Lewinsky was only brought up to prove that Clinton had a record of taking advantage of subordinates. Since he lied about Jones and she had no way to prove it, they set sails to prove it with other people.
On August 29, 1997, Jones' attorneys Davis and Cammarata asked to resign from the case, believing the settlement offer they had secured, which Jones refused, was the appropriate way to end the case.[14] Jones had reportedly told her lawyers she wanted an apology from Clinton, in addition to a settlement.[15] In September, Judge Wright accepted their request.[10]
Paula Jones - Wikipedia
Again … why would Clinton apologize for something he maintains he never did? Would you apologize for something you never did?
Problem is he did do it. He only met Jones one time, and that was when he had a state trooper usher her into a hotel room. She thought her work as a state employee was recognized by the Governor. Boy was she wrong. So if Bill didn't want her for sexual reasons, WTF would he invite her into a hotel room?
According to you, he did it. She couldn't prove he did it. Her claims in court fell apart under scrutiny.
How about the woman who claims trump raped her when she was 13? Do you believe her too? Or do you need to know the party of the accused to make that determination?
Her claim fell apart because there was no way to prove it. Lord knows how many times he's done that in the past. But that's the same thing he thought about Lewinsky: nobody in the room but him and her. So if he did that with Lewinsky, that gives Jones's claims more merit. And you failed to answer the question: if Clinton didn't summon Jones on behalf of her work, and not sex, what did he want with her?
Wrong, as usual. It wasn't just that there was no way to prove it -- some of her claims were flat out proven false. Like her claims that she was passed over for merit increases for rebuffing Clinton's advances. The advances she couldn't prove since there was no corroborating evidence; but her claims of not getting merit increases, which was what she presented as corroborating evidence, was shown in court to be untrue. Every one of her merit increases was provided to the court to demonstrate she was full of shit.
As far as Lewinsky, there never was any evidence he exposed himself in the fashion Jones claimed. So that blows up her case as well.
"And you failed to answer the question: if Clinton didn't summon Jones on behalf of her work, and not sex, what did he want with her?"
That's odd since you didn't answer my questions either. But in answer to yours, since I wasn't there and never got to ask Clinton why, I can only go by that Jones herself said was the explanation, which was that it was common during such events to meet the governor.
