Trumps 45 min speech on Wed

[Dale Smith]

These are hack , leftist judges in dirty , filthy rotten robe- they’re the lowest form of humanity

Um....

Trump-Appointed Judges Balk at President’s Efforts to Overturn Election

'Judicial independence is alive and well,' declares one former jurist

www.voanews.com

U.S. judiciary, shaped by Trump, thwarts his election challenges

U.S. President Donald Trump's reshaping of the federal judiciary has done little to help him win lawsuits challenging the election outcome, with Trump appointees rebuffing him and the U.S. Supreme Court showing little interest in getting involved.

www.reuters.com

Trump-Appointed Judge Dismisses Pennsylvania Election Case

Circuit Judge Stephanos Bibas noted that the president's "claims have no merit."

www.newsweek.com

These are fake judges and nothing else
You have hundreds of eyewitness affidavits, you moron

They don't want to see the truth cause they want Biden as POTUS even if he got there in a fraudulent election.

If he had won fair and square I wouldn't be saying a thing and neither would the rest of us.

Yeppers and I knew from the "git-go" that Barrypuppet was going to win in 2008 and 2012...it was blatantly obvious that he had the media on his side and any criticism of his socialist policies were met with "YOU ARE RACIST!!!!". The Hildebeast and Pedo Joe were cursed with the wrong skin tint.

 

[forkup]

I am not a mathematician but I have the intellect to connect “‘the dots “

You have the intellect? Let me give you some more dots than.

There is a process for challenging election results. That process involves the courts. In those courts you have the opportunity to provide proof of your claims. This proof includes expert witnesses. This includes actual mathematicians. At the moment not a single of those lawsuits that allege voter fraud has been ruled favorably on. A lot of them have been dismissed tough. They have been dismissed by judges nominated by Trump, Obama and W.

Now use yourr intellect and connect those dots.

These are hack , leftist judges in dirty , filthy rotten robe- they’re the lowest form of humanity

For someone who has "the intellect" you sure seem to need to call people names a lot. You also seem to make some weird intellectual leaps. Judges appointed by Trump are leftists? How do you connect that dot? Barr also says there was no wide spread voter fraud. Is he a leftist?

I'll give you a more likely premise... You are wrong.

Sob, sob.....sniffle, sniffle....did somebody here hurt your lil tender feelins'?

Dry your little tears.... have your mommy squeeze your pathetic excuse for a physique against her massive, fat-filled "Daisy, the dairy cow" sized teats for you to suckle from when you get all "butthurt", ya candy ass *****.

Nope not at all. I just know that people who don't have an argument just throw those little tantrums. It just tells me how little actual intellect they actually have.

A smart person knows how to show somebody that they're dumb without actually having to call them that.

Just so your tiny brain understands I'll make it blatant this time. I just called you dumb.

Some things are just so blatantly obvious that to skirt the issue and try to be "clever" would be a waste 'o' time. On the best day that you ever had, you couldn't take me on in a debate and come away with any semblance of dignity. You would get your ass kicked so bad that you would either:

A: Abandon this forum....
B: Sneak back on this site using a different ID.

My bowels spew out bigger turds than you. Shall we revisit past correspondence here? I slapped you around like a pimp does a crack-addicted whore. It was brutal and you took a big time "beat down". You begged for it and you got it......

(snicker)

Well since I don't remember ever being "beat down" by you it couldn't have been all that brutal. Come to mention it I don't think you would recognise a debate if you ever saw one.

A debate is something you do without resorting to personal attacks, or fallacious arguments. Very doubtful you can survive without them.

But in the interest of fairness. Review our past correspondence (not that I believe there is much) and show me this brutal beatdown. Or better yet pick a topic and let's do the bull ring.

Here ya go, ya creepy little "fuckup"......find a thread from this assortment of exchanges where you believe that you "won".

Google search results

www.usmessageboard.com

As far as your challenge to debate in the "bullring" goes???? I eagerly accept....... create the topic. Crushing your contentions is going to be an effortless endeavor.

(snicker)

Oh lord, do I really have to explain again that calling me names says nothing about me but a whole lot about yourself?

I will start a topic later (I'm on my phone at the moment.) So why don't you provide the judges? Anything in particular you want to talk about?

 

[Indeependent]

I am not a mathematician but I have the intellect to connect “‘the dots “

You have the intellect? Let me give you some more dots than.

There is a process for challenging election results. That process involves the courts. In those courts you have the opportunity to provide proof of your claims. This proof includes expert witnesses. This includes actual mathematicians. At the moment not a single of those lawsuits that allege voter fraud has been ruled favorably on. A lot of them have been dismissed tough. They have been dismissed by judges nominated by Trump, Obama and W.

Now use yourr intellect and connect those dots.

The judges did not ask experts and mathematicians; they simply rejected the arguments.

 

[forkup]

I am not a mathematician but I have the intellect to connect “‘the dots “

You have the intellect? Let me give you some more dots than.

There is a process for challenging election results. That process involves the courts. In those courts you have the opportunity to provide proof of your claims. This proof includes expert witnesses. This includes actual mathematicians. At the moment not a single of those lawsuits that allege voter fraud has been ruled favorably on. A lot of them have been dismissed tough. They have been dismissed by judges nominated by Trump, Obama and W.

Now use yourr intellect and connect those dots.

The judges did not ask experts and mathematicians; they simply rejected the arguments.

