Trump's most impeachable offense thread & poll

[CrusaderFrank]

Since he obstructed Hillary from her rightful place on the White House throne, there have been so, so, so, so many impeachable offenses.

Name your favorite 2 or 3

a) Asking Ukraine to investigate his political rival
b) Asking Communist China to investigate his political rival
c) Withholding Congressionally authorized military assistance to Ukraine to force Ukraine to investigate the DNC server(quid pro quo)
d) Withholding Congressionally authorized military assistance to Ukraine to force Ukraine to investigate his political rival(quid pro quo)
e) Using his Presidential authority for his direct financial benefit(G7 Doral)
f) Obstruction of Justice
g) Putting the safety of the U.S. at risk with an unplanned withdrawal from Syria, leading to the escape of ISIS terrorists.

Sorry- I couldn't think of just 2 or 3.

a) Asking Ukraine to investigate his political rival - Completely debunked BS
b) Asking Communist China to investigate his political rival - Completely debunked BS
c) Withholding Congressionally authorized military assistance to Ukraine to force Ukraine to investigate the DNC server(quid pro quo) Completely debunked BS
d) Withholding Congressionally authorized military assistance to Ukraine to force Ukraine to investigate his political rival(quid pro quo) Completely debunked BS
e) Using his Presidential authority for his direct financial benefit(G7 Doral) Completely debunked BS (LOL.ZOMG!! He left another flaming bag on his porch! Let's stomp it out!)
f) Obstruction of Justice - 3 years later and keeping Hillary out of the White House is STILL not obstruction of Justice
g) Putting the safety of the U.S. at risk with an unplanned withdrawal from Syria, leading to the escape of ISIS terrorist Maybe you should volunteer to defend that border?

 

[Syriusly]

Since he obstructed Hillary from her rightful place on the White House throne, there have been so, so, so, so many impeachable offenses.

Name your favorite 2 or 3

a) Asking Ukraine to investigate his political rival
b) Asking Communist China to investigate his political rival
c) Withholding Congressionally authorized military assistance to Ukraine to force Ukraine to investigate the DNC server(quid pro quo)
d) Withholding Congressionally authorized military assistance to Ukraine to force Ukraine to investigate his political rival(quid pro quo)
e) Using his Presidential authority for his direct financial benefit(G7 Doral)
f) Obstruction of Justice
g) Putting the safety of the U.S. at risk with an unplanned withdrawal from Syria, leading to the escape of ISIS terrorists.

Sorry- I couldn't think of just 2 or 3.

a) Asking Ukraine to investigate his political rival - Completely debunked BS
b) Asking Communist China to investigate his political rival - Completely debunked BS
c) Withholding Congressionally authorized military assistance to Ukraine to force Ukraine to investigate the DNC server(quid pro quo) Completely debunked BS
d) Withholding Congressionally authorized military assistance to Ukraine to force Ukraine to investigate his political rival(quid pro quo) Completely debunked BS
e) Using his Presidential authority for his direct financial benefit(G7 Doral) Completely debunked BS (LOL.ZOMG!! He left another flaming bag on his porch! Let's stomp it out!)
f) Obstruction of Justice - 3 years later and keeping Hillary out of the White House is STILL not obstruction of Justice
g) Putting the safety of the U.S. at risk with an unplanned withdrawal from Syria, leading to the escape of ISIS terrorist Maybe you should volunteer to defend that border?

LOL- you loyal Trumpkins- 'debunked bs' is just means you approve of Trump doing it.

a) Asking Ukraine to investigate his political rival - Completely debunked BS- the President's own words: "There's a lot of talk about Biden's son, that Biden stopped the prosecution and a lot of people want to find out about that so whatever you can do with the Attorney General would be great. Biden went around bragging that he stopped the prosecution so if you can look into it ... It sounds horrible to me," Trump says
b) Asking Communist China to investigate his political rival - Completely debunked BS- President's own words: “Likewise, China should start an investigation into the Bidens, because what happened in China is just about as bad as what happened with Ukraine.”
c) Withholding Congressionally authorized military assistance to Ukraine to force Ukraine to investigate the DNC server(quid pro quo) Completely debunked BS: Trump's Chief of Staff's words:
Did he also mention to me in passing the corruption related to the DNC server? Absolutely. No question about that. But that's it, and that's why we held up the money."
Karl: "But to be clear, what you just described is a quid-pro-quo: the funding will not flow unless you're getting an investigation into the Democratic server happened as well."

