progressive hunter
Diamond Member
- Dec 11, 2018
- 59,785
- 36,489
- 2,615
democrats do that all the time,,,
Navigation
Install the app
How to install the app on iOS
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
More options
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Twitter Attacks Lawyer Representing American Patriot, Kyle Rittenhouse
- Thread starter Biff_Poindexter
- Start date
otto105
Diamond Member
- Sep 11, 2017
- 34,121
- 10,867
- 1,315
sounds like youre defending the criminals that were rioting,,,Of course it is.no its not,,,but you left out the part where those two were trying to kill him,,,say that 3 times really fast and it still wont be true,,,OK so he gets a little misdemeanor,,,at least hes still alive to tell the story,,,nope, still wrong blueYou neglect to include that the person who shot those 2 criminals was also breaking WI gun laws so he was also a criminal.
Lawyer: Kyle Rittenhouse Had Firearm in Wisconsin Legally
The 17-year-old charged for his role in a shooting in Kenosha, Wisconsin was carrying a legal firearm at the time, his attorney said in an interview.www.mediaite.com
Wisconsin statute prohibits children younger than 14 from “possession of control” of “any firearm” unless they are accompanied by an adult aged 18 or older who has been designated by a parent or guardian. The state’s regulations governing those aged 15 and older vary widely depending on the type of gun being used and on whether the user is engaged in activity defined as hunting or training.
It was ILLEGAL for him to carry that rifle in public.
nope, still wrong blueYou neglect to include that the person who shot those 2 criminals was also breaking WI gun laws so he was also a criminal.
Lawyer: Kyle Rittenhouse Had Firearm in Wisconsin Legally
The 17-year-old charged for his role in a shooting in Kenosha, Wisconsin was carrying a legal firearm at the time, his attorney said in an interview.
Wisconsin statute prohibits children younger than 14 from “possession of control” of “any firearm” unless they are accompanied by an adult aged 18 or older who has been designated by a parent or guardian. The state’s regulations governing those aged 15 and older vary widely depending on the type of gun being used and on whether the user is engaged in activity defined as hunting or training.
The minimum age to open carry in Wisconsin is 18.
There is a difference between possessing (owning) a rifle and carrying it in public.
WI gun laws on open carry state one must be 18 to open carry a rifle and 21 to carry a handgun
He shouldn't have been there at all.
He was committing a criminal act and during that commission of a crime he killed 2 people.
Tell me if a person breaks into your house and shoots you and your wife can he claim it was self defense?
he basically ran a stop sign and killed 2 people that were trying to kill him,,, doesnt mean he murdered anyone,,,
I never said he murdered anyone.
I said he killed 2 people while he himself was committing a crime
Were they?
Or were they just going to rough him up?
It was Rittenhouse's action of breaking the law that put him in the middle of the riots.
Everything that proceeded from the instant he decided to break the law is ultimately Rittenhouse's own fault.
If he was a law abiding citizen he would not have been there with a rifle.
If he was not there with a rifle he could not have killed anyone.
If he was there without a rifle we don't know that anyone would have threatened him in any way.
The doughy little wannabe soldier boy assumed that just because he had a rifle ( that he was illegally carrying) that he would be safe.
once the police refused to stop the riots it was every law abiding persons responsibility to be there with guns and stop the riots,,,
it just took a 17 yr old to show us how,,,
Sadly, 17 year olds know how to kill people.
otto105
Diamond Member
- Sep 11, 2017
- 34,121
- 10,867
- 1,315
democrats do that all the time,,,The Media such as CNN and Yahoo---the leftist lying media, have been lying once again about what the Boogaloo boys are---they have been desperately trying to have them called a right hate group when in fact they are the opposite...they are a left wing attack squad pro get this ISLAM.White guy shoots 3 other white guys..... and this makes him a racist?you said he was a murderer,,,so show us where he was convicted of murder or shut up,,,show us where he was convicted of murder,,,But he is tbe [sic] one that killed two people and wounded another. That rather elevates it.
He did not kill nor wound any people. He killed two and wounded one, subhuman criminal pieces of shit.
Kyle from Antoich is a murderer.
Why do you support criminala?
give it time
kyle from Antoich will be convicted of murder (twice) once for attempted murder, illegal possession of a deadly weapon and by public opinion of being a white racist Asshole.
