separation of powers

Our U.S. Supreme Court is currently reviewing Trump v. Barbara, a case which challenges President Trump’s executive order, “Protecting the Meaning and Value of American Citizenship”. Factually speaking, unwritten federal policy, and only unwritten federal policy, not statutory law, now...

. From the very beginning of our nation's founding, and when debating our Nations` first RULE OF NATURALIZATION, FEB. 3RD, 1790, page ll56, Annals of Congress Representative Burk emphatically states the introduction of some foreign nationals ought to be considered “. . . as a high misdemeanor.”...

With regard to the question “Is our S.C. vested with power to create a new category of U.S. citizenship?", the obvious answer is no, since Congress, the people’s elected representatives, are granted exclusive authority “To establish a uniform Rule of Naturalization”, and by Section 5 of the...

I would like participants in the thread to keep to our system’s fundamental principles of law, and apply the acknowledged rule of “interpretation” where applicable, as stated by our U.S. Senate which follows: “In construing the Constitution we are compelled to give it such interpretation as...

Considering a preponderance of historical evidence from the debates of the 39th Congress indicates the 14th Amendment was never intended to grant U.S. citizenship to the offspring of an illegal entrant foreign national, born on American soil, I’m having great difficulty imagining, under what...

FACT: Unwritten federal public policy, and only federal unwritten public policy, now recognizes citizenship for the offspring of illegal entrant foreign nationals born on American soil. But the qualifier in the 14th Amendment “and subject to the jurisdiction thereof” was explicitly adopted by...

While Justice Gorsuch in LEARNING RESOURCES, INC. v. TRUMP entertains much ado about the “major questions doctrine” and its asserted purpose “. . . to sustain a claim that Congress has granted them an extraordinary power, executive officials must identify clear authority for that power . . . “...

From Justice Roberts’ opinion: (a) IEEPA authorizes the President to “investigate, block during the pendency of an investigation, regulate, direct and compel, nullify, void, prevent or prohibit . . . importation or exportation.” §1702(a)(1)(B). Absent from this lengthy list of specific powers...

See: Supreme Court agrees to decide the fate of Trump’s tariffs My guess is, our Supreme Court may very well find, and rightly so, Congress’s power includes overruling any tariff which Trump has imposed, and not our Supreme Court. The case revolves around the International Emergency Economic...

We are witnessing federal rogue judges meddling in our system’s executive and legislative functions and doing so without establishing their interventions are required because a constitutional provision is being subverted and demands intervention. Congress needs to grow a spine and start...

See: How the 14th Amendment is changing the fight for gender-affirming care for minors “U.S. District Judge Jay Moody struck down Tuesday Arkansas' first-in-the-nation ban as unconstitutional, arguing it violated young people's right to equal protection under the law and due process, and those...

. In Clinton v. City of New York, 524 U.S. 417 1998, our Supreme Court correctly struck down our Executive Branch of government [our President] from exercising the extraordinary power of line-item veto powers, i.e., our president removing specific provisions of a bill presented to him, before...

Is it not an irrefutable fact that a majority on our Supreme Court, in its Roe and Casey opinions, decided to exercise legislative, judiciary and executive powers, which in effect subtlety subverted our constitution’s mandated system of separation of powers, and replaced it with one which...

. In Biden v. Missouri, the Majority opinion never established the constitutionality of an agency, unelected by the people __ the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), acting through the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) ___ to adopt a rule demanding and enforcing medical...

. See Supreme Court hears oral arguments on Biden vaccine mandates: LIVE UPDATES The question is, will a majority on the court apply the Humpty Dumpty theory of language to our Constitution in order to uphold Biden’s vaccine mandate? “When I use a word,” Humpty Dumpty said, in rather a...

While Ronald Reagan never delivered this speech, the contents are nonetheless spot on as they always were with Ronald Reagan’s speeches. While I don’t believe that it functions as a “smokescreen” as Magnuson did, I know that it he was absolutely correct in his understanding of the threat of the...

I have felt for a long time that Executive Orders can and do erode the separation of powers and override the Constitution. I thought perhaps I was wrong, that modern society required swifter reaction to crisis by the actions of our leader or that it was purely an obvious administrative...

Now that all of you on the left are freaking out and completely losing your shit because of a Donald Trump presidency, will you finally admit that the unconstitutional, unlimited power that you built and celebrated for the Oval Office isn't so great after all? The Donald Trump administration...

On many occasions the courts have struck down Barack Obama's unconstitutional "Executive Orders". Some of which have even been struck down unanimously by the Supreme Court - astounding since two of the justices (Elana Kagen and Sonja Sotomayor) are extreme left-wing activists appointed by Barack...