Twitter Attacks Lawyer Representing American Patriot, Kyle Rittenhouse

basquebromance

Diamond Member
Joined
Nov 26, 2015
Messages
60,613
Reaction score
8,579
Points
2,070
if you guys knew Kyle personally, you probably would love him. of course, if you get your news from the NYT and MSDNC, of course you will hate him!
 

jc456

Diamond Member
Joined
Dec 18, 2013
Messages
91,005
Reaction score
9,420
Points
2,030
if you guys knew Kyle personally, you probably would love him. of course, if you get your news from the NYT and MSDNC, of course you will hate him!
Come back when you’re honest
 

daveman

Diamond Member
Joined
Jun 25, 2010
Messages
61,195
Reaction score
11,319
Points
2,030
Location
On the way to the Dark Tower.

"Twitter locked the account of John Pierce, the lead defense lawyer for Kyle Rittenhouse, over a tweet comparing Rittenhouse to the “unknown patriot” who fired the opening shot of the Battle of Concord on April 19th, 1775 that started the American Revolutionary War. This is the second time in two days that a lawyer on Rittenhouse’s defense team has been censored by Twitter. On September 1, defense lawyer Lin Wood was locked out of his account after advocating for his client. Twitter later reinstated the account, admitting the suspension was a mistake."

View attachment 384419

All the guy said is that Kyle will go down in history along side of the patriot who fired the shot heard around the world -- what Kyle did was just that important....and he will be remembered along side of other Revolutionary patriots like Crispus Attucks and Peter Salem....

Twitter is actively trying to censor the defense efforts of Kyle and violating the free speech of him and his legal defense team -- it is past time now that Trump nationalizes Twitter and Facebook so everyone's speech can be heard, no government censorship -- except for socialist liberal lies and propaganda...no more shutting down people's political speech, no more deleting QAnon posts just because JFK Jr. is still alive and will announce his support for Trump in 2020 -- Now there is some political speech that does need to be cracked down on, like speech that disagrees with real Americans -- and I trust the Trump admin will decide what is best when it comes to that....
He's no patriot, he went looking to kill someone, and he'll pay for it.
Are you angry a pedo got killed, or that a white conservative wasn't?
Eight year old black girl got shot and killed in Chiraq this week, that fk doesn’t give a shit about her life.

just a pedo’s. Tells you all you need to know
BLACK LIVES MATTER only when we can blame white cops
 

freyasman

Platinum Member
Joined
Apr 1, 2020
Messages
5,652
Reaction score
3,393
Points
908
Location
Texas
It's cute the way people here try to excuse the mob chasing him and attacking him as "people trying to apprehend a killer", but the very same people keep saying that there is no reason for vigilantes to be out on the streets.
:rolleyes:
 

Blues Man

Gold Member
Joined
Aug 28, 2016
Messages
8,903
Reaction score
1,984
Points
195
[
Look you retard the law has been posted in this forum several times, Kyle was NOT in violation of the LAW. You can disagree all you want Coyote but that is a BALD FACED LIE and you keep repeating it. You are a LYING ASSHOLE.

Again:

948.60  Possession of a dangerous weapon by a person under 18.
(1)  In this section, “dangerous weapon" means any firearm, loaded or unloaded; any electric weapon, as defined in s. 941.295 (1c) (a); metallic knuckles or knuckles of any substance which could be put to the same use with the same or similar effect as metallic knuckles; a nunchaku or any similar weapon consisting of 2 sticks of wood, plastic or metal connected at one end by a length of rope, chain, wire or leather; a cestus or similar material weighted with metal or other substance and worn on the hand; a shuriken or any similar pointed star-like object intended to injure a person when thrown; or a manrikigusari or similar length of chain having weighted ends.
(2) 
(a) Any person under 18 years of age who possesses or goes armed with a dangerous weapon is guilty of a Class A misdemeanor.
(b) Except as provided in par. (c), any person who intentionally sells, loans or gives a dangerous weapon to a person under 18 years of age is guilty of a Class I felony.
(c) Whoever violates par. (b) is guilty of a Class H felony if the person under 18 years of age under par. (b) discharges the firearm and the discharge causes death to himself, herself or another.
(d) A person under 17 years of age who has violated this subsection is subject to the provisions of ch. 938 unless jurisdiction is waived under s. 938.18 or the person is subject to the jurisdiction of a court of criminal jurisdiction under s. 938.183.
(3) 
(a) This section does not apply to a person under 18 years of age who possesses or is armed with a dangerous weapon when the dangerous weapon is being used in target practice under the supervision of an adult or in a course of instruction in the traditional and proper use of the dangerous weapon under the supervision of an adult. This section does not apply to an adult who transfers a dangerous weapon to a person under 18 years of age for use only in target practice under the adult's supervision or in a course of instruction in the traditional and proper use of the dangerous weapon under the adult's supervision.
(b) This section does not apply to a person under 18 years of age who is a member of the armed forces or national guard and who possesses or is armed with a dangerous weapon in the line of duty. This section does not apply to an adult who is a member of the armed forces or national guard and who transfers a dangerous weapon to a person under 18 years of age in the line of duty.
(c) This section applies only to a person under 18 years of age who possesses or is armed with a rifle or a shotgun if the person is in violation of s. 941.28 or is not in compliance with ss. 29.304 and 29.593. This section applies only to an adult who transfers a firearm to a person under 18 years of age if the person under 18 years of age is not in compliance with ss. 29.304 and 29.593 or to an adult who is in violation of s. 941.28.
History: 1987 a. 332; 1991 a. 18, 139; 1993 a. 98; 1995 a. 27, 77; 1997 a. 248; 2001 a. 109; 2005 a. 163; 2011 a. 35.
Sub. (2) (b) does not set a standard for civil liability, and a violation of sub. (2) (b) does not constitute negligence per se. Logarto v. Gustafson, 998 F. Supp. 998(1998).
Same with curfew. I think that as well as allowing an illegally armed 17 yr old in are reasonable questions to ask and all you have is a partisan political response?
The streets were filled with anarchy and mayhem thanks to bedwetting liberal democrat mayors

