For the third time, Iām happy to school you on you āmultiple tripā narrative as soon as we close the book on your false felony claims. Are you going to stop spreading this lie? Say yes and then Iāll address the multiple trips topic
Iāll say it for the 4th time. Happy to discuss the multiple trips topic as soon as we put to bed your felony lies. Be a man and fess up to being wrong. Weak people change the subject.The gullible think there is some other reason to go to multiple drop boxes and non-profits and do it daily before the election besides fraud. They cannot tell me what it is but insist it is not fraud.
You never described stricter, dumbass. And why shouldn't an election have strict rules? They were meant to to keep them honest and give them integrity. 2020 had no integrity. The last thing you want is a fair election.
Haha, youāre such a moron. I literally wrote stricter. Not my problem if you canāt read good
You are trying to change what I said, and failing like usual.Haha, youāre such a moron. I literally wrote stricter. Not my problem if you canāt read good
First you say the rules arenāt strict and now youāre defending strict rules. Youāre all over the place except for on the topic.
Except for you lied and I showed it.
You keep saying that based on what you believe. Do you understand it means nothing to me or anyone else but you?
Itās not a belief itās a fact. I wrote stricter. You lied and said I didnāt. I posted the quotes. There no belief there, just dishonesty
Fraud is the topic. I do not care what you said about voting laws because no matter what the law says the criminals will not care.
Whether you care or not makes no difference, just stop lying. You lying has be some the topic because you are posting false things. Be honest for once in your life and admit you were being dishonest when you mischaraterized my āstricterā comment and when you cited a 2010 Georgia law and claimed that anybody dropping of somebody elseās ballot was committing a felony. Both these statements of yours were untrue. Not because of what I believe but from the evidence I showed. See thatās how you are supposed to engage in debate.
Come on, you can do it. No need to dodge by posting cartoons, thatās for the weak minded. Be honest and answer questions directly. It isnāt hard
So you are saying that that's what it would take to make it happen eh (thousand's of people) ? Hmmmm one wonder's how much weight at a time a mule could carry, and how many trips would have to be made depending on the ballot weight, otherwise therefore controlling the rates of distribution in a possible ballot box stuffing scenario ??
Those ballots have to be matched for signature's etc, and they had to meet all other means of integrity checks that were being hap-hazzardly done prior to a win taking place or during the voting stage of the game.... Many ballots were revealed as inadequate or not legit due to all sorts of irregularities found, and this after checking them by way of certain criteria then used, and so the 2020 ballots became highly suspicious in the various audit's taken after the fact...The court's however, with the controlling effects that are used through intimidation method's as is used, wouldn't or decided not to go near anything with less than a 30' pole these days..
No thatās not at all what I was saying. Whatās with all these crazy misinterpretations of basic English? These conversations arenāt hard to follow. I wasnāt claiming anything, I was questioning the absurdity of the claims being made.
My ballot was one of those. Didnāt get counted because my signature didnāt match what they had on file. Know what that tells meā¦ the system is working.Those ballots have to be matched for signature's etc, and they had to meet all other means of integrity checks that were being hap-hazzardly done prior to a win taking place or during the voting stage of the game.... Many ballots were revealed as inadequate or not legit due to all sorts of irregularities found, and this after checking them by way of certain criteria then used, and so the 2020 ballots became highly suspicious in the various audit's taken after the fact...The court's however, with the controlling effects that are used through intimidation method's as is used, wouldn't or decided not to go near anything with less than a 30' pole these days..
Now what was the purpose of changing any of the old law's ??? Give it your best excuse, we can't wait.
Questioning and making excuses that aren't very good... Carry on.
Ok, so Joe got more votes than Obama while he held up in the basement along with million's more leftist that feared the virus extremely before attempting to return to mainstream living, but they made sure to get out and vote no matter what eh ??
Well that depends on who did the changing. For elections the Dems try to do as much as they can to make voting easy and accessible because larger voter turnout out favors them. Republicans change the laws to be stricter in the name of securityā¦ their unspoken agenda is the fact that the more regulations the less the turn out which is in their favor.
