Tulsi Gabbard - Worst Cabinet Pick in History - John Bolton

[Luckyone]

If he picks more Left Wing Zionist Fascist 911 Traitors close to W, this time... ABSOLUTELY!!!

NO QUESTION ABOUT IT

The entire effort to put him back in the WH was that he LEARNED NOT TO DO THAT....

So he was a Dummy in 2016?

He didn't think so!

2016 Trump Statements:

 

[theHawk]

According to John Bolton a few days ago:

‘Tulsi Gabbard is the worst cabinet-level appointment in history, much like Caliguala nominating his horse as a Roman council member"


Jamie Metzl (a national security expert) unpacked some of the “really concerning” ramifications of Donald Trump’s decision to nominate former Rep. Tulsi Gabbard as his director of national intelligence.“Tulsi Gabbard has never worked in intelligence. She has no real background for this job,” Metzl added, noting that Gabbard has been a “booster” for autocrats such as Russia’s Vladimir Putin, Syria’s Bashar al-Assad and Turkey’s Recep Tayyip Erdogan.

Gabbard, a veteran and former Democratic House member, has promoted conspiracy theories about the U.S.’s involvement in Ukraine.

and one more


With all of these very obvious reasons for this woman to be not only totally unqualified for the job but also leaning to the "bad side" (such as Russia), how does Trump (supposedly an American patriot) choose her?

 

[Luckyone]

She understood Syria more than Obama.

Give me the LIST of things that qualifies her to be Secretary of Intelligence. She is not being made Ambassador to Syria.

 

[pknopp]

Give me the LIST of things that qualifies her to be Secretary of Intelligence. She is not being made Ambassador to Syria.

She knew more than Obama. Not sure what else you need.

 

[Foxfyre]

According to John Bolton a few days ago:

‘Tulsi Gabbard is the worst cabinet-level appointment in history, much like Caliguala nominating his horse as a Roman council member"


Jamie Metzl (a national security expert) unpacked some of the “really concerning” ramifications of Donald Trump’s decision to nominate former Rep. Tulsi Gabbard as his director of national intelligence.“Tulsi Gabbard has never worked in intelligence. She has no real background for this job,” Metzl added, noting that Gabbard has been a “booster” for autocrats such as Russia’s Vladimir Putin, Syria’s Bashar al-Assad and Turkey’s Recep Tayyip Erdogan.

Gabbard, a veteran and former Democratic House member, has promoted conspiracy theories about the U.S.’s involvement in Ukraine.

and one more


With all of these very obvious reasons for this woman to be not only totally unqualified for the job but also leaning to the "bad side" (such as Russia), how does Trump (supposedly an American patriot) choose her?

Well since John Bolton is among probably the top three worst picks Trump chose on his team in his last administration--Trump did fire him--I would say his criticism of Tulsi Gabbard pretty much gives her the Good Housekeeping and all other Seals of Approval.

 

[gtopa1]

She is female. Trump could care less about anything Tulsi has to say. He wants her to read that teleprompter, do his firings, and then shut her mouth.

Sounds quite reasonable. Add to that streamlining the NSI and making it better able to DO ITS JOB is also high on the cards; probably the second week of Trump's term. lol

Greg

 

[Dekster]

According to John Bolton a few days ago:

‘Tulsi Gabbard is the worst cabinet-level appointment in history, much like Caliguala nominating his horse as a Roman council member"


Jamie Metzl (a national security expert) unpacked some of the “really concerning” ramifications of Donald Trump’s decision to nominate former Rep. Tulsi Gabbard as his director of national intelligence.“Tulsi Gabbard has never worked in intelligence. She has no real background for this job,” Metzl added, noting that Gabbard has been a “booster” for autocrats such as Russia’s Vladimir Putin, Syria’s Bashar al-Assad and Turkey’s Recep Tayyip Erdogan.

Gabbard, a veteran and former Democratic House member, has promoted conspiracy theories about the U.S.’s involvement in Ukraine.

and one more


With all of these very obvious reasons for this woman to be not only totally unqualified for the job but also leaning to the "bad side" (such as Russia), how does Trump (supposedly an American patriot) choose her?

Oh no, the AG nominee was far worse. It was why he was curbed so quickly.

 

[Luckyone]

She knew more than Obama. Not sure what else you need.

You are deflecting (likely because you do not have an answer). We are in 2024 and Obama is not in the picture and the problems then are not the same as the ones now. What makes her qualified to address the 2024 intelligence problems?

 

[excalibur]

... John Bolton, who was picked and worked for Trump.

And who was summarily fired by Trump.

 

[LeroyDumonde]

She knew more than Obama. Not sure what else you need.

