Trump Media Empire?? Don't bet on it- -

surada, you sound like an unhinged TDS idiot though. Do you have any evidence to indicate you descent from Europeans like from Ancestry dot com since mainly the British (and the Dutch of course) migrated to the New World in the 1600's?
 
He'd be fine, and he'd continue inciting the sheep and avoiding blame for what they did.

This country is in desperate need of the anti-Trump.

Blame for what he did? In four years in office, blunted by Establishment candidates, 24/7 investigations and flakes like Paul Ryan?

What in the hell do you have to say about the 30 years prior when he WASN'T in office?

Before Trump was in office he was a well known liar and a cheat. He cheated employees, vendors, contractors, banks, investors and wives. He cheated charities for God's sake.

You have to be kidding me.

Please, point me to ONE honest politician. Just one.

You know just 20 years ago, America was about 9x the size of the Chinese economy in GDP. Where are they today, and more importantly, where will they be tomorrow?

Who is responsible for not defending U.S interests during this two decade period?
 
Storming the Capitol was just too much.

Even though it was partly Antifa obviously, how can entering the Peoples' House be "too much?" What other places are forbidden to you TDS folks while being silent when Code Pink and other insane groups regularly are openly allowed to invade the Capital Building and scream insane shit? And surada, please, you know nothing about business. What island are you from by the way surada?

Surada is the name of a town in India. My family is English and Dutch.

You can't break into the people's house with pipe bombs and nooses to take a sh*t in the hallways.
 
He'd bank millions if he started one...

Fools and their money.

But if you look at the larger model that goes for targeted audiences with a single product....there is a ceiling and it is rather low compared to networks that are not so hamstrung by content.

He's too exposed.. He had a bad reputation for 40 years as a liar, cheat and sloppy businessman.. Now his reputation is world wide.. If he doesn't have his own network, who would carry his show?
Im saying he would have his own network. He'll have the title of Editor in Chief but someone else will run the day-to-day operations. Mark Burnett would likely be a good candidate to provide filler

Its fairly cheap to start your own network and provide your own content. Look at the Pluto TV platform for example...it has endless sub-channels of streaming content. The show "Unsolved Mysteries" has it's own channel on Pluto.
He's incredibly popular with his deranged base.

In no way would he pay actual field reporters to spend weeks on a story. It would be done on the cheap, no journalistic standards and zero integrity. Much like all of his enterprises.

But he would rake in enormous amounts of cash doing it. In my mind, theres no question about that.

Who would pay money to subscribe to that?

Well, Pluto is free so there is no payment. Whomever owns the content on the channels pays Pluto to be on it's channel line up. The advertisers on the channels, pay the channel holders (or Pluto in many cases) and the content provider gets either some or all of the money depending on the specific agreement.

Every now and again I go back to my birth-state of Texas. It takes a week to wash the aura of the shithole off of me but when I'm there I usually thumb through the cable TV line up in the hotel. I often see the "Longhorn Network" that features only stuff related to The University of Texas sports. If there is a market for that--they show very little first-run UT Football games live--maybe 3 or 4 a season--there is a market for The Blob. Hell, There is something called GRIT TV on my system at the condo. It shows nothing but B-rate westerns. IF there is a market for that, there is a market for BLOB-TV.

Would I subscribe? N
 
surada, you sound like an unhinged TDS idiot though. Do you have any evidence to indicate you descent from Europeans like from Ancestry dot com since mainly the British (and the Dutch of course) migrated to the New World in the 1600's?

I have plenty of evidence for my family going back to historic landmarks in New Amsterdam.
 
He'd be fine, and he'd continue inciting the sheep and avoiding blame for what they did.

This country is in desperate need of the anti-Trump.

Blame for what he did? In four years in office, blunted by Establishment candidates, 24/7 investigations and flakes like Paul Ryan?

What in the hell do you have to say about the 30 years prior when he WASN'T in office?

