JimBowie1958
Old Fogey
- Sep 25, 2011
- 63,590
- 16,756
- 2,220
Fortunately they were Dhimmicrats and couldnt hit the broad side of a barn from being too damned high.Poor old Trump, he was pelted by tomatoes tonight by protesters...
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Fortunately they were Dhimmicrats and couldnt hit the broad side of a barn from being too damned high.Poor old Trump, he was pelted by tomatoes tonight by protesters...
Well I get stoned and can still hit the broad side of a barn..Fortunately they were Dhimmicrats and couldnt hit the broad side of a barn from being too damned high.Poor old Trump, he was pelted by tomatoes tonight by protesters...
lol, you do know that the old 'You cant hit the broad side of a barn!' was a sucker ploy, right?Well I get stoned and can still hit the broad side of a barn..Fortunately they were Dhimmicrats and couldnt hit the broad side of a barn from being too damned high.Poor old Trump, he was pelted by tomatoes tonight by protesters...
He did better then 2 to 1 in the polls without being there. The REAL killer should be out tomorrow. Viewership.Scarborough Rips Fox for ‘Begging’ Trump - ‘He Is in the Catbird’s Seat,’ Fox ‘Walked Into a Trap’ - Breitbart
Scarborough argued that based on O’Reilly’s tack in the interview, it appears Trump has an advantage over Fox News.
“Donald Trump – the guy looks like he is in the catbird’s seat,” he added. “Again, I think Fox has walked into a trap. It actually feeds into every one of his strengths. He now has the most powerful network for Republicans. It’s an indispensable network for Republicans. It now has pretty much its most powerful person begging him to be on the network.”
But now what you see, is, the apparent split that Trump is creating in the GOP, even during the runoff season...He did better then 2 to 1 in the polls without being there. The REAL killer should be out tomorrow. Viewership.Scarborough Rips Fox for ‘Begging’ Trump - ‘He Is in the Catbird’s Seat,’ Fox ‘Walked Into a Trap’ - Breitbart
Scarborough argued that based on O’Reilly’s tack in the interview, it appears Trump has an advantage over Fox News.
“Donald Trump – the guy looks like he is in the catbird’s seat,” he added. “Again, I think Fox has walked into a trap. It actually feeds into every one of his strengths. He now has the most powerful network for Republicans. It’s an indispensable network for Republicans. It now has pretty much its most powerful person begging him to be on the network.”
You know that idiot threw his vote at the same time. Attacking a person running for president is a felony and if convicted BEFORE the general he can't vote.lol, you do know that the old 'You cant hit the broad side of a barn!' was a sucker ploy, right?Well I get stoned and can still hit the broad side of a barn..Fortunately they were Dhimmicrats and couldnt hit the broad side of a barn from being too damned high.Poor old Trump, he was pelted by tomatoes tonight by protesters...
The pranksters would then hand the outraged noob, intent on proving he could hit the barn, a shotgun plugged with clay and that then would blow up on them when they pulled the trigger.
I think the correct answer to such a provocation is 'Fuck you'.
And that will be a good thing for the GOP, no joke.But now what you see, is, the apparent split that Trump is creating in the GOP, even during the runoff season...He did better then 2 to 1 in the polls without being there. The REAL killer should be out tomorrow. Viewership.Scarborough Rips Fox for ‘Begging’ Trump - ‘He Is in the Catbird’s Seat,’ Fox ‘Walked Into a Trap’ - Breitbart
Scarborough argued that based on O’Reilly’s tack in the interview, it appears Trump has an advantage over Fox News.
“Donald Trump – the guy looks like he is in the catbird’s seat,” he added. “Again, I think Fox has walked into a trap. It actually feeds into every one of his strengths. He now has the most powerful network for Republicans. It’s an indispensable network for Republicans. It now has pretty much its most powerful person begging him to be on the network.”
