tyranny.

Armed people don't get on the cattle cars.

Stupid libertarian canard.

Does wanting people to be safe mean downplaying a deadly virus for political purpose?

Democrat's want all people to resist tyranny unlike ever-trumpers who love their dictators.

The Holocaust didn't happen because the Jewish people didn't have guns. It happened because a fascist racist government demonized them with falsehoods and sycophants like you bought the lies.

Oh, eat shit, you dumbass.

It's leftists who want an all-powerful government...not conservatives.

Democrats want all people to resist tyranny?

Then why do they want to ban guns?

And don't even bother denying it. It's a fact.

It'd be cool if you could stop lying for two minutes in a row.

Bringing back the confederacy or stating that libertarianism is a good system of government is stupid. We need a strong Federal government to be a strong nation.

Yes, starting with Kim jong Un, Putin, Duterte and that murderer in Saudi Arabia.

Banning guns? Show me the proof.


I'll wait.

 

[progressive hunter]

You neglect to include that the person who shot those 2 criminals was also breaking WI gun laws so he was also a criminal.

nope, still wrong blue

Lawyer: Kyle Rittenhouse Had Firearm in Wisconsin Legally

The 17-year-old charged for his role in a shooting in Kenosha, Wisconsin was carrying a legal firearm at the time, his attorney said in an interview.

www.mediaite.com

Wisconsin statute prohibits children younger than 14 from “possession of control” of “any firearm” unless they are accompanied by an adult aged 18 or older who has been designated by a parent or guardian. The state’s regulations governing those aged 15 and older vary widely depending on the type of gun being used and on whether the user is engaged in activity defined as hunting or training.

It was ILLEGAL for him to carry that rifle in public.

You neglect to include that the person who shot those 2 criminals was also breaking WI gun laws so he was also a criminal.

nope, still wrong blue

Lawyer: Kyle Rittenhouse Had Firearm in Wisconsin Legally

The 17-year-old charged for his role in a shooting in Kenosha, Wisconsin was carrying a legal firearm at the time, his attorney said in an interview.

www.mediaite.com

Wisconsin statute prohibits children younger than 14 from “possession of control” of “any firearm” unless they are accompanied by an adult aged 18 or older who has been designated by a parent or guardian. The state’s regulations governing those aged 15 and older vary widely depending on the type of gun being used and on whether the user is engaged in activity defined as hunting or training.

Wisconsin Open Carry

Wisconsin Open Carry

www.usacarry.com

The minimum age to open carry in Wisconsin is 18.

There is a difference between possessing (owning) a rifle and carrying it in public.

WI gun laws on open carry state one must be 18 to open carry a rifle and 21 to carry a handgun

OK so he gets a little misdemeanor,,,at least hes still alive to tell the story,,,

He shouldn't have been there at all.

He was committing a criminal act and during that commission of a crime he killed 2 people.

Tell me if a person breaks into your house and shoots you and your wife can he claim it was self defense?

say that 3 times really fast and it still wont be true,,,

he basically ran a stop sign and killed 2 people that were trying to kill him,,, doesnt mean he murdered anyone,,,

I never said he murdered anyone.

I said he killed 2 people while he himself was committing a crime

but you left out the part where those two were trying to kill him,,,

Were they?

Or were they just going to rough him up?

It was Rittenhouse's action of breaking the law that put him in the middle of the riots.

Everything that proceeded from the instant he decided to break the law is ultimately Rittenhouse's own fault.

"It was that woman's fault she got raped. Did you see the way she was dressed?"

That's exactly what you're saying.

Women who dress provocatively are not breaking the law.

Big difference.

What started the whole chain of events is the domestic terrorists set a dumpster on fire and were pushing it towards the gas station where the boy was.

He put out the fire with an extinguisher. Because dumpster fires next to gas pumps is a bad idea. Surely even you can agree with that.

The domestic terrorists attacked him for it.

You idiot leftists can stop pretending the domestic terrorists are perfectly innocent.

The boy put out a fire. You wish he'd been murdered for it.

What the fuck is wrong with you?

What started The Whole chain of events was an illegally armed minor.

your ignorance becomes more clear each time you talk,,,,

the whole chain of events started when a few decided to burn down a city,,,

you can disagree but you cant prove it wrong,,,

 

[daveman]

You neglect to include that the person who shot those 2 criminals was also breaking WI gun laws so he was also a criminal.

nope, still wrong blue

Lawyer: Kyle Rittenhouse Had Firearm in Wisconsin Legally

The 17-year-old charged for his role in a shooting in Kenosha, Wisconsin was carrying a legal firearm at the time, his attorney said in an interview.

www.mediaite.com

Wisconsin statute prohibits children younger than 14 from “possession of control” of “any firearm” unless they are accompanied by an adult aged 18 or older who has been designated by a parent or guardian. The state’s regulations governing those aged 15 and older vary widely depending on the type of gun being used and on whether the user is engaged in activity defined as hunting or training.