Logic and you should meet sometime, maybe get know each other, because you're clearly strangers now.
bangoolo boi wasn’t there because white people were protesting in Kenosha.
boogaloo bois are LEFTISTS you idiot. They fucking marched with BLM you halfwit.
Why lie about something so easy searched?
So, it's the rubber and glue elementary school bullshit with you.
progressive hunter
Diamond Member
- Dec 11, 2018
- 59,785
- 36,489
- 2,615
gotta learn sometime,,17 is a little old but what the heck,,,sounds like youre defending the criminals that were rioting,,,Of course it is.no its not,,,but you left out the part where those two were trying to kill him,,,say that 3 times really fast and it still wont be true,,,OK so he gets a little misdemeanor,,,at least hes still alive to tell the story,,,nope, still wrong blueYou neglect to include that the person who shot those 2 criminals was also breaking WI gun laws so he was also a criminal.
Lawyer: Kyle Rittenhouse Had Firearm in Wisconsin Legally
The 17-year-old charged for his role in a shooting in Kenosha, Wisconsin was carrying a legal firearm at the time, his attorney said in an interview.
Wisconsin statute prohibits children younger than 14 from “possession of control” of “any firearm” unless they are accompanied by an adult aged 18 or older who has been designated by a parent or guardian. The state’s regulations governing those aged 15 and older vary widely depending on the type of gun being used and on whether the user is engaged in activity defined as hunting or training.
It was ILLEGAL for him to carry that rifle in public.
nope, still wrong blueYou neglect to include that the person who shot those 2 criminals was also breaking WI gun laws so he was also a criminal.
Lawyer: Kyle Rittenhouse Had Firearm in Wisconsin Legally
The 17-year-old charged for his role in a shooting in Kenosha, Wisconsin was carrying a legal firearm at the time, his attorney said in an interview.
Wisconsin statute prohibits children younger than 14 from “possession of control” of “any firearm” unless they are accompanied by an adult aged 18 or older who has been designated by a parent or guardian. The state’s regulations governing those aged 15 and older vary widely depending on the type of gun being used and on whether the user is engaged in activity defined as hunting or training.
The minimum age to open carry in Wisconsin is 18.
There is a difference between possessing (owning) a rifle and carrying it in public.
WI gun laws on open carry state one must be 18 to open carry a rifle and 21 to carry a handgun
He shouldn't have been there at all.
He was committing a criminal act and during that commission of a crime he killed 2 people.
Tell me if a person breaks into your house and shoots you and your wife can he claim it was self defense?
he basically ran a stop sign and killed 2 people that were trying to kill him,,, doesnt mean he murdered anyone,,,
I never said he murdered anyone.
I said he killed 2 people while he himself was committing a crime
Were they?
Or were they just going to rough him up?
It was Rittenhouse's action of breaking the law that put him in the middle of the riots.
Everything that proceeded from the instant he decided to break the law is ultimately Rittenhouse's own fault.
If he was a law abiding citizen he would not have been there with a rifle.
If he was not there with a rifle he could not have killed anyone.
If he was there without a rifle we don't know that anyone would have threatened him in any way.
The doughy little wannabe soldier boy assumed that just because he had a rifle ( that he was illegally carrying) that he would be safe.
once the police refused to stop the riots it was every law abiding persons responsibility to be there with guns and stop the riots,,,
it just took a 17 yr old to show us how,,,
Sadly, 17 year olds know how to kill people.
progressive hunter
Diamond Member
- Dec 11, 2018
- 59,785
- 36,489
- 2,615
when???democrats do that all the time,,,The Media such as CNN and Yahoo---the leftist lying media, have been lying once again about what the Boogaloo boys are---they have been desperately trying to have them called a right hate group when in fact they are the opposite...they are a left wing attack squad pro get this ISLAM.White guy shoots 3 other white guys..... and this makes him a racist?you said he was a murderer,,,so show us where he was convicted of murder or shut up,,,show us where he was convicted of murder,,,But he is tbe [sic] one that killed two people and wounded another. That rather elevates it.
He did not kill nor wound any people. He killed two and wounded one, subhuman criminal pieces of shit.
Kyle from Antoich is a murderer.
Why do you support criminala?
give it time
kyle from Antoich will be convicted of murder (twice) once for attempted murder, illegal possession of a deadly weapon and by public opinion of being a white racist Asshole.
