Section 242 of Title 18 makes it a crime for a person acting under color of any law to willfully deprive a person of a right or privilege protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States.
For the purpose of Section 242, acts under "color of law" include acts not only done by federal, state, or local officials within their lawful authority, but also acts done beyond the bounds of that official's lawful authority, if the acts are done while the official is purporting to or pretending to act in the performance of his/her official duties. Persons acting under color of law within the meaning of this statute include police officers, prisons guards and other law enforcement officials, as well as judges, care providers in public health facilities, and others who are acting as public officials. It is not necessary that the crime be motivated by animus toward the race, color, religion, sex, handicap, familial status or national origin of the victim.
The offense is punishable by a range of imprisonment up to a life term, or the death penalty, depending upon the circumstances of the crime, and the resulting injury, if any.
TITLE 18, U.S.C., SECTION 242
Whoever, under color of any law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom, willfully subjects any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States, ... shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both; and if bodily injury results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include the use, attempted use, or threatened use of a dangerous weapon, explosives, or fire, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and if death results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, shall be fined under this title, or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death."
Section 242 of Title 18 makes it a crime for a person acting under color of any law to willfully deprive a person of a right or privilege protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States.
For the purpose of Section 242, acts under "color of law" include acts not only done by federal, state, or local officials within their lawful authority, but also acts done beyond the bounds of that official's lawful authority, if the acts are done while the official is purporting to or pretending to act in the performance of his/her official duties. Persons acting under color of law within the meaning of this statute include police officers, prisons guards and other law enforcement officials, as well as judges, care providers in public health facilities, and others who are acting as public officials. It is not necessary that the crime be motivated by animus toward the race, color, religion, sex, handicap, familial status or national origin of the victim.
The offense is punishable by a range of imprisonment up to a life term, or the death penalty, depending upon the circumstances of the crime, and the resulting injury, if any.
TITLE 18, U.S.C., SECTION 242
Whoever, under color of any law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom, willfully subjects any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States, ... shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both; and if bodily injury results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include the use, attempted use, or threatened use of a dangerous weapon, explosives, or fire, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and if death results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, shall be fined under this title, or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death."
None of those 2020 cases were allowed to go to the discovery phase to allow for the search for evidence. Don't you find that a little strange? They were told either they lacked standing or filed too late. It's not like there were trials where evidence was examined.
As far as the NYC sexual assault civil trial farce, where's the dress? Isn't that evidence?
Just further examples of Republican lawyer being inept, not knowing the law, when they try to go to court. Been 4 years and the idiots haven't found a court, yet, including courts with Trump appointed judges. Only court they can win at, are courthouse steps and FOX NEWS. Inside real courtrooms with real judges and real laws and procedures, nope. If you have a Republican lawyer on retainer, best move your retainer, as you might need a real lawyer sometime.
Because your demfacists brainwashers changed the terms ****** dykes and trannies into one big kookbrella LGBTQ+. So every time you and your butt buddies say LGBQ think gay stuff. I think youāll find your circle thinks about gay stuff much more than republicans.
Because your demfacists brainwashers changed the terms ****** dykes and trannies into one big kookbrella LGBTQ+. So every time you and your butt buddies say LGBQ think gay stuff. I think youāll find your circle thinks about gay stuff much more than republicans.
"Trump lawyers may soon have the power to prosecute Jack Smith ā NY Times is not pleased.
In many ways, the letter that President-elect Donald J. Trumpās criminal defense lawyers sent to the Justice Department this week was a display of legal and political bombast.
The lawyers, Todd Blanche and Emil Bove, sought in it to prevent the special counsel, Jack Smith, from releasing a report about his inquiry into Mr. Trumpās mishandling of classified material.
They accused Mr. Smith of āunethicalā and āimproperā behavior for how he has handled the case, using damning phrases like ādereliction of dutyā and accusing the special counsel of āleaking sensitive detailsā to the news media. Mr. Blanche and Mr. Bove have for many months launched similar attacks against Mr. Smith and his team.
But while the tone of denunciation was familiar, the accusations themselves carry new weight now that Mr. Trump, who has often suggested that Mr. Smith is corrupt and should face consequences for bringing charges against him, has won the election.
And the letterās aggressive posture was all the more fraught and remarkable because Mr. Blanche and Mr. Bove are now poised to assume senior positions in Mr. Trumpās Justice Department, where they could soon have a say in how to evaluate ā or even punish ā Mr. Smith and his deputies."
edit post News Nintendo Black Friday 2025 Deals Announced: See All Switch Games Discounted November 10, 2025 Optimal Column This
dnyuz.com
Now, let's not put the cart in front of the horse. Before any prosecutions occur, grand juries will need to investigate the Democrats' prosecution of Biden's political enemies. They will be put under oath and any perjury will not be covered by a Biden blanket pardon. Biden himself should be forced to tell the grand jury about his regret that Garland didn't prosecute Trump quickly enough. Garland can explain who told him to appoint Smith. Smith can explain who he talked to in the Biden admin.
Many in government are worried about Trumpās return. At DOJ, theyāre terrified.
Trump blames DOJ for much of his torment over the past four years. Lawyers there fear whatās next.
I was for part of the time, in what they call the BGC. Moved around the countryside a bit, a few different islands, was doing some scouting under contract for my old shop.
"Trump lawyers may soon have the power to prosecute Jack Smith ā NY Times is not pleased.
In many ways, the letter that President-elect Donald J. Trumpās criminal defense lawyers sent to the Justice Department this week was a display of legal and political bombast.
The lawyers, Todd Blanche and Emil Bove, sought in it to prevent the special counsel, Jack Smith, from releasing a report about his inquiry into Mr. Trumpās mishandling of classified material.
They accused Mr. Smith of āunethicalā and āimproperā behavior for how he has handled the case, using damning phrases like ādereliction of dutyā and accusing the special counsel of āleaking sensitive detailsā to the news media. Mr. Blanche and Mr. Bove have for many months launched similar attacks against Mr. Smith and his team.
But while the tone of denunciation was familiar, the accusations themselves carry new weight now that Mr. Trump, who has often suggested that Mr. Smith is corrupt and should face consequences for bringing charges against him, has won the election.
And the letterās aggressive posture was all the more fraught and remarkable because Mr. Blanche and Mr. Bove are now poised to assume senior positions in Mr. Trumpās Justice Department, where they could soon have a say in how to evaluate ā or even punish ā Mr. Smith and his deputies."
edit post News Nintendo Black Friday 2025 Deals Announced: See All Switch Games Discounted November 10, 2025 Optimal Column This
dnyuz.com
Now, let's not put the cart in front of the horse. Before any prosecutions occur, grand juries will need to investigate the Democrats' prosecution of Biden's political enemies. They will be put under oath and any perjury will not be covered by a Biden blanket pardon. Biden himself should be forced to tell the grand jury about his regret that Garland didn't prosecute Trump quickly enough. Garland can explain who told him to appoint Smith. Smith can explain who he talked to in the Biden admin.