Mulvaney: "We do that all the time with foreign policy

d) Withholding Congressionally authorized military assistance to Ukraine to force Ukraine to investigate his political rival(quid pro quo) Completely debunked BS. The words of the acting Ambassador to the Ukraine: "I think it's crazy to withhold security assistance for help with a political campaign.”
e) Using his Presidential authority for his direct financial benefit(G7 Doral) Completely debunked BS (LOL.ZOMG!! He left another flaming bag on his porch! Let's stomp it out!) lol- headline:
TRUMP ANNOUNCES HE'S HOSTING G7 AT HIS DORAL RESORT WHILE ARGUING BIDEN USED VP POSITION FOR PERSONAL GAIN

f) Obstruction of Justice - 3 years later and keeping Hillary out of the White House is STILL not obstruction of Justice. 3 years later and Trump's obstruction of justice has nothing to do with Hillary- Trumpkins sure can't stop talking about Hillary
g) Putting the safety of the U.S. at risk with an unplanned withdrawal from Syria, leading to the escape of ISIS terrorist Maybe you should volunteer to defend that border?
Maybe you welcome the release of ISIS terrorists? Along with the betrayal of our allies, at the same time that Trump puts our troops at risk by deploying them in Saudi Arabia.

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

Since he obstructed Hillary from her rightful place on the White House throne, there have been so, so, so, so many impeachable offenses.

Name your favorite 2 or 3

a) Asking Ukraine to investigate his political rival
b) Asking Communist China to investigate his political rival
c) Withholding Congressionally authorized military assistance to Ukraine to force Ukraine to investigate the DNC server(quid pro quo)
d) Withholding Congressionally authorized military assistance to Ukraine to force Ukraine to investigate his political rival(quid pro quo)
e) Using his Presidential authority for his direct financial benefit(G7 Doral)
f) Obstruction of Justice
g) Putting the safety of the U.S. at risk with an unplanned withdrawal from Syria, leading to the escape of ISIS terrorists.

Sorry- I couldn't think of just 2 or 3.

a) Asking Ukraine to investigate his political rival - Completely debunked BS
b) Asking Communist China to investigate his political rival - Completely debunked BS
c) Withholding Congressionally authorized military assistance to Ukraine to force Ukraine to investigate the DNC server(quid pro quo) Completely debunked BS
d) Withholding Congressionally authorized military assistance to Ukraine to force Ukraine to investigate his political rival(quid pro quo) Completely debunked BS
e) Using his Presidential authority for his direct financial benefit(G7 Doral) Completely debunked BS (LOL.ZOMG!! He left another flaming bag on his porch! Let's stomp it out!)
f) Obstruction of Justice - 3 years later and keeping Hillary out of the White House is STILL not obstruction of Justice
g) Putting the safety of the U.S. at risk with an unplanned withdrawal from Syria, leading to the escape of ISIS terrorist Maybe you should volunteer to defend that border?

LOL- you loyal Trumpkins- 'debunked bs' is just means you approve of Trump doing it.

a) Asking Ukraine to investigate his political rival - Completely debunked BS- the President's own words: "There's a lot of talk about Biden's son, that Biden stopped the prosecution and a lot of people want to find out about that so whatever you can do with the Attorney General would be great. Biden went around bragging that he stopped the prosecution so if you can look into it ... It sounds horrible to me," Trump says
b) Asking Communist China to investigate his political rival - Completely debunked BS- President's own words: “Likewise, China should start an investigation into the Bidens, because what happened in China is just about as bad as what happened with Ukraine.”
c) Withholding Congressionally authorized military assistance to Ukraine to force Ukraine to investigate the DNC server(quid pro quo) Completely debunked BS: Trump's Chief of Staff's words:
Did he also mention to me in passing the corruption related to the DNC server? Absolutely. No question about that. But that's it, and that's why we held up the money."
Karl: "But to be clear, what you just described is a quid-pro-quo: the funding will not flow unless you're getting an investigation into the Democratic server happened as well."