Logic and you should meet sometime, maybe get know each other, because you're clearly strangers now.
bangoolo boi wasn’t there because white people were protesting in Kenosha.
boogaloo bois are LEFTISTS you idiot. They fucking marched with BLM you halfwit.
Why lie about something so easy searched?
So, it's the rubber and glue elementary school bullshit with you.
- Banned
- #526
You're trash.Disgusting? I think you know what you can do with yourself.There is no such thing as anyone "needed to be killed." The statement itself is beyond disgusting. How do you know that they were criminals? How did Rittenhouse know that they were (supposedly) "criminals"? He could not have.
They needed to be killed---------they attacked him and certainly would have and had been attacking others. For those with common sense, their attacks on the kids that day indicated previously convicted criminals as their actions simply aren't what the non-criminally inclined do. Which tells me a whole lot about you Lysistrata---------and your moral compass. Common sense ain't so common for many though is it Lysistrata.
I am sorry, but he certainly would have been able to tell easily that they were drug addicts and violent by their actions earlier in the day and even in the moments before their death. These a-holes won't be attacking anyone else---efficient and served justice. #CriminalLIVESDONTMATTER.
Yeah. They attacked kids. Sure. Drug addicts. Sure. Right. There is no evidence of anything except that they tried to catch a killer. You can twist your sick narrative anyway that you want, but it still remains mere propaganda. What sort of moral compass do you have? Rittenhouse is a little criminal and he came there to break the law. This little bitch had already killed one person. But you like this. Figures.
Dirty vigilantes are killers who do not belong on the streets of the United States. If the police in the armored vehicles had actually done their jobs and sent these gunslingers back out of town, none of this would have happened.
You should be ashamed of yourself for your complete failure as a human being.
- Dec 18, 2013
- 136,475
- 27,937
- 2,180
Especially defending himselfSadly, 17 year olds know how to kill people
- Banned
- #528
Everybody knows how.sounds like youre defending the criminals that were rioting,,,Of course it is.no its not,,,but you left out the part where those two were trying to kill him,,,say that 3 times really fast and it still wont be true,,,OK so he gets a little misdemeanor,,,at least hes still alive to tell the story,,,nope, still wrong blueYou neglect to include that the person who shot those 2 criminals was also breaking WI gun laws so he was also a criminal.
Lawyer: Kyle Rittenhouse Had Firearm in Wisconsin Legally
The 17-year-old charged for his role in a shooting in Kenosha, Wisconsin was carrying a legal firearm at the time, his attorney said in an interview.
Wisconsin statute prohibits children younger than 14 from “possession of control” of “any firearm” unless they are accompanied by an adult aged 18 or older who has been designated by a parent or guardian. The state’s regulations governing those aged 15 and older vary widely depending on the type of gun being used and on whether the user is engaged in activity defined as hunting or training.
It was ILLEGAL for him to carry that rifle in public.
nope, still wrong blueYou neglect to include that the person who shot those 2 criminals was also breaking WI gun laws so he was also a criminal.
Lawyer: Kyle Rittenhouse Had Firearm in Wisconsin Legally
The 17-year-old charged for his role in a shooting in Kenosha, Wisconsin was carrying a legal firearm at the time, his attorney said in an interview.
Wisconsin statute prohibits children younger than 14 from “possession of control” of “any firearm” unless they are accompanied by an adult aged 18 or older who has been designated by a parent or guardian. The state’s regulations governing those aged 15 and older vary widely depending on the type of gun being used and on whether the user is engaged in activity defined as hunting or training.
The minimum age to open carry in Wisconsin is 18.
There is a difference between possessing (owning) a rifle and carrying it in public.
WI gun laws on open carry state one must be 18 to open carry a rifle and 21 to carry a handgun
He shouldn't have been there at all.
He was committing a criminal act and during that commission of a crime he killed 2 people.
Tell me if a person breaks into your house and shoots you and your wife can he claim it was self defense?
he basically ran a stop sign and killed 2 people that were trying to kill him,,, doesnt mean he murdered anyone,,,
I never said he murdered anyone.
I said he killed 2 people while he himself was committing a crime
Were they?
Or were they just going to rough him up?
It was Rittenhouse's action of breaking the law that put him in the middle of the riots.
Everything that proceeded from the instant he decided to break the law is ultimately Rittenhouse's own fault.
