Twitter Attacks Lawyer Representing American Patriot, Kyle Rittenhouse

[RetiredGySgt]

You neglect to include that the person who shot those 2 criminals was also breaking WI gun laws so he was also a criminal.

nope, still wrong blue

Lawyer: Kyle Rittenhouse Had Firearm in Wisconsin Legally

The 17-year-old charged for his role in a shooting in Kenosha, Wisconsin was carrying a legal firearm at the time, his attorney said in an interview.

www.mediaite.com

Wisconsin statute prohibits children younger than 14 from “possession of control” of “any firearm” unless they are accompanied by an adult aged 18 or older who has been designated by a parent or guardian. The state’s regulations governing those aged 15 and older vary widely depending on the type of gun being used and on whether the user is engaged in activity defined as hunting or training.

It was ILLEGAL for him to carry that rifle in public.

You neglect to include that the person who shot those 2 criminals was also breaking WI gun laws so he was also a criminal.

nope, still wrong blue

Lawyer: Kyle Rittenhouse Had Firearm in Wisconsin Legally

The 17-year-old charged for his role in a shooting in Kenosha, Wisconsin was carrying a legal firearm at the time, his attorney said in an interview.

www.mediaite.com

Wisconsin statute prohibits children younger than 14 from “possession of control” of “any firearm” unless they are accompanied by an adult aged 18 or older who has been designated by a parent or guardian. The state’s regulations governing those aged 15 and older vary widely depending on the type of gun being used and on whether the user is engaged in activity defined as hunting or training.

Wisconsin Open Carry

Wisconsin Open Carry

www.usacarry.com

The minimum age to open carry in Wisconsin is 18.

There is a difference between possessing (owning) a rifle and carrying it in public.

WI gun laws on open carry state one must be 18 to open carry a rifle and 21 to carry a handgun

OK so he gets a little misdemeanor,,,at least hes still alive to tell the story,,,

He shouldn't have been there at all.

He was committing a criminal act and during that commission of a crime he killed 2 people.

Tell me if a person breaks into your house and shoots you and your wife can he claim it was self defense?

say that 3 times really fast and it still wont be true,,,

he basically ran a stop sign and killed 2 people that were trying to kill him,,, doesnt mean he murdered anyone,,,

I never said he murdered anyone.

I said he killed 2 people while he himself was committing a crime

but you left out the part where those two were trying to kill him,,,

Were they?

Or were they just going to rough him up?

It was Rittenhouse's action of breaking the law that put him in the middle of the riots.

Everything that proceeded from the instant he decided to break the law is ultimately Rittenhouse's own fault.

"It was that woman's fault she got raped. Did you see the way she was dressed?"

That's exactly what you're saying.

Women who dress provocatively are not breaking the law.

Big difference.

What started the whole chain of events is the domestic terrorists set a dumpster on fire and were pushing it towards the gas station where the boy was.

He put out the fire with an extinguisher. Because dumpster fires next to gas pumps is a bad idea. Surely even you can agree with that.

The domestic terrorists attacked him for it.

You idiot leftists can stop pretending the domestic terrorists are perfectly innocent.

The boy put out a fire. You wish he'd been murdered for it.

What the fuck is wrong with you?

What started The Whole chain of events was an illegally armed minor.

You keep on lying. I would tell you to be ashamed of yourself but you have repeatedly proven LYING is what YOU want to do. The video is there for all to see, have you refused to view it? It clearly shows what started this was a dumpster fire thet Kyle put out and was attacked for. All the videos clearly show self defense on Kyle's part every damn one of them. Remind us again how firearm violence has not gone down since 1992 while firearm ownership and less restrictive laws have gone UP. Lie some more go ahead disagree with this truthful post like you did the other two.

 

[Wyatt earp]

Since when is a murderer a "patriot"?

50 million murdered since the early 1970s to a liberal I assume

 

[Coyote]

You neglect to include that the person who shot those 2 criminals was also breaking WI gun laws so he was also a criminal.

nope, still wrong blue

Lawyer: Kyle Rittenhouse Had Firearm in Wisconsin Legally

The 17-year-old charged for his role in a shooting in Kenosha, Wisconsin was carrying a legal firearm at the time, his attorney said in an interview.

www.mediaite.com

Wisconsin statute prohibits children younger than 14 from “possession of control” of “any firearm” unless they are accompanied by an adult aged 18 or older who has been designated by a parent or guardian. The state’s regulations governing those aged 15 and older vary widely depending on the type of gun being used and on whether the user is engaged in activity defined as hunting or training.

It was ILLEGAL for him to carry that rifle in public.

You neglect to include that the person who shot those 2 criminals was also breaking WI gun laws so he was also a criminal.

nope, still wrong blue

Lawyer: Kyle Rittenhouse Had Firearm in Wisconsin Legally

The 17-year-old charged for his role in a shooting in Kenosha, Wisconsin was carrying a legal firearm at the time, his attorney said in an interview.

www.mediaite.com

Wisconsin statute prohibits children younger than 14 from “possession of control” of “any firearm” unless they are accompanied by an adult aged 18 or older who has been designated by a parent or guardian. The state’s regulations governing those aged 15 and older vary widely depending on the type of gun being used and on whether the user is engaged in activity defined as hunting or training.

Wisconsin Open Carry

Wisconsin Open Carry

www.usacarry.com

The minimum age to open carry in Wisconsin is 18.

There is a difference between possessing (owning) a rifle and carrying it in public.

WI gun laws on open carry state one must be 18 to open carry a rifle and 21 to carry a handgun

OK so he gets a little misdemeanor,,,at least hes still alive to tell the story,,,

He shouldn't have been there at all.

He was committing a criminal act and during that commission of a crime he killed 2 people.

Tell me if a person breaks into your house and shoots you and your wife can he claim it was self defense?

say that 3 times really fast and it still wont be true,,,

he basically ran a stop sign and killed 2 people that were trying to kill him,,, doesnt mean he murdered anyone,,,

I never said he murdered anyone.

