toobfreak
Tungsten/Glass Member
Their own geo data showed they were going around town in the middle of the night while most people sleep going from drop box to drop box, unless you are going to try to make an even bigger ass of yourself and try to suggest it was just pure coincidence that everywhere they stopped was within a stone's throw of another drop box? In a proper investigation, if the authorities took that election half as serious as they do J6, the thing to do would be to interview these people and recover the data from their phones and other things to determine the TRUTH. But everyone seems afraid to stir up the hornets nest of muck which is our fraudulent and failed election system known broken almost 20 years ago.without any evidence of what they were actually doing.
I don't need to do anything, schmuck. But the evidence in the movie is damning, if circumstantial. The kind of direct, immediate, smoking gun evidence you speak of is impossible unless you literally had a live person at each drop box 24/7 checking every ballot as it was delivered because once opened, a ballot is a ballot, and almost impossible to prove and you know that, so don't play coy with me. Democrats knew all this when they set up the fraud but the door is closing on those shenanigans now and people will be proactively vigilant now to ensure that the left never pulls it again. You shot all your wad just to get Trump out of office, and it landed you right into Biden's lap of shit.So yes you need video evidence or any kind of evidence showing that they did anything illegal. Just as you need to show that the people in the videos were doing something illegal.
You really want to run with that? Strictly speaking, you are right, no one can absolutely eliminate those as POSSIBILITIES, but you really need to learn the difference between empiricism and stubbornness. I used to be a trained board-certified forensic expert witness doing work for and appearing to give testimony in some criminal cases and what we have here is strong supporting circumstantial evidence, which has been enough to convict many of murder.Here is an example of your dishonesty. You have a video of somebody taking a photo of the ballot box and you automatically assume it is proof that it was proof for payment. Well how do you know that?! Why couldn’t it be a photo for a social media post saying “I just voted!!”Or a photo for a text message he was sending to friends?
You keep trying to dissect the video down to its smallest components when if honest, you really need to take the evidence in whole collectively with everything else and add it all together to see the big picture, which is more I think what most others here ARE doing. It ALL points to Joe not winning that election by a million years.
And the investigations will be going on for a very long time, which means, everyone who said the fraud was totally baseless, had all been debunked and this election was squeaky clean-- LIED.