If he was a law abiding citizen he would not have been there with a rifle.
If he was not there with a rifle he could not have killed anyone.
If he was there without a rifle we don't know that anyone would have threatened him in any way.
The doughy little wannabe soldier boy assumed that just because he had a rifle ( that he was illegally carrying) that he would be safe.
once the police refused to stop the riots it was every law abiding persons responsibility to be there with guns and stop the riots,,,
it just took a 17 yr old to show us how,,,
Sadly, 17 year olds know how to kill people.
It's something we have been doing to each other since the dawn of time, just like fucking.
otto105
Diamond Member
- Sep 11, 2017
- 34,121
- 10,867
- 1,315
Especially defending himselfSadly, 17 year olds know how to kill people
One can't claim self defense when they cause the problem.
otto105
Diamond Member
- Sep 11, 2017
- 34,121
- 10,867
- 1,315
Everybody knows how.sounds like youre defending the criminals that were rioting,,,Of course it is.no its not,,,but you left out the part where those two were trying to kill him,,,say that 3 times really fast and it still wont be true,,,OK so he gets a little misdemeanor,,,at least hes still alive to tell the story,,,nope, still wrong blueYou neglect to include that the person who shot those 2 criminals was also breaking WI gun laws so he was also a criminal.
Lawyer: Kyle Rittenhouse Had Firearm in Wisconsin Legally
The 17-year-old charged for his role in a shooting in Kenosha, Wisconsin was carrying a legal firearm at the time, his attorney said in an interview.
Wisconsin statute prohibits children younger than 14 from “possession of control” of “any firearm” unless they are accompanied by an adult aged 18 or older who has been designated by a parent or guardian. The state’s regulations governing those aged 15 and older vary widely depending on the type of gun being used and on whether the user is engaged in activity defined as hunting or training.
It was ILLEGAL for him to carry that rifle in public.
nope, still wrong blueYou neglect to include that the person who shot those 2 criminals was also breaking WI gun laws so he was also a criminal.
Lawyer: Kyle Rittenhouse Had Firearm in Wisconsin Legally
The 17-year-old charged for his role in a shooting in Kenosha, Wisconsin was carrying a legal firearm at the time, his attorney said in an interview.
Wisconsin statute prohibits children younger than 14 from “possession of control” of “any firearm” unless they are accompanied by an adult aged 18 or older who has been designated by a parent or guardian. The state’s regulations governing those aged 15 and older vary widely depending on the type of gun being used and on whether the user is engaged in activity defined as hunting or training.
The minimum age to open carry in Wisconsin is 18.
There is a difference between possessing (owning) a rifle and carrying it in public.
WI gun laws on open carry state one must be 18 to open carry a rifle and 21 to carry a handgun
He shouldn't have been there at all.
He was committing a criminal act and during that commission of a crime he killed 2 people.
Tell me if a person breaks into your house and shoots you and your wife can he claim it was self defense?
he basically ran a stop sign and killed 2 people that were trying to kill him,,, doesnt mean he murdered anyone,,,
I never said he murdered anyone.
I said he killed 2 people while he himself was committing a crime
Were they?
Or were they just going to rough him up?
It was Rittenhouse's action of breaking the law that put him in the middle of the riots.
Everything that proceeded from the instant he decided to break the law is ultimately Rittenhouse's own fault.
If he was a law abiding citizen he would not have been there with a rifle.
If he was not there with a rifle he could not have killed anyone.
If he was there without a rifle we don't know that anyone would have threatened him in any way.
The doughy little wannabe soldier boy assumed that just because he had a rifle ( that he was illegally carrying) that he would be safe.
once the police refused to stop the riots it was every law abiding persons responsibility to be there with guns and stop the riots,,,
it just took a 17 yr old to show us how,,,
Sadly, 17 year olds know how to kill people.
It's something we have been doing to each other since the dawn of time, just like fucking.
Then 17 year olds should fuck more.
progressive hunter
Diamond Member
- Dec 11, 2018
- 59,785
- 36,489
- 2,615
they do regularly,,,your lack of experience isnt normal,,,Everybody knows how.sounds like youre defending the criminals that were rioting,,,Of course it is.no its not,,,but you left out the part where those two were trying to kill him,,,say that 3 times really fast and it still wont be true,,,OK so he gets a little misdemeanor,,,at least hes still alive to tell the story,,,nope, still wrong blueYou neglect to include that the person who shot those 2 criminals was also breaking WI gun laws so he was also a criminal.
