Tulsi Gabbard - Worst Cabinet Pick in History - John Bolton

[sparky]

~S~

 

[skye]

John Bolton said that not only on CNN but everywhere. How can you blame CNN for what Bolton does?

 

[Nobody911]

According to John Bolton a few days ago:

‘Tulsi Gabbard is the worst cabinet-level appointment in history, much like Caliguala nominating his horse as a Roman council member"


Jamie Metzl (a national security expert) unpacked some of the “really concerning” ramifications of Donald Trump’s decision to nominate former Rep. Tulsi Gabbard as his director of national intelligence.“Tulsi Gabbard has never worked in intelligence. She has no real background for this job,” Metzl added, noting that Gabbard has been a “booster” for autocrats such as Russia’s Vladimir Putin, Syria’s Bashar al-Assad and Turkey’s Recep Tayyip Erdogan.

Gabbard, a veteran and former Democratic House member, has promoted conspiracy theories about the U.S.’s involvement in Ukraine.

and one more


With all of these very obvious reasons for this woman to be not only totally unqualified for the job but also leaning to the "bad side" (such as Russia), how does Trump (supposedly an American patriot) choose her?

●●●Tulsi Gabbard, a former Democratic presidential candidate and a member of the US House of Representatives, has been a vocal critic of the military-industrial complex. She has spoken out against the influence of defense contractors and the military-industrial complex on US foreign policy and has advocated for a more peaceful and diplomatic approach to international relations.

In 2019, Gabbard introduced the "Stop Arming Terrorists Act," which aimed to prevent the US government from providing military aid to countries that have been known to support terrorist organizations. She has also spoken out against the US involvement in the war in Yemen and has called for an end to US support for the Saudi-led coalition.

Gabbard has also been critical of the military-industrial complex's influence on US politics, saying that it has led to a "perpetual state of war" and has drained resources away from domestic priorities. She has advocated for a more transparent and accountable defense budget and has called for an end to the practice of "wasteful and unnecessary" military spending.

In a 2020 interview with The Intercept, Gabbard said: "The military-industrial complex has a stranglehold on our foreign policy, and it's driving us towards more and more wars, and it's draining our resources away from the things that we need to be focusing on here at home."

Gabbard has also been critical of John Bolton, saying that he is a "warmonger" who has "made a career out of promoting regime change and war." She has also criticized Bolton's role in promoting the US invasion of Iraq and his advocacy for a more aggressive approach to Iran.

Overall, Tulsi Gabbard has been a vocal critic of the military-industrial complex and has advocated for a more peaceful and diplomatic approach to international relations.


●●● John Bolton has had connections to the military-industrial complex throughout his career. As a hawkish foreign policy expert, he has often advocated for a strong military and has been critical of efforts to reduce defense spending.

In the 1980s, Bolton worked as a lawyer for the law firm of Covington & Burling, which has represented several major defense contractors, including Boeing and Lockheed Martin.

In the 1990s and 2000s, Bolton was a senior vice president at the American Enterprise Institute (AEI), a conservative think tank that has received funding from several major defense contractors, including Boeing, Lockheed Martin, and Raytheon.

Bolton has also served on the boards of several organizations that have ties to the military-industrial complex, including the Project for the New American Century (PNAC), a neoconservative think tank that advocated for a more aggressive US foreign policy and increased defense spending.

In addition, Bolton has received funding from several defense contractors and military-industrial complex-related organizations for his research and writing. For example, in 2013, he received a $115,000 grant from the Lynde and Harry Bradley Foundation, a conservative foundation that has funded several organizations with ties to the military-industrial complex.

As national security adviser, Bolton was a strong advocate for increased defense spending and a more aggressive US military posture. He was also a key player in the Trump administration's efforts to promote the sale of US arms to foreign countries, including Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates.

Bolton's connections to the military-industrial complex have been criticized by some as evidence of his bias towards a more aggressive and militarized foreign policy. However, Bolton and his supporters argue that his views are driven by a commitment to US national security and a desire to promote American interests abroad.

I don't want to say anything about other people you mentioned. Too long now.

