Trump loses Carroll case appeal

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

Yet two juries found her more credible than Donald J Trump

And is now closer to $5mm.

 

[rightwinger]

And is now closer to $5mm.

Carrol testified under oath in two trials and was cross examined by Trumps top attorneys.
Trump refused to take the stand.

The juries believed Carrol more than Trumps denials.

Guess that “Grab em by the pussies” didn’t help his case

 

[Zafira Cherry]

Yet you don’t believe the women out there saying thing of this nature against Biden…Strange.

Actually I do. As a woman, I take rape very seriously. As a man, you laugh at it. Nothing strange about that.

 

[Zafira Cherry]

Carroll claims rape is sexy.

Weird, huh?

bleed out whimpering in your basement

E. Jean Carroll has not said that rape is sexy. In fact, she has testified under oath that she believes rape is "one of the most violent and horrible things that can happen to a woman or a man".

During a CNN interview, she said, "I think most people think of rape as being sexy." She explained that this comment was made because "in our culture we are saturated with entertainment shows which continually show rapes to gather an audience".

She has also stated that she prefers to use the word "fight" instead of "rape" when describing her alleged encounter with Donald Trump. She felt the word "rape" carried too many sexual connotations.

j-mac and Meister and all you CULTISTS now is the time, put up or shut up

Tommy Tainant watch this one.

 

[Paradoxical#1]

Yet two juries found her more credible than Donald J Trump

New Yawk. New York! In ole New York.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

New Yawk. New York! In ole New York.

New Yorkers are smarter than almost any Republican.

 

[j-mac]

Actually I do. As a woman, I take rape very seriously. As a man, you laugh at it. Nothing strange about that.

Then you should have no problem pointing to your postings relating such, during the Biden conversations on the subject…We’ll wait.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

Then you should have no problem pointing to your postings relating such, during the Biden conversations on the subject…We’ll wait.

I did not know Biden was held liable for sexual battery.

Oh, he was not.

 

[j-mac]

I did not know Biden was held liable for sexual battery.

Oh, he was not.

He damn sure should have been.

 

[rightwinger]

New Yawk. New York! In ole New York.

Trump sexually assaulted her in New York

If he wants juries who excuse such behavior he should molest women in Mississippi or Alabama

 

[Paradoxical#1]

New Yorkers are smarter than almost any Republican.

The smart ones are moving from there in droves. Like Commyfornia.

 

[Paradoxical#1]

Yes. In her rape and groping fantasies about rich and powerful men.

 

[MagicMike]

What is fair is a jury of impartial peers. The judge should have granted the change in venue.

Regardless of the fact that had this been any other person than Trump, this trial would never have happened.

It was a political prosecution for political purposes.

Out here in the real world we call it justice.

 

[Darkwind]

Out here in the real world we call it justice.

You don't live in a real world that sane people would recognize.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

He damn sure should have been.

Nah, there is no preponderance of evidence against Biden.

Sure existed against Trump.

 

[Zafira Cherry]

Then you should have no problem pointing to your postings relating such, during the Biden conversations on the subject…We’ll wait.

Point me to a thread and I will respond. I am relatively new to this site
The following is my stand on rape. What is YOURS

Actually I do. As a woman, I take rape very seriously. As a man, you laugh at it. Nothing strange about that.

Let me guess, j-mac finds it entertaining. Impotent men are easily amused

 

[BackAgain]

I tend to support juries. You don't.

You support jury verdicts which result in any attack against conservatism.

But if you were politically persecuted and suffered an unjustified conviction, you would not favor the jury verdict. You’d be damn happy to have an appellate process.

So, no. You don’t “support juries.”

 

[j-mac]

Point me to a thread and I will respond. I am relatively new to this site
The following is my stand on rape. What is YOURS


Let me guess, j-mac finds it entertaining. Impotent men are easily amused

Isn’t that convenient…you can’t provide an example, so you deflect, and make outrageous claims about others without knowing the first thing about them.

You ma’am are not a quality human being

 

[berg80]

If that's what you think, you don't get it.

It's not what I think, it's effectively what you said.

 

[Zafira Cherry]

Isn’t that convenient…you can’t provide an example, so you deflect, and make outrageous claims about others without knowing the first thing about them.

You ma’am are not a quality human being

failed take a stand on rape