Trump lawyers may soon have the power to prosecute Jack Smith

[DonGlock26]

NOBODY is above the law!

Oh God I love that saying!

I like to throw- "trust the science" back at progs when they can't explain what a woman is.

 

[john doe 101]

"Trump lawyers may soon have the power to prosecute Jack Smith — NY Times is not pleased.



In many ways, the letter that President-elect Donald J. Trump’s criminal defense lawyers sent to the Justice Department this week was a display of legal and political bombast.

The lawyers, Todd Blanche and Emil Bove, sought in it to prevent the special counsel, Jack Smith, from releasing a report about his inquiry into Mr. Trump’s mishandling of classified material.

They accused Mr. Smith of “unethical” and “improper” behavior for how he has handled the case, using damning phrases like “dereliction of duty” and accusing the special counsel of “leaking sensitive details” to the news media. Mr. Blanche and Mr. Bove have for many months launched similar attacks against Mr. Smith and his team.

But while the tone of denunciation was familiar, the accusations themselves carry new weight now that Mr. Trump, who has often suggested that Mr. Smith is corrupt and should face consequences for bringing charges against him, has won the election.

And the letter’s aggressive posture was all the more fraught and remarkable because Mr. Blanche and Mr. Bove are now poised to assume senior positions in Mr. Trump’s Justice Department, where they could soon have a say in how to evaluate — or even punish — Mr. Smith and his deputies."

Trump’s Lawyers Have Assailed Jack Smith. They Could Soon Have Power to Go After Him.

In many ways, the letter that President-elect Donald J. Trump’s criminal defense lawyers sent to the Justice Department this week

dnyuz.com

Now, let's not put the cart in front of the horse. Before any prosecutions occur, grand juries will need to investigate the Democrats' prosecution of Biden's political enemies. They will be put under oath and any perjury will not be covered by a Biden blanket pardon. Biden himself should be forced to tell the grand jury about his regret that Garland didn't prosecute Trump quickly enough. Garland can explain who told him to appoint Smith. Smith can explain who he talked to in the Biden admin.

zero chance that happens. But like everything else the right says will happen, this will be forgotten about in a day or 2 and you'll move on to the next grift.

 

[john doe 101]

I like to throw- "trust the science" back at progs when they can't explain what a woman is.

A woman is something you havent touched in 40 years.

 

[john doe 101]

What kind of evidence?

The tens of thousands of pages that jack has.

 

[Thunk]

I like to throw- "trust the science" back at progs when they can't explain what a woman is.

I told my liberal sister that I was a now woman & she should call me "Maggie".

Maggie Nificent

 

[DonGlock26]

zero chance that happens. But like everything else the right says will happen, this will be forgotten about in a day or 2 and you'll move on to the next grift.

DOJ lawyers talk about fleeing as Trump loyalists are set to commandeer the agency

Donald Trump’s scorn for the DOJ has only grown over the last four years as he became the subject of two criminal prosecutions

www.the-independent.com

 

[john doe 101]

DOJ lawyers talk about fleeing as Trump loyalists are set to commandeer the agency

Donald Trump’s scorn for the DOJ has only grown over the last four years as he became the subject of two criminal prosecutions

www.the-independent.com

Nothing will happen.

 

[White 6]

What kind of evidence?

He would need evidence, proving false statements. There really isn't much you can do, if somebody tells the truth about you. Evidence is the thing. Either you have it, or you don't. Remember, his Republican lawyers lost 63 cases in a row, trying to overthrow the 2020, due to evidence or the lack, there of. He also lost 2 big money defamation cases he couldn't keep out of the court, even with the best delay lawyers around, but lost, due to evidence in front of the jury and the court. He lost 34 criminal charges out of 34 due to evidence, when he failed to keep the New York criminal trial from going to court. Republican lawyers are only good as mouthpieces in front of cameras, but consistently shitty in the courtroom or dealing with evidence, and this is true even in front of Trump appointed judges. I just don't think he will sue on libel or slander, not wanting the evidence coming to court, doing more damage for longer than the report, alone.

 

[john doe 101]

He would need evidence, proving false statements. There really isn't much you can do, if somebody tells the truth about you. Evidence is the thing. Either you have it, or you don't. Remember, his Republican lawyers lost 63 cases in a row, trying to overthrow the 2020, due to evidence or the lack, there of. He also lost 2 big money defamation cases he couldn't keep out of the court, even with the best delay lawyers around, but lost, due to evidence in front of the jury and the court. He lost 34 criminal charges out of 34 due to evidence, when he failed to keep the New York criminal trial from going to court. Republican lawyers are only good as mouthpieces in front of cameras, but consistently shitty in the courtroom or dealing with evidence, and this is true even in front of Trump appointed judges. I just don't think he will sue on libel or slander, not wanting the evidence coming to court, doing more damage for longer than the report, alone.

