Two scoops of ice cream.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
How many times did he mention his personal attorney? Was Giuliani acting in the interest of the country or the president?I disagree with your disagreement.I disagree with your assesment of the Mueller probe.
The last time I checked, it is perfectly legal for a President to withhold money in the interest of the US. Mulvaney clearly stated the reason he was going to hold up the money was due to the corruption which may have affected the integrity of the election in 2016. That is what the President is supposed to do. Democrats were all about investigating Russian corruption into the 2016 election, but for some reason, they don't seem to care much about Ukraine's potential influence. They don't care because it looks as though the corruption stems from the Democrats, NOT the Republicans. What Mulvaney did NOT do is admit a Quid Pro Quo as it relates to Biden. The media is in full spin cyle again.
I think the key phrase in your reply is "in the interest of the US". I appears to me Trump was not interested in corruption in general since he only mentioned Biden. Was he the sole source of corruption? Did Trump have any evidence of Biden's corruption or was he trying to start his own witch hunt? There was plenty of evidence of Russian interference in the US elections, confirmed by multiple US sources.
What Mulvaney admitted was that presidential politics played a role in US foreign policy. America first but Trump firster?
You're a liar, he mentioned the Ukraine cooperating with the AG 4 times in the call.
.
dunno. which was he?How many times did he mention his personal attorney? Was Giuliani acting in the interest of the country or the president?I disagree with your disagreement.I disagree with your assesment of the Mueller probe.
The last time I checked, it is perfectly legal for a President to withhold money in the interest of the US. Mulvaney clearly stated the reason he was going to hold up the money was due to the corruption which may have affected the integrity of the election in 2016. That is what the President is supposed to do. Democrats were all about investigating Russian corruption into the 2016 election, but for some reason, they don't seem to care much about Ukraine's potential influence. They don't care because it looks as though the corruption stems from the Democrats, NOT the Republicans. What Mulvaney did NOT do is admit a Quid Pro Quo as it relates to Biden. The media is in full spin cyle again.
I think the key phrase in your reply is "in the interest of the US". I appears to me Trump was not interested in corruption in general since he only mentioned Biden. Was he the sole source of corruption? Did Trump have any evidence of Biden's corruption or was he trying to start his own witch hunt? There was plenty of evidence of Russian interference in the US elections, confirmed by multiple US sources.
What Mulvaney admitted was that presidential politics played a role in US foreign policy. America first but Trump firster?
You're a liar, he mentioned the Ukraine cooperating with the AG 4 times in the call.
.
You missed the winner. He won in 2016. That offense is unforgivable.Since he obstructed Hillary from her rightful place on the White House throne, there have been so, so, so, so many impeachable offenses.
Name your favorite 2 or 3
BothHow many times did he mention his personal attorney? Was Giuliani acting in the interest of the country or the president?I disagree with your disagreement.I disagree with your assesment of the Mueller probe.
The last time I checked, it is perfectly legal for a President to withhold money in the interest of the US. Mulvaney clearly stated the reason he was going to hold up the money was due to the corruption which may have affected the integrity of the election in 2016. That is what the President is supposed to do. Democrats were all about investigating Russian corruption into the 2016 election, but for some reason, they don't seem to care much about Ukraine's potential influence. They don't care because it looks as though the corruption stems from the Democrats, NOT the Republicans. What Mulvaney did NOT do is admit a Quid Pro Quo as it relates to Biden. The media is in full spin cyle again.
I think the key phrase in your reply is "in the interest of the US". I appears to me Trump was not interested in corruption in general since he only mentioned Biden. Was he the sole source of corruption? Did Trump have any evidence of Biden's corruption or was he trying to start his own witch hunt? There was plenty of evidence of Russian interference in the US elections, confirmed by multiple US sources.
What Mulvaney admitted was that presidential politics played a role in US foreign policy. America first but Trump firster?
You're a liar, he mentioned the Ukraine cooperating with the AG 4 times in the call.
.
How many times did he mention his personal attorney? Was Giuliani acting in the interest of the country or the president?I disagree with your disagreement.I disagree with your assesment of the Mueller probe.
