Judge Smith's report concludes that President would have been convicted at trial

Nothing like losers spinning their loss:WooHooSmileyWave-vi:
1744038268048.webp
 
So you can't refute my claims.
It appears you have nothing left except your mindless hate cult.
Continue throwing your tantrums and singing off key in the streets 😆
You can't prove your claims.

Allegations are not evidence, so why would I?
 
No allegations.
It is illegal for election/pole workers to require voter ID in California.
Try to prove me wrong.
You can't and you won't.
That is a statement that common knowledge proves itself.

You are right. But your statements themselves without evidence are not facts.
 
Here's the problem with that: the good judge automatically assumes, like the media has repeated endlessly, that the claims were false. No such thing, but it has played well for you. The claims were never really examined no matter how many kangaroo court decisions you can come up with. It is too terrible a thing to address. It will never be addressed.
Reason there would be a trial... Trump could show the evdience. But he did it in 60 other trials and failed....

This is the problem with MAGA, you just don't seem to get it.. Trump lost, Trump then lied...
Smith even has proof that Trump knew he lost and said it to other people that he lost...
 
Back
Top Bottom