Bolton = a shadow of vulture

Gabbard = a shadow of dove

Which one do you like more? I prefer Gabbard.

 

[Luckyone]

None of the Trump ass kissers on this board has been able to show one thing that actually qualifies Gabbard for the post.

You all have been criticizing everyone else but not actually addressing the problem.............Tulsi Gabbard as Secretary of Intelligence.

I gave tangible reasons for the being unqualified. Where are you debate responses that actually address the debate and not the messenger, not the media, and not the traitors (supposedly) against her?

Do you want another 85% of the cabinet members to leave in 2025 and the country suffer from the incompetence of Trump's picks? Do you actually care about the country, or just care about protecting Trump? Are you a patriot or just an ass kisser?

 

[pknopp]

You are deflecting (likely because you do not have an answer). We are in 2024 and Obama is not in the picture and the problems then are not the same as the ones now. What makes her qualified to address the 2024 intelligence problems?

She is smarter than Obama. What made him qualified as president? (not a great question as he wasn't)

 

[EMH]

Qualified? detail her qualification please, so we can all understand the facts.

Honest patriotic military officer, Congresswoman, Prez candidate, and most importantly


NOT A ZIONIST FASCIST 911 TRAITOR


like all of her critics are.

 

[justoffal]

According to John Bolton a few days ago:

‘Tulsi Gabbard is the worst cabinet-level appointment in history, much like Caliguala nominating his horse as a Roman council member"


Jamie Metzl (a national security expert) unpacked some of the “really concerning” ramifications of Donald Trump’s decision to nominate former Rep. Tulsi Gabbard as his director of national intelligence.“Tulsi Gabbard has never worked in intelligence. She has no real background for this job,” Metzl added, noting that Gabbard has been a “booster” for autocrats such as Russia’s Vladimir Putin, Syria’s Bashar al-Assad and Turkey’s Recep Tayyip Erdogan.

Gabbard, a veteran and former Democratic House member, has promoted conspiracy theories about the U.S.’s involvement in Ukraine.

and one more


With all of these very obvious reasons for this woman to be not only totally unqualified for the job but also leaning to the "bad side" (such as Russia), how does Trump (supposedly an American patriot) choose her?

They're just pissed that it's not a deep state puppet....

A monkey with one eye could fill that position.

Enough with the bunched panties already!

 

[Luckyone]

●●●Tulsi Gabbard, a former Democratic presidential candidate and a member of the US House of Representatives, has been a vocal critic of the military-industrial complex. She has spoken out against the influence of defense contractors and the military-industrial complex on US foreign policy and has advocated for a more peaceful and diplomatic approach to international relations.

In 2019, Gabbard introduced the "Stop Arming Terrorists Act," which aimed to prevent the US government from providing military aid to countries that have been known to support terrorist organizations. She has also spoken out against the US involvement in the war in Yemen and has called for an end to US support for the Saudi-led coalition.

Gabbard has also been critical of the military-industrial complex's influence on US politics, saying that it has led to a "perpetual state of war" and has drained resources away from domestic priorities. She has advocated for a more transparent and accountable defense budget and has called for an end to the practice of "wasteful and unnecessary" military spending.

In a 2020 interview with The Intercept, Gabbard said: "The military-industrial complex has a stranglehold on our foreign policy, and it's driving us towards more and more wars, and it's draining our resources away from the things that we need to be focusing on here at home."

Gabbard has also been critical of John Bolton, saying that he is a "warmonger" who has "made a career out of promoting regime change and war." She has also criticized Bolton's role in promoting the US invasion of Iraq and his advocacy for a more aggressive approach to Iran.

Overall, Tulsi Gabbard has been a vocal critic of the military-industrial complex and has advocated for a more peaceful and diplomatic approach to international relations.


●●● John Bolton has had connections to the military-industrial complex throughout his career. As a hawkish foreign policy expert, he has often advocated for a strong military and has been critical of efforts to reduce defense spending.

In the 1980s, Bolton worked as a lawyer for the law firm of Covington & Burling, which has represented several major defense contractors, including Boeing and Lockheed Martin.

