Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
There were no indictable offenses listed in The Mueller Report after a 3,500 subpoenas, several hundred witnesses interviewed, 40 Million spent, 30 FBI investigators and 2 plus years of endless investigations and The White House providing Millions of Documents.You somehow left off my top choices (an oversight I'm sure):Since he obstructed Hillary from her rightful place on the White House throne, there have been so, so, so, so many impeachable offenses.
Name your favorite 2 or 3
- Obstruction of Justice as outlined in the Mueller Report
- Abuse of Power to advance Trump's personal interests in the Ukraine Quid Pro Quo.
I don't see any grand conspiracy, more likely bureaucratic screw ups.There is a big difference between what the CIA can do and what they actually do. They are a gov't agency like any other and are governed by the same laws.You didn't actually say anything other than the CIA might have done it. I don't have to prove your paranoid fantasy is wrong, you have to prove it is right, or at least provide some evidence or motivation.How about you prove anything I said was wrong instead of being an ignorant commie.
.
You are worshiping at the alter of Trump. Since he is above suspicion any wrong doing must be a conspiracy to dethrone him. Occam's Razor would disagree.
Are you saying the CIA doesn't have the capability to hack a system using foreign tools?
WikiLeaks says CIA disguised hacking as Russian activity | Daily Mail Online
And tell me what federal agency verified Crowdstrike analysis of the DNC server?
.
I have no idea which federal agency, if any, investigated Crowdstrike, do you?
First, I didn't ask who investigated Crowdstrike, I asked what agency verified their analysis of the DNC server. The short answer is none.
Second, government agencies violate the law all the freaking time.
FISA Court Still Uncovering Surveillance Abuses By NSA, FBI
Mueller hauled before secret FISA court to address FBI abuses in 2002, Congress told
.
The first link appears to address technical failures:
"The court was extremely concerned about NSA's failure to comply with its minimization procedures—and potentially" a provision in federal law, Hogan wrote. The NSA violations appeared to involve preserving surveillance data in its systems beyond the two or five years after which it was supposed to be deleted.
"Perhaps more disappointing than the NSA's failure to purge this information for more than four years, was the Government's failure to convey to the Court explicitly during that time that the NSA was continuing to retain this information," the judge wrote in the Nov. 6, 2015, opinion made public Tuesday.
The info was collected legally but no one went back to clean it up 2-5 years later.
Hogan said the FBI revealed some such incidents in 2014, but the number was redacted from the opinion made public Tuesday. "The government generally attributed those instances to individual failures or confusion, rather than a 'systematic issue,' " Hogan wrote. However, more incidents occurred from mid-2014 and through 2015, although again the precise number was not released. In some instances, FBI agents believed, incorrectly, that they didn't need to set up a review team if the indictment was under seal or outside the U.S.
Who said that? Certainly not Mueller.There were no indictable offenses listed in The Mueller Report
What Rock did you just crawl out from under?Who said that? Certainly not Mueller.There were no indictable offenses listed in The Mueller Report
So you think the data resides on someone's hard drive somewhere? I guarantee it is in a distributed database with onsite and offsite backups. Deletions would be difficult, dangerous, and expensive.Oh right, some of the brightest tech minds in the world can't program an auto delete? Give me a break. BTW, not following minimization protocols is a big deal, those protocols are there to protect the rights of US Citizens. And don't think your ignoring my first point went unnoticed.
Your ignorance of the Mueller Report is actually rather scary.What Rock did you just crawl out from under?
No Recommendations for Indictment were made. None, Zero, Nada.
There were no indictable offenses listed in The Mueller Report after a 3,500 subpoenas, several hundred witnesses interviewed, 40 Million spent, 30 FBI investigators and 2 plus years of endless investigations and The White House providing Millions of Documents.You somehow left off my top choices (an oversight I'm sure):Since he obstructed Hillary from her rightful place on the White House throne, there have been so, so, so, so many impeachable offenses.
Name your favorite 2 or 3
- Obstruction of Justice as outlined in the Mueller Report
- Abuse of Power to advance Trump's personal interests in the Ukraine Quid Pro Quo.
So how is COUP 3.0 going for Emperor Pelosi these days?
Oh, it's a SECRET?
How very KGB of you.
No, apparently sexual assault is OK with a large number of American conservatives.How about grabbing pussies? That should be impeachable, especially if your skin is orange.
No, apparently sexual assault is OK with a large number of American conservatives.How about grabbing pussies? That should be impeachable, especially if your skin is orange.
Don't agree. That came out before the election. It was another reason for me not to vote for Trump but voters made their choice, so be it. If that is the morality of the country, I don't like it but I accept it.New Category: Impeach Trump for talking about stuff that Clinton actually didNo, apparently sexual assault is OK with a large number of American conservatives.How about grabbing pussies? That should be impeachable, especially if your skin is orange.
So you think the data resides on someone's hard drive somewhere? I guarantee it is in a distributed database with onsite and offsite backups. Deletions would be difficult, dangerous, and expensive.Oh right, some of the brightest tech minds in the world can't program an auto delete? Give me a break. BTW, not following minimization protocols is a big deal, those protocols are there to protect the rights of US Citizens. And don't think your ignoring my first point went unnoticed.
I thought you adequately answered you first point. What you didn't answer was whose responsibility it was the answer is the same, no ones.