Yes. You see, trump is the biggest pussy in the world. He's all talk and nothing else. Evidently the incel's on here love that.

 

[john doe 101]

I told my liberal sister that I was a now woman & she should call me "Maggie".

Maggie Nificent

You know what's funny. The only people I ever hear talking about trannies or gay stuff are right wingers. Now why is that?

 

[DonGlock26]

A woman is something you havent touched in 40 years.

Nonsense, sir. I wear Hai Karate everyday.

 

[john doe 101]

Nonsense, sir. I wear Hai Karate everyday.

That was 50 years ago. My point stands.

 

[DonGlock26]

That was 50 years ago. My point stands.

The only point you have is your head.

 

[john doe 101]

The only point you have is your head.

So is Jack going to get put in jail just like Hillary? LOL!

 

[struth]

Smith should run to europe and release the report from there.

You are advocating he steal govt property and flee with it to a foreign country and release it to damage our govt?

There are laws against that

 

[DonGlock26]

So is Jack going to get put in jail just like Hillary? LOL!

He might not have a Comey to protect him.

 

[frigidweirdo]

I've been considering a stay in the Philippines myself. Was the back in November and it's a really nice place.

Affordable too.

Nice as long as you're not in Manila.

 

[john doe 101]

He might not have a Comey to protect him.

You'll forget all about this and move on to the next thing that won't happen. It's what you do.

 

[Zincwarrior]

"Trump lawyers may soon have the power to prosecute Jack Smith — NY Times is not pleased.



In many ways, the letter that President-elect Donald J. Trump’s criminal defense lawyers sent to the Justice Department this week was a display of legal and political bombast.

The lawyers, Todd Blanche and Emil Bove, sought in it to prevent the special counsel, Jack Smith, from releasing a report about his inquiry into Mr. Trump’s mishandling of classified material.

They accused Mr. Smith of “unethical” and “improper” behavior for how he has handled the case, using damning phrases like “dereliction of duty” and accusing the special counsel of “leaking sensitive details” to the news media. Mr. Blanche and Mr. Bove have for many months launched similar attacks against Mr. Smith and his team.

But while the tone of denunciation was familiar, the accusations themselves carry new weight now that Mr. Trump, who has often suggested that Mr. Smith is corrupt and should face consequences for bringing charges against him, has won the election.

And the letter’s aggressive posture was all the more fraught and remarkable because Mr. Blanche and Mr. Bove are now poised to assume senior positions in Mr. Trump’s Justice Department, where they could soon have a say in how to evaluate — or even punish — Mr. Smith and his deputies."

Trump’s Lawyers Have Assailed Jack Smith. They Could Soon Have Power to Go After Him.

In many ways, the letter that President-elect Donald J. Trump’s criminal defense lawyers sent to the Justice Department this week

dnyuz.com

Now, let's not put the cart in front of the horse. Before any prosecutions occur, grand juries will need to investigate the Democrats' prosecution of Biden's political enemies. They will be put under oath and any perjury will not be covered by a Biden blanket pardon. Biden himself should be forced to tell the grand jury about his regret that Garland didn't prosecute Trump quickly enough. Garland can explain who told him to appoint Smith. Smith can explain who he talked to in the Biden admin.

Prosecutors have immunity and you are stupid
.

 

[DonGlock26]

He would need evidence, proving false statements. There really isn't much you can do, if somebody tells the truth about you. Evidence is the thing. Either you have it, or you don't. Remember, his Republican lawyers lost 63 cases in a row, trying to overthrow the 2020, due to evidence or the lack, there of. He also lost 2 big money defamation cases he couldn't keep out of the court, even with the best delay lawyers around, but lost, due to evidence in front of the jury and the court. He lost 34 criminal charges out of 34 due to evidence, when he failed to keep the New York criminal trial from going to court. Republican lawyers are only good as mouthpieces in front of cameras, but consistently shitty in the courtroom or dealing with evidence, and this is true even in front of Trump appointed judges. I just don't think he will sue on libel or slander, not wanting the evidence coming to court, doing more damage for longer than the report, alone.

None of those 2020 cases were allowed to go to the discovery phase to allow for the search for evidence. Don't you find that a little strange? They were told either they lacked standing or filed too late. It's not like there were trials where evidence was examined.

As far as the NYC sexual assault civil trial farce, where's the dress? Isn't that evidence?