I said he killed 2 people while he himself was committing a crime

but you left out the part where those two were trying to kill him,,,

Were they?

Or were they just going to rough him up?

It was Rittenhouse's action of breaking the law that put him in the middle of the riots.

Everything that proceeded from the instant he decided to break the law is ultimately Rittenhouse's own fault.

"It was that woman's fault she got raped. Did you see the way she was dressed?"

That's exactly what you're saying.

Women who dress provocatively are not breaking the law.

Big difference.

What started the whole chain of events is the domestic terrorists set a dumpster on fire and were pushing it towards the gas station where the boy was.

He put out the fire with an extinguisher. Because dumpster fires next to gas pumps is a bad idea. Surely even you can agree with that.

The domestic terrorists attacked him for it.

You idiot leftists can stop pretending the domestic terrorists are perfectly innocent.

The boy put out a fire. You wish he'd been murdered for it.

What the fuck is wrong with you?

What started The Whole chain of events was an illegally armed minor.

You keep on lying. I would tell you to be ashamed of yourself but you have repeatedly proven LYING is what YOU want to do. The video is there for all to see, have you refused to view it? It clearly shows what started this was a dumpster fire thet Kyle put out and was attacked for. All the videos clearly show self defense on Kyle's part every damn one of them. Remind us again how firearm violence has not gone down since 1992 while firearm ownership and less restrictive laws have gone UP. Lie some more go ahead disagree with this truthful post like you did the other two.

If an ILLEGALLY armed MINOR had not been there...none of this would have happened, moron.

 

[Rye Catcher]

Kyle Rittenhouse lead defense lawyer John Pierce locked out of Twitter over tweet advocating for his client

Twitter's censorship of Rittenhouse's defense team continues.

reclaimthenet.org

"Twitter locked the account of John Pierce, the lead defense lawyer for Kyle Rittenhouse, over a tweet comparing Rittenhouse to the “unknown patriot” who fired the opening shot of the Battle of Concord on April 19th, 1775 that started the American Revolutionary War. This is the second time in two days that a lawyer on Rittenhouse’s defense team has been censored by Twitter. On September 1, defense lawyer Lin Wood was locked out of his account after advocating for his client. Twitter later reinstated the account, admitting the suspension was a mistake."

View attachment 384419

All the guy said is that Kyle will go down in history along side of the patriot who fired the shot heard around the world -- what Kyle did was just that important....and he will be remembered along side of other Revolutionary patriots like Crispus Attucks and Peter Salem....

Twitter is actively trying to censor the defense efforts of Kyle and violating the free speech of him and his legal defense team -- it is past time now that Trump nationalizes Twitter and Facebook so everyone's speech can be heard, no government censorship -- except for socialist liberal lies and propaganda...no more shutting down people's political speech, no more deleting QAnon posts just because JFK Jr. is still alive and will announce his support for Trump in 2020 -- Now there is some political speech that does need to be cracked down on, like speech that disagrees with real Americans -- and I trust the Trump admin will decide what is best when it comes to that....

He's no patriot, he went looking to kill someone, and he'll pay for it.

 

[freyasman]

You neglect to include that the person who shot those 2 criminals was also breaking WI gun laws so he was also a criminal.

nope, still wrong blue

Lawyer: Kyle Rittenhouse Had Firearm in Wisconsin Legally

The 17-year-old charged for his role in a shooting in Kenosha, Wisconsin was carrying a legal firearm at the time, his attorney said in an interview.

www.mediaite.com

Wisconsin statute prohibits children younger than 14 from “possession of control” of “any firearm” unless they are accompanied by an adult aged 18 or older who has been designated by a parent or guardian. The state’s regulations governing those aged 15 and older vary widely depending on the type of gun being used and on whether the user is engaged in activity defined as hunting or training.

It was ILLEGAL for him to carry that rifle in public.

You neglect to include that the person who shot those 2 criminals was also breaking WI gun laws so he was also a criminal.

nope, still wrong blue

Lawyer: Kyle Rittenhouse Had Firearm in Wisconsin Legally

The 17-year-old charged for his role in a shooting in Kenosha, Wisconsin was carrying a legal firearm at the time, his attorney said in an interview.

www.mediaite.com

Wisconsin statute prohibits children younger than 14 from “possession of control” of “any firearm” unless they are accompanied by an adult aged 18 or older who has been designated by a parent or guardian. The state’s regulations governing those aged 15 and older vary widely depending on the type of gun being used and on whether the user is engaged in activity defined as hunting or training.

Wisconsin Open Carry

Wisconsin Open Carry

www.usacarry.com

The minimum age to open carry in Wisconsin is 18.

There is a difference between possessing (owning) a rifle and carrying it in public.

WI gun laws on open carry state one must be 18 to open carry a rifle and 21 to carry a handgun

OK so he gets a little misdemeanor,,,at least hes still alive to tell the story,,,

He shouldn't have been there at all.

He was committing a criminal act and during that commission of a crime he killed 2 people.

Tell me if a person breaks into your house and shoots you and your wife can he claim it was self defense?

say that 3 times really fast and it still wont be true,,,

he basically ran a stop sign and killed 2 people that were trying to kill him,,, doesnt mean he murdered anyone,,,

I never said he murdered anyone.

I said he killed 2 people while he himself was committing a crime

but you left out the part where those two were trying to kill him,,,

Were they?

Or were they just going to rough him up?

It was Rittenhouse's action of breaking the law that put him in the middle of the riots.

Everything that proceeded from the instant he decided to break the law is ultimately Rittenhouse's own fault.

"It was that woman's fault she got raped. Did you see the way she was dressed?"

That's exactly what you're saying.

Women who dress provocatively are not breaking the law.

Big difference.

What started the whole chain of events is the domestic terrorists set a dumpster on fire and were pushing it towards the gas station where the boy was.

He put out the fire with an extinguisher. Because dumpster fires next to gas pumps is a bad idea. Surely even you can agree with that.

The domestic terrorists attacked him for it.

You idiot leftists can stop pretending the domestic terrorists are perfectly innocent.

The boy put out a fire. You wish he'd been murdered for it.

