Trump's silence for over five hours is absolute proof of culpability

The most compelling evidence of both guilt and culpability is Trump's stunning silence for over five hours while the horror was unfolding. This, in itself, is the ultimate proof of complicity. Any decent human being would have been in front of a microphone in 60 seconds decrying what was being undertaken on their behalf. Not Trump.


LINK???
Why would a link be required? I'm simply pointing something out that needs to be weighed and discussed. What would "a link" add to what I said?
I the riot was preplanned for weeks. The FBI warned Pelosi. AOC was getting messages a week before. What did she do???

This was all a big lie and scam and impeachment is the only way to get the truth out.

The Dems planned this to happen. You people slaving to a shit boss and life amaze me.
Paranoid thinking like that can be a real problem.
Too bad the facts are out. This is a scam.
 
The most compelling evidence of both guilt and culpability is Trump's stunning silence for over five hours while the horror was unfolding. This, in itself, is the ultimate proof of complicity. Any decent human being would have been in front of a microphone in 60 seconds decrying what was being undertaken on their behalf. Not Trump.
If he had said anything, you dimwits would be claiming that he was egging the protestors on.
Nope. If he implored them to obey the law and stand down how could anyone have criticized him of egging anyone on?
The libs and chinese would say that he secretly did using mind control like they are for saying he sent them to break into the capital despite his speech being recorded.
No. Not libs.
True--the left leaning globalist communists then?
 
The most compelling evidence of both guilt and culpability is Trump's stunning silence for over five hours while the horror was unfolding. This, in itself, is the ultimate proof of complicity. Any decent human being would have been in front of a microphone in 60 seconds decrying what was being undertaken on their behalf. Not Trump.
Did you think you would somehow be more believable with "PsychDoc"?
That's what I am. Did you think you'd be viewed as observant by asking that question?
You're full of shit. That's what you are.
How many years did it take you to get out of 3rd grade? Or did you?
And just like that, you let the cat out of the bag.

Thanks.
 
It's proof of nothing.

It's the equivalent of someone in Police custody getting interviewed saying "no comment" because they don't trust the folk in the room.

Trump for all his faults never has nothing to say. He's got loads to say. He'll have been advised to sit through it and shut up for this stage.

Also, if he started defending himself the same fascists would be the first to reel out "even now he's still vindicating the protestors/he just can't help himself"
 
This can be debated all day. The question I have is how can anyone just worship and adore any one man? Can someone explain this? Party aside how does this happen. I could never get behind anyone so fervently other than my Lord and savior. What makes this happen?
Results and not BS is why I like Trump. Plus like me he never had a boss in his life. I only listen to people who never slaved to a shit job.
 
This can be debated all day. The question I have is how can anyone just worship and adore any one man? Can someone explain this? Party aside how does this happen. I could never get behind anyone so fervently other than my Lord and savior. What makes this happen?
TRump did everything he could to help america against our corrupt swamp and foreign enemies. HE's deserves the Adorationk. Unfortunately with the trajectory that Biden is putting on---MORE PEOPLE will be realizing how much better off under trump that we were.
 
Last edited:
The most compelling evidence of both guilt and culpability is Trump's stunning silence for over five hours while the horror was unfolding. This, in itself, is the ultimate proof of complicity. Any decent human being would have been in front of a microphone in 60 seconds decrying what was being undertaken on their behalf. Not Trump.
If he had said anything, you dimwits would be claiming that he was egging the protestors on.

No other US president would have incited violence as Trump has. Trump is a disgrace. Do you really want to overthrow the Republic out of loyalty to Trump?
 
This can be debated all day. The question I have is how can anyone just worship and adore any one man? Can someone explain this? Party aside how does this happen. I could never get behind anyone so fervently other than my Lord and savior. What makes this happen?
Results and not BS is why I like Trump. Plus like me he never had a boss in his life. I only listen to people who never slaved to a shit job.

What results?
 
What was most damning was when Trump tweeted his support for the insurrectionists and called them “patriots.”
View attachment 455417




Notice how the President told the people to go home "in love and peace" and not to burn down the Capitol or anything else violent. That's reasonable doubt, the Senate must exonerate.
 
It's proof of nothing.

It's the equivalent of someone in Police custody getting interviewed saying "no comment" because they don't trust the folk in the room.

Trump for all his faults never has nothing to say. He's got loads to say. He'll have been advised to sit through it and shut up for this stage.

Also, if he started defending himself the same fascists would be the first to reel out "even now he's still vindicating the protestors/he just can't help himself"
Trump did not need to defend himself.

Once the protest turned violent (and it was violent immediately) a responsible President would stand up and call them off. Trump watched and tweeted his support.
 
It's hard for anyone, not to agree with that imo.

