Trump Wants No Tax For Americans Making Less Than $150,000 A Year

[M14 Shooter]

I would rather see a flat tax on personal income and a flat tax on corporate income with no deductions, but this would certainly be better than the current code and I would support it, but don't hold your breath. It's unlikely to happen. If it's actually proposed, it will be interesting to see who stands against it and why.

Clearly, a tax cut for the rich.

 

[M14 Shooter]

What happened to "everyone must pay their fair share" OP?

Its not fair for families who make $40k/yr to not pay any federal income tax?
Why do you hate the working class?

 

[pknopp]

I thought that's what you idiots wanted? Now you don't? make up your mind you fking idiot.

No idea what you are rambling about.

 

[Stann]

I would rather see a flat tax on personal income and a flat tax on corporate income with no deductions, but this would certainly be better than the current code and I would support it, but don't hold your breath. It's unlikely to happen. If it's actually proposed, it will be interesting to see who stands against it and why.

Did he do any studies to see how this reduction in funfdimg would affect the federal and state governments. We do want our nation to survive after all. Bet not. He seems to believe any thoughts that comes off the top of his head is a good one and damn the consequences.

 

[Stann]

I would rather see a flat tax on personal income and a flat tax on corporate income with no deductions, but this would certainly be better than the current code and I would support it, but don't hold your breath. It's unlikely to happen. If it's actually proposed, it will be interesting to see who stands against it and why.

Idiotic idea. That would eliminate ALL taxes from 93% of the population. He has no idea how people live. That would destroy the country. Governments require funding to work and keep US safe.

 

[Rogue AI]

No roads, no fire dept, etc......yeah, you know i kinda like that stuff and I'm willing to pay for it.

They don't have those things in states without income taxes? Actually they do. You just want a nanny state. How sad.

 

[pknopp]

They don't have those things in states without income taxes? Actually they do. You just want a nanny state. How sad.

I'll note how you narrowed the argument down. The argument was "taxes".

I want roads and fire departments. You just want to mindlessly whine.

 

[Rogue AI]

I'll note how you narrowed the argument down. The argument was "taxes".

I want roads and fire departments. You just want to mindlessly whine.

I narrowed nothing, you are talking about state and local services. How asinine are you?

 

[jc456]

No idea what you are rambling about.

tax cuts for the rich, fk, the stuff you all can't retain amazes me.

 

[pknopp]

I narrowed nothing, you are talking about state and local services. How asinine are you?

And the complaint was about "taxes".

 

[pknopp]

tax cuts for the rich, fk, the stuff you all can't retain amazes me.

I never argued for that.

 

[jc456]

I never argued for that.

so you never said another tax cut for the rich? I will search the forum if you say no.

 

[Rogue AI]

And the complaint was about "taxes".

Income taxes. Keep up.

 

[Dekster]

I would rather see a flat tax on personal income and a flat tax on corporate income with no deductions, but this would certainly be better than the current code and I would support it, but don't hold your breath. It's unlikely to happen. If it's actually proposed, it will be interesting to see who stands against it and why.

175 Million workers making an average of 59K gets you to just over $10T and the current federal spending is about $7 T, meaning people directly would need to have a flat tax rate of 70% to cover it.

 

[Stann]

They don't have those things in states without income taxes? Actually they do. You just want a nanny state. How sad.

trump's idiotic idea would have 93% of Americans not paying taxes. And there's his rich buddies, most of whom pay no taxes. So who's going to find the government. The 6 *% of Americans who are in between those 2 groups ? In simple terms it just won't work.

 

[Rogue AI]

trump's idiotic idea would have 93% of Americans not paying taxes. And there's his rich buddies, most of whom pay no taxes. So who's going to find the government. The 6 *% of Americans who are in between those 2 groups ? In simple terms it just won't work.

So what? The Founders had 100% of the people not paying income taxes. You rubes just want a nanny state. No thanks. Without the people as collateral the government must stay within it's means.

 

[Stann]

So what? The Founders had 100% of the people not paying income taxes. You rubes just want a nanny state. No thanks. Without the people as collateral the government must stay within it's means.

You're missing the point idiot. They have to have some funding in order to work. Or do you think the military and government workers should work for free.

 

[jc456]

trump's idiotic idea would have 93% of Americans not paying taxes. And there's his rich buddies, most of whom pay no taxes. So who's going to find the government. The 6 *% of Americans who are in between those 2 groups ? In simple terms it just won't work.

yep and pay taxes using foreign money through tariffs.

 

[pknopp]

yep and pay taxes using foreign money through tariffs.

A tax is a tax is a tax.

 

[jc456]

A tax is a tax is a tax.

and the foreign money would do that rather than americans. kind of the point.