Lawyer: Kyle Rittenhouse Had Firearm in Wisconsin Legally
The 17-year-old charged for his role in a shooting in Kenosha, Wisconsin was carrying a legal firearm at the time, his attorney said in an interview.
Wisconsin statute prohibits children younger than 14 from “possession of control” of “any firearm” unless they are accompanied by an adult aged 18 or older who has been designated by a parent or guardian. The state’s regulations governing those aged 15 and older vary widely depending on the type of gun being used and on whether the user is engaged in activity defined as hunting or training.
It was ILLEGAL for him to carry that rifle in public.
nope, still wrong blueYou neglect to include that the person who shot those 2 criminals was also breaking WI gun laws so he was also a criminal.
Lawyer: Kyle Rittenhouse Had Firearm in Wisconsin Legally
The 17-year-old charged for his role in a shooting in Kenosha, Wisconsin was carrying a legal firearm at the time, his attorney said in an interview.
Wisconsin statute prohibits children younger than 14 from “possession of control” of “any firearm” unless they are accompanied by an adult aged 18 or older who has been designated by a parent or guardian. The state’s regulations governing those aged 15 and older vary widely depending on the type of gun being used and on whether the user is engaged in activity defined as hunting or training.
The minimum age to open carry in Wisconsin is 18.
There is a difference between possessing (owning) a rifle and carrying it in public.
WI gun laws on open carry state one must be 18 to open carry a rifle and 21 to carry a handgun
He shouldn't have been there at all.
He was committing a criminal act and during that commission of a crime he killed 2 people.
Tell me if a person breaks into your house and shoots you and your wife can he claim it was self defense?
he basically ran a stop sign and killed 2 people that were trying to kill him,,, doesnt mean he murdered anyone,,,
I never said he murdered anyone.
I said he killed 2 people while he himself was committing a crime
Were they?
Or were they just going to rough him up?
It was Rittenhouse's action of breaking the law that put him in the middle of the riots.
Everything that proceeded from the instant he decided to break the law is ultimately Rittenhouse's own fault.
If he was a law abiding citizen he would not have been there with a rifle.
If he was not there with a rifle he could not have killed anyone.
If he was there without a rifle we don't know that anyone would have threatened him in any way.
The doughy little wannabe soldier boy assumed that just because he had a rifle ( that he was illegally carrying) that he would be safe.
once the police refused to stop the riots it was every law abiding persons responsibility to be there with guns and stop the riots,,,
it just took a 17 yr old to show us how,,,
Sadly, 17 year olds know how to kill people.
It's something we have been doing to each other since the dawn of time, just like fucking.
Then 17 year olds should fuck more.
- Banned
- #532
I don't think any of ya'll know any boogaloo boys, and the media lies..... about everything.The Media such as CNN and Yahoo---the leftist lying media, have been lying once again about what the Boogaloo boys are---they have been desperately trying to have them called a right hate group when in fact they are the opposite...they are a left wing attack squad pro get this ISLAM.White guy shoots 3 other white guys..... and this makes him a racist?you said he was a murderer,,,so show us where he was convicted of murder or shut up,,,show us where he was convicted of murder,,,But he is tbe [sic] one that killed two people and wounded another. That rather elevates it.
He did not kill nor wound any people. He killed two and wounded one, subhuman criminal pieces of shit.
Kyle from Antoich is a murderer.
Why do you support criminala?
give it time
kyle from Antoich will be convicted of murder (twice) once for attempted murder, illegal possession of a deadly weapon and by public opinion of being a white racist Asshole.
Logic and you should meet sometime, maybe get know each other, because you're clearly strangers now.
bangoolo boi wasn’t there because white people were protesting in Kenosha.
boogaloo bois are LEFTISTS you idiot. They fucking marched with BLM you halfwit.
Why lie about something so easy searched?
- Banned
- #533
And you can't call it murder when they're the ones assaulting people.Especially defending himselfSadly, 17 year olds know how to kill people
One can't claim self defense when they cause the problem.
