FISA needs to end.
Secret Courts and Secret Hearings with no Due Process are Unconstitutional.
Sry, that's a NO GO.
You don't understand TYRANNY.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
FISA needs to end.
Secret Courts and Secret Hearings with no Due Process are Unconstitutional.
The 4th Reich or 4th Industrial Revolution is what we live in now, and they really don't give a shit about giving themselves legitimate cover.Hitler was careful to get legal authority for every evil thing he did within the 3rd Reich
So this prissy lib attitude of hiding behind judges is nothing new
You seem confused.Proof like an empty fucking safe?
Bullshit. She printed up a few copies so you can't track header info and deleted the rest.What CRIMEs were on Hunter's laptop....spell out the crimes please.
Sandy Berger was prosecuted, got two years probation, a very big fine, and lost his law licence!!!
Hillary did not get caught STEALING emails, she turned them over when asked.
trump has refused to turn these govt top secret documents over, for a year and a half.
my guess for one of the items missing is that Trump is holding on to Kim Jong Un's letter.... It's pretty important that the next president, knows what the China leader, said to the previous president in his official letter.....
Justice Stanley Reed wrote the majority opinion and disagreed that the law was unconstitutionally vague, but only on the very narrow grounds that the law required “intent or reason to believe that the information to be obtained is to be used to the injury of the United States.” Only because the court read the law to require scienter, or bad faith, before a conviction could be sustained was the law constitutional. Otherwise, it would be too difficult for a defendant to know when exactly material related to the national defense. The court made clear that if the law criminalized the simple mishandling of classified information, it would not survive constitutional scrutiny, writing:OMG. How Dems ^^^ can complain about Trump’s “record of destroying documents” after Hillary destroyed 33,000 documents - including classified ones - is the height of hypocrisy.
Your side is going down. You crossed the line this time.
In other words, the defendant had to intend for his conduct to benefit a foreign power for his actions to violate 793(f).The sections are not simple prohibitions against obtaining or delivering to foreign powers information… relating to national defense. If this were the language, it would need to be tested by the inquiry as to whether it had double meaning or forced anyone, at his peril, to speculate as to whether certain actions violated the statute.
You have no valid argument nor the ability to debate effectively.You seem confused.
And you’re being used by people who know how to funnel that hatred.Meh, we hated Democrat scum long before Trump.
You trust the FBI.
And you obviously trust the MSM.
It's going to be glorious. I hope there's blood.
I think your programming is faulty, little bot. Ask your leftist masters to give you a tune-up.Were you going to have their trials on conservative media or reality?
Because there’s actual standards of proof in reality that don’t exist in conservative media.
Oh, so you’re just going to abandon the constitution then. I remember when the right used to adhere to it.None are needed, it's commonly known the guy is an imbecile.
Hunter's laptop, not Russian disinformation as said before the 2020 election.What CRIMEs were on Hunter's laptop....spell out the crimes please.
Sandy Berger was prosecuted, got two years probation, a very big fine, and lost his law license!!!
Hillary did not get caught STEALING emails, she turned them over when asked.
trump has refused to turn these govt top secret documents over, for a year and a half.
my guess for one of the items missing is that Trump is holding on to Kim Jong Un's letter.... It's pretty important that the next president, knows what the China leader, said to the previous president in his official letter.....
The dems went to a friendly judge, White.Suspect you are correct, but it would not be the first time for a Trump appointed judge to rule against trump interests.
No one gives a fuckity fuck about shithole Venezuala.There was blood in Venezuela. It was shed by conservatives. They now have a dictator.
The USA will soon have one as well.
"All that was required for evil men to prevail..............."
Seek medical help immediately.And you’re being used by people who know how to funnel that hatred.
Follow the money, duh.
"The big guy" is guilty as sin. Its all there in Hunter's laptop, including a real live whistleblower (Bobulinsky).
I didn’t.Didnt you say that bailing Hitler out was a problem? Stick to one position please.
I guess you are right.Sry, that's a NO GO.
You don't understand TYRANNY.
Fuck YOU and your projection GROOMER!!!
Easy now...I side with Conservatives, I vote with Conservatives BUT they are the most nutless, spinless, big mouth pieces of shit that ever were. Come on man...they didn’t have the balls to keep heterosexual white Christians cool in a nation founded, built, run and funded by heterosexual white Christians. The Left has owned their sackless asses for decades....Sad but true.
So it's all ok if your side does it, for some kind of revenge? Really? That's your stance?The Democrats have set a dangerous precedence. Let's see how loud you pigs squeal after we take back the House this November, and the Biden family finds themselves under investigation.