Godboy
Diamond Member
- Dec 29, 2008
- 37,851
- 20,759
- 1,905
What does that have to do with this discussion?Don’t use google if you don’t like your results.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
What does that have to do with this discussion?Don’t use google if you don’t like your results.
And what do you think should be done about that?Conservative radio doesnt pop up when you open google, but shitloads of left wing articles are there. Most people get media from phones, not the radio.
Depends on your answer to the above.What does that have to do with this discussion?
/----/ And how do you know about his skeletons in the closet? Do you ever think before you post?Trump will never let this go to Court, if he does do you know how much he will have to open himself up to. All of the skeletons will have to come out the closet.
Well let's see if the idiot goes to Court./----/ And how do you know about his skeletons in the closet? Do you ever think before you post?
View attachment 677173
Media companies are governed by an “equal time” doctrine, especially during elections….And what do you think should be done about that?
Depends on your answer to the above.
Not really. Fairness doctrine died a long time ago and even then it only applied to broadcast.Media companies are governed by an “equal time” doctrine, especially during elections….
This all moot now that Mr Musk is going to welcome him back.
justice Byron Wright wrote...Not really. Fairness doctrine died a long time ago and even then it only applied to broadcast.
Equal time was declared unconstitutional for other media in Miami Herald v Tornillo. It would abridge their first amendment rights.
Only applies to broadcasting on public airwaves.justice Byron Wright wrote...
A license permits broadcasting, but the licensee has no constitutional right to be the one who holds the license or to monopolize a radio frequency to the exclusion of his fellow citizens. There is nothing in the First Amendment which prevents the Government from requiring a licensee to share his frequency with others. ... It is the right of the viewers and listeners, not the right of the broadcasters, which is paramount
Also a load of statist bullshit.Media companies are governed by an “equal time” doctrine, especially during elections….
No brother...I am no statist...I was simply pointing out that entities like Twitter, or Facebook get around some fairness by declaring themselves a media entity....Well, if that is the case, then they have to provide equal time....Also a load of statist bullshit.
They don’t. There’s no law that requires that and any law that attempted to would be unconstitutional.No brother...I am no statist...I was simply pointing out that entities like Twitter, or Facebook get around some fairness by declaring themselves a media entity....Well, if that is the case, then they have to provide equal time....
And you think they should? Should government be telling them what to put on their website?No brother...I am no statist...I was simply pointing out that entities like Twitter, or Facebook get around some fairness by declaring themselves a media entity....Well, if that is the case, then they have to provide equal time....
Keep clutching your pearls snowflake. The pervasive left wing media is going down.In any right wing country the state must control the media so that they can control the news agenda. Trump is following a well trodden path.
You thought musk was going to rescue him. How did that work out ?Keep clutching your pearls snowflake. The pervasive left wing media is going down.
Then Congress should revoke their 230 exemptions....They don’t. There’s no law that requires that and any law that attempted to would be unconstitutional.
Should they tell media companies that they have to give equal time to opposing sides in politics?And you think they should? Should government be telling them what to put on their website?