Before Trump was in office he was a well known liar and a cheat. He cheated employees, vendors, contractors, banks, investors and wives. He cheated charities for God's sake.

You have to be kidding me.

Please, point me to ONE honest politician. Just one.

You know just 20 years ago, America was about 9x the size of the Chinese economy in GDP. Where are they today, and more importantly, where will they be tomorrow?

Who is responsible for not defending U.S interests during this two decade period?

And so the "man" who had stuff made in China to contribute to their economic upturn has no blame in this?
 
He'd bank millions if he started one...

Fools and their money.

But if you look at the larger model that goes for targeted audiences with a single product....there is a ceiling and it is rather low compared to networks that are not so hamstrung by content.

He's too exposed.. He had a bad reputation for 40 years as a liar, cheat and sloppy businessman.. Now his reputation is world wide.. If he doesn't have his own network, who would carry his show?
Im saying he would have his own network. He'll have the title of Editor in Chief but someone else will run the day-to-day operations. Mark Burnett would likely be a good candidate to provide filler

Its fairly cheap to start your own network and provide your own content. Look at the Pluto TV platform for example...it has endless sub-channels of streaming content. The show "Unsolved Mysteries" has it's own channel on Pluto.
He's incredibly popular with his deranged base.

In no way would he pay actual field reporters to spend weeks on a story. It would be done on the cheap, no journalistic standards and zero integrity. Much like all of his enterprises.

But he would rake in enormous amounts of cash doing it. In my mind, theres no question about that.

Who would pay money to subscribe to that?

Well, Pluto is free so there is no payment. Whomever owns the content on the channels pays Pluto to be on it's channel line up. The advertisers on the channels, pay the channel holders (or Pluto in many cases) and the content provider gets either some or all of the money depending on the specific agreement.

Every now and again I go back to my birth-state of Texas. It takes a week to wash the aura of the shithole off of me but when I'm there I usually thumb through the cable TV line up in the hotel. I often see the "Longhorn Network" that features only stuff related to The University of Texas sports. If there is a market for that--they show very little first-run UT Football games live--maybe 3 or 4 a season--there is a market for The Blob. Hell, There is something called GRIT TV on my system at the condo. It shows nothing but B-rate westerns. IF there is a market for that, there is a market for BLOB-TV.

Would I subscribe? N

Trump needs adulation... I just don't see it. Sounds like you do know the cable business pretty well. Blob TV...:auiqs.jpg:
 
Storming the Capitol was just too much.

Even though it was partly Antifa obviously, how can entering the Peoples' House be "too much?" What other places are forbidden to you TDS folks while being silent when Code Pink and other insane groups regularly are openly allowed to invade the Capital Building and scream insane shit? And surada, please, you know nothing about business. What island are you from by the way surada?

Surada is the name of a town in India. My family is English and Dutch.

You can't break into the people's house with pipe bombs and nooses to take a sh*t in the hallways.

So how do you feel about the potential, some say, impending incursion into India by the Communist China military?
 
He'd bank millions if he started one...

Fools and their money.

But if you look at the larger model that goes for targeted audiences with a single product....there is a ceiling and it is rather low compared to networks that are not so hamstrung by content.

He's too exposed.. He had a bad reputation for 40 years as a liar, cheat and sloppy businessman.. Now his reputation is world wide.. If he doesn't have his own network, who would carry his show?
Im saying he would have his own network. He'll have the title of Editor in Chief but someone else will run the day-to-day operations. Mark Burnett would likely be a good candidate to provide filler

Its fairly cheap to start your own network and provide your own content. Look at the Pluto TV platform for example...it has endless sub-channels of streaming content. The show "Unsolved Mysteries" has it's own channel on Pluto.
He's incredibly popular with his deranged base.

In no way would he pay actual field reporters to spend weeks on a story. It would be done on the cheap, no journalistic standards and zero integrity. Much like all of his enterprises.

But he would rake in enormous amounts of cash doing it. In my mind, theres no question about that.

Who would pay money to subscribe to that?

