Slade3200
Diamond Member
- Jan 13, 2016
- 68,371
- 17,535
- 2,190
Wow, you sure got me there!!Questioning and making excuses that aren't very good... Carry on.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Wow, you sure got me there!!Questioning and making excuses that aren't very good... Carry on.
Yes Joe got more votes for three reasons. 1. Population growth 2. Pandemic locking people inside to watch the political drama and most importantly 3. Trump was that bad of a President people came out of the woodworks to give him the boot.Ok, so Joe got more votes than Obama while he held up in the basement along with million's more leftist that feared the virus extremely before attempting to return to mainstream living, but they made sure to get out and vote no matter what eh ??
The whole thing reeps of investigation, but due to the extensive convincing by bad political apparatuses and their handler's, it's all just swept nice and neatly underneath the rug.
What a bunch of bullshit. Everything they do enables some kind of fraud. It is what they do.Well that depends on who did the changing. For elections the Dems try to do as much as they can to make voting easy and accessible because larger voter turnout out favors them. Republicans change the laws to be stricter in the name of security… their unspoken agenda is the fact that the more regulations the less the turn out which is in their favor.
Did you not know this or did you just want to see me explain it??
Oh look who’s back, Mr Liar…. Ready to fess up for the “stricter” and “felony” lies you told so we can move on to the “30-40” narrative. I can’t wait to school you on that one!!!What a bunch of bullshit. Everything they do enables some kind of fraud. It is what they do.
You gave two excuses in which one I agree with, and that is that the Democrat's have to dumb it down for their base in order to ensure the vote, otherwise they treat them just like one having to lead a poor person to a bowl of water, and this in order to get him or her some temporary on the spot nutrition that they were being denied, and this from a point of entrenched starvation caused by what however (?), but as soon as they hit it big together, and the channel is again secured (IOW, if they win), then they forget quickly about the voter that helped them win, and so they abandon the poor little feller's or worse they give them to other's to politically raise because they don't have time for it anymore, and on top of that they got what they wanted (A political win or upset), but in the meantime everything is failing.Well that depends on who did the changing. For elections the Dems try to do as much as they can to make voting easy and accessible because larger voter turnout out favors them. Republicans change the laws to be stricter in the name of security… their unspoken agenda is the fact that the more regulations the less the turn out which is in their favor.
Did you not know this or did you just want to see me explain it??
Hahaha. Was that a serious post or where you trying to sound like an illiterate prick?You gave two excuses in which one I agree with, and that is that the Democrat's have to dumb it down for their base in order to ensure the vote, otherwise they treat them just like one having to lead a poor person to a bowl of water, and this in order to get him or her some temporary on the spot nutrition that they were being denied, and this from a point of entrenched starvation caused by what however (?), but as soon as they hit it big together, and the channel is again secured (IOW, if they win), then they forget quickly about the voter that helped them win, and so they abandon the poor little feller's or worse they give them to other's to politically raise because they don't have time for it anymore, and on top of that they got what they wanted (A political win or upset), but in the meantime everything is failing.
Where did you go Lastamender ?! Let’s finish this conversation, shall we?Oh look who’s back, Mr Liar…. Ready to fess up for the “stricter” and “felony” lies you told so we can move on to the “30-40” narrative. I can’t wait to school you on that one!!!
We have finished.Where did you go Lastamender ?! Let’s finish this conversation, shall we?
You don’t want to get schooled on the 30-40 ballot box visits? Not like you to back down from a fight. Everything ok?We have finished.
Your excuses are fucking ridiculous.You don’t want to get schooled on the 30-40 ballot box visits? Not like you to back down from a fight. Everything ok?
You haven’t heard my excuses about the 30-40 trips yet. you dodged and ran instead of providing counter arguments to my other points about you lying. We both know that’s because there are no counterpoints, so just fess up and apologize for your dishonesty and then we can move into the next subjectYour excuses are fucking ridiculous.
There is no excuse for 30 or 40 trips.You haven’t heard my excuses about the 30-40 trips yet. you dodged and ran instead of providing counter arguments to my other points about you lying. We both know that’s because there are no counterpoints, so just fess up and apologize for your dishonesty and then we can move into the next subject
Wait, aren't the pings and geo tracking information backed up by video accounts or evidence of these folks being at the drop boxes, otherwise Corroborating the evidence that tends to support a proposition that is already supported by some initial evidence, therefore confirming the proposition ??It’s not an excuse it’s an accurate statement. We don’t know what dots on a map are doing. If I geo tracked you to the lumber yard can I say that’s verified proof you stole wood? The comical thing about your argument is you want to say it proves you stole wood and there isn’t even evidence that wood was stolen!
Happy to dive into it right after you admit to making false statements about the stricter and felony issues. Let’s close the door on those then get to the 30-40. Ok?There is no excuse for 30 or 40 trips.
So is it a misdemeanor to steal an election?Happy to dive into it right after you admit to making false statements about the stricter and felony issues. Let’s close the door on those then get to the 30-40. Ok?
Haha, what are you talking about?? Trying to change the subject again?! Fess up to your lies and then I’ll explain exactly why your 30-40 theory is flawedSo is it a misdemeanor to steal an election?
Wouldn’t that be great?! Link the group tracked data to actual videos of somebody committing a crime. You’d think that would be a main focus of this revolutionary movie. But alas. Not on geo tracked dot is identified or linked to a video… and not one video shows the same person making multiple drops. So we are left with one thing…. AssumptionsWait, aren't the pings and geo tracking information backed up by video accounts or evidence of these folks being at the drop boxes, otherwise Corroborating the evidence that tends to support a proposition that is already supported by some initial evidence, therefore confirming the proposition ??
So you admit there was that many trips? If you do, you have no argument.Haha, what are you talking about?? Trying to change the subject again?! Fess up to your lies and then I’ll explain exactly why your 30-40 theory is flawed
As I’ve said… fess up to your previous lies and then we can dive right into it!So you admit there was that many trips? If you do, you have no argument.