The last time I checked, it is perfectly legal for a President to withhold money in the interest of the US. Mulvaney clearly stated the reason he was going to hold up the money was due to the corruption which may have affected the integrity of the election in 2016. That is what the President is supposed to do. Democrats were all about investigating Russian corruption into the 2016 election, but for some reason, they don't seem to care much about Ukraine's potential influence. They don't care because it looks as though the corruption stems from the Democrats, NOT the Republicans. What Mulvaney did NOT do is admit a Quid Pro Quo as it relates to Biden. The media is in full spin cyle again.
I think the key phrase in your reply is "in the interest of the US". I appears to me Trump was not interested in corruption in general since he only mentioned Biden. Was he the sole source of corruption? Did Trump have any evidence of Biden's corruption or was he trying to start his own witch hunt? There was plenty of evidence of Russian interference in the US elections, confirmed by multiple US sources.
What Mulvaney admitted was that presidential politics played a role in US foreign policy. America first but Trump firster?
You're a liar, he mentioned the Ukraine cooperating with the AG 4 times in the call.
.
You missed the winner. He won in 2016. That offense is unforgivable.Since he obstructed Hillary from her rightful place on the White House throne, there have been so, so, so, so many impeachable offenses.
Name your favorite 2 or 3
So what's all the bull crud about the Ukrainians having the DNC server, which is the conspiracy with Crowdstrike that Trump and Giuliani are promoting?How many times did he mention his personal attorney? Was Giuliani acting in the interest of the country or the president?I disagree with your disagreement.I disagree with your assesment of the Mueller probe.
The last time I checked, it is perfectly legal for a President to withhold money in the interest of the US. Mulvaney clearly stated the reason he was going to hold up the money was due to the corruption which may have affected the integrity of the election in 2016. That is what the President is supposed to do. Democrats were all about investigating Russian corruption into the 2016 election, but for some reason, they don't seem to care much about Ukraine's potential influence. They don't care because it looks as though the corruption stems from the Democrats, NOT the Republicans. What Mulvaney did NOT do is admit a Quid Pro Quo as it relates to Biden. The media is in full spin cyle again.
I think the key phrase in your reply is "in the interest of the US". I appears to me Trump was not interested in corruption in general since he only mentioned Biden. Was he the sole source of corruption? Did Trump have any evidence of Biden's corruption or was he trying to start his own witch hunt? There was plenty of evidence of Russian interference in the US elections, confirmed by multiple US sources.
What Mulvaney admitted was that presidential politics played a role in US foreign policy. America first but Trump firster?
You're a liar, he mentioned the Ukraine cooperating with the AG 4 times in the call.
.
Giuliani was working in Ukraine long before the Mueller report was released, doing exactly what Barr and Durham are doing now, looking for evidence in what sparked the investigation into the Trump campaign. Ukraine courts have said, people in the Ukraine put out a lot of false information on Trump associates in an attempt to influence the election and aid the bitch. All the information is out there if you bothered to look instead of letting the MSM do your thinking for you.
.
FEC violations by seeking foreign help in hurting a political opponent
Extortion -the quid pro quo that was admitted
Abuse of power
Obstruction of justice
So what's all the bull crud about the Ukrainians having the DNC server, which is the conspiracy with Crowdstrike that Trump and Giuliani are promoting?How many times did he mention his personal attorney? Was Giuliani acting in the interest of the country or the president?I disagree with your disagreement.I disagree with your assesment of the Mueller probe.
The last time I checked, it is perfectly legal for a President to withhold money in the interest of the US. Mulvaney clearly stated the reason he was going to hold up the money was due to the corruption which may have affected the integrity of the election in 2016. That is what the President is supposed to do. Democrats were all about investigating Russian corruption into the 2016 election, but for some reason, they don't seem to care much about Ukraine's potential influence. They don't care because it looks as though the corruption stems from the Democrats, NOT the Republicans. What Mulvaney did NOT do is admit a Quid Pro Quo as it relates to Biden. The media is in full spin cyle again.
I think the key phrase in your reply is "in the interest of the US". I appears to me Trump was not interested in corruption in general since he only mentioned Biden. Was he the sole source of corruption? Did Trump have any evidence of Biden's corruption or was he trying to start his own witch hunt? There was plenty of evidence of Russian interference in the US elections, confirmed by multiple US sources.