Well, Pluto is free so there is no payment. Whomever owns the content on the channels pays Pluto to be on it's channel line up. The advertisers on the channels, pay the channel holders (or Pluto in many cases) and the content provider gets either some or all of the money depending on the specific agreement.

Every now and again I go back to my birth-state of Texas. It takes a week to wash the aura of the shithole off of me but when I'm there I usually thumb through the cable TV line up in the hotel. I often see the "Longhorn Network" that features only stuff related to The University of Texas sports. If there is a market for that--they show very little first-run UT Football games live--maybe 3 or 4 a season--there is a market for The Blob. Hell, There is something called GRIT TV on my system at the condo. It shows nothing but B-rate westerns. IF there is a market for that, there is a market for BLOB-TV.

Would I subscribe? N

Trump needs adulation... I just don't see it. Sounds like you do know the cable business pretty well. Blob TV...:auiqs.jpg:

Adoration is subjective. Trump drinks as much of his own koolaid as he pours. He's very capable of self deception.
 
surada, thanks for the great conversion you TDS idiot. English is definitely not your first language. :laugh:

Dayem, Skylar is fucking nuts. :cuckoo:

Hi Skylar, please give us more predictions after you disappeared for months (years?) after being butthurt President Trump whipped Crooked Hillary. :icon_rolleyes:
 
Last edited:
He'd bank millions if he started one...

Fools and their money.

But if you look at the larger model that goes for targeted audiences with a single product....there is a ceiling and it is rather low compared to networks that are not so hamstrung by content.

He's too exposed.. He had a bad reputation for 40 years as a liar, cheat and sloppy businessman.. Now his reputation is world wide.. If he doesn't have his own network, who would carry his show?
Im saying he would have his own network. He'll have the title of Editor in Chief but someone else will run the day-to-day operations. Mark Burnett would likely be a good candidate to provide filler

Its fairly cheap to start your own network and provide your own content. Look at the Pluto TV platform for example...it has endless sub-channels of streaming content. The show "Unsolved Mysteries" has it's own channel on Pluto.
He's incredibly popular with his deranged base.

In no way would he pay actual field reporters to spend weeks on a story. It would be done on the cheap, no journalistic standards and zero integrity. Much like all of his enterprises.

But he would rake in enormous amounts of cash doing it. In my mind, theres no question about that.

Who would pay money to subscribe to that?

Well, Pluto is free so there is no payment. Whomever owns the content on the channels pays Pluto to be on it's channel line up. The advertisers on the channels, pay the channel holders (or Pluto in many cases) and the content provider gets either some or all of the money depending on the specific agreement.

Every now and again I go back to my birth-state of Texas. It takes a week to wash the aura of the shithole off of me but when I'm there I usually thumb through the cable TV line up in the hotel. I often see the "Longhorn Network" that features only stuff related to The University of Texas sports. If there is a market for that--they show very little first-run UT Football games live--maybe 3 or 4 a season--there is a market for The Blob. Hell, There is something called GRIT TV on my system at the condo. It shows nothing but B-rate westerns. IF there is a market for that, there is a market for BLOB-TV.

Would I subscribe? N

Trump needs adulation... I just don't see it. Sounds like you do know the cable business pretty well. Blob TV...:auiqs.jpg:

Adoration is subjective. Trump drinks as much of his own koolaid as he pours. He's very capable of self deception.

I agree with that. Trump gaslights himself which probably accounts for his many failures..
 
He'd bank millions if he started one...

Fools and their money.

But if you look at the larger model that goes for targeted audiences with a single product....there is a ceiling and it is rather low compared to networks that are not so hamstrung by content.

He's too exposed.. He had a bad reputation for 40 years as a liar, cheat and sloppy businessman.. Now his reputation is world wide.. If he doesn't have his own network, who would carry his show?
Im saying he would have his own network. He'll have the title of Editor in Chief but someone else will run the day-to-day operations. Mark Burnett would likely be a good candidate to provide filler

Its fairly cheap to start your own network and provide your own content. Look at the Pluto TV platform for example...it has endless sub-channels of streaming content. The show "Unsolved Mysteries" has it's own channel on Pluto.
He's incredibly popular with his deranged base.