Rittenhouse was only one small part of the insanity
True. But he is tbe one that killed two people and wounded another. That rather elevates it.
I think you are very confused. The law says "Shall not be infringed".

He was using the 2A EXACTLY for the purpose it was intended. If you think that's not going to come up in the trial, you are wrong.

By the way, have you not found any laws the rioters have broken? Is it only the guy who shot a pedophile that is in the wrong?
You xan argue 2A, but it is irrelevant. Wisconsin law says otherwise and age restrictions have long been upheld.

You realize your argument would allow toddlers to posess abd use fire arms right?
Oh heck, they're all for Toddlers with Guns. Always remember the immortal words of Steve Stockman!


View attachment 385672



This what I mean. We have a crazy sick gun culture in this country. It was nothing like this in my Grandfather’s time, and the weaponry was far less lethal. Guns were just a tool. Not a fetish you parade into 7-11 when you are getting a slurpy.
It's hilarious to me that they use quotes from 18th century Flintlock single fire fans as if they compare to today's weaponry.
Even Justice Scalia said that their are limits to the 2nd Amendment.
If I ever enter a Chipotle and encounter these assholes by the salad bar ...
I'll remember that I don't like their food anyway. ;)

That guy on the left should be more concerned that he is a fat slob
Looks like a guy you'd see at a Trump rally don't it? :D
Lots of fat democrats out there too
 

Jarlaxle

Gold Member
Joined
Sep 4, 2012
Messages
17,103
Reaction score
1,894
Points
245
Location
New England
Read the article.

And I haven't thrown out the Constitution. Every state has gun laws. Tell me when WI gun laws regarding open carry were found to be unconstitutional.

Rittenhouse was breaking the law. Period.

If you don't care that he was committing a crime in WI then you cannot say you want criminals who break gun laws to be arrested and serve time without being a hypocrite
Stop lying.
 

Blues Man

Gold Member
Joined
Aug 28, 2016
Messages
8,903
Reaction score
1,984
Points
195
Read the article.

And I haven't thrown out the Constitution. Every state has gun laws. Tell me when WI gun laws regarding open carry were found to be unconstitutional.

Rittenhouse was breaking the law. Period.

If you don't care that he was committing a crime in WI then you cannot say you want criminals who break gun laws to be arrested and serve time without being a hypocrite
Stop lying.
I haven't lied once in this thread.

It is illegal in Wisconsin for anyone under 18 to carry a firearm in public

Look it up
 

Jarlaxle

Gold Member
Joined
Sep 4, 2012
Messages
17,103
Reaction score
1,894
Points
245
Location
New England
No, you just lost
Read the article.

And I haven't thrown out the Constitution. Every state has gun laws. Tell me when WI gun laws regarding open carry were found to be unconstitutional.

Rittenhouse was breaking the law. Period.

If you don't care that he was committing a crime in WI then you cannot say you want criminals who break gun laws to be arrested and serve time without being a hypocrite
Stop lying.
I haven't lied once in this thread.

It is illegal in Wisconsin for anyone under 18 to carry a firearm in public

Look it up
You lied again.
 

Blues Man

Gold Member
Joined
Aug 28, 2016
Messages
8,903
Reaction score
1,984
Points
195
No, you just lost
Read the article.

And I haven't thrown out the Constitution. Every state has gun laws. Tell me when WI gun laws regarding open carry were found to be unconstitutional.

Rittenhouse was breaking the law. Period.

If you don't care that he was committing a crime in WI then you cannot say you want criminals who break gun laws to be arrested and serve time without being a hypocrite
Stop lying.
I haven't lied once in this thread.

It is illegal in Wisconsin for anyone under 18 to carry a firearm in public

Look it up
You lied again.
No I did not.

 

Jarlaxle

Gold Member
Joined
Sep 4, 2012
Messages
17,103
Reaction score
1,894
Points
245
Location
New England
Yes, you did. Regurgitating something wrong does not make it correct. Repeatedly doing so after being corrected is a LIE.
 

New Topics

Most reactions - Past 7 days

Forum List

Top