It was ILLEGAL for him to carry that rifle in public.

You neglect to include that the person who shot those 2 criminals was also breaking WI gun laws so he was also a criminal.

nope, still wrong blue

Lawyer: Kyle Rittenhouse Had Firearm in Wisconsin Legally

The 17-year-old charged for his role in a shooting in Kenosha, Wisconsin was carrying a legal firearm at the time, his attorney said in an interview.

www.mediaite.com

Wisconsin statute prohibits children younger than 14 from “possession of control” of “any firearm” unless they are accompanied by an adult aged 18 or older who has been designated by a parent or guardian. The state’s regulations governing those aged 15 and older vary widely depending on the type of gun being used and on whether the user is engaged in activity defined as hunting or training.

Wisconsin Open Carry

Wisconsin Open Carry

www.usacarry.com

The minimum age to open carry in Wisconsin is 18.

There is a difference between possessing (owning) a rifle and carrying it in public.

WI gun laws on open carry state one must be 18 to open carry a rifle and 21 to carry a handgun

OK so he gets a little misdemeanor,,,at least hes still alive to tell the story,,,

He shouldn't have been there at all.

He was committing a criminal act and during that commission of a crime he killed 2 people.

Tell me if a person breaks into your house and shoots you and your wife can he claim it was self defense?

say that 3 times really fast and it still wont be true,,,

he basically ran a stop sign and killed 2 people that were trying to kill him,,, doesnt mean he murdered anyone,,,

I never said he murdered anyone.

I said he killed 2 people while he himself was committing a crime

but you left out the part where those two were trying to kill him,,,

Were they?

Or were they just going to rough him up?

It was Rittenhouse's action of breaking the law that put him in the middle of the riots.

Everything that proceeded from the instant he decided to break the law is ultimately Rittenhouse's own fault.

"It was that woman's fault she got raped. Did you see the way she was dressed?"

That's exactly what you're saying.

Women who dress provocatively are not breaking the law.

Big difference.

What started the whole chain of events is the domestic terrorists set a dumpster on fire and were pushing it towards the gas station where the boy was.

He put out the fire with an extinguisher. Because dumpster fires next to gas pumps is a bad idea. Surely even you can agree with that.

The domestic terrorists attacked him for it.

You idiot leftists can stop pretending the domestic terrorists are perfectly innocent.

The boy put out a fire. You wish he'd been murdered for it.

What the fuck is wrong with you?

What started The Whole chain of events was an illegally armed minor.

You just make sure you don't criticize the domestic terrorists. You'll burst into flames like the dumpster they set on fire.

 

[jc456]

We need a strong Federal government to be a strong nation

What is that?

 

[daveman]

I don't support law breaking of any kind and I have said that repeatedly.
You do.

If that person was carrying illegally he is just as much a criminal as Rittenhouse is.

The Second Amendment is the law.

Apparently, you're perfectly fine with lawbreaking in the form of the enactment and enforcement of unconstitutional “law” that violates the Constitution which is the highest law in this nation.

You cannot credibly support any act of government which violates the people's right to keep and bear arms, and still honestly claim to oppose lawbreaking or to uphold the rule of law.

So you want felons, rapists and murderers to be able to buy guns and carry them in public?

The Supreme Court has ruled that states have the right to pass laws regarding firearms and those state laws that have not been ruled unconstitutional are just as valis as any other law.

And don't forget the Second Amendment does not give you the right to discharge any firearms but only to keep and bear.

They're going to anyway.

So why do you think there should be laws restricting those us who are not "felons, rapists and murderers" from being able to do so?

Democrats don't want people safe.

The want people unable to resist leftist tyranny.

Armed people don't get on the cattle cars.

Stupid libertarian canard.

Does wanting people to be safe mean downplaying a deadly virus for political purpose?

Democrat's want all people to resist tyranny unlike ever-trumpers who love their dictators.

The Holocaust didn't happen because the Jewish people didn't have guns. It happened because a fascist racist government demonized them with falsehoods and sycophants like you bought the lies.

Oh, eat shit, you dumbass.

It's leftists who want an all-powerful government...not conservatives.

Democrats want all people to resist tyranny?

Then why do they want to ban guns?

