Seymour Flops
Diamond Member
In this video, the jude listens and questions Trump's attorney's arguments:
In this one, he states that the issue should wait until "directed verdict time."
In other words, Trump will have to sit through the prosecution's presentation of the case and THEN his lawyer can ask for a directd verdict because the case is nothing more than an attempt to criminalize speech about an election.
Unless the State is unlawfully holding back discovery material, the judge and the defense know what the prosecutor is alleging is criminal. If the judge can determine that even if all of the state's factual claims are true, the case is an unconstitutional attack on speech, he should dismiss it now. If the judge can determine that the case is not an unconstitutional attack on speech, he should rule that way now, so Trump's attorney's can appeal.
If the judge is unable to determine either way at this time, he should recuse himself for being unable to make a decision, because there is no new information to be had. We can have hung juries. Judges are supposed to make rulings and hope the superior courts uphold them, not procrastinate while a defendant is subjected to a trial.
But this is the same coward that let Fanni Willis take over his courtroom, and then ruled that she could stay on the case that she used to go gain money for her married lover, and only had to get rid of her current gigalo and would be then free to pick another one.
In this one, he states that the issue should wait until "directed verdict time."
In other words, Trump will have to sit through the prosecution's presentation of the case and THEN his lawyer can ask for a directd verdict because the case is nothing more than an attempt to criminalize speech about an election.
Unless the State is unlawfully holding back discovery material, the judge and the defense know what the prosecutor is alleging is criminal. If the judge can determine that even if all of the state's factual claims are true, the case is an unconstitutional attack on speech, he should dismiss it now. If the judge can determine that the case is not an unconstitutional attack on speech, he should rule that way now, so Trump's attorney's can appeal.
If the judge is unable to determine either way at this time, he should recuse himself for being unable to make a decision, because there is no new information to be had. We can have hung juries. Judges are supposed to make rulings and hope the superior courts uphold them, not procrastinate while a defendant is subjected to a trial.
But this is the same coward that let Fanni Willis take over his courtroom, and then ruled that she could stay on the case that she used to go gain money for her married lover, and only had to get rid of her current gigalo and would be then free to pick another one.
Last edited:
