Trump's executive orders

What we do know is that prices for gas will drop under Trump, and they would rise under Biden's "war on energy".

That what you want to believe.

You ‘know” nothing.

Gas prices did not rise during the Biden.

tThey aren’t likely to be much different for the foreseeable future. Trump’s idiotic promise of $1.00 gas is bullshit for morons.
 
That what you want to believe.

You ‘know” nothing.

Gas prices did not rise during the Biden.

TimFitz

you are going for comedy trollboy.you need to start a comedy club.:auiqs.jpg:
 
that is WHY trump is the first pres since kennedy not part of the corrupt two party system,when he was sworn in,i thought he would be the same old same old,the fact the name republican was attached to it but the few people on here that keep saying he is part of the corrupt two party system are ignorant and have not studied his executive orders because had they done so,they would know they are set in place to go after the deep state.
 
that is WHY trump is the first pres since kennedy not part of the corrupt two party system,when he was sworn in,i thought he would be the same old same old,the fact the name republican was attached to it but the few people on here that keep saying he is part of the corrupt two party system are ignorant and have not studied his executive orders because had they done so,they would know they are set in place to go after the deep state.
Trump is not out to destroy the proverbial "deep state", he is out to create his own.
 
:clap:


1737494090039.webp
 
And that would drive up prices on America goods even more, and make people MORE likely to buy from China.

How much over minimum wage do YOU pay your lower level employees in the business YOU own?
No one working for makes minimum wage.

The lowliest part time social media person makes $40/hr.

They're happy that way, and I'm happy too, cause I want to retain them.
 
Here are two versions of them:



Energy emergency

Border emergency

No more DEI

No more EV mandate

Cartels are now terrorist organizations

No more birthright citizenship for illegals

No more asylum

No more catch and release

Remain in Mexico back in place

More...

