Trump Is Going To Lose Most Of The Current Federal Court Cases....Then What?

[CrusaderFrank]

Below is the current situation regarding all of Trump's Federal court cases. Trump is getting his ass handed to him right now by the Federal judges. --

Everything Trump is doing is blatantly unconstitutional. A 10 year old civics student can tell you that. Most of these court cases will just be laughed out of court.

What is Trump going to do when he ultimately loses most of these cases? Is he just going to ignore the rulings and become King Trump? That's my guess.

And his pathetic lackey JD Vance is already encouraging Trump to do just that.

View attachment 1077707

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2025/02/07/trump-lawsuits-executive-orders-actions-legal-challenges/

Impeachment # 6 for losing court cases!!

 

[Dr. Phosphorous]

Who is going to stop Trump from doing what he wants?

Republicans in Congress are afraid of him
The Courts can rule against him but has no enforcement capability

I agree with you.

The military also took an oath to the Constitution. They might be the only hope.

 

[d0gbreath]

No, these activist liberal judges will be overruled. The president should just defy them.

Oh yes, please do!

 

[kyzr]

Yeah...Trump never lies.
So I take it you disagree with JD Vance encouraging Trump to ignore the judges' rulings?

My preference is for AG Pam Bondi and the WH legal counsel to opine on judge's rulings at a press conference and to recommend that Trump follow or ignore the order pending appeal to a higher court based a legal rationale'.

Otherwise all we have is an unopposed judge order that may be total bullshit.

 

[Modern Messiah]

They certainly can. That is how the 3 co-equal branches of government work.

Most Americans did not sign up for the crazy shit that Trump is doing right now....not even many of the people who voted for Trump.

Nope
312>226
The American People voted for a transparent audit of the U.S. government.
Deal with it

 

[Dr. Phosphorous]

My preference is for AG Pam Bondi and the WH legal counsel to opine on judge's rulings at a press conference and to recommend that Trump follow or ignore the order pending appeal to a higher court based a legal rationale'.

And when they say something Trump doesn't like, he will just get rid of them.

You still don't get it.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Just explain how what Trump is doing is legal...or quit trolling and shut up.

Explain how a Judge can order SecTres to NOT look at payments made by Treasury

Trump needs to ignore these demented judges

 

[Slade3200]

Its based on a bad ruling/opinion of the SC

It’s written in black and white. Rules upon by scotus and has been in practice for over a century. I don’t know how you get more precedent than that. I actually think that most people would agree to change the law, I would… but it should be done through the proper channels

 

[Dr. Phosphorous]

Nope
312>226
The American People voted for a transparent audit of the U.S. government.
Deal with it

This is not an argument, Kleetus.

We have a Constitution, whether you like it or not. A Constitution that is not dependent on who won the election. King Trump does not get to do whatever the fuck he wants to do.

 

[Blisterfinger]

Trump will lose his court cases because what he is doing is illegal.

But he will just ignore the ruling and keep doing what he is doing

Just like Biden did.

 

[kyzr]

And when they say something Trump doesn't like, he will just get rid of them.
You still don't get it.

Trump said he will obey court orders, so you don't get it.

I like that VP Vance put up a rationale' that Trump has wide ranging Article 2 powers.

 

[Slade3200]

No, wrong again. He needs to ignore these liberal activist judges who aren't ruling based on the constitution. They are ruling with seething rage and white hot hate for trump. Thats all.

Just don’t ever pretend to be a supporter of “law and order” youve disqualified yourself for that and put yourself into the Politcal hack category

 

[Blisterfinger]

This is not an argument, Kleetus.

We have a Constitution, whether you like it or not. A Constitution that is not dependent on who won the election. King Trump does not get to do whatever the fuck he wants to do.

Where in the constitution does it say we cannot have a transparent audit of the federal government?

 

[Dr. Phosphorous]

Explain how a Judge can order SecTres to NOT look at payments made by Treasury

Trump needs to ignore these demented judges

SecTres can look at those payments all he wants.

However, that does not mean that Elon Musk gets access to a Treasury system responsible for over $6 trillion in payments per year.

 

[Dr. Phosphorous]

Where in the constitution does it say we cannot have a transparent audit of the federal government?

It doesn't. Too bad that's not what Elon Musk is doing.

 

[Slade3200]

Where in the constitution does it say we cannot have a transparent audit of the federal government?

A transparent audit isn’t an issue in any of the court cases

 

[Dr. Phosphorous]

Trump said he will bey court orders, so you don't get it.

I like that VP Vance put up a rationale' that Trump has wide ranging Article 2 powers.

LOL...you know what else Vance said, too. You are dishonest.

 

[Modern Messiah]

This is not an argument, Kleetus.

We have a Constitution, whether you like it or not. A Constitution that is not dependent on who won the election. King Trump does not get to do whatever the fuck he wants to do.

Random judges do not get to do whatever they want because they have TDS.
These judges are way out on a limb.
We have to account for where all of our tax money goes.
You do pay taxes, right?
What are you afraid DOGE will find?

 

[Dr. Phosphorous]

Just like Biden did.

Biden did not ignore any judges' rulings.

It remains to be seen what Trump is going to do when he loses most of these cases.

 

[Slade3200]

It doesn't. Too bad that's not what Elon Musk is doing.

Blisterfinger is the king of rewording and mischaracterizing the subject matter because he is incapable of engaging in an honest and straightforward debate. I’ve asked him who he thinks he is fooling. Apparently only himself