Leo123
Diamond Member
- Aug 26, 2017
- 33,315
- 26,120
- 2,915
Smith's case is built on lawfare.You are reliably full of shit and disinformed.
It’s official: America’s real wages are up under Biden-Harris
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Smith's case is built on lawfare.You are reliably full of shit and disinformed.
It’s official: America’s real wages are up under Biden-Harris
Yes and iconoclasts.Democrats are scofflaws.
Then why object to the release of his report? If the case is build on lawfare, not the facts, why not allow the report to be released and then tear it apart?
Smith isn't a legitimately nominated and confirmed prosecutor.
This is a ruling that has been made.
Yes, it is under appeal. But right now, all of his actions are invalid, and he was unjustly enriched by the paychecks he received as he wasn't confirmed.
Why not just wait until the case makes it through the appeal process.
Because it’s full of lies that masquerade as facts that some idiots and the Democrat controlled legacy media will say is true. Waste of time and energy. The election is over, Trump won. Everyone knew these cases were nothing but lawfare propaganda put out by the Democrat party.Then why object to the release of his report? If the case is build on lawfare, not the facts, why not allow the report to be released and then tear it apart?
You already know the answer to that. Neither report will be released to the public once Dotard gets sworn in.
The laughable thing here is that you've LOST everything and you think it's winning.
Everything Trump touches dies.
It’s not at all obvious that Cannon even had jurisdiction to provide that relief. It’s well-settled that a notice of appeal, especially after a final judgment, divests district courts of almost all of their jurisdiction over a dispute. None of the exceptions courts have recognized to this general rule (e.g., to stay or un-stay the ruling under appeal; to aid the appellate court’s consideration of the appeal; or to modify existing injunctions) seem to remotely encompass what Cannon did.[4] In any event, at least initially, the stated justification for the district court’s intervention was solely to ensure that the Eleventh Circuit would have time to consider the matter. That’s now happened because…
![]()
Judge Cannon and the Special Counsel's Report
Explaining the state of litigation over whether DOJ can publicly release the January 6th report - and how the Supreme Court may decide.www.justsecurity.org
Cannon has once again exceeded her authority (lawfare) in favor of the Orange Menace.
Ummmmmmmmmmmm, democrats, for the most part, have had very friendly judges.Trump seeks to block ‘imminent’ release of special counsel Jack Smith’s report
President-elect Donald Trump and his former co-defendants in the Florida classified documents case launched an effort Monday to block the release of a final report by special counsel Jack Smith that also addresses the election interference case.
Both cases against Trump have been dismissed.
Lawyers for defendants Walt Nauta and Carlos De Oliveira filed a motion Monday night asking U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon to block Smith, who prosecuted the case, from issuing his report. They cited the judge’s previous ruling that Smith’s appointment was unconstitutional.
“The Final Report promises to be a one-sided, slanted report, relying nearly exclusively on evidence presented to a grand jury and subject to all requisite protections—and which is known to Smith only as a result of his unconstitutional appointment—in order to serve a singular purpose: convincing the public that everyone Smith charged is guilty of the crimes charged,” the four lawyers wrote.
Defense lawyers asked Cannon on Monday to hold a hearing and rule on their motion by Friday, saying they believe the release of the report is “imminent.”
Trump’s lawyers, meanwhile, sent a letter urging Attorney General Merrick Garland to stop Smith from releasing the report. In the letter, Trump’s lawyers called Smith an “out-of-control private citizen unconstitutionally posing as a prosecutor” aiming to politically harm Trump.
https://www.cnbc.com/2025/01/07/tru...se-of-special-counsel-jack-smiths-report.html
Aileen has shown herself to be so in the tank for Dotard I'm not sure there is much suspense on how she will rule. The sticky biz being her ruling on the constitutionality of Smith's appointment was appealed and has not been decided by an appellate court. I don't know what the actual status of the appeal is or whether Smith dropped it since the election ended any chance of bringing trump to justice on this matter.
The other question being, will a docile AG Garland roll over and play dead again?
trump's lawfare didn't work.Because it’s full of lies that masquerade as facts that some idiots and the Democrat controlled legacy media will say is true. Waste of time and energy. The election is over, Trump won. Everyone knew these cases were nothing but lawfare propaganda put out by the Democrat party.