What the fuck is wrong with you?

What started The Whole chain of events was an illegally armed minor.

You keep on lying. I would tell you to be ashamed of yourself but you have repeatedly proven LYING is what YOU want to do. The video is there for all to see, have you refused to view it? It clearly shows what started this was a dumpster fire thet Kyle put out and was attacked for. All the videos clearly show self defense on Kyle's part every damn one of them. Remind us again how firearm violence has not gone down since 1992 while firearm ownership and less restrictive laws have gone UP. Lie some more go ahead disagree with this truthful post like you did the other two.

If an ILLEGALLY armed MINOR had not been there...none of this would have happened, moron.

You're siding with the mob who were burning shit down and attacking anyone who interfered.

I say again, you're trash.

 

[RetiredGySgt]

You neglect to include that the person who shot those 2 criminals was also breaking WI gun laws so he was also a criminal.

nope, still wrong blue

Lawyer: Kyle Rittenhouse Had Firearm in Wisconsin Legally

The 17-year-old charged for his role in a shooting in Kenosha, Wisconsin was carrying a legal firearm at the time, his attorney said in an interview.

www.mediaite.com

Wisconsin statute prohibits children younger than 14 from “possession of control” of “any firearm” unless they are accompanied by an adult aged 18 or older who has been designated by a parent or guardian. The state’s regulations governing those aged 15 and older vary widely depending on the type of gun being used and on whether the user is engaged in activity defined as hunting or training.

It was ILLEGAL for him to carry that rifle in public.

You neglect to include that the person who shot those 2 criminals was also breaking WI gun laws so he was also a criminal.

nope, still wrong blue

Lawyer: Kyle Rittenhouse Had Firearm in Wisconsin Legally

The 17-year-old charged for his role in a shooting in Kenosha, Wisconsin was carrying a legal firearm at the time, his attorney said in an interview.

www.mediaite.com

Wisconsin statute prohibits children younger than 14 from “possession of control” of “any firearm” unless they are accompanied by an adult aged 18 or older who has been designated by a parent or guardian. The state’s regulations governing those aged 15 and older vary widely depending on the type of gun being used and on whether the user is engaged in activity defined as hunting or training.

Wisconsin Open Carry

Wisconsin Open Carry

www.usacarry.com

The minimum age to open carry in Wisconsin is 18.

There is a difference between possessing (owning) a rifle and carrying it in public.

WI gun laws on open carry state one must be 18 to open carry a rifle and 21 to carry a handgun

OK so he gets a little misdemeanor,,,at least hes still alive to tell the story,,,

He shouldn't have been there at all.

He was committing a criminal act and during that commission of a crime he killed 2 people.

Tell me if a person breaks into your house and shoots you and your wife can he claim it was self defense?

say that 3 times really fast and it still wont be true,,,

he basically ran a stop sign and killed 2 people that were trying to kill him,,, doesnt mean he murdered anyone,,,

I never said he murdered anyone.

I said he killed 2 people while he himself was committing a crime

but you left out the part where those two were trying to kill him,,,

Were they?

Or were they just going to rough him up?

It was Rittenhouse's action of breaking the law that put him in the middle of the riots.

Everything that proceeded from the instant he decided to break the law is ultimately Rittenhouse's own fault.

"It was that woman's fault she got raped. Did you see the way she was dressed?"

That's exactly what you're saying.

Women who dress provocatively are not breaking the law.

Big difference.

What started the whole chain of events is the domestic terrorists set a dumpster on fire and were pushing it towards the gas station where the boy was.

He put out the fire with an extinguisher. Because dumpster fires next to gas pumps is a bad idea. Surely even you can agree with that.

The domestic terrorists attacked him for it.

You idiot leftists can stop pretending the domestic terrorists are perfectly innocent.

The boy put out a fire. You wish he'd been murdered for it.

What the fuck is wrong with you?

What started The Whole chain of events was an illegally armed minor.

You keep on lying. I would tell you to be ashamed of yourself but you have repeatedly proven LYING is what YOU want to do. The video is there for all to see, have you refused to view it? It clearly shows what started this was a dumpster fire thet Kyle put out and was attacked for. All the videos clearly show self defense on Kyle's part every damn one of them. Remind us again how firearm violence has not gone down since 1992 while firearm ownership and less restrictive laws have gone UP. Lie some more go ahead disagree with this truthful post like you did the other two.

Ohh look, the lying asshole disagreed again. She can not be bothered with FACTS or evidence she does not read links nor view videos but she JUST FEELS she is right.

 

[RetiredGySgt]

If he

You neglect to include that the person who shot those 2 criminals was also breaking WI gun laws so he was also a criminal.

nope, still wrong blue

Lawyer: Kyle Rittenhouse Had Firearm in Wisconsin Legally

The 17-year-old charged for his role in a shooting in Kenosha, Wisconsin was carrying a legal firearm at the time, his attorney said in an interview.

www.mediaite.com

Wisconsin statute prohibits children younger than 14 from “possession of control” of “any firearm” unless they are accompanied by an adult aged 18 or older who has been designated by a parent or guardian. The state’s regulations governing those aged 15 and older vary widely depending on the type of gun being used and on whether the user is engaged in activity defined as hunting or training.

It was ILLEGAL for him to carry that rifle in public.

You neglect to include that the person who shot those 2 criminals was also breaking WI gun laws so he was also a criminal.

nope, still wrong blue

Lawyer: Kyle Rittenhouse Had Firearm in Wisconsin Legally

The 17-year-old charged for his role in a shooting in Kenosha, Wisconsin was carrying a legal firearm at the time, his attorney said in an interview.

www.mediaite.com

Wisconsin statute prohibits children younger than 14 from “possession of control” of “any firearm” unless they are accompanied by an adult aged 18 or older who has been designated by a parent or guardian. The state’s regulations governing those aged 15 and older vary widely depending on the type of gun being used and on whether the user is engaged in activity defined as hunting or training.

Wisconsin Open Carry

Wisconsin Open Carry

www.usacarry.com

The minimum age to open carry in Wisconsin is 18.