Mulvaney: "We do that all the time with foreign policy

d) Withholding Congressionally authorized military assistance to Ukraine to force Ukraine to investigate his political rival(quid pro quo) Completely debunked BS. The words of the acting Ambassador to the Ukraine: "I think it's crazy to withhold security assistance for help with a political campaign.”
e) Using his Presidential authority for his direct financial benefit(G7 Doral) Completely debunked BS (LOL.ZOMG!! He left another flaming bag on his porch! Let's stomp it out!) lol- headline:
TRUMP ANNOUNCES HE'S HOSTING G7 AT HIS DORAL RESORT WHILE ARGUING BIDEN USED VP POSITION FOR PERSONAL GAIN

f) Obstruction of Justice - 3 years later and keeping Hillary out of the White House is STILL not obstruction of Justice. 3 years later and Trump's obstruction of justice has nothing to do with Hillary- Trumpkins sure can't stop talking about Hillary
g) Putting the safety of the U.S. at risk with an unplanned withdrawal from Syria, leading to the escape of ISIS terrorist Maybe you should volunteer to defend that border?
Maybe you welcome the release of ISIS terrorists? Along with the betrayal of our allies, at the same time that Trump puts our troops at risk by deploying them in Saudi Arabia.

 

[alang1216]

How many times did he mention his personal attorney? Was Giuliani acting in the interest of the country or the president?

Giuliani was working in Ukraine long before the Mueller report was released, doing exactly what Barr and Durham are doing now, looking for evidence in what sparked the investigation into the Trump campaign. Ukraine courts have said, people in the Ukraine put out a lot of false information on Trump associates in an attempt to influence the election and aid the *****. All the information is out there if you bothered to look instead of letting the MSM do your thinking for you.

.

So what's all the bull crud about the Ukrainians having the DNC server, which is the conspiracy with Crowdstrike that Trump and Giuliani are promoting?

I don't know, I haven't heard anyone elaborate on that.

.

trump did in his call with the Ukraine president...

Crowdstrike was his first mention, Bidens his second, on the quid pro quo ''favor'' asked.

A mention is not a elaboration. And there was no quid pro quo, exactly what has Trump withheld until Ukraine did something? Hint, NOTHING. The military aid was released and the sale of the Javelins has been completed, which were unrelated items.

.

There are none so blind as those who will not see.

 

[OKTexas]

Giuliani was working in Ukraine long before the Mueller report was released, doing exactly what Barr and Durham are doing now, looking for evidence in what sparked the investigation into the Trump campaign. Ukraine courts have said, people in the Ukraine put out a lot of false information on Trump associates in an attempt to influence the election and aid the *****. All the information is out there if you bothered to look instead of letting the MSM do your thinking for you.

.

So what's all the bull crud about the Ukrainians having the DNC server, which is the conspiracy with Crowdstrike that Trump and Giuliani are promoting?

I don't know, I haven't heard anyone elaborate on that.

.

trump did in his call with the Ukraine president...

Crowdstrike was his first mention, Bidens his second, on the quid pro quo ''favor'' asked.

A mention is not a elaboration. And there was no quid pro quo, exactly what has Trump withheld until Ukraine did something? Hint, NOTHING. The military aid was released and the sale of the Javelins has been completed, which were unrelated items.

.

There are none so blind as those who will not see.

Yeah, you commies are pathetic little things.

.

 

[SweetTea]

Giuliani was working in Ukraine long before the Mueller report was released, doing exactly what Barr and Durham are doing now, looking for evidence in what sparked the investigation into the Trump campaign. Ukraine courts have said, people in the Ukraine put out a lot of false information on Trump associates in an attempt to influence the election and aid the *****. All the information is out there if you bothered to look instead of letting the MSM do your thinking for you.

.

So what's all the bull crud about the Ukrainians having the DNC server, which is the conspiracy with Crowdstrike that Trump and Giuliani are promoting?

I don't know, I haven't heard anyone elaborate on that.

.

trump did in his call with the Ukraine president...

Crowdstrike was his first mention, Bidens his second, on the quid pro quo ''favor'' asked.

A mention is not a elaboration. And there was no quid pro quo, exactly what has Trump withheld until Ukraine did something? Hint, NOTHING. The military aid was released and the sale of the Javelins has been completed, which were unrelated items.

.

There are none so blind as those who will not see.

Exacly my sentiment with those with TDS. They are blind.

 

[Butch_Coolidge]

Tweets are very sarcastic. How dare he.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[diver52]

Right now, the decision to use his own commercial property to host the G-7. A clear violation of the Emoluments Clause and using the powers of his office for personal enrichment.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Since he obstructed Hillary from her rightful place on the White House throne, there have been so, so, so, so many impeachable offenses.