- Dec 18, 2013
- 136,475
- 27,937
- 2,180
Caused what problemOne can't claim self defense when they cause the problem
otto105
Diamond Member
- Sep 11, 2017
- 34,121
- 10,867
- 1,315
And you can't call it murder when they're the ones assaulting people.Especially defending himselfSadly, 17 year olds know how to kill people
One can't claim self defense when they cause the problem.
What is kyle from Antioch charged with?
otto105
Diamond Member
- Sep 11, 2017
- 34,121
- 10,867
- 1,315
Caused what problemOne can't claim self defense when they cause the problem
murder
daveman
Diamond Member
Democrats don't want people safe.They're going to anyway.I don't support law breaking of any kind and I have said that repeatedly.
You do.
If that person was carrying illegally he is just as much a criminal as Rittenhouse is.
The Second Amendment is the law.
Apparently, you're perfectly fine with lawbreaking in the form of the enactment and enforcement of unconstitutional “law” that violates the Constitution which is the highest law in this nation.
You cannot credibly support any act of government which violates the people's right to keep and bear arms, and still honestly claim to oppose lawbreaking or to uphold the rule of law.
So you want felons, rapists and murderers to be able to buy guns and carry them in public?
The Supreme Court has ruled that states have the right to pass laws regarding firearms and those state laws that have not been ruled unconstitutional are just as valis as any other law.
And don't forget the Second Amendment does not give you the right to discharge any firearms but only to keep and bear.
So why do you think there should be laws restricting those us who are not "felons, rapists and murderers" from being able to do so?
The want people unable to resist leftist tyranny.
Armed people don't get on the cattle cars.
- Dec 18, 2013
- 136,475
- 27,937
- 2,180
That’s impracticalCaused what problemOne can't claim self defense when they cause the problem
murder
- Banned
- #539
Better question; why is he being charged with anything?And you can't call it murder when they're the ones assaulting people.Especially defending himselfSadly, 17 year olds know how to kill people
One can't claim self defense when they cause the problem.
What is kyle from Antioch charged with?
Because it's dangerous to be right when the government is wrong, that's why.
daveman
Diamond Member
You sure are sad the boy wasn't murdered.OK so he gets a little misdemeanor,,,at least hes still alive to tell the story,,,nope, still wrong blueYou neglect to include that the person who shot those 2 criminals was also breaking WI gun laws so he was also a criminal.
Lawyer: Kyle Rittenhouse Had Firearm in Wisconsin Legally
The 17-year-old charged for his role in a shooting in Kenosha, Wisconsin was carrying a legal firearm at the time, his attorney said in an interview.
Wisconsin statute prohibits children younger than 14 from “possession of control” of “any firearm” unless they are accompanied by an adult aged 18 or older who has been designated by a parent or guardian. The state’s regulations governing those aged 15 and older vary widely depending on the type of gun being used and on whether the user is engaged in activity defined as hunting or training.
It was ILLEGAL for him to carry that rifle in public.
nope, still wrong blueYou neglect to include that the person who shot those 2 criminals was also breaking WI gun laws so he was also a criminal.
Lawyer: Kyle Rittenhouse Had Firearm in Wisconsin Legally
The 17-year-old charged for his role in a shooting in Kenosha, Wisconsin was carrying a legal firearm at the time, his attorney said in an interview.
Wisconsin statute prohibits children younger than 14 from “possession of control” of “any firearm” unless they are accompanied by an adult aged 18 or older who has been designated by a parent or guardian. The state’s regulations governing those aged 15 and older vary widely depending on the type of gun being used and on whether the user is engaged in activity defined as hunting or training.
The minimum age to open carry in Wisconsin is 18.
There is a difference between possessing (owning) a rifle and carrying it in public.
WI gun laws on open carry state one must be 18 to open carry a rifle and 21 to carry a handgun
He shouldn't have been there at all.
He was committing a criminal act and during that commission of a crime he killed 2 people.
Tell me if a person breaks into your house and shoots you and your wife can he claim it was self defense?
Similar threads
- Replies
- 62
- Views
- 755
- Replies
- 175
- Views
- 1K
- Replies
- 13
- Views
- 160
- Replies
- 2
- Views
- 83
Latest Discussions
- Replies
- 10
- Views
- 38
- Replies
- 5
- Views
- 26
- Replies
- 103
- Views
- 508
Forum List
-
-
-
-
-
Political Satire 8061
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
ObamaCare 781
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Member Usernotes 470
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-