There is a difference between possessing (owning) a rifle and carrying it in public.

WI gun laws on open carry state one must be 18 to open carry a rifle and 21 to carry a handgun

OK so he gets a little misdemeanor,,,at least hes still alive to tell the story,,,

He shouldn't have been there at all.

He was committing a criminal act and during that commission of a crime he killed 2 people.

Tell me if a person breaks into your house and shoots you and your wife can he claim it was self defense?

say that 3 times really fast and it still wont be true,,,

he basically ran a stop sign and killed 2 people that were trying to kill him,,, doesnt mean he murdered anyone,,,

I never said he murdered anyone.

I said he killed 2 people while he himself was committing a crime

but you left out the part where those two were trying to kill him,,,

Were they?

Or were they just going to rough him up?

It was Rittenhouse's action of breaking the law that put him in the middle of the riots.

Everything that proceeded from the instant he decided to break the law is ultimately Rittenhouse's own fault.

"It was that woman's fault she got raped. Did you see the way she was dressed?"

That's exactly what you're saying.

Women who dress provocatively are not breaking the law.

Big difference.

What started the whole chain of events is the domestic terrorists set a dumpster on fire and were pushing it towards the gas station where the boy was.

He put out the fire with an extinguisher. Because dumpster fires next to gas pumps is a bad idea. Surely even you can agree with that.

The domestic terrorists attacked him for it.

You idiot leftists can stop pretending the domestic terrorists are perfectly innocent.

The boy put out a fire. You wish he'd been murdered for it.

What the fuck is wrong with you?

What started The Whole chain of events was an illegally armed minor.

You keep on lying. I would tell you to be ashamed of yourself but you have repeatedly proven LYING is what YOU want to do. The video is there for all to see, have you refused to view it? It clearly shows what started this was a dumpster fire thet Kyle put out and was attacked for. All the videos clearly show self defense on Kyle's part every damn one of them. Remind us again how firearm violence has not gone down since 1992 while firearm ownership and less restrictive laws have gone UP. Lie some more go ahead disagree with this truthful post like you did the other two.

If an ILLEGALLY armed MINOR had not been there...none of this would have happened, moron.

IF he hadn't been there the Gas Station would have burned down and the guy with the pistol would have shot some one.

 

[progressive hunter]

You neglect to include that the person who shot those 2 criminals was also breaking WI gun laws so he was also a criminal.

nope, still wrong blue

Lawyer: Kyle Rittenhouse Had Firearm in Wisconsin Legally

The 17-year-old charged for his role in a shooting in Kenosha, Wisconsin was carrying a legal firearm at the time, his attorney said in an interview.

www.mediaite.com

Wisconsin statute prohibits children younger than 14 from “possession of control” of “any firearm” unless they are accompanied by an adult aged 18 or older who has been designated by a parent or guardian. The state’s regulations governing those aged 15 and older vary widely depending on the type of gun being used and on whether the user is engaged in activity defined as hunting or training.

It was ILLEGAL for him to carry that rifle in public.

You neglect to include that the person who shot those 2 criminals was also breaking WI gun laws so he was also a criminal.

nope, still wrong blue

Lawyer: Kyle Rittenhouse Had Firearm in Wisconsin Legally

The 17-year-old charged for his role in a shooting in Kenosha, Wisconsin was carrying a legal firearm at the time, his attorney said in an interview.

www.mediaite.com

Wisconsin statute prohibits children younger than 14 from “possession of control” of “any firearm” unless they are accompanied by an adult aged 18 or older who has been designated by a parent or guardian. The state’s regulations governing those aged 15 and older vary widely depending on the type of gun being used and on whether the user is engaged in activity defined as hunting or training.

Wisconsin Open Carry

Wisconsin Open Carry

www.usacarry.com

The minimum age to open carry in Wisconsin is 18.

There is a difference between possessing (owning) a rifle and carrying it in public.

WI gun laws on open carry state one must be 18 to open carry a rifle and 21 to carry a handgun

OK so he gets a little misdemeanor,,,at least hes still alive to tell the story,,,

He shouldn't have been there at all.

He was committing a criminal act and during that commission of a crime he killed 2 people.

Tell me if a person breaks into your house and shoots you and your wife can he claim it was self defense?

say that 3 times really fast and it still wont be true,,,

he basically ran a stop sign and killed 2 people that were trying to kill him,,, doesnt mean he murdered anyone,,,

I never said he murdered anyone.

I said he killed 2 people while he himself was committing a crime

but you left out the part where those two were trying to kill him,,,

Were they?

Or were they just going to rough him up?

It was Rittenhouse's action of breaking the law that put him in the middle of the riots.

Everything that proceeded from the instant he decided to break the law is ultimately Rittenhouse's own fault.

"It was that woman's fault she got raped. Did you see the way she was dressed?"

That's exactly what you're saying.

Women who dress provocatively are not breaking the law.

Big difference.

What started the whole chain of events is the domestic terrorists set a dumpster on fire and were pushing it towards the gas station where the boy was.

He put out the fire with an extinguisher. Because dumpster fires next to gas pumps is a bad idea. Surely even you can agree with that.

The domestic terrorists attacked him for it.

You idiot leftists can stop pretending the domestic terrorists are perfectly innocent.

The boy put out a fire. You wish he'd been murdered for it.

What the fuck is wrong with you?

What started The Whole chain of events was an illegally armed minor.

You keep on lying. I would tell you to be ashamed of yourself but you have repeatedly proven LYING is what YOU want to do. The video is there for all to see, have you refused to view it? It clearly shows what started this was a dumpster fire thet Kyle put out and was attacked for. All the videos clearly show self defense on Kyle's part every damn one of them. Remind us again how firearm violence has not gone down since 1992 while firearm ownership and less restrictive laws have gone UP. Lie some more go ahead disagree with this truthful post like you did the other two.

If an ILLEGALLY armed MINOR had not been there...none of this would have happened, moron.

it was already happening when he got there,,in fact he went there because it was happening,,,

 

[daveman]

I don't support law breaking of any kind and I have said that repeatedly.
You do.