Any President, other than president Trump, would have spoken to the crowd within the first few minutes and gotten the NG to go in and help congress critters and the VP, instead of stand down orders holding the NG back for hours....

And of course the President continued his Big Lie, before he finally told them to go home..... :(
You mean like Biden did with the DC rioters the other night? Making the accusation of inciting insurrection is like the cowboy movies when they hang the wrong man in a rush to judgement, strictly based on their total dislike for that person. What these congressional idiots are doing is a lynching, plain and simple.
 
What was most damning was when Trump tweeted his support for the insurrectionists and called them “patriots.”
View attachment 455417




Notice how the President told the people to go home "in love and peace" and not to burn down the Capitol or anything else violent. That's reasonable doubt, the Senate must exonerate.
After repeated urging to do something, Trump waited four hours before making a statement
 
It's hard for anyone, not to agree with that imo.

Any President, other than president Trump, would have spoken to the crowd within the first few minutes and gotten the NG to go in and help congress critters and the VP, instead of stand down orders holding the NG back for hours....

And of course the President continued his Big Lie, before he finally told them to go home..... :(
You mean like Biden did with the DC rioters the other night? Making the accusation of inciting insurrection is like the cowboy movies when they hang the wrong man in a rush to judgement, strictly based on their total dislike for that person. What these congressional idiots are doing is a lynching, plain and simple.
Were those rioters marching under a Biden flag?
Did Biden send them?
Did Biden fill them with lies?
 
It's proof of nothing.

It's the equivalent of someone in Police custody getting interviewed saying "no comment" because they don't trust the folk in the room.

Trump for all his faults never has nothing to say. He's got loads to say. He'll have been advised to sit through it and shut up for this stage.

Also, if he started defending himself the same fascists would be the first to reel out "even now he's still vindicating the protestors/he just can't help himself"
Trump did not need to defend himself.

Once the protest turned violent (and it was violent immediately) a responsible President would stand up and call them off. Trump watched and tweeted his support.

I must have imagined the Tweets/Facebook posts from him telling them to go home and saying not in our name etc etc.

Or does that now mean something different in line with everything else redefined to suit people's outlooks?

If you're even referring to calling them off from descending on Capitol (before the storming of the building) then why would he do that? is the rights to freedom of expression and protest only afforded to BLM or something and not Republicans?
 
And at the end of it all, the capitol has been sacked, people are dead, 140 are injured, he says "this is what happens".

And the sheep still adore him. Group psychopathy.

Spare us..you sheep condoned violence by being complicit for well over a year. The Democratic politicians weren’t just complicit, they condoned it and you lemmings bought into it because you felt like it was for a good cause. The left is perfectly fine with violence when it suits them. That is rather obvious.
 
And at the end of it all, the capitol has been sacked, people are dead, 140 are injured, he says "this is what happens".

And the sheep still adore him. Group psychopathy.

Spare us..you sheep condoned violence by being complicit for well over a year. The Democratic politicians weren’t just complicit, they condoned it and you lemmings bought into it because you felt like it was for a good cause. The left is perfectly fine with violence when it suits them. That is rather obvious.
3bwn4Jn.jpg
 
It's proof of nothing.

It's the equivalent of someone in Police custody getting interviewed saying "no comment" because they don't trust the folk in the room.

Trump for all his faults never has nothing to say. He's got loads to say. He'll have been advised to sit through it and shut up for this stage.

Also, if he started defending himself the same fascists would be the first to reel out "even now he's still vindicating the protestors/he just can't help himself"
Trump did not need to defend himself.

Once the protest turned violent (and it was violent immediately) a responsible President would stand up and call them off. Trump watched and tweeted his support.

I must have imagined the Tweets/Facebook posts from him telling them to go home and saying not in our name etc etc.

Or does that now mean something different in line with everything else redefined to suit people's outlooks?

If you're even referring to calling them off from descending on Capitol (before the storming of the building) then why would he do that? is the rights to freedom of expression and protest only afforded to BLM or something and not Republicans?
The right to protest does not include storming the Capitol and killing people.
Trump could have called hem off. He stood by and did nothing
 
It's hard for anyone, not to agree with that imo.

Any President, other than president Trump, would have spoken to the crowd within the first few minutes and gotten the NG to go in and help congress critters and the VP, instead of stand down orders holding the NG back for hours....

And of course the President continued his Big Lie, before he finally told them to go home..... :(
You mean like Biden did with the DC rioters the other night? Making the accusation of inciting insurrection is like the cowboy movies when they hang the wrong man in a rush to judgement, strictly based on their total dislike for that person. What these congressional idiots are doing is a lynching, plain and simple.
Were those rioters marching under a Biden flag?
Did Biden send them?
Did Biden fill them with lies?
The black flag with the A on it and the BLM logo are Biden's flags. Everything they do is to promote the Marxism that Biden has embraced.
 

Forum List

Back
Top