Trump loses Carroll case appeal

Isn’t that convenient…you can’t provide an example, so you deflect, and make outrageous claims about others without knowing the first thing about them.

You ma’am are not a quality human being

She characterized you exactly.
 
More than 3,000 civil suits were filed during the window opened by the Adult Survivors Act, including against former New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo and New York City Mayor Eric Adams—both Democrats. A number of prominent hospitals and prisons were also sued, alongside a variety of other institutions.
Which establishes nothing. I still maintain that the change of statute of limitations was primarily directed at a political ā€œenemy.ā€

Furthermore, and just to be clear, I also have a problem with a change in such a statute to ā€œgetā€ defendants years after the original statute of limitations had already passed by.
Whether it is even Constitutionally valid is debatable. Statutes of limitation exist as a matter of fairness.
 
1749912632307.webp
 
Carrol testified under oath in two trials and was cross examined by Trumps top attorneys.
Trump refused to take the stand.

The juries believed Carrol more than Trumps denials.

Guess that ā€œGrab em by the pussiesā€ didn’t help his case
The simple approach explains what happened best. There was a trial during which trump was afforded every chance to defend himself. He lost. He's lost two appeals. Full stop.
 
Then don't defend DJT.
I for one do NOT defend anyone who abuses women.

I don’t believe that the Carroll case is true for one. And two, her claim was turned into a circus to try and not only break Trump from having the funds to run again, but along with other Lawfare embraced by the left, to jail him as well.

What the democrat left did last summer, was not only disgusting, but also the most un-American thing I have ever witnessed in my lifetime.

So, yes. I will defend DJT, because I don’t believe for one minute that ANY of these charges, arrived through biased juries, and ideologically corrupt judges are true.
 
Stupid question ^ from a dishonest hack troll.

Obviously, I neither said any such thing nor did anything I did say imply any such thing.

The always dishonest Leftwhiner just lied again.
It was your post Skippy…#137

You claimed the Carrol trial jury verdict was an assault on Conservatism.

What is conservative about a sexual assault?
 
It was your post Skippy

You claimed the Carrol trial jury verdict was an assault on Conservatism.

What is conservative about a sexual assault?
No squidtard. You either misunderstood or you’re just lying again.

I didn’t ever say that the verdict was an assault.

Go play in traffic, you lying hack troll.
 
So, yes. I will defend DJT, because I don’t believe for one minute that ANY of these charges, arrived through biased juries, and ideologically corrupt judges are true.
Two juries heard all the testimony and found Carrol to be credible and Trump not so much
 
15th post
No squidtard. You either misunderstood or you’re just lying again.

I didn’t ever say that the verdict was an assault.

Go play in traffic, you lying hack troll.

Your post Skippy….
Keep dancing

ā€œYou support jury verdicts which result in any attack against conservatismā€œ
 
Your post Skippy….
Keep dancing

ā€œYou support jury verdicts which result in any attack against conservatismā€œ
Your failure of reading comprehension is now on you squidtard.

ā€œResult in.ā€

Try reading with comprehension or posting with honesty.

I’m not squirming you cockroach. I’m once again exposing your fundamental dishonesty.
 
Back
Top Bottom