If that person was carrying illegally he is just as much a criminal as Rittenhouse is.

The Second Amendment is the law.

Apparently, you're perfectly fine with lawbreaking in the form of the enactment and enforcement of unconstitutional “law” that violates the Constitution which is the highest law in this nation.

You cannot credibly support any act of government which violates the people's right to keep and bear arms, and still honestly claim to oppose lawbreaking or to uphold the rule of law.

So you want felons, rapists and murderers to be able to buy guns and carry them in public?

The Supreme Court has ruled that states have the right to pass laws regarding firearms and those state laws that have not been ruled unconstitutional are just as valis as any other law.

And don't forget the Second Amendment does not give you the right to discharge any firearms but only to keep and bear.

They're going to anyway.

So why do you think there should be laws restricting those us who are not "felons, rapists and murderers" from being able to do so?

Democrats don't want people safe.

The want people unable to resist leftist tyranny.

Armed people don't get on the cattle cars.

Stupid libertarian canard.

Does wanting people to be safe mean downplaying a deadly virus for political purpose?

Democrat's want all people to resist tyranny unlike ever-trumpers who love their dictators.

The Holocaust didn't happen because the Jewish people didn't have guns. It happened because a fascist racist government demonized them with falsehoods and sycophants like you bought the lies.

Oh, eat shit, you dumbass.

It's leftists who want an all-powerful government...not conservatives.

Democrats want all people to resist tyranny?

Then why do they want to ban guns?

And don't even bother denying it. It's a fact.

It'd be cool if you could stop lying for two minutes in a row.

Bringing back the confederacy or stating that libertarianism is a good system of government is stupid. We need a strong Federal government to be a strong nation.

Yes, starting with Kim jong Un, Putin, Duterte and that murderer in Saudi Arabia.

Banning guns? Show me the proof.


I'll wait.

Oh, look -- a leftist demanding all-powerful government. Gasp.

Proof? You're going to wish you hadn't asked.

Democrats to propose weapons ban, gun confiscation powers in bill inspired by Trump

Poll: Democrats Split on Banning All Guns
So, just over 8 in 10 Democrats favor banning all semi-automatic weapons.
...
So, when asked if they’d ban all handguns, Democrats are divided, with 44 percent in favor, 46 percent in opposition, and 10 percent undecided. When asked if they’d want to ban all semi-automatic weapons (which includes handguns – but perhaps they’re ignorant of this fact), 82 percent favor banning them.

California Democrats Seek to Ban More Semiautomatic Guns as ‘Assault Weapons’

Biden Calls For ‘Assault’ Gun Ban While Americans Buy In Record Numbers After Riots, ‘Defund Police’ Push. NRA Trolls Him.

Kamala Harris' next target: Banning AR-15-style assault weapons

Democrats openly embracing gun confiscation

You should probably never come back to this thread again.

Where is the evidence that convinces of an complete gun ban?

I don't see it.

For bonus points can you point to a government on this planet that has the size of government that you advocate for.

Ooooh, imagine that. You moved the goalposts. I said Democrats want to ban guns, and I proved it. I didn't claim they wanted to ban ALL guns. That's your pathetic attempt to save face.

Nevertheless, most Democrats want to ban ALL semiautomatic weapons. That's fucked up.

You're intellectually dishonest, and therefore dismissed.

 

[daveman]

You neglect to include that the person who shot those 2 criminals was also breaking WI gun laws so he was also a criminal.

nope, still wrong blue

Lawyer: Kyle Rittenhouse Had Firearm in Wisconsin Legally

The 17-year-old charged for his role in a shooting in Kenosha, Wisconsin was carrying a legal firearm at the time, his attorney said in an interview.

www.mediaite.com

Wisconsin statute prohibits children younger than 14 from “possession of control” of “any firearm” unless they are accompanied by an adult aged 18 or older who has been designated by a parent or guardian. The state’s regulations governing those aged 15 and older vary widely depending on the type of gun being used and on whether the user is engaged in activity defined as hunting or training.

It was ILLEGAL for him to carry that rifle in public.

You neglect to include that the person who shot those 2 criminals was also breaking WI gun laws so he was also a criminal.

nope, still wrong blue

Lawyer: Kyle Rittenhouse Had Firearm in Wisconsin Legally

The 17-year-old charged for his role in a shooting in Kenosha, Wisconsin was carrying a legal firearm at the time, his attorney said in an interview.

www.mediaite.com

Wisconsin statute prohibits children younger than 14 from “possession of control” of “any firearm” unless they are accompanied by an adult aged 18 or older who has been designated by a parent or guardian. The state’s regulations governing those aged 15 and older vary widely depending on the type of gun being used and on whether the user is engaged in activity defined as hunting or training.

Wisconsin Open Carry

Wisconsin Open Carry

www.usacarry.com

The minimum age to open carry in Wisconsin is 18.

There is a difference between possessing (owning) a rifle and carrying it in public.

WI gun laws on open carry state one must be 18 to open carry a rifle and 21 to carry a handgun

OK so he gets a little misdemeanor,,,at least hes still alive to tell the story,,,

He shouldn't have been there at all.

He was committing a criminal act and during that commission of a crime he killed 2 people.

Tell me if a person breaks into your house and shoots you and your wife can he claim it was self defense?

say that 3 times really fast and it still wont be true,,,

he basically ran a stop sign and killed 2 people that were trying to kill him,,, doesnt mean he murdered anyone,,,

I never said he murdered anyone.

I said he killed 2 people while he himself was committing a crime

but you left out the part where those two were trying to kill him,,,

Were they?

Or were they just going to rough him up?

It was Rittenhouse's action of breaking the law that put him in the middle of the riots.

Everything that proceeded from the instant he decided to break the law is ultimately Rittenhouse's own fault.

"It was that woman's fault she got raped. Did you see the way she was dressed?"

That's exactly what you're saying.

Women who dress provocatively are not breaking the law.

Big difference.