In no way would he pay actual field reporters to spend weeks on a story. It would be done on the cheap, no journalistic standards and zero integrity. Much like all of his enterprises.

But he would rake in enormous amounts of cash doing it. In my mind, theres no question about that.

I agree. A giant op-ed show is cheap as shit. And are legions of dipshits that would pay to be lied to.

Trump is gonna make *bank*.

The story I read way back in 2015 was that he was using the run as a set-up to launch the network. Patricia Heaton (Debra from Everybody Loves Raymond, Frankie from The Middle) was supposed to have a presence on there and be like a nightly "NFL Today" where instead of "throwing it" to the broadcast booth at Giants Stadium, she would have a brief give and take with whomever the "Hannity" figure is and then they would do their show and then "throw it back" to Debra who would then essentially applaud whatever was said; do a quick panel and then "throw it "to Bill O'Reiley or whomver....
 
He'd be fine, and he'd continue inciting the sheep and avoiding blame for what they did.

This country is in desperate need of the anti-Trump.

Blame for what he did? In four years in office, blunted by Establishment candidates, 24/7 investigations and flakes like Paul Ryan?

What in the hell do you have to say about the 30 years prior when he WASN'T in office?

Before Trump was in office he was a well known liar and a cheat. He cheated employees, vendors, contractors, banks, investors and wives. He cheated charities for God's sake.

You have to be kidding me.

Please, point me to ONE honest politician. Just one.

You know just 20 years ago, America was about 9x the size of the Chinese economy in GDP. Where are they today, and more importantly, where will they be tomorrow?

Who is responsible for not defending U.S interests during this two decade period?

And so the "man" who had stuff made in China to contribute to their economic upturn has no blame in this?

The man, was going with the old adage, "lowest price is best". We were all sticker shocked and so were domestic manufacturers who quickly realized that they were finished, since everything was being manufactured in China and imported in. China was accepting massive loses to ensure they had a foothold in America and then they would create Communist monopolies and crush businesses.

Some of us thought, "hey, free markets", not realizing that the Chinese were going to NOT float their currency, nor improve freedoms or play by the rules set by capitalists for 100 years, and that they had an agenda far bigger than we knew. CIA knew, they tried to warn Clinton who ignored them and media didn't ask a question.

By the time we woke up the damage had long been done. Now, we finally get a leader who is reversing course and setting the boundaries and the lazy, low performers who don't really care about principles, but care only about a few extra bucks in their pockets; have tarred and feathered him.

Americans have no idea was is coming down the pipe. When I said AOC was going to be very powerful and was brushed off, we now see 500,000 likes for a tweet of her demanding activities by corporations to stifle speech and Trump supporters. She has the potential to be president one day and you can bet America will be even furthered changed by that time.

Georgia won both seats which I predicted the day Trump lost the G.E. I've had a few of these predictions, even predicting Harris would be V.P of Biden after the first Primary debate but backing off due to her being so low in polls and unpopular with black Americans. I couldn't count on the mailout ballot that were to come some time later.

I haven't been following politics a long time, but, I think in this case it's a blessing because I'm not seeing the world through biased, rosy glasses. What we are seeing is a dramatic shift. it was slow at first, but the brakes will be off now.

America is going to lose because you are telling the world that YOU need China. Which means other nations will just side with them rather than be squeezed between you both. Trump was the answer, as much as that bothered people. We needed that unpredictable, Wildcard.
 
Last edited:
surada, thanks for the great conversion you TDS idiot. :laugh:

Dayem Skylar is fucking nuts. :cuckoo: Skylar gives us more predictions after you disappeared for months after being butthurt President Trump whipped Crooked Hillary. :icon_rolleyes:

So......just random insults then?

Good luck with that.
 

Forum List

Back
Top