Name your favorite 2 or 3

a) Asking Ukraine to investigate his political rival
b) Asking Communist China to investigate his political rival
c) Withholding Congressionally authorized military assistance to Ukraine to force Ukraine to investigate the DNC server(quid pro quo)
d) Withholding Congressionally authorized military assistance to Ukraine to force Ukraine to investigate his political rival(quid pro quo)
e) Using his Presidential authority for his direct financial benefit(G7 Doral)
f) Obstruction of Justice
g) Putting the safety of the U.S. at risk with an unplanned withdrawal from Syria, leading to the escape of ISIS terrorists.

Sorry- I couldn't think of just 2 or 3.

a) Asking Ukraine to investigate his political rival - Completely debunked BS
b) Asking Communist China to investigate his political rival - Completely debunked BS
c) Withholding Congressionally authorized military assistance to Ukraine to force Ukraine to investigate the DNC server(quid pro quo) Completely debunked BS
d) Withholding Congressionally authorized military assistance to Ukraine to force Ukraine to investigate his political rival(quid pro quo) Completely debunked BS
e) Using his Presidential authority for his direct financial benefit(G7 Doral) Completely debunked BS (LOL.ZOMG!! He left another flaming bag on his porch! Let's stomp it out!)
f) Obstruction of Justice - 3 years later and keeping Hillary out of the White House is STILL not obstruction of Justice
g) Putting the safety of the U.S. at risk with an unplanned withdrawal from Syria, leading to the escape of ISIS terrorist Maybe you should volunteer to defend that border?

LOL- you loyal Trumpkins- 'debunked bs' is just means you approve of Trump doing it.

a) Asking Ukraine to investigate his political rival - Completely debunked BS- the President's own words: "There's a lot of talk about Biden's son, that Biden stopped the prosecution and a lot of people want to find out about that so whatever you can do with the Attorney General would be great. Biden went around bragging that he stopped the prosecution so if you can look into it ... It sounds horrible to me," Trump says
b) Asking Communist China to investigate his political rival - Completely debunked BS- President's own words: “Likewise, China should start an investigation into the Bidens, because what happened in China is just about as bad as what happened with Ukraine.”
c) Withholding Congressionally authorized military assistance to Ukraine to force Ukraine to investigate the DNC server(quid pro quo) Completely debunked BS: Trump's Chief of Staff's words:
Did he also mention to me in passing the corruption related to the DNC server? Absolutely. No question about that. But that's it, and that's why we held up the money."
Karl: "But to be clear, what you just described is a quid-pro-quo: the funding will not flow unless you're getting an investigation into the Democratic server happened as well."

Mulvaney: "We do that all the time with foreign policy

d) Withholding Congressionally authorized military assistance to Ukraine to force Ukraine to investigate his political rival(quid pro quo) Completely debunked BS. The words of the acting Ambassador to the Ukraine: "I think it's crazy to withhold security assistance for help with a political campaign.”
e) Using his Presidential authority for his direct financial benefit(G7 Doral) Completely debunked BS (LOL.ZOMG!! He left another flaming bag on his porch! Let's stomp it out!) lol- headline:
TRUMP ANNOUNCES HE'S HOSTING G7 AT HIS DORAL RESORT WHILE ARGUING BIDEN USED VP POSITION FOR PERSONAL GAIN

f) Obstruction of Justice - 3 years later and keeping Hillary out of the White House is STILL not obstruction of Justice. 3 years later and Trump's obstruction of justice has nothing to do with Hillary- Trumpkins sure can't stop talking about Hillary
g) Putting the safety of the U.S. at risk with an unplanned withdrawal from Syria, leading to the escape of ISIS terrorist Maybe you should volunteer to defend that border?
Maybe you welcome the release of ISIS terrorists? Along with the betrayal of our allies, at the same time that Trump puts our troops at risk by deploying them in Saudi Arabia.

He asked Ukraine to investigate why the DNC wanted to have Ukraine interfere in the 2016 Election and also look into democrat money laundering, payola and extortion. He people who actually asked a foreign government to investigate their opponent were Obama and Hillary

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Right now, the decision to use his own commercial property to host the G-7. A clear violation of the Emoluments Clause and using the powers of his office for personal enrichment.

He didn't "decide" anything, it was another flaming bag he left on the porch for you

 

[harmonica]

giving Old Yeller rabies

 

[alang1216]

He people who actually asked a foreign government to investigate their opponent were Obama and Hillary

Let's not forget that Trump asked the Russians to help find Hillary's emails.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

He people who actually asked a foreign government to investigate their opponent were Obama and Hillary

Let's not forget that Trump asked the Russians to help find Hillary's emails.