What started the whole chain of events is the domestic terrorists set a dumpster on fire and were pushing it towards the gas station where the boy was.

He put out the fire with an extinguisher. Because dumpster fires next to gas pumps is a bad idea. Surely even you can agree with that.

The domestic terrorists attacked him for it.

You idiot leftists can stop pretending the domestic terrorists are perfectly innocent.

The boy put out a fire. You wish he'd been murdered for it.

What the fuck is wrong with you?

What started The Whole chain of events was an illegally armed minor.

You keep on lying. I would tell you to be ashamed of yourself but you have repeatedly proven LYING is what YOU want to do. The video is there for all to see, have you refused to view it? It clearly shows what started this was a dumpster fire thet Kyle put out and was attacked for. All the videos clearly show self defense on Kyle's part every damn one of them. Remind us again how firearm violence has not gone down since 1992 while firearm ownership and less restrictive laws have gone UP. Lie some more go ahead disagree with this truthful post like you did the other two.

If an ILLEGALLY armed MINOR had not been there...none of this would have happened, moron.

None of it? Domestic terrorists wouldn't have tried to burn down Kenosha?

Are you stupid enough to believe that?

 

[daveman]

Kyle Rittenhouse lead defense lawyer John Pierce locked out of Twitter over tweet advocating for his client

Twitter's censorship of Rittenhouse's defense team continues.

reclaimthenet.org

"Twitter locked the account of John Pierce, the lead defense lawyer for Kyle Rittenhouse, over a tweet comparing Rittenhouse to the “unknown patriot” who fired the opening shot of the Battle of Concord on April 19th, 1775 that started the American Revolutionary War. This is the second time in two days that a lawyer on Rittenhouse’s defense team has been censored by Twitter. On September 1, defense lawyer Lin Wood was locked out of his account after advocating for his client. Twitter later reinstated the account, admitting the suspension was a mistake."

View attachment 384419

All the guy said is that Kyle will go down in history along side of the patriot who fired the shot heard around the world -- what Kyle did was just that important....and he will be remembered along side of other Revolutionary patriots like Crispus Attucks and Peter Salem....

Twitter is actively trying to censor the defense efforts of Kyle and violating the free speech of him and his legal defense team -- it is past time now that Trump nationalizes Twitter and Facebook so everyone's speech can be heard, no government censorship -- except for socialist liberal lies and propaganda...no more shutting down people's political speech, no more deleting QAnon posts just because JFK Jr. is still alive and will announce his support for Trump in 2020 -- Now there is some political speech that does need to be cracked down on, like speech that disagrees with real Americans -- and I trust the Trump admin will decide what is best when it comes to that....

He's no patriot, he went looking to kill someone, and he'll pay for it.

Are you angry a pedo got killed, or that a white conservative wasn't?

 

[otto105]

I don't support law breaking of any kind and I have said that repeatedly.
You do.

If that person was carrying illegally he is just as much a criminal as Rittenhouse is.

The Second Amendment is the law.

Apparently, you're perfectly fine with lawbreaking in the form of the enactment and enforcement of unconstitutional “law” that violates the Constitution which is the highest law in this nation.

You cannot credibly support any act of government which violates the people's right to keep and bear arms, and still honestly claim to oppose lawbreaking or to uphold the rule of law.

So you want felons, rapists and murderers to be able to buy guns and carry them in public?

The Supreme Court has ruled that states have the right to pass laws regarding firearms and those state laws that have not been ruled unconstitutional are just as valis as any other law.

And don't forget the Second Amendment does not give you the right to discharge any firearms but only to keep and bear.

They're going to anyway.

So why do you think there should be laws restricting those us who are not "felons, rapists and murderers" from being able to do so?

Democrats don't want people safe.

The want people unable to resist leftist tyranny.

Armed people don't get on the cattle cars.

Stupid libertarian canard.

Does wanting people to be safe mean downplaying a deadly virus for political purpose?

Democrat's want all people to resist tyranny unlike ever-trumpers who love their dictators.

The Holocaust didn't happen because the Jewish people didn't have guns. It happened because a fascist racist government demonized them with falsehoods and sycophants like you bought the lies.

Oh, eat shit, you dumbass.

It's leftists who want an all-powerful government...not conservatives.

Democrats want all people to resist tyranny?

Then why do they want to ban guns?

And don't even bother denying it. It's a fact.

It'd be cool if you could stop lying for two minutes in a row.

Bringing back the confederacy or stating that libertarianism is a good system of government is stupid. We need a strong Federal government to be a strong nation.

Yes, starting with Kim jong Un, Putin, Duterte and that murderer in Saudi Arabia.

Banning guns? Show me the proof.


I'll wait.

Oh, look -- a leftist demanding all-powerful government. Gasp.

Proof? You're going to wish you hadn't asked.

Democrats to propose weapons ban, gun confiscation powers in bill inspired by Trump

Poll: Democrats Split on Banning All Guns
So, just over 8 in 10 Democrats favor banning all semi-automatic weapons.
...
So, when asked if they’d ban all handguns, Democrats are divided, with 44 percent in favor, 46 percent in opposition, and 10 percent undecided. When asked if they’d want to ban all semi-automatic weapons (which includes handguns – but perhaps they’re ignorant of this fact), 82 percent favor banning them.

California Democrats Seek to Ban More Semiautomatic Guns as ‘Assault Weapons’

Biden Calls For ‘Assault’ Gun Ban While Americans Buy In Record Numbers After Riots, ‘Defund Police’ Push. NRA Trolls Him.

Kamala Harris' next target: Banning AR-15-style assault weapons

Democrats openly embracing gun confiscation

You should probably never come back to this thread again.

Where is the evidence that convinces of an complete gun ban?

I don't see it.

For bonus points can you point to a government on this planet that has the size of government that you advocate for.

Ooooh, imagine that. You moved the goalposts. I said Democrats want to ban guns, and I proved it. I didn't claim they wanted to ban ALL guns. That's your pathetic attempt to save face.

Nevertheless, most Democrats want to ban ALL semiautomatic weapons. That's fucked up.