What Mulvaney admitted was that presidential politics played a role in US foreign policy. America first but Trump firster?
You're a liar, he mentioned the Ukraine cooperating with the AG 4 times in the call.
.
Giuliani was working in Ukraine long before the Mueller report was released, doing exactly what Barr and Durham are doing now, looking for evidence in what sparked the investigation into the Trump campaign. Ukraine courts have said, people in the Ukraine put out a lot of false information on Trump associates in an attempt to influence the election and aid the bitch. All the information is out there if you bothered to look instead of letting the MSM do your thinking for you.
.
Dunno either but seems like a question that deserves an answer.dunno. which was he?Was Giuliani acting in the interest of the country or the president?
So what is good for Trump is good for the country? Sorry, don't buy it.BothWas Giuliani acting in the interest of the country or the president?
trump did in his call with the Ukraine president...So what's all the bull crud about the Ukrainians having the DNC server, which is the conspiracy with Crowdstrike that Trump and Giuliani are promoting?How many times did he mention his personal attorney? Was Giuliani acting in the interest of the country or the president?I disagree with your disagreement.
I think the key phrase in your reply is "in the interest of the US". I appears to me Trump was not interested in corruption in general since he only mentioned Biden. Was he the sole source of corruption? Did Trump have any evidence of Biden's corruption or was he trying to start his own witch hunt? There was plenty of evidence of Russian interference in the US elections, confirmed by multiple US sources.
What Mulvaney admitted was that presidential politics played a role in US foreign policy. America first but Trump firster?
You're a liar, he mentioned the Ukraine cooperating with the AG 4 times in the call.
.
Giuliani was working in Ukraine long before the Mueller report was released, doing exactly what Barr and Durham are doing now, looking for evidence in what sparked the investigation into the Trump campaign. Ukraine courts have said, people in the Ukraine put out a lot of false information on Trump associates in an attempt to influence the election and aid the bitch. All the information is out there if you bothered to look instead of letting the MSM do your thinking for you.
.
I don't know, I haven't heard anyone elaborate on that.
.
trump did in his call with the Ukraine president...So what's all the bull crud about the Ukrainians having the DNC server, which is the conspiracy with Crowdstrike that Trump and Giuliani are promoting?How many times did he mention his personal attorney? Was Giuliani acting in the interest of the country or the president?You're a liar, he mentioned the Ukraine cooperating with the AG 4 times in the call.
.
Giuliani was working in Ukraine long before the Mueller report was released, doing exactly what Barr and Durham are doing now, looking for evidence in what sparked the investigation into the Trump campaign. Ukraine courts have said, people in the Ukraine put out a lot of false information on Trump associates in an attempt to influence the election and aid the bitch. All the information is out there if you bothered to look instead of letting the MSM do your thinking for you.
.
I don't know, I haven't heard anyone elaborate on that.
.
Crowdstrike was his first mention, Bidens his second, on the quid pro quo ''favor'' asked.
trump did in his call with the Ukraine president...So what's all the bull crud about the Ukrainians having the DNC server, which is the conspiracy with Crowdstrike that Trump and Giuliani are promoting?How many times did he mention his personal attorney? Was Giuliani acting in the interest of the country or the president?You're a liar, he mentioned the Ukraine cooperating with the AG 4 times in the call.
.
Giuliani was working in Ukraine long before the Mueller report was released, doing exactly what Barr and Durham are doing now, looking for evidence in what sparked the investigation into the Trump campaign. Ukraine courts have said, people in the Ukraine put out a lot of false information on Trump associates in an attempt to influence the election and aid the bitch. All the information is out there if you bothered to look instead of letting the MSM do your thinking for you.
.
I don't know, I haven't heard anyone elaborate on that.
.
Crowdstrike was his first mention, Bidens his second, on the quid pro quo ''favor'' asked.
a) Asking Ukraine to investigate his political rivalSince he obstructed Hillary from her rightful place on the White House throne, there have been so, so, so, so many impeachable offenses.
Name your favorite 2 or 3