Let's not forget Hillary's porous server got all of our Chinese CIA assets tortured and killed

 

[OKTexas]

Right now, the decision to use his own commercial property to host the G-7. A clear violation of the Emoluments Clause and using the powers of his office for personal enrichment.

You might want to look up the definition of an emolument, but that said, Doral will be doing the conference at cost. They won't be making money on it, and it will save the US taxpayers a ton of money over any other facility. BTW Trump didn't pick the facility, the team assigned to find one did.

.

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

Right now, the decision to use his own commercial property to host the G-7. A clear violation of the Emoluments Clause and using the powers of his office for personal enrichment.

You might want to look up the definition of an emolument, but that said, Doral will be doing the conference at cost. They won't be making money on it, and it will save the US taxpayers a ton of money over any other facility. BTW Trump didn't pick the facility, the team assigned to find one did.

.

They've been whining about the emolument clause since Trump was nominated. No evidence of violation has surfaced.

It has all the legal depth of their current impeachment carnival side show.

 

[OKTexas]

He people who actually asked a foreign government to investigate their opponent were Obama and Hillary

Let's not forget that Trump asked the Russians to help find Hillary's emails.

Yeah, more than two years after her server was shut down. So Russia would have already had them when Trump made that joke. You commies need to start thinking for yourself and investigating the facts.

.

 

[alang1216]

He people who actually asked a foreign government to investigate their opponent were Obama and Hillary

Let's not forget that Trump asked the Russians to help find Hillary's emails.

Let's not forget Hillary's porous server got all of our Chinese CIA assets tortured and killed

Oh, I guess I forgot that. Wait, I never knew that, I never heard that, and I don't believe that.

 

[alang1216]

He people who actually asked a foreign government to investigate their opponent were Obama and Hillary

Let's not forget that Trump asked the Russians to help find Hillary's emails.

Yeah, more than two years after her server was shut down. So Russia would have already had them when Trump made that joke. You commies need to start thinking for yourself and investigating the facts.

.

Yet he did ask a foreign power to interfere with an election and it doesn't sound like a joke since, as you say, the Russians did have them but hadn't released them.

Trump obviously learned nothing since he just asked the Ukrainians to help him locate the DNC server.

 

[OKTexas]

He people who actually asked a foreign government to investigate their opponent were Obama and Hillary

Let's not forget that Trump asked the Russians to help find Hillary's emails.

Yeah, more than two years after her server was shut down. So Russia would have already had them when Trump made that joke. You commies need to start thinking for yourself and investigating the facts.

.

Yet he did ask a foreign power to interfere with an election and it doesn't sound like a joke since, as you say, the Russians did have them but hadn't released them.

Trump obviously learned nothing since he just asked the Ukrainians to help him locate the DNC server.

You evidently can't read, I said they would have had to have had them already, in order to release them, which never happened BTW, because the bitches server no longer existed. And Trump asked Ukraine to cooperate with the AG in an ongoing investigation 4 times during their conversation, which is completely appropriate. You commies seen to be ignoring the facts to advance your propaganda.

.

 

[alang1216]

He people who actually asked a foreign government to investigate their opponent were Obama and Hillary

Let's not forget that Trump asked the Russians to help find Hillary's emails.

Yeah, more than two years after her server was shut down. So Russia would have already had them when Trump made that joke. You commies need to start thinking for yourself and investigating the facts.

.

Yet he did ask a foreign power to interfere with an election and it doesn't sound like a joke since, as you say, the Russians did have them but hadn't released them.

Trump obviously learned nothing since he just asked the Ukrainians to help him locate the DNC server.

You evidently can't read, I said they would have had to have had them already, in order to release them, which never happened BTW, because the bitches server no longer existed. And Trump asked Ukraine to cooperate with the AG in an ongoing investigation 4 times during their conversation, which is completely appropriate. You commies seen to be ignoring the facts to advance your propaganda.

Fact: it is incredibly hard, if not impossible, to remove something that has traversed the internet. If she had sent/received 30,000 emails, odds are they still exist somewhere. If the Russian hacked the DNC they may have had the emails.

And Trump asked Ukraine to cooperate with the AG and his personal attorney to START an investigation into his political opponent. Did he provide any evidence of wrongdoing or 'probable cause'? If he had gone to a US FBI agent with zero evidence would there be an investigation? Entirely inappropriate.