trump once again seeks relief from a friendly judge.

The 11th Circuit Court of Appeals has had Smith's appeal of Cannon's ruling before it since August 26. If I have learned anything about our justice system it's how infuriatingly slowly it works. And how those with malevolent intent can take advantage of its lack of speed.
 
Last edited:
How does that protect Hunter from having evidence released??
. We are discussing the release of special counsel reports, not evidence.

Everyone is by default protected from public release of these reports, as they are confidential. The AG then decides if the public interest merits release.
 
. We are discussing the release of special counsel reports, not evidence.

Everyone is by default protected from public release of these reports, as they are confidential. The AG then decides if the public interest merits release.

Hunter's laptop is evidence held by the FBI. Why is it immune from being released to the public?
 
Trump seeks to block ‘imminent’ release of special counsel Jack Smith’s report

President-elect Donald Trump and his former co-defendants in the Florida classified documents case launched an effort Monday to block the release of a final report by special counsel Jack Smith that also addresses the election interference case.

Both cases against Trump have been dismissed.

Lawyers for defendants Walt Nauta and Carlos De Oliveira filed a motion Monday night asking U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon to block Smith, who prosecuted the case, from issuing his report. They cited the judge’s previous ruling that Smith’s appointment was unconstitutional.

“The Final Report promises to be a one-sided, slanted report, relying nearly exclusively on evidence presented to a grand jury and subject to all requisite protections—and which is known to Smith only as a result of his unconstitutional appointment—in order to serve a singular purpose: convincing the public that everyone Smith charged is guilty of the crimes charged,” the four lawyers wrote.

Defense lawyers asked Cannon on Monday to hold a hearing and rule on their motion by Friday, saying they believe the release of the report is “imminent.”

Trump’s lawyers, meanwhile, sent a letter urging Attorney General Merrick Garland to stop Smith from releasing the report. In the letter, Trump’s lawyers called Smith an “out-of-control private citizen unconstitutionally posing as a prosecutor” aiming to politically harm Trump.

https://www.cnbc.com/2025/01/07/tru...se-of-special-counsel-jack-smiths-report.html

Aileen has shown herself to be so in the tank for Dotard I'm not sure there is much suspense on how she will rule. The sticky biz being her ruling on the constitutionality of Smith's appointment was appealed and has not been decided by an appellate court. I don't know what the actual status of the appeal is or whether Smith dropped it since the election ended any chance of bringing trump to justice on this matter.

The other question being, will a docile AG Garland roll over and play dead again?
Since the government had no jurisdiction over that criminal matter (and for related reasons), the supposed special counsel should not be permitted to further pollute the body politic with more of his poisoned pen crap. Fuck Smith and his “report.”

But I suspect none of that will matter. Judge Cannon may probably be reversed on her order temporarily denying Smith the right to release that bullshit “report.”

Maybe it’s just as well. Free speech cuts both ways even when the author is a biased scumbag.
 
Trump has friendly judges at the very top. And what will soon be called derisively “the Trump court.”
 
Yes, where it was discovered that many of them had been altered.

That wasn't a leak from the FBI. That was propaganda from Rudy and his collection of criminals.

Really? Did they blur Hunter's penis? Many of the photos were of Hunter nude with females.
Were any of the women victims of sex trafficking?
 
No, they altered or fabricated materials, as exposed by the date stamps.

Don't they report ANYTHING on Newsmax? Every discussion with you is like teaching a remedial class.

That's interesting. Where did you hear that? Did they obscure the photos of cocaine?
 
That's interesting. Where did you hear that?
In reporting. Go read up. The public has never seen a legit copy of the hard drive.

And the FBI isn't going to release information to the public from the invetsigation into a private citizen.
 

Forum List

Back
Top