birthright citizenship

Our U.S. Supreme Court is currently reviewing Trump v. Barbara, a case which challenges President Trump’s executive order, “Protecting the Meaning and Value of American Citizenship”. Factually speaking, unwritten federal policy, and only unwritten federal policy, not statutory law, now...

. From the very beginning of our nation's founding, and when debating our Nations` first RULE OF NATURALIZATION, FEB. 3RD, 1790, page ll56, Annals of Congress Representative Burk emphatically states the introduction of some foreign nationals ought to be considered “. . . as a high misdemeanor.”...

With regard to the question “Is our S.C. vested with power to create a new category of U.S. citizenship?", the obvious answer is no, since Congress, the people’s elected representatives, are granted exclusive authority “To establish a uniform Rule of Naturalization”, and by Section 5 of the...

I would like participants in the thread to keep to our system’s fundamental principles of law, and apply the acknowledged rule of “interpretation” where applicable, as stated by our U.S. Senate which follows: “In construing the Constitution we are compelled to give it such interpretation as...

Considering a preponderance of historical evidence from the debates of the 39th Congress indicates the 14th Amendment was never intended to grant U.S. citizenship to the offspring of an illegal entrant foreign national, born on American soil, I’m having great difficulty imagining, under what...

See: Supreme Court agrees to hear challenge to Trump’s birthright citizenship order. "In an order released Friday afternoon, the justices said they would take up for review Trump v. Barbara, a case originally brought in a federal court in New Hampshire by a group of people whose children could...

. See: Supreme Court doesn't have 5 votes to uphold birthright citizenship: ex-AG 6/29/2025 "Former U.S. Attorney General Alberto Gonzales during an interview on Sunday speculated that the U.S. Supreme Court ruled against nationwide injunctions in a landmark case as a compromise after failing...

The question should be, do they have standing? I say no, they do not. But we see over and over how Democrats care nothing for the American people and want to subdue us with overwhelming numbers of foreign born women coming here illegally, popping out a baby, thus an 'anchor baby', and neither...

By the terms of our Constitution, which became effective on June 21st, 1788, (when New Hampshire became the ninth state to ratify it), Congress, and only Congress, was authorized “To establish a uniform Rule of Naturalization…” (Article 1, Section 8, Clause 4). By this provision Congress, and...

. Note that the Wong Kim Ark ruling based birthright citizenship on the status of his parents when born, who were lawfully domiciled in the United States. Our current statutory wording for lawfully domiciled is lawful permanent residence (LPR) SOURCE And, as expressed under existing statutory...

. See: Birthright citizenship is guaranteed in the US Constitution. Both Trump and DeSantis want it gone, and they'll need the court's help to do it. Madison Hall writes: “As granted by the 14th Amendment, which was ratified in 1868, anybody born in the United States is guaranteed...

How many ways does Trump/Republicans wanna trash the American Constitution? First, they want to get rid of automatic citizenship for people born in this country. And they’re talking about policing the Internet so they can stop discussion of trumps lies and criminality. Trump wants to...

This is a simple YES or NO poll BUT please post a reasoning to the vote you cast in the poll. Thanks