You're intellectually dishonest, and therefore dismissed.

I didn't move any goalpost. I simply responded to your post about perceived tyranny and banning guns.

So dismiss that.

 

[jc456]

Kyle Rittenhouse lead defense lawyer John Pierce locked out of Twitter over tweet advocating for his client

Twitter's censorship of Rittenhouse's defense team continues.

reclaimthenet.org

"Twitter locked the account of John Pierce, the lead defense lawyer for Kyle Rittenhouse, over a tweet comparing Rittenhouse to the “unknown patriot” who fired the opening shot of the Battle of Concord on April 19th, 1775 that started the American Revolutionary War. This is the second time in two days that a lawyer on Rittenhouse’s defense team has been censored by Twitter. On September 1, defense lawyer Lin Wood was locked out of his account after advocating for his client. Twitter later reinstated the account, admitting the suspension was a mistake."

View attachment 384419

All the guy said is that Kyle will go down in history along side of the patriot who fired the shot heard around the world -- what Kyle did was just that important....and he will be remembered along side of other Revolutionary patriots like Crispus Attucks and Peter Salem....

Twitter is actively trying to censor the defense efforts of Kyle and violating the free speech of him and his legal defense team -- it is past time now that Trump nationalizes Twitter and Facebook so everyone's speech can be heard, no government censorship -- except for socialist liberal lies and propaganda...no more shutting down people's political speech, no more deleting QAnon posts just because JFK Jr. is still alive and will announce his support for Trump in 2020 -- Now there is some political speech that does need to be cracked down on, like speech that disagrees with real Americans -- and I trust the Trump admin will decide what is best when it comes to that....

He's no patriot, he went looking to kill someone, and he'll pay for it.

Are you angry a pedo got killed, or that a white conservative wasn't?

Eight year old black girl got shot and killed in Chiraq this week, that fk doesn’t give a shit about her life.

just a pedo’s. Tells you all you need to know

 

[jc456]

ashamed of yourself but you have repeatedly proven LYING is what YOU want to do. The video is there for all to see, have you refused to view it? It clearly shows what started this was a dumpster fire thet Kyle put out and was attacked for. All the videos clearly show self defense on Kyle's part every damn one of them. Remind us again how firearm violence has not gone down since 1992 while firearm ownership and less restrictive laws have gone UP. Lie some more go ahead disagree with this truthful post like you did the other two

That dude doesn’t care about the fire like he doesn’t mind an eight year old girl was killed in chiraq! Hear him bitching at the dude who killed her? Nope just a pedo

 

[DrLove]

[
Look you retard the law has been posted in this forum several times, Kyle was NOT in violation of the LAW. You can disagree all you want Coyote but that is a BALD FACED LIE and you keep repeating it. You are a LYING ASSHOLE.

Again:

948.60  Possession of a dangerous weapon by a person under 18.
(1)  In this section, “dangerous weapon" means any firearm, loaded or unloaded; any electric weapon, as defined in s. 941.295 (1c) (a); metallic knuckles or knuckles of any substance which could be put to the same use with the same or similar effect as metallic knuckles; a nunchaku or any similar weapon consisting of 2 sticks of wood, plastic or metal connected at one end by a length of rope, chain, wire or leather; a cestus or similar material weighted with metal or other substance and worn on the hand; a shuriken or any similar pointed star-like object intended to injure a person when thrown; or a manrikigusari or similar length of chain having weighted ends.
(2) 
(a) Any person under 18 years of age who possesses or goes armed with a dangerous weapon is guilty of a Class A misdemeanor.
(b) Except as provided in par. (c), any person who intentionally sells, loans or gives a dangerous weapon to a person under 18 years of age is guilty of a Class I felony.
(c) Whoever violates par. (b) is guilty of a Class H felony if the person under 18 years of age under par. (b) discharges the firearm and the discharge causes death to himself, herself or another.
(d) A person under 17 years of age who has violated this subsection is subject to the provisions of ch. 938 unless jurisdiction is waived under s. 938.18 or the person is subject to the jurisdiction of a court of criminal jurisdiction under s. 938.183.
(3) 
(a) This section does not apply to a person under 18 years of age who possesses or is armed with a dangerous weapon when the dangerous weapon is being used in target practice under the supervision of an adult or in a course of instruction in the traditional and proper use of the dangerous weapon under the supervision of an adult. This section does not apply to an adult who transfers a dangerous weapon to a person under 18 years of age for use only in target practice under the adult's supervision or in a course of instruction in the traditional and proper use of the dangerous weapon under the adult's supervision.
(b) This section does not apply to a person under 18 years of age who is a member of the armed forces or national guard and who possesses or is armed with a dangerous weapon in the line of duty. This section does not apply to an adult who is a member of the armed forces or national guard and who transfers a dangerous weapon to a person under 18 years of age in the line of duty.
(c) This section applies only to a person under 18 years of age who possesses or is armed with a rifle or a shotgun if the person is in violation of s. 941.28 or is not in compliance with ss. 29.304 and 29.593. This section applies only to an adult who transfers a firearm to a person under 18 years of age if the person under 18 years of age is not in compliance with ss. 29.304 and 29.593 or to an adult who is in violation of s. 941.28.
History: 1987 a. 332; 1991 a. 18, 139; 1993 a. 98; 1995 a. 27, 77; 1997 a. 248; 2001 a. 109; 2005 a. 163; 2011 a. 35.
Sub. (2) (b) does not set a standard for civil liability, and a violation of sub. (2) (b) does not constitute negligence per se. Logarto v. Gustafson, 998 F. Supp. 998(1998).

Same with curfew. I think that as well as allowing an illegally armed 17 yr old in are reasonable questions to ask and all you have is a partisan political response?

The streets were filled with anarchy and mayhem thanks to bedwetting liberal democrat mayors

Rittenhouse was only one small part of the insanity

True. But he is tbe one that killed two people and wounded another. That rather elevates it.

I think you are very confused. The law says "Shall not be infringed".

He was using the 2A EXACTLY for the purpose it was intended. If you think that's not going to come up in the trial, you are wrong.