But will Trump allow the Heritage Foundation back in the semi-cabinet position?And that will be a good thing for the GOP, no joke.But now what you see, is, the apparent split that Trump is creating in the GOP, even during the runoff season...He did better then 2 to 1 in the polls without being there. The REAL killer should be out tomorrow. Viewership.Scarborough Rips Fox for ‘Begging’ Trump - ‘He Is in the Catbird’s Seat,’ Fox ‘Walked Into a Trap’ - Breitbart
Scarborough argued that based on O’Reilly’s tack in the interview, it appears Trump has an advantage over Fox News.
“Donald Trump – the guy looks like he is in the catbird’s seat,” he added. “Again, I think Fox has walked into a trap. It actually feeds into every one of his strengths. He now has the most powerful network for Republicans. It’s an indispensable network for Republicans. It now has pretty much its most powerful person begging him to be on the network.”
And this is because it means the most fanatical neocons leave the party and we get back in all the 40% of conservatives the GOP has been running off since Bush left office.
The split was already there. He just made more people notice it.But now what you see, is, the apparent split that Trump is creating in the GOP, even during the runoff season...He did better then 2 to 1 in the polls without being there. The REAL killer should be out tomorrow. Viewership.Scarborough Rips Fox for ‘Begging’ Trump - ‘He Is in the Catbird’s Seat,’ Fox ‘Walked Into a Trap’ - Breitbart
Scarborough argued that based on O’Reilly’s tack in the interview, it appears Trump has an advantage over Fox News.
“Donald Trump – the guy looks like he is in the catbird’s seat,” he added. “Again, I think Fox has walked into a trap. It actually feeds into every one of his strengths. He now has the most powerful network for Republicans. It’s an indispensable network for Republicans. It now has pretty much its most powerful person begging him to be on the network.”
Trump doesnt need a cabinet; he has Twitter.But will Trump allow the Heritage Foundation back in the semi-cabinet position?
He did better then 2 to 1 in the polls without being there. The REAL killer should be out tomorrow. Viewership.Scarborough Rips Fox for ‘Begging’ Trump - ‘He Is in the Catbird’s Seat,’ Fox ‘Walked Into a Trap’ - Breitbart
Scarborough argued that based on O’Reilly’s tack in the interview, it appears Trump has an advantage over Fox News.
“Donald Trump – the guy looks like he is in the catbird’s seat,” he added. “Again, I think Fox has walked into a trap. It actually feeds into every one of his strengths. He now has the most powerful network for Republicans. It’s an indispensable network for Republicans. It now has pretty much its most powerful person begging him to be on the network.”
He'll have the members of the Shark Tank as federal reserve chiefs...Trump doesnt need a cabinet; he has Twitter.But will Trump allow the Heritage Foundation back in the semi-cabinet position?
Current policy and process got this country IN the mess its in.He did better then 2 to 1 in the polls without being there. The REAL killer should be out tomorrow. Viewership.Scarborough Rips Fox for ‘Begging’ Trump - ‘He Is in the Catbird’s Seat,’ Fox ‘Walked Into a Trap’ - Breitbart
Scarborough argued that based on O’Reilly’s tack in the interview, it appears Trump has an advantage over Fox News.
“Donald Trump – the guy looks like he is in the catbird’s seat,” he added. “Again, I think Fox has walked into a trap. It actually feeds into every one of his strengths. He now has the most powerful network for Republicans. It’s an indispensable network for Republicans. It now has pretty much its most powerful person begging him to be on the network.”
I'll ask AGAIN since you ignored it the first time --- what "polls" are you even talking about?
"Viewership" is absolutely irrelevant. Ratings are for one purpose, and that is setting advertising rates. Doesn't apply to a political debate, which is a public service program. They're two different things. "Ratings" serve no purpose on a public service program. The only time ratings have any meaning is when a medium can say to an advertiser, "we can deliver X number of eyeballs, in Y demographics, with our Gilligan's Island program". That is their function, and their only function.