In the 1990s and 2000s, Bolton was a senior vice president at the American Enterprise Institute (AEI), a conservative think tank that has received funding from several major defense contractors, including Boeing, Lockheed Martin, and Raytheon.

Bolton has also served on the boards of several organizations that have ties to the military-industrial complex, including the Project for the New American Century (PNAC), a neoconservative think tank that advocated for a more aggressive US foreign policy and increased defense spending.

In addition, Bolton has received funding from several defense contractors and military-industrial complex-related organizations for his research and writing. For example, in 2013, he received a $115,000 grant from the Lynde and Harry Bradley Foundation, a conservative foundation that has funded several organizations with ties to the military-industrial complex.

As national security adviser, Bolton was a strong advocate for increased defense spending and a more aggressive US military posture. He was also a key player in the Trump administration's efforts to promote the sale of US arms to foreign countries, including Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates.

Bolton's connections to the military-industrial complex have been criticized by some as evidence of his bias towards a more aggressive and militarized foreign policy. However, Bolton and his supporters argue that his views are driven by a commitment to US national security and a desire to promote American interests abroad.

I don't want to say anything about other people you mentioned. Too long now.

Bolton = a shadow of vulture

Gabbard = a shadow of dove

Which one do you like more? I prefer Gabbard.

First of all, this OP is not about Bolton. He is not an option for Secretary of Defense now.

I do applaud the fact that you did address the OP. That is a plus for you. That is what a debate is supposed to be.

As such, I am going to give you a debate question back.

You stated "Tulsi Gabbard, a former Democratic presidential candidate and a member of the US House of Representatives, has been a vocal critic of the military-industrial complex. She has spoken out against the influence of defense contractors and the military-industrial complex on US foreign policy and has advocated for a more peaceful and diplomatic approach to international relations."

Then how can Trump defend her when he has vengence against the Democrats in mind and has stated that he could use the "military" to put his "enemies within" in jail?

Is he real or she real, given that they seem to be at odds on that?

 

[Independent thinker]

According to John Bolton a few days ago:

‘Tulsi Gabbard is the worst cabinet-level appointment in history, much like Caliguala nominating his horse as a Roman council member"


Jamie Metzl (a national security expert) unpacked some of the “really concerning” ramifications of Donald Trump’s decision to nominate former Rep. Tulsi Gabbard as his director of national intelligence.“Tulsi Gabbard has never worked in intelligence. She has no real background for this job,” Metzl added, noting that Gabbard has been a “booster” for autocrats such as Russia’s Vladimir Putin, Syria’s Bashar al-Assad and Turkey’s Recep Tayyip Erdogan.

Gabbard, a veteran and former Democratic House member, has promoted conspiracy theories about the U.S.’s involvement in Ukraine.

and one more


With all of these very obvious reasons for this woman to be not only totally unqualified for the job but also leaning to the "bad side" (such as Russia), how does Trump (supposedly an American patriot) choose her?

Nobody gives a crap what John Bolton has to say.

 

[Luckyone]

Nobody gives a crap what John Bolton has to say.

It isn't what he has to say that counts. It is the listing of Gabbard's lacks of knowledge, experience and leanings that counts. Those have nothing to do with Bolton.

 

[EMH]

this OP is not about Bolton

Yes it is. It is about the Zionist Fascist 911 False Flag Hate Hoax, and all the "intel" traitors who keep lying about it, including Bolton.

Obviously you are a Left Wing Zionist Fascist 911 Traitor like all the rest

W
Cheney
Traitor Joe
Chris Wray
Kim Cheatle
Jeff Sessions
George Tenet
Sandy the Burglar
Spanberger - left wing Zionist Fascist 911 CIA traitor who used Dominion Voting Machines to steal a House seat

 

[Luckyone]

Yes it is. It is about the Zionist Fascist 911 False Flag Hate Hoax, and all the "intel" traitors who keep lying about it, including Bolton.

