How about you prove anything I said was wrong instead of being an ignorant commie.
.
You didn't actually say anything other than the CIA might have done it. I don't have to prove your paranoid fantasy is wrong, you have to prove it is right, or at least provide some evidence or motivation.
You are worshiping at the alter of Trump. Since he is above suspicion any wrong doing must be a conspiracy to dethrone him. Occam's Razor would disagree.
Are you saying the CIA doesn't have the capability to hack a system using foreign tools?
WikiLeaks says CIA disguised hacking as Russian activity | Daily Mail Online
And tell me what federal agency verified Crowdstrike analysis of the DNC server?
.
There is a big difference between what the CIA can do and what they actually do. They are a gov't agency like any other and are governed by the same laws.
I have no idea which federal agency, if any, investigated Crowdstrike, do you?
First, I didn't ask who investigated Crowdstrike, I asked what agency verified their analysis of the DNC server. The short answer is none.
Second, government agencies violate the law all the freaking time.
FISA Court Still Uncovering Surveillance Abuses By NSA, FBI
Mueller hauled before secret FISA court to address FBI abuses in 2002, Congress told
.
I don't see any grand conspiracy, more likely bureaucratic screw ups.
The first link appears to address technical failures:
"The court was extremely concerned about NSA's failure to comply with its minimization procedures—and potentially" a provision in federal law, Hogan wrote. The NSA violations appeared to involve preserving surveillance data in its systems beyond the two or five years after which it was supposed to be deleted.
"Perhaps more disappointing than the NSA's failure to purge this information for more than four years, was the Government's failure to convey to the Court explicitly during that time that the NSA was continuing to retain this information," the judge wrote in the Nov. 6, 2015, opinion made public Tuesday.
The info was collected legally but no one went back to clean it up 2-5 years later.
Hogan said the FBI revealed some such incidents in 2014, but the number was redacted from the opinion made public Tuesday. "The government generally attributed those instances to individual failures or confusion, rather than a 'systematic issue,' " Hogan wrote. However, more incidents occurred from mid-2014 and through 2015, although again the precise number was not released. In some instances, FBI agents believed, incorrectly, that they didn't need to set up a review team if the indictment was under seal or outside the U.S.