The fact that Rump brought up ratings "let them have their debate and we'll see what the ratings are" just demonstrate that he doesn't have a clue in the world what he's doing, that he thinks all of this is still some kind of bizarre "reality" show, that he has no respect whatsoever for the process, or any type of policy. Sad to say it also demonstrates that you don't either.
Current policy and process got this country IN the mess its in.He did better then 2 to 1 in the polls without being there. The REAL killer should be out tomorrow. Viewership.Scarborough Rips Fox for ‘Begging’ Trump - ‘He Is in the Catbird’s Seat,’ Fox ‘Walked Into a Trap’ - Breitbart
Scarborough argued that based on O’Reilly’s tack in the interview, it appears Trump has an advantage over Fox News.
“Donald Trump – the guy looks like he is in the catbird’s seat,” he added. “Again, I think Fox has walked into a trap. It actually feeds into every one of his strengths. He now has the most powerful network for Republicans. It’s an indispensable network for Republicans. It now has pretty much its most powerful person begging him to be on the network.”
I'll ask AGAIN since you ignored it the first time --- what "polls" are you even talking about?
"Viewership" is absolutely irrelevant. Ratings are for one purpose, and that is setting advertising rates. Doesn't apply to a political debate, which is a public service program. They're two different things. "Ratings" serve no purpose on a public service program. The only time ratings have any meaning is when a medium can say to an advertiser, "we can deliver X number of eyeballs, in Y demographics, with our Gilligan's Island program". That is their function, and their only function.
The fact that Rump brought up ratings "let them have their debate and we'll see what the ratings are" just demonstrate that he doesn't have a clue in the world what he's doing, that he thinks all of this is still some kind of bizarre "reality" show, that he has no respect whatsoever for the process, or any type of policy. Sad to say it also demonstrates that you don't either.
Time to think and do out of the box.
Drudge report did the poll. Find it yourself idiot.Current policy and process got this country IN the mess its in.He did better then 2 to 1 in the polls without being there. The REAL killer should be out tomorrow. Viewership.Scarborough Rips Fox for ‘Begging’ Trump - ‘He Is in the Catbird’s Seat,’ Fox ‘Walked Into a Trap’ - Breitbart
Scarborough argued that based on O’Reilly’s tack in the interview, it appears Trump has an advantage over Fox News.
“Donald Trump – the guy looks like he is in the catbird’s seat,” he added. “Again, I think Fox has walked into a trap. It actually feeds into every one of his strengths. He now has the most powerful network for Republicans. It’s an indispensable network for Republicans. It now has pretty much its most powerful person begging him to be on the network.”
I'll ask AGAIN since you ignored it the first time --- what "polls" are you even talking about?
"Viewership" is absolutely irrelevant. Ratings are for one purpose, and that is setting advertising rates. Doesn't apply to a political debate, which is a public service program. They're two different things. "Ratings" serve no purpose on a public service program. The only time ratings have any meaning is when a medium can say to an advertiser, "we can deliver X number of eyeballs, in Y demographics, with our Gilligan's Island program". That is their function, and their only function.
The fact that Rump brought up ratings "let them have their debate and we'll see what the ratings are" just demonstrate that he doesn't have a clue in the world what he's doing, that he thinks all of this is still some kind of bizarre "reality" show, that he has no respect whatsoever for the process, or any type of policy. Sad to say it also demonstrates that you don't either.
Time to think and do out of the box.
So you have no answer whatsoever.
Shocking. Sure didn't see that coming, nope.
Drudge report did the poll. Find it yourself idiot.Current policy and process got this country IN the mess its in.He did better then 2 to 1 in the polls without being there. The REAL killer should be out tomorrow. Viewership.Scarborough Rips Fox for ‘Begging’ Trump - ‘He Is in the Catbird’s Seat,’ Fox ‘Walked Into a Trap’ - Breitbart
Scarborough argued that based on O’Reilly’s tack in the interview, it appears Trump has an advantage over Fox News.