And don't even bother denying it. It's a fact.

It'd be cool if you could stop lying for two minutes in a row.

Bringing back the confederacy or stating that libertarianism is a good system of government is stupid. We need a strong Federal government to be a strong nation.

Yes, starting with Kim jong Un, Putin, Duterte and that murderer in Saudi Arabia.

Banning guns? Show me the proof.


I'll wait.

Oh, look -- a leftist demanding all-powerful government. Gasp.

Proof? You're going to wish you hadn't asked.

Democrats to propose weapons ban, gun confiscation powers in bill inspired by Trump

Poll: Democrats Split on Banning All Guns
So, just over 8 in 10 Democrats favor banning all semi-automatic weapons.
...
So, when asked if they’d ban all handguns, Democrats are divided, with 44 percent in favor, 46 percent in opposition, and 10 percent undecided. When asked if they’d want to ban all semi-automatic weapons (which includes handguns – but perhaps they’re ignorant of this fact), 82 percent favor banning them.

California Democrats Seek to Ban More Semiautomatic Guns as ‘Assault Weapons’

Biden Calls For ‘Assault’ Gun Ban While Americans Buy In Record Numbers After Riots, ‘Defund Police’ Push. NRA Trolls Him.

Kamala Harris' next target: Banning AR-15-style assault weapons

Democrats openly embracing gun confiscation

You should probably never come back to this thread again.

 

[otto105]

We need a strong Federal government to be a strong nation

What is that?

The opposite of the bathtub government you want.

 

[otto105]

I don't support law breaking of any kind and I have said that repeatedly.
You do.

If that person was carrying illegally he is just as much a criminal as Rittenhouse is.

The Second Amendment is the law.

Apparently, you're perfectly fine with lawbreaking in the form of the enactment and enforcement of unconstitutional “law” that violates the Constitution which is the highest law in this nation.

You cannot credibly support any act of government which violates the people's right to keep and bear arms, and still honestly claim to oppose lawbreaking or to uphold the rule of law.

So you want felons, rapists and murderers to be able to buy guns and carry them in public?

The Supreme Court has ruled that states have the right to pass laws regarding firearms and those state laws that have not been ruled unconstitutional are just as valis as any other law.

And don't forget the Second Amendment does not give you the right to discharge any firearms but only to keep and bear.

They're going to anyway.

So why do you think there should be laws restricting those us who are not "felons, rapists and murderers" from being able to do so?

Democrats don't want people safe.

The want people unable to resist leftist tyranny.

Armed people don't get on the cattle cars.

Stupid libertarian canard.

Does wanting people to be safe mean downplaying a deadly virus for political purpose?

Democrat's want all people to resist tyranny unlike ever-trumpers who love their dictators.

The Holocaust didn't happen because the Jewish people didn't have guns. It happened because a fascist racist government demonized them with falsehoods and sycophants like you bought the lies.

Oh, eat shit, you dumbass.

It's leftists who want an all-powerful government...not conservatives.

Democrats want all people to resist tyranny?

Then why do they want to ban guns?

And don't even bother denying it. It's a fact.

It'd be cool if you could stop lying for two minutes in a row.

Bringing back the confederacy or stating that libertarianism is a good system of government is stupid. We need a strong Federal government to be a strong nation.

Yes, starting with Kim jong Un, Putin, Duterte and that murderer in Saudi Arabia.

Banning guns? Show me the proof.


I'll wait.

Oh, look -- a leftist demanding all-powerful government. Gasp.

Proof? You're going to wish you hadn't asked.

Democrats to propose weapons ban, gun confiscation powers in bill inspired by Trump

Poll: Democrats Split on Banning All Guns
So, just over 8 in 10 Democrats favor banning all semi-automatic weapons.
...
So, when asked if they’d ban all handguns, Democrats are divided, with 44 percent in favor, 46 percent in opposition, and 10 percent undecided. When asked if they’d want to ban all semi-automatic weapons (which includes handguns – but perhaps they’re ignorant of this fact), 82 percent favor banning them.

California Democrats Seek to Ban More Semiautomatic Guns as ‘Assault Weapons’

Biden Calls For ‘Assault’ Gun Ban While Americans Buy In Record Numbers After Riots, ‘Defund Police’ Push. NRA Trolls Him.

Kamala Harris' next target: Banning AR-15-style assault weapons

Democrats openly embracing gun confiscation

You should probably never come back to this thread again.

Where is the evidence that convinces of an complete gun ban?

I don't see it.

For bonus points can you point to a government on this planet that has the size of government that you advocate for.