Commentary: (sits calmly and waits for leftard heads to explode)
~~~~~~

Trump will find that the executive orders were the easy part

21 Jan 2025 ~~ By Andrea Widburg

Trump’s executive orders and memoranda to his department heads are thrilling. He’s doing all the right things. But of course, signing pieces of paper is easy. The hard part is getting those things to happen.



Trump will face opposition from the entrenched federal workers (all of whom have been protected for decades by their increasingly partisan, leftist unions), from Democrat-run states, and from individual actors. Most of this will end up in the courts, so we need to hope that judges correctly read the American mood and give Trump his way on acts manifestly within his constitutional purview.
Last week, a very scary poll came out showing that over 40% of federal workers say that they intend to oppose the administration. The poll surprisingly showed that highly educated, affluent Americans, the ones who are the Democrats’ most fervent supporters, are willing to give Trump a chance, as are ordinary Americans, the ones without post-graduate degrees and high salaries. The outliers, however, were federal employees who live in and around D.C. and bring home salaries exceeding $75,000:
~Snip~
These resisters will also get major support from their unions, so I continue to hope that Trump reverses JFK’s executive order authorizing those unions. The unions are a pernicious way for Democrats to buy votes using taxpayer money (Dems give the unions huge wages and benefits; the unions respond by funding and voting for Democrats), and have no place in our constitutional system.
Trump’s not just facing trouble from within the workforce. Twenty-two states instantly sued Trump to block his executive order ending birthright citizenship. I believe Trump is right, and stand by S. David Sultzer’s excellent analysis on the subject. (If you have friends in the Trump administration, maybe you can pass the analysis on to them.)
~Snip~
All these pro-illegal immigration, anti-Trump efforts will eventually ended up in the courts, of course. As we all remember, during Trump’s first term, the courts were relentlessly hostile to his actions. This was especially true for border initiatives, which saw federal district court judges in cherry-picked jurisdictions block the entire federal machinery. This was never how the system was intended to work, with unelected judges controlling national security and other powers unique to the president.
This time, however, those judges might notice that Trump has enormous support, as shown by his stunning Electoral College victory, his popular vote victory, and the poll mentioned at the top of this essay. Perhaps the judges will show a little wisdom this time around and let the constitutional system operate.


Commentary:
It's obvious that the Civil Service lws need tweaking...
Just how many lawsuits can the Neo-Marxist Left file? It’s easy enough to file a lawsuit, I suppose, but if it’s going to succeed it needs to have a strong legal team and legal strategy. They're going to be spread thin by all these Exe-O's. Do the have the money and legal expertise to fight all them? After all Kamaltoe spent all their money and lost.
Trump has one huge advantage over even hostile judges. He can ignore their orders with relative impunity. Joey B., did that often enough. The ONLY remedy for a president who ignores judges is impeachment, and that's highly unlikely to happen - at least for now.
If a bureaucrat is fired and then a judge orders him reinstated, the executive branch can simply refuse to honor the order. The judge has NO recourse whatsoever.
 
That what you want to believe. You ‘know” nothing.
Gas prices did not rise during the Biden.
They aren’t likely to be much different for the foreseeable future. Trump’s idiotic promise of $1.00 gas is bullshit for morons.
Trump said "half" the price for gas in a year, $1.5x, a big ask since permits and drilling and pipelines take longer, we'll see what happens.
 
Let's not mince words ... go Trump!


1737926221727.webp
 
Here are two versions of them:



Energy emergency

Border emergency

No more DEI

No more EV mandate

Cartels are now terrorist organizations

No more birthright citizenship for illegals

No more asylum

No more catch and release

Remain in Mexico back in place

More...

Commentary: (sits calmly and waits for leftard heads to explode)
Every single one of Trump's executive orders can be reversed by the next President. He is using these executive orders as red meat for his base. MAGAs are easy to fool aren't they?
So tragic.
 
Every single one of Trump's executive orders can be reversed by the next President. He is using these executive orders as red meat for his base. MAGAs are easy to fool aren't they?
So tragic.
No one's fooled.

Especially no one behind deported.

None of the J6 political prisoners were fooled either, they're out of jail.

Google isn't fooled, they changed the names on their maps already.

Who's being fooled, fool?
 
Every single one of Trump's executive orders can be reversed by the next President. He is using these executive orders as red meat for his base. MAGAs are easy to fool aren't they?
So tragic.
Red is for mods. Switch to black.
 
No one's fooled.

Especially no one behind deported.

None of the J6 political prisoners were fooled either, they're out of jail.

Google isn't fooled, they changed the names on their maps already.

Who's being fooled, fool?
Who is being fooled? The one who asked the question. :auiqs.jpg::auiqs.jpg::auiqs.jpg:
 
How about Biden's "pre-emptive pardons" to his family and others?

Trump can battle for his EOs in court.

What about the Biden Crime Family pardons?
Presidential pardons are absolute. There can be no contesting, no matter which prez gave the pardon.
 
Presidential pardons are absolute. There can be no contesting, no matter which prez gave the pardon.
Depends on the definition of pardon, and what our founders intended. Clearly, they intended presidents to be the last recourse to a man (or woman) who was unfairly found guilty of a specific crime - NOT a blanket pardon excusing any unnamed and unidentified and undiscovered crimes that have yet to be charged.

It’s a job for the SCOTUS.
 
Don't you just hate it when a member thinks that colored, bold, large, or any combination thereof makes them special? Special Ed maybe.
I do. Especially those large bold fonts, as if what they have to say is more important than anyone else.

Or, maybe blacks should type in black font and whites in white. I’ll do it now. Here is what I have to say:





————

:laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301:
 
Depends on the definition of pardon, and what our founders intended. Clearly, they intended presidents to be the last recourse to a man (or woman) who was unfairly found guilty of a specific crime - NOT a blanket pardon excusing any unnamed and unidentified and undiscovered crimes that have yet to be charged.

It’s a job for the SCOTUS.
I'm certainly willing to see what they think. I doubt that they'll try to override any of them.
 
Back
Top Bottom