To be honest, a box of rocks knows more than Obama.

 

[Luckyone]

Well since John Bolton is among probably the top three worst picks Trump chose on his team in his last administration--Trump did fire him--I would say his criticism of Tulsi Gabbard pretty much gives her the Good Housekeeping and all other Seals of Approval.

What about the worries/doubts felt by James Lankford, Susan Collins, John Cornyn and Mike Rounds (GOP members)? How does that qualify her?

 

[excalibur]

To be honest, a box of rocks knows more than Obama.

I disagree, Kamala does not know more than Obama.

 

[skye]

According to John Bolton a few days ago:

‘Tulsi Gabbard is the worst cabinet-level appointment in history, much like Caliguala nominating his horse as a Roman council member"


Jamie Metzl (a national security expert) unpacked some of the “really concerning” ramifications of Donald Trump’s decision to nominate former Rep. Tulsi Gabbard as his director of national intelligence.“Tulsi Gabbard has never worked in intelligence. She has no real background for this job,” Metzl added, noting that Gabbard has been a “booster” for autocrats such as Russia’s Vladimir Putin, Syria’s Bashar al-Assad and Turkey’s Recep Tayyip Erdogan.

Gabbard, a veteran and former Democratic House member, has promoted conspiracy theories about the U.S.’s involvement in Ukraine.

and one more


With all of these very obvious reasons for this woman to be not only totally unqualified for the job but also leaning to the "bad side" (such as Russia), how does Trump (supposedly an American patriot) choose her?

 

[Luckyone]

And who was summarily fired by Trump.

but picked by Trump. I thought that Trump was perfect? That he is NEVER wrong about anything. How do you explain him choosing Bolton and the other 85% of his cabinet members that were fired or left?

That kind of a track records STRONGLY suggests that he is likely wrong about Gabbard, after all, Trump never blames himself for anything and learning something takes the acknowledgement of an error being made.

Can you show me just one acknowledgment from Trump of a mistake he made, where he does not blame others for the mistake?

 

[Luckyone]

View attachment 1046964

John Bolton said that not only on CNN but everywhere. How can you blame CNN for what Bolton does?

 

[excalibur]

but picked by Trump. I thought that Trump was perfect? That he is NEVER wrong about anything. How do you explain him choosing Bolton and the other 85% of his cabinet members that were fired or left?

That kind of a track records STRONGLY suggests that he is likely wrong about Gabbard, after all, Trump never blames himself for anything and learning something takes the acknowledgement of an error being made.

Can you show me just one acknowledgment from Trump of a mistake he made, where he does not blame others for the mistake?

And was summarily filed by Trump. Know when to hold 'em, know when to fold 'em.

 

[crossbody]

Trump don't sit around to hear anything Melania has to say let alone unqualified Tulsi.

 

[Foxfyre]

What about the worries/doubts felt by James Lankford, Susan Collins, John Cornyn and Mike Rounds (GOP members)? How does that qualify her?

What about the many others in the GOP who think she is just fine. A few old guard and/or RINO Republicans is hardly an endorsement or condemnation of anything.

Trump is looking for aptitude, attitude, insight, knowledge, understanding, and commitment to a MAGA agenda in his appointments. He, as well as I, believe that is far more likely to serve the people well than appointing someone with experience who lackall the other traits we need to reform a broken government and set the country back on the right path.

And for Bolton to denigrate Tulsi absolutely reinforces my opinion that she was a good choice.

 

[LAUGHatLEFTISTS]

Yeah, the real deal...............a Trump ass kisser and as incompetent as Trump. Just what Trump is looking for!

312>226
House
Senate
Popular vote
Mandate

 

[TheGreatSatan]

According to John Bolton a few days ago:

‘Tulsi Gabbard is the worst cabinet-level appointment in history, much like Caliguala nominating his horse as a Roman council member"


Jamie Metzl (a national security expert) unpacked some of the “really concerning” ramifications of Donald Trump’s decision to nominate former Rep. Tulsi Gabbard as his director of national intelligence.“Tulsi Gabbard has never worked in intelligence. She has no real background for this job,” Metzl added, noting that Gabbard has been a “booster” for autocrats such as Russia’s Vladimir Putin, Syria’s Bashar al-Assad and Turkey’s Recep Tayyip Erdogan.

Gabbard, a veteran and former Democratic House member, has promoted conspiracy theories about the U.S.’s involvement in Ukraine.

and one more


With all of these very obvious reasons for this woman to be not only totally unqualified for the job but also leaning to the "bad side" (such as Russia), how does Trump (supposedly an American patriot) choose her?

When America's enemies hate a pick like Tulsi, you know she's the best for the America.

Tulsi