By the way, have you not found any laws the rioters have broken? Is it only the guy who shot a pedophile that is in the wrong?

You xan argue 2A, but it is irrelevant. Wisconsin law says otherwise and age restrictions have long been upheld.

You realize your argument would allow toddlers to posess abd use fire arms right?

Oh heck, they're all for Toddlers with Guns. Always remember the immortal words of Steve Stockman!



View attachment 385672

This what I mean. We have a crazy sick gun culture in this country. It was nothing like this in my Grandfather’s time, and the weaponry was far less lethal. Guns were just a tool. Not a fetish you parade into 7-11 when you are getting a slurpy.

It's hilarious to me that they use quotes from 18th century Flintlock single fire fans as if they compare to today's weaponry.
Even Justice Scalia said that their are limits to the 2nd Amendment.
If I ever enter a Chipotle and encounter these assholes by the salad bar ...
I'll remember that I don't like their food anyway.

That guy on the left should be more concerned that he is a fat slob

Looks like a guy you'd see at a Trump rally don't it?

 

[basquebromance]

"ask the young, they know everything" - Joseph Joubert

Kyle knew what he was doing, folks!

 

[jc456]

[
Look you retard the law has been posted in this forum several times, Kyle was NOT in violation of the LAW. You can disagree all you want Coyote but that is a BALD FACED LIE and you keep repeating it. You are a LYING ASSHOLE.

Again:

948.60  Possession of a dangerous weapon by a person under 18.
(1)  In this section, “dangerous weapon" means any firearm, loaded or unloaded; any electric weapon, as defined in s. 941.295 (1c) (a); metallic knuckles or knuckles of any substance which could be put to the same use with the same or similar effect as metallic knuckles; a nunchaku or any similar weapon consisting of 2 sticks of wood, plastic or metal connected at one end by a length of rope, chain, wire or leather; a cestus or similar material weighted with metal or other substance and worn on the hand; a shuriken or any similar pointed star-like object intended to injure a person when thrown; or a manrikigusari or similar length of chain having weighted ends.
(2) 
(a) Any person under 18 years of age who possesses or goes armed with a dangerous weapon is guilty of a Class A misdemeanor.
(b) Except as provided in par. (c), any person who intentionally sells, loans or gives a dangerous weapon to a person under 18 years of age is guilty of a Class I felony.
(c) Whoever violates par. (b) is guilty of a Class H felony if the person under 18 years of age under par. (b) discharges the firearm and the discharge causes death to himself, herself or another.
(d) A person under 17 years of age who has violated this subsection is subject to the provisions of ch. 938 unless jurisdiction is waived under s. 938.18 or the person is subject to the jurisdiction of a court of criminal jurisdiction under s. 938.183.
(3) 
(a) This section does not apply to a person under 18 years of age who possesses or is armed with a dangerous weapon when the dangerous weapon is being used in target practice under the supervision of an adult or in a course of instruction in the traditional and proper use of the dangerous weapon under the supervision of an adult. This section does not apply to an adult who transfers a dangerous weapon to a person under 18 years of age for use only in target practice under the adult's supervision or in a course of instruction in the traditional and proper use of the dangerous weapon under the adult's supervision.
(b) This section does not apply to a person under 18 years of age who is a member of the armed forces or national guard and who possesses or is armed with a dangerous weapon in the line of duty. This section does not apply to an adult who is a member of the armed forces or national guard and who transfers a dangerous weapon to a person under 18 years of age in the line of duty.
(c) This section applies only to a person under 18 years of age who possesses or is armed with a rifle or a shotgun if the person is in violation of s. 941.28 or is not in compliance with ss. 29.304 and 29.593. This section applies only to an adult who transfers a firearm to a person under 18 years of age if the person under 18 years of age is not in compliance with ss. 29.304 and 29.593 or to an adult who is in violation of s. 941.28.
History: 1987 a. 332; 1991 a. 18, 139; 1993 a. 98; 1995 a. 27, 77; 1997 a. 248; 2001 a. 109; 2005 a. 163; 2011 a. 35.
Sub. (2) (b) does not set a standard for civil liability, and a violation of sub. (2) (b) does not constitute negligence per se. Logarto v. Gustafson, 998 F. Supp. 998(1998).

Same with curfew. I think that as well as allowing an illegally armed 17 yr old in are reasonable questions to ask and all you have is a partisan political response?

The streets were filled with anarchy and mayhem thanks to bedwetting liberal democrat mayors

Rittenhouse was only one small part of the insanity

True. But he is tbe one that killed two people and wounded another. That rather elevates it.

I think you are very confused. The law says "Shall not be infringed".

He was using the 2A EXACTLY for the purpose it was intended. If you think that's not going to come up in the trial, you are wrong.

By the way, have you not found any laws the rioters have broken? Is it only the guy who shot a pedophile that is in the wrong?

You xan argue 2A, but it is irrelevant. Wisconsin law says otherwise and age restrictions have long been upheld.

You realize your argument would allow toddlers to posess abd use fire arms right?

Oh heck, they're all for Toddlers with Guns. Always remember the immortal words of Steve Stockman!



View attachment 385672

This what I mean. We have a crazy sick gun culture in this country. It was nothing like this in my Grandfather’s time, and the weaponry was far less lethal. Guns were just a tool. Not a fetish you parade into 7-11 when you are getting a slurpy.

It's hilarious to me that they use quotes from 18th century Flintlock single fire fans as if they compare to today's weaponry.
Even Justice Scalia said that their are limits to the 2nd Amendment.
If I ever enter a Chipotle and encounter these assholes by the salad bar ...
I'll remember that I don't like their food anyway.

your hero.. what a hypocrite you continue to be. LOL/ hahahahahahahahahaha

 

[jc456]

"ask the young, they know everything" - Joseph Joubert

Kyle knew what he was doing, folks!

it's why he survived. good lessons he learned eh?

 

[basquebromance]

 

[jc456]

I walk away with my life Every time I have an encounter with police. I respect them! Hmmmm pattern?