“Donald Trump – the guy looks like he is in the catbird’s seat,” he added. “Again, I think Fox has walked into a trap. It actually feeds into every one of his strengths. He now has the most powerful network for Republicans. It’s an indispensable network for Republicans. It now has pretty much its most powerful person begging him to be on the network.”
I'll ask AGAIN since you ignored it the first time --- what "polls" are you even talking about?
"Viewership" is absolutely irrelevant. Ratings are for one purpose, and that is setting advertising rates. Doesn't apply to a political debate, which is a public service program. They're two different things. "Ratings" serve no purpose on a public service program. The only time ratings have any meaning is when a medium can say to an advertiser, "we can deliver X number of eyeballs, in Y demographics, with our Gilligan's Island program". That is their function, and their only function.
The fact that Rump brought up ratings "let them have their debate and we'll see what the ratings are" just demonstrate that he doesn't have a clue in the world what he's doing, that he thinks all of this is still some kind of bizarre "reality" show, that he has no respect whatsoever for the process, or any type of policy. Sad to say it also demonstrates that you don't either.
Time to think and do out of the box.
So you have no answer whatsoever.
Shocking. Sure didn't see that coming, nope.
I and MANY others here are tired of trying to educate your dumb ass. So we IGNORE your feeble brain dead requests.Drudge report did the poll. Find it yourself idiot.Current policy and process got this country IN the mess its in.He did better then 2 to 1 in the polls without being there. The REAL killer should be out tomorrow. Viewership.
I'll ask AGAIN since you ignored it the first time --- what "polls" are you even talking about?
"Viewership" is absolutely irrelevant. Ratings are for one purpose, and that is setting advertising rates. Doesn't apply to a political debate, which is a public service program. They're two different things. "Ratings" serve no purpose on a public service program. The only time ratings have any meaning is when a medium can say to an advertiser, "we can deliver X number of eyeballs, in Y demographics, with our Gilligan's Island program". That is their function, and their only function.
The fact that Rump brought up ratings "let them have their debate and we'll see what the ratings are" just demonstrate that he doesn't have a clue in the world what he's doing, that he thinks all of this is still some kind of bizarre "reality" show, that he has no respect whatsoever for the process, or any type of policy. Sad to say it also demonstrates that you don't either.
Time to think and do out of the box.
So you have no answer whatsoever.
Shocking. Sure didn't see that coming, nope.
Ah... so not only an internet poll but a Drudge internet poll.
It just gets better and better. No wonder you were embarrassed to come clean.
"Find it yourself"?? Who the fuck brought it up, DUMBASS?
I and MANY others here are tired of trying to educate your dumb ass. So we IGNORE your feeble brain dead requests.Drudge report did the poll. Find it yourself idiot.Current policy and process got this country IN the mess its in.I'll ask AGAIN since you ignored it the first time --- what "polls" are you even talking about?
"Viewership" is absolutely irrelevant. Ratings are for one purpose, and that is setting advertising rates. Doesn't apply to a political debate, which is a public service program. They're two different things. "Ratings" serve no purpose on a public service program. The only time ratings have any meaning is when a medium can say to an advertiser, "we can deliver X number of eyeballs, in Y demographics, with our Gilligan's Island program". That is their function, and their only function.
The fact that Rump brought up ratings "let them have their debate and we'll see what the ratings are" just demonstrate that he doesn't have a clue in the world what he's doing, that he thinks all of this is still some kind of bizarre "reality" show, that he has no respect whatsoever for the process, or any type of policy. Sad to say it also demonstrates that you don't either.
Time to think and do out of the box.
So you have no answer whatsoever.
Shocking. Sure didn't see that coming, nope.
Ah... so not only an internet poll but a Drudge internet poll.
It just gets better and better. No wonder you were embarrassed to come clean.
"Find it yourself"?? Who the fuck brought it up, DUMBASS?