Obviously you are a Left Wing Zionist Fascist 911 Traitor like all the rest

W
Cheney
Traitor Joe
Chris Wray
Kim Cheatle
Jeff Sessions
George Tenet
Sandy the Burglar
Spanberger - left wing Zionist Fascist 911 CIA traitor who used Dominion Voting Machines to steal a House seat

Wrong, the OP is about Tulsi Gabbard and nothing else. It can never be about the messenger. It is always about the message itself.

 

[SmokeALib]

According to John Bolton a few days ago:

‘Tulsi Gabbard is the worst cabinet-level appointment in history, much like Caliguala nominating his horse as a Roman council member"


Jamie Metzl (a national security expert) unpacked some of the “really concerning” ramifications of Donald Trump’s decision to nominate former Rep. Tulsi Gabbard as his director of national intelligence.“Tulsi Gabbard has never worked in intelligence. She has no real background for this job,” Metzl added, noting that Gabbard has been a “booster” for autocrats such as Russia’s Vladimir Putin, Syria’s Bashar al-Assad and Turkey’s Recep Tayyip Erdogan.

Gabbard, a veteran and former Democratic House member, has promoted conspiracy theories about the U.S.’s involvement in Ukraine.

and one more


With all of these very obvious reasons for this woman to be not only totally unqualified for the job but also leaning to the "bad side" (such as Russia), how does Trump (supposedly an American patriot) choose her?

I think she's a great pick. So there's that...

 

[g5000]

Well since John Bolton is among probably the top three worst picks Trump chose on his team in his last administration--Trump did fire him--I would say his criticism of Tulsi Gabbard pretty much gives her the Good Housekeeping and all other Seals of Approval.

Bolton resigned because he opposed the orange idiot making a peace deal with the Taliban.

 

[Foxfyre]

Bolton resigned because he opposed the orange idiot making a peace deal with the Taliban.

Trump fired Bolton after a long list of policy disagreements. Trump wanted world peace. Bolton thought war was the best solution to many problems. They were completely incompatible.

 

[g5000]

Trump fired Bolton after a long list of policy disagreements. Trump wanted world peace. Bolton thought war was the best solution to many problems. They were completely incompatible.

Trump is an appeaser. A coward. Bolton called him on it.

Ironically, Trump never fired anyone to their face, including Bolton.

And this is the guy who campaigned on his game show tagline, "You're fired!"

In the real world, he turned out to be a chickenshit coward who can't look anyone in the face to fire them.

 

[westwall]

According to John Bolton a few days ago:

‘Tulsi Gabbard is the worst cabinet-level appointment in history, much like Caliguala nominating his horse as a Roman council member"


Jamie Metzl (a national security expert) unpacked some of the “really concerning” ramifications of Donald Trump’s decision to nominate former Rep. Tulsi Gabbard as his director of national intelligence.“Tulsi Gabbard has never worked in intelligence. She has no real background for this job,” Metzl added, noting that Gabbard has been a “booster” for autocrats such as Russia’s Vladimir Putin, Syria’s Bashar al-Assad and Turkey’s Recep Tayyip Erdogan.

Gabbard, a veteran and former Democratic House member, has promoted conspiracy theories about the U.S.’s involvement in Ukraine.

and one more


With all of these very obvious reasons for this woman to be not only totally unqualified for the job but also leaning to the "bad side" (such as Russia), how does Trump (supposedly an American patriot) choose her?

Oh? NOW you like Bolton?

Dude, you're going batshit crazy.

 

[Foxfyre]

Trump is an appeaser. A coward. Bolton called him on it.

Ironically, Trump never fired anyone to their face, including Bolton.

And this is the guy who campaigned on his game show tagline, "You're fired!"

In the real world, he turned out to be a chickenshit coward who can't look anyone in the face to fire them.

No.

 

[BluesLegend]

Tulsi Gabbard - Worst Cabinet Pick in History - John Bolton​

John Bolton?? The IRONY meter just exploded.

 

[BluesLegend]

Oh? NOW you like Bolton?

Dude, you're going batshit crazy.

And Dick Cheney and George Bush and other former mortal enemies IF they oppose Trump.