Maybe because the arguments where bad? For instance if you content that observers weren't allowed to witness counting and a judge asks the claimants lawyer if there were observers present in the room to wich the lawyer replies "yes there were a non-zero number of observers present" chances are the case will be dismissed.

 

[forkup]

I am not a mathematician but I have the intellect to connect “‘the dots “

You have the intellect? Let me give you some more dots than.

There is a process for challenging election results. That process involves the courts. In those courts you have the opportunity to provide proof of your claims. This proof includes expert witnesses. This includes actual mathematicians. At the moment not a single of those lawsuits that allege voter fraud has been ruled favorably on. A lot of them have been dismissed tough. They have been dismissed by judges nominated by Trump, Obama and W.

Now use yourr intellect and connect those dots.

The judges did not ask experts and mathematicians; they simply rejected the arguments.

Cases being summarily dismissed does not exactly give credence to the claims made.

 

[Indeependent]

I am not a mathematician but I have the intellect to connect “‘the dots “

You have the intellect? Let me give you some more dots than.

There is a process for challenging election results. That process involves the courts. In those courts you have the opportunity to provide proof of your claims. This proof includes expert witnesses. This includes actual mathematicians. At the moment not a single of those lawsuits that allege voter fraud has been ruled favorably on. A lot of them have been dismissed tough. They have been dismissed by judges nominated by Trump, Obama and W.

Now use yourr intellect and connect those dots.

The judges did not ask experts and mathematicians; they simply rejected the arguments.

Cases being summarily dismissed does not exactly give credence to the claims made.

I think the judges are afraid for their lives.
This will wind up in SCOTUS, where they have lifetime employment and will be protected by the Secret Service.
If I were a judge and forced to hear the case I’d be wearing Depends for the next year or so.

 

[dblack]

It's all pro-wrestling to me. Fans included.

 

[Toro]

Pretty much sums up the biggest fraud election in world history
I suggest you watch it

Pretty much sums up the crazies President in world history.

 

[Indeependent]

Pretty much sums up the biggest fraud election in world history
I suggest you watch it

Pretty much sums up the crazies President in world history.

World history

 

[Toro]

A: Abandon this forum....
B: Sneak back on this site using a different ID.

Or you could just be like Crazy Dale, post two "BYE I'M NEVER COMING BACK TO THIS FORUM EVER AGAIN" threads, and then slink on back a few months later.

 

[Toro]

Pretty much sums up the biggest fraud election in world history
I suggest you watch it

Pretty much sums up the crazies President in world history.

World history

American Presidents in world history.

 

[forkup]

I am not a mathematician but I have the intellect to connect “‘the dots “

You have the intellect? Let me give you some more dots than.

There is a process for challenging election results. That process involves the courts. In those courts you have the opportunity to provide proof of your claims. This proof includes expert witnesses. This includes actual mathematicians. At the moment not a single of those lawsuits that allege voter fraud has been ruled favorably on. A lot of them have been dismissed tough. They have been dismissed by judges nominated by Trump, Obama and W.

Now use yourr intellect and connect those dots.

The judges did not ask experts and mathematicians; they simply rejected the arguments.

Cases being summarily dismissed does not exactly give credence to the claims made.

I think the judges are afraid for their lives.
This will wind up in SCOTUS, where they have lifetime employment and will be protected by the Secret Service.
If I were a judge and forced to hear the case I’d be wearing Depends for the next year or so.

You think it's fear? What leads you to believe that dismissing the cases doesn't hold risk to their safety ? Are you contending that only Democrats would be capable of violence?

 

[Indeependent]

A: Abandon this forum....
B: Sneak back on this site using a different ID.

Or you could just be like Crazy Dale, post two "BYE I'M NEVER COMING BACK TO THIS FORUM EVER AGAIN" threads, and then slink on back a few months later.

Perhaps Dale will do that one day when you post something coherent.

 

[Toro]

You guys do know that in Scamming Sydney's Krapen lawsuit, her "expert" witness is hidden from the court.

And you know that makes her evidence inadmissible, right?

 

[Toro]

A: Abandon this forum....
B: Sneak back on this site using a different ID.

Or you could just be like Crazy Dale, post two "BYE I'M NEVER COMING BACK TO THIS FORUM EVER AGAIN" threads, and then slink on back a few months later.

Perhaps Dale will do that one day when you post something coherent.

Your retort is incoherent.

 

[Toro]

Is it possible, on any level, that more voters just didn't want a second Trump term, based on their personal priorities, life experiences, positions on the issues and perspectives?

This is known as "Occam's Razor."

But when you are in a cult, it's just much easier to believe in a massive conspiracy theory about fraud that would require hundreds if not thousands of people to execute.

 

[dblack]

Pretty much sums up the biggest fraud election in world history
I suggest you watch it

Pretty much sums up the crazies President in world history.

And a grim reminder of how crazy our people are.

 

[Turtlesoup]

At this point it is clear that the king is mad.

You ain't the king.

 

[Indeependent]

A: Abandon this forum....
B: Sneak back on this site using a different ID.

Or you could just be like Crazy Dale, post two "BYE I'M NEVER COMING BACK TO THIS FORUM EVER AGAIN" threads, and then slink on back a few months later.

Perhaps Dale will do that one day when you post something coherent.

Your retort is incoherent.

Imitation is the greatest form of flattery.

 

[MaryAnne11]

Mac is so easy to fool and manipulate

I think you are the one being manipulated. Sure hope you did not donate to the Trump slush fund that has new reached 207 million, 60% going into Trump pockets.